Julius Caesar

The Vicar acts as God's vassal on Earth. Usually the Vicar will take care of the Eulogy (memorial speech) as well as helping to comfort those who are in attendance. The actual speech will usually vary from funeral to funeral as the Vicar sees what words may be the most helpful. Many also consider the Apostolic Blessing to be appropriate when one passes. It says

"Ego facultate mihi ab Apostolic Sede tributa, indulgatiam plenarium et remissionem omnium peccatorum tibi concedo et benedico te. In nomine Patris, et Filli, y et Spiritu Sancti. Amen"

Which translates,

"By the faculty which the Apostolic See has given me, I grant you a plenary indulgence for the remission of all your sins, and bless you. In the name of the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit. Amen."

Julius Caesar was a good fighter in his wars because he was a good strategist and used rapid troop movements as one of his tactics. He was also a man of personal courage and when he saw that his troops were falling back, he would not hesitate to admonish them and personally lead them into battle on foot. This was how he gained the loyalty of most of his troops. As most military leaders don't personally fight on the field, Caesar did due to his huge amount of experience in combat from a mere officer to Dictator for life.

Julius Caesar began his conquest of Gaul in 58 BC. He had just about finished up in 52 BC with the victory at Alesia.

In the Suetonius where we get the story from I don't believe it says specifically, but I think it implies that it was fairly near the time of his speech that ended in his murder (as in a few days before).

Briefly, Marc Antony was a man with a muscular, rather hefty body structure. He had an aquiline nose and some ancient historians say he had a cleft chin. He also had a good head of thick curls. You can type Marc Antony in your browser and you will find several sites with pictures of him, although some of the pictures are suspect.

Burning men walking and an owl was hooting at the market place at midday.

Purgers

She was depressed that her husband Brutus was ignoring her and she found out that he was one of the main conspirators in Julius Caesar's death. She was killing her self.

Cassius tells Brutus about the story about Caesar swimming the Tiber River because he wants to make Brutus understand that Caesar had flaws too, and he was just another simple human in the city of Rome. There was nothing special about him and people should stop looking at him as a god.

After the collapse of the Roman Empire it fell into disuse and disrepair, though still standing. During the Middle Ages it was used as housing and for churches. During the Renaissance it was pillaged by the good citizens of Rome who stripped it to use the marble on their own homes.

The upper part of the southern side of the Colosseum collapsed in an earthquake in 1349 because the soil under that side is less stable.

Marc Antony, at the time of his involvement with Cleopatra, was a Roman triumvir. He had supreme Roman authority in the East. He came east to settle border disputes and to stabilize the area for Rome. He also planned to carry out Julius Caesar's war against the Parthians. He kept this authority all through his affair with Cleopatra which is why old Cleo snuggled up to him.

that he considered Caesar a friend

ambition

If an authentic signature of Julius Caesar were found today it would be priceless. Museums , private collectors, schools, historians would all go bananas trying to outbid each other for possession. It would either be the property of whatever country it was found in or of the university that sponsored the research.( I don't know how they determine ownership of an artifact.) But at any rate, if the autograph were up for sale, the bidding would go sky high.

Both were achieved by defeating rival groups of aristocrats - Julius over Pompey and his family and the Cassius-Casca-Brutus gang, and Augustus over Mark Antony.

That caesar didnt deserve to be murdered

Had he given in to Cassius's much more realpolitik suggestions, they would have bumped off Antony at the same time as Caesar and have consolidated their positions in Rome. But if Brutus had been that kind of a guy, Cassius would not have recruited him as an ally in the first place.

If idealism is a "tragic flaw" in Brutus, then isn't it also a "tragic flaw" in Jesus? If he had only co-operated with the Sanhedrin and the Romans he wouldn't have been crucified, right? But I think Jesus would have said that his ideals were more important than not getting killed, and I think Brutus (at least in the way Shakespeare portrayed him) would have said the same.

Curiously, Dante portrays Brutus as a villain because he betrayed his friend and benefactor. Would treachery make more sense as a tragic flaw?

Aristotle died before the historical Julius Caesar was born, and over a millennium before Shakespeare wrote his play. In fact, in his Poetics, Aristotle was thinking exclusively of the play he had seen: Sophocles's Oedipus Rex. Of course there is no character in Julius Caesar who kills his father and marries his mother, so Aristotle's remarks are rather beside the point.

In short, the notions of the "Aristotelian Unities" or the "tragic hero" were constructed many hundreds of years after Aristotle and were applied to drama from totally different traditions, such as English Elizabethan and Jacobean drama. Most of the writers of Shakespeare's time, including Shakespeare, could not possibly care less about Aristotle.

all answers are correct

“To show that audience that Brutus is not trustworthy “

The cast of Julius Caesar - 1950 includes: David Bradley as Brutus Theodore Cloak as Lepidus Homer Dietmeier as Artemidorus Alfred Edyvean as Flavius George Gilbert as Strato Grosvenor Glenn as Cassius Russell Gruebner as Cinna-the poet Walter Hardy as Cimber Charlton Heston as Antony George Hinners as Lucius Bob Holt as Octavius Caesar Jeffrey Hunter as Third Plebian Sam Needham as Pindarus Cornelius Peeples as Popilius Frederick Roscoe as Decius Helen Ross as Calpurnia Mary Sefton Darr as Portia Arthur Sus as Cinna Harold Tasker as Julius Caesar

The aristocratic senators feared that Caesar was using his popularity with the masses as a means to make a play for permanent dictator, from which he could make himself king, which the republicans abhorred.

you need to specify what this excerpt is or provide its text if you want to make it possible to answer your question.

Yes. Julius Caesar was a patrician or an aristocrat even though his political base was populist.

Based on the histories available on the leadership qualities or any ecesses he may have taken in conquering foreign peoples or leading the government of Rome, it can be argued that he was no less harsh and cruel than other leaders of his time. This takes into consideration foreign rulers and earlier Roman rulers such as Sulla.

One clear fault he did have was at a crucial time of Rome's history, when Caesar had conqured all of his Roman enemies, it is clear now that he was too forgiving in his treatment of Roman senators who were against him. Later, these same senators whom Caesar had "pardoned" when he could have had them executed, turned out to be many of the assassins that took his life.