The Difference Between

The dictionary defines truth as the true or actual state of a matter, while defining honesty as being honourable in principles, intentions and actions. One can be truthful in what they say, but not honest in their intent. For example: "Do these jeans make me look fat?" "No, the jeans don't make you look fat!" (The responder is telling the truth, it's not the jeans that make the wearer look fat. But if they were being honest they would have replied, "No, the jeans don't make you look fat - it's just you that's fat!")

APATHY, AGITATION AND ACTIVITY The concept of being above pains and pleasures appears to be akin to being apathetic and indifferent. The sensitivity to the surroundings; appears to be the hallmark of life. But apathy, inertia, indolence, intoxication and inaction on the one hand and agitation and aggravated assertion on the other, do not give fulfillment.Can NAMASMARAN help acquire such a state of existence which can emanate the appropriate, illuminating, rectifying and objective influence on the inner and outer environment, besides appropriate intellectual, emotional and physical actions? It is for everyone to ponder and verify.

a qualitive observation is observing something without using numbers like here is an example: the cell is round with blue cytoplasm in it. a quanitive observation is with using numbers only. here is an example: the tree is 23 inches round and 17ft off the ground. that is the difference.

Society and culture are intertwined because culture is shaped by the collective beliefs, practices, and values of a society. Society provides the environment in which culture develops, while culture, in turn, influences societal norms, behaviors, and institutions. Together, they form the fabric of a community's identity and heritage.

A control variable is a factor that is held constant in an experiment to prevent it from influencing the outcome. A control treatment, on the other hand, is a specific group or condition in an experiment that receives no experimental manipulation and is used as a baseline for comparison with the treatment groups.

Sociology and social psychology both study human behavior in social contexts. However, sociology focuses on larger social structures and institutions, while social psychology focuses on individual behavior within those structures. Sociology often uses quantitative research methods, while social psychology typically uses experimental and qualitative methods.

Being clear-minded means having a focused and balanced state of mind, free from confusion, distractions, and unnecessary clutter. It involves having mental clarity, sharpness, and the ability to think logically and make decisions effectively.

the difference between modernism and traditionalism is the difference in metaphysics. in post modern era the knowledge or values was sent or given by God and in modern times values are human centric.

"White Russian" typically refers to a person who opposed the Bolsheviks during the Russian Civil War in the early 20th century. "Great Russian" is a broader term referring to an ethnic Russian person, regardless of their political affiliations. White Russians were anti-Bolshevik forces who supported the monarchy, while Great Russians are simply a part of the larger Russian ethnic group.

Interaction refers to the act of engaging or communicating with others, while interrelation involves the mutual connections or influences between different entities. In human relations, interaction focuses on the direct exchanges between individuals, whereas interrelation emphasizes the broader network of relationships and dependencies that exist among people.

Hearing is something that happens when the sound hits your eardrum and its converted to signals which the auditory nerves send to the brain and the brain interprets them as sounds.

Listening is a skill, where you interpret the sounds signals into a message which then can be acted upon or reacted to (such as giving an answer, or taking some action as responding to a command).

Dialogue is more likely to use slang.

apex..

Essentially, they are pretty much the same - "mesmerism" is an old fashioned word for what is now generally called "hypnotism".

In modern usage, however, many argue that hypnotism is a deliberate, intensely focused, form of interpersonal communication during which one person methodically induces a trance state in another, usually via a spoken "screed" plus maybe the use of some form of visual focus on a dot, spiral pattern, a swinging pendulum etc.. Typically, the process also involves gentle guided progressive relaxation in some form, or possibly subtle, indirect, suggestions, story telling etc..

"Mesmerism", on the other hand, tends to be essentially non verbal, and usually employs intense "fascination" (eg direct eye gaze) plus a "physical driver" such as deliberate touch in a rhythmical manner, and sudden/ direct "command" rather than the gentler, more collaborative/ permissive, sustained suggestion of hypnosis.

Hypnotised people are deeply relaxed, and are in a "right brain predominant state" which allows their intuitive, imaginative, and unconscious thought processes full play, whereas those who are "mesmerised" are often rendered physically rigid - eg standing up straight, "at attention", or become cataleptic, as if "frozen". Many psychologists describe this as an ideomotor response - senses overwhelmed, shocked even, causing the body to "shut down" as a sort of defence mechanism. Unsurprisingly, therefore, it is very rare indeed for someone who has been hypnotised to have anything other than a pleasant experience, but those subjected to "mesmerism" (eg volunteers for "hypnosis" stage shows, which, in truth, are generally more "mesmeric" than hypnotic in style) often find it upsetting, disturbing, or even worse! Not all deliberately induced trance states are the same, and personally I'd steer well clear of anyone practising "mesmerism", including "hypnosis entertainers".

It's important to recognise that most people readily enter spontaneous trance states on a regular basis: eg when absorbed in watching a play or film, or when performing tedious everyday tasks "on autopilot" whilst thinking of other things. "Daydreaming" is a commonly experienced everyday hypnotic state, and the period immediately before falling asleep may also reasonably be described as such. When someone is overwhelmed by something or someone; totally fascinated, they're often described as "mesmerised".

