0
US Foreign Policy
The US foreign policy is the policy through which the US interacts with other nations. The overall goal of this policy is to secure democracy for the benefit of both the American and international communities.
883 Questions
How is foreign aid currently used as a foreign policy tool?
Foreign aid is currently used as a foreign policy tool to promote stability, foster economic development, and enhance diplomatic relations between countries. By providing assistance to developing nations, donor countries aim to address issues such as poverty, health care, and education, which can lead to greater political alignment and influence. Additionally, aid can serve as a strategic instrument to counteract adversarial influences, support allies, and promote democratic governance. Overall, foreign aid is leveraged to achieve both humanitarian goals and strategic geopolitical interests.
From the Japanese perspective, the Amau Statement was equivalent to the American Monroe Doctrine. Both statements asserted a nation's right to influence and control its regional sphere, with the Amau Statement justifying Japan's expansion in East Asia, while the Monroe Doctrine established the United States' stance against European colonialism in the Americas. Each reflected a commitment to regional dominance and a rejection of foreign intervention in their respective areas.
Which describes the goal of international foreign aid?
The goal of international foreign aid is to provide financial, technical, or humanitarian assistance to countries in need, particularly those facing economic challenges, natural disasters, or conflicts. This support aims to alleviate poverty, promote sustainable development, and enhance the overall well-being of populations. Additionally, foreign aid can help stabilize regions, foster economic growth, and strengthen diplomatic relationships among nations. Ultimately, it seeks to create a more equitable and prosperous global community.
What has been the US foreign policy approach to Israel?
The United States supports Israel as a key ally in the region. The United States support for the State of Israel is the strongest of any of the US relations outside of NATO. It comes from a variety of sources. Israel has cooperated with the United States on diplomatic issues, military and intelligence exchanges, large amounts of trade, and significant technological investment. In addition there a numerous Americans who support the State of Israel because of religious convictions on top of the already-listed reasons.
The United States has strong antagonism towards Iran and does not even maintain diplomatic relations with the country. The tensions between the US and Iran are based on three major issues: (1) Iran's Nuclear Ambitions, (2) Iran's Numerous Human Rights Violations, (3) Particular Political Grievances Between the United States and Iran. The United States and most European states are very distrustful that Iran is engaging in a peaceful nuclear energy production program and believe that Iran intends to create nuclear weapons. The United States also categorically opposes Iran having a nuclear weapon given that Iran has expressed militancy towards and supported/founded militant groups that act throughout the Middle East. Iran is well-known for being a country which violates fundamental human freedoms and is quite proud for doing so. There are several grievances between Iran and Western countries, particularly Iran and the United States. Some of those grievances include:
- The Iranian Hostage Crisis in 1979
- Iran's financial support of Islamist groups that attacked US and French forces in the 1983 Beirut Barracks Bombing
- Iran's continual monetary and political support to the end of eliminating Israel
- Iran's antagonism towards the Arab Gulf countries
- Iran's support for Hezbollah, Hamas, and Palestinian Jihad -- all recognized terrorist organizations
- Iran's use of the al-Quds Expeditionary forces to attack Coalition Troops during the Iraq War.
Why were some people afraid of the Treatys influence over American foreign policy?
Some people were afraid of the Treaty of Versailles' influence over American foreign policy because they believed it would entangle the United States in international conflicts and obligations that could compromise national sovereignty. Critics, particularly isolationists, feared that the League of Nations, established by the treaty, would lead to unnecessary military commitments and undermine the country's ability to act independently. There were concerns that the treaty would shift American priorities from domestic issues to international affairs, potentially dragging the nation into future wars. This apprehension ultimately contributed to the Senate's rejection of the treaty.
When did the 'iran-contra affair' happen?
The Iran-Contra affair was a political scandal which was revealed in 1986 as a result of earlier events during the Reagan Administration. It began as an operation to increase U.S.-Iranian relations, wherein Israel would ship weapons to a moderate, politically influential group of Iranians opposed to the Ayatollah Khomeni; the U.S. would reimburse Israel with those weapons and receive payment from Israel. The moderate Iranians agreed to do everything in their power to achieve the release of six U.S. hostages, who were being held by Hezbollah. The plan eventually deteriorated into an arms-for-hostages scheme, in which members of the executive branch sold weapons to Iran in exchange for the release of the American hostages, without the direct authorization of President Ronald Reagan. Large modifications to the plan were conjured by Lieutenant Colonel Oliver North of the National Security Council in late 1985. In North's plan, a portion of the proceeds from the weapon sales was diverted to fund anti-Sandinista and anti-communist rebels, or Contras, in Nicaragua.[3] While President Ronald Reagan was a supporter of the Contra cause,[4] he did not authorize this plan, nor was he aware that the funds were being sent to the Contras.
