Crime

murder is one

Criminal justice.

the Doctor

Depends upon what crime you're soliciting. If you're soliciting a serious crime, then the penalty is usually the same as conspiracy or attempt to commit that crime, even if the underlying crime is not completed.

The American justice system was created to lock up all the criminals and scumbags of america.

Social justice can take place over a long period of time and the aim is to provide a permanent solution to the problem and to liberate those affected whereas charity is a bandaid solution designed to address the problem there and then, however it doesn't have a long lasting plan.

Yes, you can. In terms of academics, one does not have anything to do with the other. However, if you feel you need special services, then you need to let the disabilities counselor at the school know so you can be provided with any needs you may have.

Not necessarily. It's not uncommon for criminal charges to be dismissed on the condition the accused pays restitution to the victim.

Biocriminology is the subdiscipline of criminology that investigates biological and genetic factors and their relation to criminal behaviors.

Truthfully, and officially, no one knows. Anything else would be purely supposition. As Lanza ended his own life and left no note, or much in the way of clues, we can never know with even the remotest form of certainty.

That would be the person (usually in a civil proceeding) who asserts (or claims) something, usually (but not always) having to do with 'property' matters.

Mr. Sharpton is a high school graduate. He attended Brooklyn College for two years before dropping out in 1975. He has no college degree and has not attended a seminary.

The Reverend Al Sharpton has a law degree.

And what if the phone that was used was person A but person B was actually the one the made the phone call.

Claiming to be someone else in a phone call is fraud, it doesn't matter how many calls are made. If it involves exchange of money or other property then it is a felony.

Yes there should. But of course it depends on the degree of the charge. Most people who support the death penalty say murderers should be put under the penalty. This is correct; if you killed someone you deserve the same fate you gave that person.

Alcatraz is no longer actively used as a prison. It is still kept as a historical tourist destination. Tours are done here daily.

DNA fingerprinting is reliable because with that they can convict or acquit individuals of criminal offenses because every person is genetically unique.

statutory law, law enforcement, criminal courts, and punishment

Homeless people are far less a burden on society than some other groups. Killing them would only make the streets look nicer in a few places. However, it would be taking human life, so for what it would do there is no justification.

Drugs are collected with specific equipment, they are picked up with sterile gloves and put in an evidence back, filtered vaccuum devices may also be used for drugs such as cocaine which is more of a dusty substance

Hope this Helps

:P

Resources are necessary in order to protect against theft coercion and fraud in order for consumers and producers to have freedom of choice.
Resources

There is no definitive answer to this question and, at best, is a springboard for discussion, debate and argument. This site is WikiANSWERS not WIkiOpinions this "question" is best posed in a chatroom or blog.

The man would simply be let go. If what you're trying to say is "what measures are used if a detainee has to be restrained" then it depends on what force is needed. Detainees that lash out can face numerous measures like pepper spray, tasers, and (probably the most common of all) multiple strong men holding them down and forcefully restraining the detainee.

Because they can be hit or miss they can toughen a person up and prepare him or her to be worse off after they are freed or they can rehabilitate

it would be that your children may follow in your footsteps