More generally, "mesmeric" states of total fascination are very common: eg listening to a very interesting speaker, or staring into the embers of a fire. Dancing rhythmically, especially when accompanied by flashing lights, drumming/ loud beats, often produces mesmeric states in participants, as can sexual excitement. Indeed, women experiencing orgasm may be described as mesmerised, and it's notable that for a period (often as long as an hour) after orgasm many women are in a deep trance: eyes are glazed (sometimes inverted - rolled up in the head); there is complete lassitude/ physical immobility; they are extremely suggestible, and in some cases they're cataleptic - ie arms, hands etc will remain in whatever position they're placed. This is probably biologically determined; an evolutionary trait which serves to maximise the chances of conception occurring.

To conclude, there is nothing "magical" about hypnotism - it's normal and natural, as is being "mesmerised" by something/ someone fascinating. "Mesmerism", however, is mired in arcane mumbo jumbo, and generally practitioners of it are exploiting the natural capacity of humans to enter trance states for dubious purposes. In my professional work as a counsellor I have encountered more than a few clients who have been traumatised by participation in hypnosis shows; the damage is never evident at the time, but typically emerges during the weeks/ months after the "entertainment" experience. Most are people for whom hypnosis would be inadvisable as a therapeutic modality, as any ethical and competent hypnotherapist or counsellor would ascertain, but these modern mesmerists don't give a hoot so long as their show goes down a storm with their (paying) audiences.

Intellect refers to one's ability to think, reason, and understand concepts, while will refers to one's capacity to make decisions, choose actions, and exert self-control. In essence, intellect is about knowing and understanding, while will is about choosing and acting.

Values are about how we have learned to think about how things ought to be, or people ought to behave, especially in terms of qualities such as honesty, integrity and openness, which when people are asked what their values are tend to be the main values.

Attitudes are the established ways of responding to people and situations that we have learned based on the beliefs, values and assumptions we hold. How we respond to situations and our behavior can reflect our attitude. However, we can control our behavior in a way that does not reflect our beliefs and values, which in order to embrace a diverse culture and behaviors as a successful manager, we have to adapt our behavior in a positive manner.

This questions deals with a question about another language and words that may appear to be nonsense to a bot versed in English are legitimate.

'Should have' means 'venamayirunnu/vendathayirunnu/vendathundayirunnu'. (e.g. If he had broken your pen, you should have beat him. (Avan thankalude pen odichenkil, thankal avane thallanamayirunnu/thallendathayirunnu/thallendathundayirunnu.) 'Must have' means' 'undakum/undakam'. (e.g. He must have departed early. (Avan nerathe poyittundakum/poyittundakam.) More example with the modal auxiliaries. (Could have beat = Thallamayirunnu/thallanakumayirunnu. Would have beat = Thalliyene/thallumayirunnu. Might have beat = Thallumayirikkum/thalliyittundayirikkum.)

You may have a cup of coffee. ((Thankal) oru cup kappi kudikkoo.)

You could have gone to the party instead of sitting here sulking. (Ivide veruthe irunnu samayam kalayunnathinekkal, ninakku partikku pokamayirunnu.)

You might have won the race, but you were not at all prepared. (Nee ottathil jayikkumayirunnu, pakshe ninakku ottum thayareduppundayirunnilla (nee thayarayirunnilla.))

well describe is like telling someone the factors and details of something and the other description is describing to someone about something OK now analyse,analyse is like a lot of what computers and machines do like analysing something by taking something and observing it that's analyse cause you're like scanning it and another description is like you not knowing what something is and analysing it and adding data or for living things learning more about it sorry if this didn't help much or even a little I don't know much about this stuff I just use what I know.

Counselling is not unplanned conversation.

Standard English typically follows grammar, punctuation, and spelling rules established by traditional grammar guides. It is a form of English used in formal writing, education, and professional settings. Nonstandard English may include regional dialects, slang, colloquialisms, and variations in grammar or syntax that do not adhere to standard rules.

The seven distinctions between authority and influence are as a following:

1. Authority is the static,structural aspect of power in organizations; influence is the dynamic tactical element.

2. Authority is the formal aspect of power; influence is the informal aspect.

3. Authority refers to the formally sanctioned right to make final decision; influence is not sanctioned by the organization and is therefore, not a matter of organization rights.

4. Authority implies involuntary submission by subordinates; influence implies voluntary submission and does not necessarily entail a superior - subordinate relationship.

5. Authority flows downward, and it is unidirectional; influence is multi directional and can flow upward, downward, or horizontally.

6. Authority source is solely structural; influence source may be personal characteristics, expertise or opportunity.

7. Authority is circumscribed, that the domain, scope, and legitimacy of the power are specifically and clearly delimited; influence is uncircumscribed, that's, its domain, scope, and legitimacy are typically ambiguous. (Bush, 2011, pp. 108,109)

Salah Meemar

Objective point of views are based on fact and proof. This includes using facts and figures to back up a viewpoint or idea.

Subjective point of views are opinionated or based on rumours. This includes a person using emotion and opinions to demonstrate a point.

Being loud refers to speaking or making noise at a high volume, while yelling specifically involves raising one's voice in a forceful or angry manner. Yelling typically conveys strong emotions such as frustration, anger, or excitement, while being loud can simply mean speaking at a higher volume than normal.

The difference between propaganda movement and katipunan in object is that, propaganda is reformist wants independence, while katipunan is a reformist, that they want to reform the law in our nation through the spanish colonizer.

"Jushigessoyo" is a more polite way to say "Please give me" in Korean, whereas "juseyo" is the casual form. The former is used in formal situations or when speaking to someone older or in a higher position, while the latter is more appropriate for informal settings or when talking to friends or those younger.