The Patriot Act does not directly impact CDL HAZMAT endorsed drivers. However, it does impose stricter security measures on transportation in general, which may indirectly affect these drivers. They may encounter more thorough background checks, increased scrutiny at checkpoints, or additional security protocols when handling hazardous materials.
It was when Benjamin Franklin and his friends signed a bill that made us all competely free men...and women...and whatever else exists, Now, Someone tell me the name of that bill, SHOW me the location of the wording and where to get a copy of it !!
>Bill is not real, and was never signed by Benjamin Franklin or any of his known associates.
Patriots were brave men who were not loyal to Britain anymore, and some fought in militias (volunteer army) during battles against the Redcoats.
The Loyalists (loyal to Britain) still wanted America to be a colony of Britain, but they didn't want to be taxed so heavily. The Patriots wanted to break away and be free from Britain, and control their own lands.
it violated the civil liberties of u.s citizens.
The purpose of the Patriot Act is to strengthen the ability to deter and prosecute terrorist acts, not only in the United States, but around the world. The act also aims to improve law enforcement tools for investigation, prevent, and detect and prosecute money laundering and financing of terrorism internationally.
Aided by the us patriot act to provide more flexibility this act requires law enforcement agents to obtain a court order to monitor traffic flowing between network service providers for national security. Law enforcement is able to look at the people you are talking to or the sites you are visiting in order to keep the nation safe.
federal wiretap
A federal wiretap is what is needed for law enforcement agents to monitor traffic flowing between network service providers. This is required because of the US patriot act.
The Federal Patriot Act Is aided by the USA patriot act to provide more flexibility; this act requires law enforcement agents to obtain a court order to monitor traffic flowing between network service providers.
federal wiretap
This is a highly contentious issue and opinions will vary. A lot depends upon whether a person's philosophical orientation is individualistic/libertarian or collectivistic/authoritarian.
To name the only positive that I am aware would be claimed, it may have resulted in some people not attacking us who otherwise would have. In fact, I think - while not liking the act - that it probably has deterred at least one amateur.
The opposite opinion would be that even if it did deter an attack or attacks, it comes at a cost that is higher than we may care to pay down the road. And that we might have been able to reduce attacks simply by changing some of our more controversial foreign policies.
Some people were concerned that the Patriot Act violated civil rights because it gives the federal government the power to wiretap the communications of suspected terrorists. They felt that this could be violating these terrorists rights, because they had not yet been convicted of any crime. Those defending the Patriot Act pointed out that in other situations of criminal justice, a conviction is not required to obtain wiretaps, to search homes, etc., only probable cause in the form of a warrant. They stated that the Patriot simply extends this power to the pursuit of terrorists; if the government has probable cause to believe he/she is a terrorist, they can wiretap his phone and monitor his communications in the interest of preventing an attack.
Congress passed the USA PATRIOT Act on October 26, 2001, barely six weeks after the terrorist attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon. The bill was passed with little debate at the height of the anthrax contamination scare when many lawmakers did not have access to their offices. Sen. Russell Feingold (D-WI), the lone dissenter in the Senate, remarked that few had even read summaries, let alone the fine print.
After the September 11, 2001 attacks, the US was concerned that legal obstacles to obtaining vital intelligence would allow similar attacks. Congress passed the Patriot Act to remove the previous restrictions on obtaining and sharing important information on possible terrorist activities. In many cases this allowed actions by government agencies that would previously have been illegal or even unconstitutional (wiretaps, surveillance, monitoring private transactions, and searching private homes and businesses).
All of these activities were deemed necessary to provide increased protection of the US public from terrorist activities.
A Federal law- this one- 18 U.S. Code § 1030 - Fraud and related activity in connection with computers
federal funding for patriotic groups
increased authority to use electronic surveillance
the right to create new taxes to fund anti-terrorist activities
P.A.T.R.I.O.T. Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism
Loss , constitution within
Gave U.S. agencies greater powers
It gave the government the right to search your home, email, telephone records, medical records, and mail to name a few, all without a warrant if they believe terrorism is involved or a terrorist act is going to be committed. It is set to expire in May of 2011.
International Wiretap
Yes, if the property was acquired legally, meaning any income used to purchase the property was properly claimed and taxed, valid identity documents were used such as SS# and so forth.
Computation of a certified voucher