After the weapon sales were revealed in November 1986, Ronald Reagan appeared on national television and stated that the weapons transfers had indeed occurred, but that the United States did not trade arms for hostages. The investigation was compounded when large volumes of documents relating to the scandal were destroyed or withheld from investigators by Reagan administration officials. On March 4, 1987, Reagan returned to the airwaves in a nationally televised address, taking full responsibility for any actions that he was unaware of, and admitting that "what began as a strategic opening to Iran deteriorated, in its implementation, into trading arms for hostages."
Many investigations ensued, including those by the United States Congress and the three-man, Reagan-appointed "Tower Commission". Neither could find any evidence that Reagan himself knew of the extent of the multiple programs. In the end, fourteen administration officials were charged with crimes, and eleven convicted, including Defense Secretary Caspar Weinberger. They were all pardoned in the final days of the George H. W. Bush presidency, who had been vice-president at the time.
The United States sold weapons to Iran and funded the Contras in Nicaragua with the money
To help fund the counter revolutionaries in Nicaragua, the White House sold weapons to Iran against the wishes of Congress.
How did US dominance in Latin America change the region's geography?
US dominance in Latin America, particularly during the 20th century, led to significant geopolitical and economic shifts that altered the region's geography. The establishment of military bases, infrastructure projects, and economic interventions, such as the construction of the Panama Canal, redefined transportation routes and trade networks. Additionally, US-backed regimes often prioritized the extraction of natural resources, altering land use patterns and contributing to environmental changes. This dominance also influenced urbanization trends, leading to the growth of cities aligned with American interests.
One prominent United States diplomat and Pan-Africanist who highlighted U.S. policies both domestically and internationally was Edward Wilmot Blyden. He advocated for the rights and development of African peoples and critiqued colonialism and racial discrimination. Blyden's work emphasized the importance of African identity and self-determination, drawing attention to the contradictions in U.S. policies regarding race and democracy. His efforts contributed to broader discussions on Pan-Africanism and the need for a united front among people of African descent worldwide.
How did the tariff policy of the US affected foreign trade during the 1920s and 1930s?
I want you to think about the question. Let's take it apart. A tariff is levied on products coming INTO a country. It is done to protect industry from foreign goods being cheaper than homemade products. Now, let's look at the second part. Taxes is money people pay to support the government. When taxes are low people have more money to use and that means the the fellow who owns the widget factory can sell more widgets. He also can earn a profit because foreign widgets aren't undercutting him through a price war. Now, that you have this I want you to answer the question.
This is the official responsibility of the appointed ambassadors to foreign nations.
What foreign policy strategy did the you ited states follow after wwll how was it tested in be rlin?
What is the foreign policy of the united states?
Ultimatum, or be sanctioned,
error: 1. Result of a failure in comprehension. 2. A genetic flaw in humans.
Terror: The product of centuries of human error!
ultimate error: declaring war on terror; instead of correcting the error!
What is the relationship between the US and South korea today?
"Relationship" is a big stretch concerning these two countries. North Korea is in poor shape comparatively speaking. It is existing in a mode similar to that which caused the second world war. South Korea is a peaceful country that is on its way to being a world leader in production, technology and trade. Y-THINK-Y
What are the advantages and disadvantages of Foreign Policy?
Benefit is to maximise international relationships
How did McCarthyism affect US foreign policy?
By making the united states once again go through another "witch hunt" and showing that we were a nation growing paranoid of communism and socialism.. combined with all the factors of arms races, nuclear fears of war..
Why should the US be interested in the Armenian genocide?
The United States should care about honoring the suffering of people who were butchered for who they were and what they believed, especially since the United States is a country founded by people who fled the Old World specifically because of ethnic and religious persecution -- just like what the Armenian, Pontic Greek, and Assyrian people suffered in the Ottoman-led genocide.
Additionally, US Recognition of the genocide may force Turkey to become more introspective about its consistent denial of this unfathomable crime. To read more about the Turkish stance on the Armenian Genocide, please see this Related Question: Why does the Turkish government deny that a genocide took place?
How the US foreign policy moves from isolationism to internationalism?
America was bombed at pearl harbour, and Hitler declared war on America the next day.
Is the people to people program a good experience?
Yes it's amazing. The people are nice and and funny. It's just so fun you should really do it and it's super fun.
