answersLogoWhite

0

🌎

Ethics and Morality

Ethics is about what we should – and should not - do. It includes identification of basic principles, e.g. the prerogatives of property owners; and the application of those principles to actual situations, e.g. copyright protection of intellectual property over the Internet.

2,801 Questions

What is etymological meaning of psychology?

â??Study of soulâ?? is the etymological definition of psychology. This word comes from the Greek word, "psyche" meaning to the mind and "ology" meaning to study.

Ethics are best defined as?

proper standards of behavior whithin a given field of activity

What are the steps are in the ethical reasoning process?

(1) D = Define the problem (2) E = establish the criteria (3) C = consider all the alternatives (4) I = identify the best alternative (5) D = develop and implement a plan of action (6) E = evaluate and monitor the solution and feedback when necessary.

Definition of ethical appeal?

the ethical appeals: appeals to one persons moral values. If the writer comes across as plesant, fair-minded, and decent, gaining reader support is much easier.

Is ethics the same as religion why?

Most religions have an ethical component, often derived from purported supernatural revelation or guidance. Ethics, which is a major branch of philosophy, encompasses right conduct and good life. It is significantly broader than the common conception of analyzing right and wrong. A central aspect of ethics is "the good life", the life worth living or life that is simply satisfying, which is held by many philosophers to be more important than traditional moral conduct.

Non-religious people take responsibility for their own ethics and conduct, with no additional help from church or temple. That they are able to achieve the same standards of ethics as most religious people, means that in practice there is no real relationship between ethics and religion.

What is importance of ethics in engineering?

because it teaches us the codes an engineer has to follow so that we can prevent tragedies.

According to the aama code of ethics members of the aama should always?

According to the AAMA code of ethics, members should always render their services with full respect for the dignity of humanity. They should also ensure compliance with state laws and act professionally towards patients and co-workers.

What is the difference between deontological ethic and a teleological ethics?

Teleological ethical theories are consequentialist in nature because they assert that the morally correct action is one that produces the greatest balance of good over bad consequences compared with alternative actions. Deontological ethical theories are nonconsequentialist and regard the rightness or wrongness of an action as intrinsic to the action itself. There, the consequences are morally irrelevant. Utilitarianism is the best-known teleological theory. Deontological theories include Kant's categorical imperative, human rights theories, and divine command theories.

What does the end justifies the means mean?

* These answers represent basically the same meaning from several perspectives.

Answer

This phrase, originating from Niccolo Machiavelli's book "The Prince", is interpreted by some to mean doing anything whatsoever that is required to get the result you want, regardless of the methods used. It does not matter whether these methods are legal or illegal, fair or foul, kind or cruel, truth or lies, democratic or dictatorial, good or evil.

Answer 2

The phrase the end justifies the means refers to the morality of an action. It means that the morality of an action is based solely on the outcome of that action and not on the action itself. Example: Telling a lie that has no negative effect on anyone, and saves someone grief, is good. Killing someone to save others may also be morally justifiable.

A deontologist would say lying/killing is always bad. A consequentialist would say that it is acceptable if the outcome is positive. It can involve illegal activities and what some would consider immoral methods, but definitely is not based on that.

Answer 3

This refers to the idea that if you need a specific outcome, it doesn't matter how it is achieved as long as you get the desired result. For instance, if you need to pass a test in order to graduate (the end) you can justify cheating in order to pass the test (the means).

Answer 4

This is normally used to comment on the ethics or morality of a given action. By itself, it might be reprehensible. But as the only method to achieve a goal, it could be acceptable on a practical basis. A simple example would be knocking down historic buildings as a last resort to control rat populations. A more complex example would be World War II, which included bombing German and Japanese cities to reduce their munitions production.

Answer 5

It means that the benefits from something outweigh the harm done by the process. For example if somebody cured cancer, but had to kill 1 cancer patient to find the cure, they might say that curing cancer made the loss of 1 life to save many worth it. Of course, the family of the dead patient (and the legal authorities) might see the matter differently.

-

Why study law ethics and biothethics?

So that you know what is socially acceptable and unacceptable in corporate America.

Etymological meaning of philosophy?

The etymological definition of a "philosopher" is "lover of wisdom." Therefore, a philosopher is someone who ultimately values wisdom, in other words, someone who seeks it. The ancient Greek philosophers used the word 'sophia' in different ways. For example, originally, Homer used it in connection with craftsmanship, but Aristotle later used it to refer to the highest intellectual virtue (as opposed to phronesis or practical wisdom).

Why is it important to look after others less fortunate than ourselves?

So others can care for you. It's the exchange of human interaction. Sprend the Love;not the hate;)

Why values are important in your life?

Personal values are those standards that you set for yourself to live by. Since these values vary by individual, they are "personal" and can include many things. Religion, morals, and ethics play a part in personal values.

As an example, most people include "do not murder" as part of their personal values. It is simply not in their ethics set to kill someone else. Many people consider this value to be an axiom of ethics, but it is not. If man were ethically inclined, this would be an axiom. However, this principle must be carefully taught to each generation simply because man is a savage creature and killing another man is advantageous in many instances for personal gain.

