Hundred Years War

Yes, trade increased after the Hundred Years War, which lasted from 1337 to 1453. The war's conclusion led to more stable political conditions in both England and France, facilitating economic recovery and growth. Additionally, the rise of merchant classes and the expansion of trade networks, particularly in textiles and other goods, contributed to this increase in trade during the late 15th century. Overall, the post-war period set the stage for the emergence of a more interconnected European economy.

The Hundred Years' War was initiated by England's King Edward III, who claimed the French throne through his mother, Isabella of France. The conflict was marked by a series of battles and shifts in power, with England initially gaining significant victories, including the Battles of Crécy and Poitiers. However, the war ultimately concluded in favor of France, largely due to the resurgence of French nationalism and leadership under figures like Joan of Arc, leading to the recapture of key territories and the eventual expulsion of English forces from France by 1453.

it has been long ago like about i dunno like about forty to fifty thousand years

The Hundred Years' War (1337-1453) primarily involved conflicts between England and France, diverting resources and focus away from exploration. However, the war's conclusion and the subsequent rise of nation-states in Europe fostered a competitive environment that encouraged exploration and colonization. The need for new trade routes and resources, along with technological advancements in navigation, ultimately set the stage for increased exploration in the late 15th century, leading to the colonization of North America. Thus, while the war itself did not directly cause exploration, it contributed to a broader context that enabled it.

The French kings who ruled for three hundred years after the Carolingians belonged to the Capetian dynasty, which began with Hugh Capet in 987 and continued until the end of the Valois line in 1589. Notable kings from this period include Philip II (Philip Augustus), Louis IX (Saint Louis), and Charles V. The Capetian dynasty is significant for establishing a more centralized monarchy in France and laying the foundation for the modern French state.

At the Battle of Agincourt, which took place on October 25, 1415, the English forces numbered approximately 6,000 to 9,000 men, while the French forces were estimated to be between 20,000 and 30,000 soldiers. The English army was significantly outnumbered, yet they achieved a remarkable victory due in part to their use of longbows and the difficult terrain. The battle is noted for its impact on the Hundred Years' War and the rise of English nationalism.

Taking into consideration the military operations, the battle of Castillon in Gascony (July 1452) in which John Talbot Earl of Shrewsbury lost her life, ended the war.

The end of the English Dominion in France was over on October 10, 1453, when the reluctant Inhabitant of Bordeaux eventually received in their midst the French who were considered as conquerors. Not to count, of course, the city of Calais which remained in English hands until the sixteenth Century.

Indeed I would like to point out the following factors which could led to a different point of view, although only worth for academic discussions. These factors are:

1 - No treaty of peace was signed.

2 - The islands of Guernsey and Jersey in the English Channel are quite part of Great Britain.

3 - The English claim to the Throne of France was not officially dropped although the "fleur de lys", (the Lilies) but not till 1803, disappeared off the English national flag.

The different point of view would be therefore: the war has not ended yet.

The Hundred Years' War (1337-1453) fostered nationalism by intensifying feelings of identity among the English and French populations. As both sides fought for territorial control and national pride, they began to see themselves as distinct nations rather than just subjects of feudal lords. The war's emphasis on national leaders, military victories, and the development of a common language helped solidify a sense of unity and collective identity. This emerging nationalism laid the groundwork for the modern nation-state concept in Europe.

The Dauphin was at a loss as to how he should proceed in the war against the British. Nothing he had done was successful. He had nothing to lose by giving Joan a leadership role so agreed to her request. He also felt that if what Joan was telling the truth about the voices she heard from God, he might be going against the Holy Spirit if he refused.

Good Question, would there be a France?, would World Wars 1 & 2 have ever happened, and what about Napoleon and the Napoleonic Wars, The French Revolution, would America still be under UK control. Makes you think doesn't it.

Simply put, Joan of Arc's methods were straightforward and military, while Charles VII's focus was slower and more political. Joan's strategy was one of simply attacking the English until they went away, while Charles was far more concerned with the legitimacy of his reign and ending the conflict between his house and the Burgundians.

After Charles was crowned, Joan didn't have the patience to wait for the political situation to improve, and went to attack the English in Paris, which failed. Charles, on the other hand, was so focused on reconciling with Burgundy that he squandered military opportunities in hopes that the Burgundians were ready to negotiate in good faith, which, at the time, they were not.

Four years after Joan's death, Charles finally did reconcile with the Duke of Burgundy, breaking the Burgundian alliance with England and having the Duke recognize Charles' right to the throne. After that, he was much more aggressive at taking the fight to the English--perhaps not quite so much as Joan would have been, but he got the job done.

The most important revolutions in history aren't neccessarily socio-political revolutions.

1) The 2nd agricultural revolution: Brought agriculture more modernized, with better techiques, technology and in general, better farming. This increased the food surplus and led to the development of cities.

2) The Industrial Revolution: Brought in the widespread use of factories, made people more efficient and drastically changed ways of life.

3) 1st Agricultural Revolution: 3 Field system and other improved techniques created a food surplus and allowed people to specialize jobs, which led to further developments.

4)French: Brought democracy and a government by the people for the people to a nation known for arrogant, unconcerned, overly wealthy monarchs and aristocrats. I put this over the American because it not only strived for equality and fairness, but it also had to overthrow a old monarchy to do it.

5)American: A bunch of rag tag farmers, colonists loyal to a monarchy declare their independence from the worlds most powerful nation. This revolution was a model for many of the documents and such of the French revolution.

The Hundred Years War ended after Joan of Arc's death. Her actions were the Catalyst for France to defeat the English within 22 years after her death.

In 1804, invented by Richard Trevithick, the worlds first full scale locomotive pulled a train along the tramway of the Penydarren Ironworks, Merthyr Tydfil, Wales.

I would call any tank over 72 ins x 24 ins x 24 ins a large tank. Anything below 48 ins by 18 ins x 18 ins. I would class as small. Anything below 24 ins x 12 ins x12 ins is TINY and barely big enough to house any fish properly.

The Battle of Hastings Took place on on Senlac Hill, near Hastings.

True

orleans

France won the hundred years war against Britain, i'm 100% sure (:

Joan de Arc was instrumental in the French defeat of the British at Agincourt. She was only about 15 years old at the time.

The 30 years war ended in 1648 with a negotiated settlement, the Peace of Westphalia. Settling differences through violence led to exhaustion. Germany, it is said, had lost a third of its urban population and two-fifths of its rural people. One thing accomplished was that the sovereignty of Switzerland and the United Netherlands was recognized. (From ChaCha.com)