answersLogoWhite

0

🎒

Research Papers

Includes questions related to the research, preparation and composition of formal written reports based on well researched findings and presented ideas.

3,731 Questions

How would you in your own opinion define intelligence?

Someone whom has a little bit better understanding of topics that others. A personal opinion really. I like this one though because it doesn't deflate those that are not as 'smart' Intelligent

What are the advantages of a research report?

It should be a research work by work on all aspect of the topic and reporter should be unbiased but don't insert his own opinion in the story.

Advantages and disadvantages of research research design?

An advantage is the researcher can determine the cause and effect of a study. A disadvantage is that the manipulator must be precise in their experiments, and extra variable that is not planned for may scrub the entire study.

Q debate on criminals are wicked and deserve punishment favor in motion?

Criminals should be cured and not punished...

Criminals are also humans, so why to treat them as wild beats and monsters.If they murder, kidnap, rob or do any sexual abuse, they may either be mentally sick or do think in spite of their circumstance or problems like lac of money etc. Perhaps they guardians or parents do not have given them proper education or they are from this type or kind of background. They might be in need of something or the other. but without any sort of information the criminals are given very bad punishment which do not fit them.

They are kept in hell and watched around the clock that turn the criminals in wild beasts and when done a small mistake and they escape, they cause damage to the public.

So what I actually want to say is that they need to be cured and not punished.

Let me put an example to make the discussion more easy to understand, suppose a man has murdered 7 people out of which he raped 3 girls. Cops caught him and he hes going to be sentenced to death tomorrow. My question is that if we kill him will the people he murdered, will they be back? No, right? might be he is mentally sick and needs a cure. So why not cure him in place of killing him. He might be some one's son or father, right? So why not cure him in place of granting him a punishment which can destroy his whole family?

So I would like to conclude saying that, if he can cure then why can't we give him a chance, and if he repeats we can punish him.

What other people say about research?

people say research is totally unescarily because like nike always said just do it

What is important to identify before reading and analyzing a source for research?

When evaluating a source, you first need to know whether it would be considered as a potentially reliable source, meaning, what type of publication is it? If it is an Internet Blog post by an unknown writer, that would have less reliability than a book written by a top expert in the field. Generally speaking, a book published from a top publisher (SAGE, for example) ranks highest. An established professional journal ranks high as well. Then come general readership magazines. Then newspaper articles. Internet sources always rank lowest--unless you use an .edu website with writings from professors or others with credentials.

As far as determining author bias, you often cannot decide the bias without first reading the article/work. However, if the Title or Publisher has a known or easily identifiable bias, you might know the "slant" before reading and analyzing a work. For example, if the article was published in a journal paid by the Klu Klux Klan, you can suppose part of the bias. In a magazine titled Sharks, written about sharks, you likely won't find articles about killing them--so the "bias" might be conservation. But if you find an article about sharks in a magazine called, High Powered Sport Reeling, you'd know it likely talks about catching sharks with some hook and reel fishing method-- the bias: that hunting and fishing is glorified as a sport.


So always try to determine if the publication itself would be ranked high. Then look for clues about bias. But you may not know author bias without first skimming or reading the article.




What is an investigative question in Research?

Conceptual research is a research that has got a certain protocol that must be observed strictly to undertake the research.

What is the reason for conducting a research?

to monitor a situation

to assess a situation

to evaluate the impact of something.

to develop a model that predicts the likely cause of events given particular intervening variables or circumstances.

to create or test a theory.

How to write detailed project report?

The detailed project report should contain the very important parts of the given report. A detailed project report should contain a Title Page ,Abstract , Acknowledgements, Content Page, Introduction, Background, Body of Report, Evaluation, Conclusions ,Bibliography, Appendix and Program Listings.

What is systematic research?

Systematic research includes a collection of all research studies and the findings of the studies. It refers to a critical appraisal and evaluation of all the research studies for a specific clinical issue.

What is the plot of karma by khushwant singh?

"Karma" is a story by Khushwant Singh of India. It is about a man who is trying to be like the upper class Englishmen and how people react to this. It was critically acclaimed and accepted with mostly positive reviews.