All personal values are tools to make the individual feel good about his conduct. There is a fine line between ethics and values. The bully uses a different set of values to live his life. In this person's lexicon, anything that makes himself feel better than another person is the value to use. It does not matter that it is detrimental to another person, this person uses tactics of harassment and intimidation to feel good about himself. These are personal values for this person, even though they are not promoting the general welfare.

At various times in history, personal values have been part of the general societal norm. Unacceptable attitudes such as racism, slavery, or dominance have all had their place in personal values as part of a societal norm. A value that is wrong...such as racism...can be viewed as "right" thinking by a particular segment of society. In these cases, the individual does not feel remorse by espousing these views because he has been taught that this value is proper for his society.

Most core values are taught as religious cores. The Ten Commandments of the Judeo-Christian Bible are common personal values. Today society accepts these values as proper values. The injunction to not steal, not lie, not take another's property, and to live a "moral" code are part of society's fiber to live together in harmony. Other personal values condition the person to move comfortably in his society as an individual.

What is the purpose of the professional code of ethics?

Many professions are regulated by statute, but due to the nature of the professions, statutes alone are not sufficient to guarantee proper conduct. That's where codes of conduct come in. Such codes encourage behavior which enable discharge of professional duties in situations where such behavior is not required (or prohibited) by law, but none the less is necessary for the functioning of the professional. For instance, judges are prohibited from behaving in a manner which reflects badly on the judiciary as a whole, but isn't illegal. A judge who is intemperate in behavior or speech may violate a code of judicial conduct and be subject to a reprimand or removal from the bench, or a member of the police service may violate a code of conduct by being uncivil or belligerent in his or her interactions with the public.

Violations of codes of conduct are generally intended to maintain public confidence in the profession; a statute may prohibit a conflict of interest, but a code of conduct may prohibit the appearance of the conflict even if there's isn't one. In addition, codes of conduct serve to prohibit behavior which would be nearly impossible to prove in a court of law, say if a judge socialized with parties appearing before that judge in court. It is possible that nothing unethical occurred during that social interaction, but one would never be able to be sure, so the code of conduct prohibits such behavior in order to eliminate even the possibility of something unethical occurring.

Many professions also have ethical strictures by which members abide, yet lack an official "code of conduct". The most important difference is that the presence of an official code of conduct usually indicates that punishment for violation of the code is administered by members of the profession itself and can be harsh, even resulting in the exclusion of the violator from the profession entirely. Attorneys can be disbarred or judges can be removed from the bench if a violation of their code is egregious enough.

What is the most important ethical standard?

the most important part of ethics is that it should have a question and have at least 3 different ideas on how it was right or wrong

How do ethics affect people?

Ethics deals with the human character by:

  • Helping people to differentiate between good and evil.
  • Helping them to maintain harmony between inner and outer state are providing a sense of joy.
  • Helping a human character in developing mutuality.
  • Helping a society to provide the means of comfort and pleasure according to the collective needs and desire.
  • Developing a sense of responsibility and hardworking among people.

Three sources of proffessional values and ethics?

Three sources of professional values and ethics include but are not limited to organizational values and codes of conduct, societal expectations, and individual beliefs and backgrounds

What are the fundamental concepts of ethics?

There are four types of ethical dilemmas.

1. Loyalty versus truth


2. Justice versus mercy


3. Short term versus long term


4. Individual versus community

What is companies moral rights?

Moral rights are rights that copyright holders and creators have pertaining to their work. The rights help protect the creator of the content and allows them to do whatever they see fit with their own work.

For instance, let's say you write a book and you receive an offer to have it made into a movie, and you agree. However, the movie turns out to be nothing like the book, and it promotes things that you oppose or find disgusting. So you have the right to disavow your name, image, likeness and credits from this work. They cannot force you to have your name associated with their misrepresentation of your work. So there is a name that is used in Hollywood when someone doesn't want credit for something. The name isn't "John Doe," but is similar.

What age do you need to be to be a pedophile?

Pedophiles are adults who are attracted to prepubescent children (pedophilia), and some have disclosed this attraction as young as 13 or 14, but the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-V), states that someone must be 16 to be diagnosed with pedophilic disorder, which is separate from pedophilia. Typically, the attraction (pedophilia) is the main or primary attraction, and has gone on for 6 months or longer.

What is an ethical issue that many people today are debating?

One prominent ethical issue currently being debated is the use of artificial intelligence (AI) in decision-making processes, particularly in areas like hiring, law enforcement, and healthcare. Concerns revolve around biases embedded in algorithms, potential job displacement, and the lack of transparency in AI systems. Additionally, there are questions about accountability when AI systems make mistakes or cause harm. This debate highlights the need for ethical guidelines to ensure that AI technologies are developed and implemented in a fair and responsible manner.

Do you think cloning is ethical?

no

Yes

It depends on your definition of ethical. Is it unethical to clone cattle for food? Is it unethical to clone mice for pharmaceutical study?

Opponents say "it's playing God", but they said that about almost every medical advancement from Birth Control pills to heart transplants, and even to genetically-modified foods. (Humans have been genetically modifying food and animals forever through selective breeding. In-vitro and DNA manipulation simply speeds up the process).

Why would or should cloning humans be any different? Identical twins are a result of cloning in the womb. Take religion out of the picture and you would have a hard time making the unethical argument.

What would be unethical would be cloning for spare parts. If the cloned person was treated no differently than a twin, a complete human person, then where is the problem?