Monarchy

Domesday Book

Jean-Baptiste de Lully.

King Henry v11 defeated King Richard 111 at Bosworth Battlefield

James wasn't "dismissed" from Parliament, as the King is not a member of Parliament. James and Parliament were in conflict over many different things.

The most important source of conflict was James's Catholic faith. James sought to pass laws that would make it legal for Catholics to hold public office in England and access other civil rights, but the English Protestant establishment strongly rejected these because they feared James was about to impose Catholicism by force. When Parliament and the population began to turn against him, the Protestant William of Orange, third in line to the English throne and also married to James's Protestant daughter Mary, used the opportunity to invade England. When it became clear that the army would not support him, James fled to Ireland, leaving the Parliament to declare that James had abdicated and William and Mary were joint monarchs of England.

James the 1st of England is also James the 6th of Scotland. He's commonly called "James the Sixth and First" unless you are talking about him particularly in relation to one or other kingdom.

He was the King of Scots before inheriting the throne of England when Elizabeth I died. His mother was Mary, Queen of Scots.

because he was king Henry's son.

like dirt that turned into mud in Micheal Jackson face

Edward VIII. He abdicated the throne in order to marry Wallis Warfield Simpson, an American divorcee.

William and Mary ruled from 1688 CE to 1702 CE. Mary died in 1694 and William ruled alone until his death in 1702.

Henry VIII had only three legitimate children. The all came to the throne, in this order:

-Edward VI

-Mary I

-Elizabeth I

He had an illegitimate child by his mistress Bessie Blount named Henry Fitzroy. He became the 1st Duke of Richmond and Somerset. There was talk of the king making him his heir before he had Edward by his third wife (Jane Seymour), but he died of consumption. He might have had other children, but these were the only four he publicly acknowledged.

XXL clothes

Henry had 33 slaves

The French monarchy was executed because of their apparent lack of concern for its people reflected by the lavish lifestyles of King Louis XVI and Marie Antoinette. The peasants revolted against their monarchs to take control of France.

Edward faced the problems of Changing the churches from Catholic to Protestant, then after Edward died at the age of 15 his sister Mary I (bloody mary) Chnaged the churches from Protestant back to Catholic, When Mary died after just a small reign, Elizbeth I was a Protestant but didn't want to take the Catholic religion away so she was stuck with the decision of changing it to Cathoic or Protestant...... She then decided to split the churches to Protestant and Catholic so everybody was happy.

He also didn't marry to geet any allies or make an heir to the tthrone and didn't make much money

After the first Civil War, the parliamentarians accepted the premise that the King, although wrong, had been able to justify his fight, and that he would still be entitled to limited powers as King under a new constitutional settlement. It was now felt that by provoking the second Civil War even while defeated and in captivity, Charles showed himself incorrigible, dishonourable, and responsible for unjustifiable bloodshed.

His trial on charges of high treason and 'other high crimes' began on 20 January 1649, but Charles refused to enter a plea, claiming that no court had jurisdiction over a monarch

Not really. Shakespeare described Richard as hunchbacked, with a "withered arm". If the skeleton discovered under a carpark really is that of Richard III, as the people who discovered it claim, neither of those is true. The skeleton showed no weakness in either arm, and although the spine was twisted, it would not give a hunchbacked appearance. Likewise, portraits of Richard do not show him as hunchbacked, and there is nothing to indicate any abnormality in his arms. (Indeed, as Richard was universally acknowledged as a great warrior, it is unlikely that either his sword-arm or shield-arm would be crippled). So, the grotesque Quasimodo-like figure Shakespeare presents to us is a fictional figure of Tudor propaganda.

people in the Tudor times had their own opinion, some people thought Henry viii was a villain because he had a argument with the pope of the catholic church and took all the treasures for himself and his friends.

Others thought he was a hero bacause he made England a strong and powerful country and ruled very well.

Lady Jane Grey's exact birth date is unknown but she was born in 1536 or 1537 and was executed in 1554 making her 17 or 18.

Generally, no. They were buried in the Valley of the Queens.

U was also the name of the king who ruled Goryeo from 1374 until 1388

wrong it is in fact Harold godwinson. William duke of normandys arm killed Harold so he became king

In 1066, Harold was a key candidate to take the throne of England after the death of Edward the Confessor in January 1066. Harold was an important noble man in England who had both the support of the Witan and important earls Edwin and Morcar- the sister of whom he had also dinastically married.

Even though the accounts of Harold's oath were sketchy- it was not clear if he had been on a fishing trip (shown by the Bayeux tapestry) and blown ashore by a storm or whether he was going to release his imprisoned relatives (Hakon- Nephew and Wulfnoth- Brother) in 1064, but what we do know is that he met with William and perhaps offered him an oath over holy relics that gave William the claim to the throne (some accounts of the Anglo-Saxon Chronicle say that William had met Edward in 1051 and was promised the throne due to his ties and shown ability to rule his own duchy of Normandy- giving him more reason to claim it) and that he would be his liege in order to have parts of his town fortified and one of the prisoners released.

The importance of the oath is that, Harold was condemned by William to the Pope (as the oath had been made over Holy Relics) as a perjured usurper "whom William was bound to attack and kill" [Howarth] It gave William the right to claim the throne from Harold as he had forcefully taken it and had gone back on the oath that he had made to William in 1064.

Not only did the oath give William an advantageous reason to take the throne- but it also bought him valuable papal support as claiming Harold as the perjurer and a usurper the Pope (Alexander II) offered William the papal banner- turning the conquest of England into a holy war for the throne.