What sources can you use for a research paper?

Books, you know that someone didn't hack, or change a book. Books give you the information on a topic without all the unneeded, edited, altered info you may find on a website. Sure, they are a bit more tedious to use, but they are far more trustworthy than anything on the Internet Because books, obviously written by a person having a slight alter from what may have really happened, and such, but you get closer to the fact than you would with a website. Because a website is another edit, a knock off of a book at times. With the opinions of another person added to the equation.

Searching the web you obviously, you have your search engines, such as Google, yahoo, ask.com, and the others like them. Me, out of those three that I named, I like yahoo, they don't give you the adds and crap like ask.com does, and I have never been a fan of Google.

I also like Wikipedia....but.....people don't like using it, because you can "go in and edit what ever you want" but that really isn't true. It will either pull up a secondary page of the same topic, or it will not allow you to edit the page.

Sites with a ".com" the "com" stands for commercial and are sites that I wouldn't trust for a research paper or anything. You can trust more ".org" or ".net", ".gov" sites. I believe "org" is "organization", "net" is "network" and "gov" is "governmental".

If you search something on wiki, and in the bibliography page if they have sites posted, I would search those. Because then you get your information straight from the document.

What should you do if in the process of researching your question you find evidence that supports opposing conclusions?

It is probable that your evidence is wrong on both counts. Research further and you may find an alternative answer which is probably the right one.

OR

Decide which answer has the most merit by looking at the supporting evidence

What are the different kinds of investigatory project?

The phases of any project are the same:

  1. Determine the question that must be resolved
  2. Determine what resolution of the problem would look like
  3. Determine data or activities are required
  4. Establish resources base: Money, manpower, equipment
  5. Set stepped program to use resources to gather data and resolve issue
  6. Initiate program
  7. Have findings peer reviewed
  8. Produce final report

resolve

I. Introduction

A. Background of study

B.Statement of the problem

C.Significance of the study

D. Scope And Limitations

II.Review of related literature

hypothesis

definition of terms

III.Methodology

materials and procedure

IV.conclusion and recommendations

V. bibliography

What is a good conclusion for a wolf report?

No, because your conclusion should depend on the content of the main body of your paper. Take a notepad and read back through what you've written so far, jotting down one idea for each paragraph or section. Then, looking at that, figure out which parts are the most important, and sum up those ideas in your conclusion. It should practically write itself.

Hey how to write acknowledgement for class 7?

I would like to express my special thanks of gratitude to my teacher, Mr./Mrs.-----, who gave me the golden opportunity to do this wonderful project on the topic ------. This has helped me in doing a lot of Research, and I came to learn about so many new things. I am really thankful to him.

Secondly I would also like to thank my parents and friends, who helped me a lot in finishing this project within the limited time. I completed this project not only formarks, but to also increase my knowledge.

What is a story with Flashback in it?

One day i saw a house,the house remind me about my old house.

When did black inventor Paul L Downing Die?

paul l downing was born december 5 . he invented the mail box

What difference between essay paper and research paper?

Length and focus. A dissertation is written at the end of your degree and should demonstrate a really detailed, in-depth knowledge of a topic, so it will be very long and specific. A research paper will be shorter and will not cover as much information.

How should a researcher go about achieving objectively in research?

Social research should be objective so that findings are without bias. Objectivity is when research is neutral, when personal bias has been removed meaning two independent researchers should be able to conduct the same research and get the same outcome. However objectivity is more of an ideal then a reality social researchers are individuals with their own culture, race, religon, gender, beliefs etc. They come to what they are researching for personal reasons therefore how are they expected to remain neutral? Traditional theorists (Weber, Durkheim) relived that social research can be objective. Objectivity was seen as a central methodological principle where the challenge was the practical constraints on objectivity rather then the desirability of the principle itself. Objectivity can be seen as detrimental to social research by contemporary researchers as they believe that emotions and feelings contribute to their understanding of research. Thus objectivity makes social research valid but i believe it is impossible for social researchers to step away from their feelings therefore is more of a ideal. Reflexivity is an alternative and is a way of researchers to acknowledge how they have helped construct meaning.