Absolutism (Political)

d

Absolutist governments in Europe were different because they believed in sovereignty. This is the belief that the king holds all powers and abilities to rule. Powers are not even given to the nobles or any of the assembly within the government.

System by which rulers tried to govern by enlightenment principles while maintaining their royal powers

Absolutism in Austria and Prussia differed from that in France because in those countries, those at the bottom of society were much worse off than they were before.

Being intolerant of other cultures

The Monarchy is Head of State, Head of Government and exercises absolute control over the State and its people. There are no restrictions attached to the rule of the Monarchy. The system is Autocratic where supreme power is concentrated in the hands of one person, so that democracy through the vote is officially not available

fearing the government usually.repression.absolute government rule,with a dictator at the helm.depending of course on if you are the one being oppressed.

Most of the governments in mainland Europe (and much of the rest of the world) were absolutist, so it is hard to say which was the "most absolutist". It would be like asking which type of cheesecake was the "cheesecake-iest". France was certainly the standard-bearer of absolutism during the Reign of Louis XIV in the 17th century, but the Prussian, Austrian, Russian, and Ottoman governments were no less absolutist than was France.

Absolutism is the principle or the exercise of complete and unrestricted power in government.

Totalitarianism is absolute control by the state or a governing branch of a highly centralized institution

Peter the Great (Russia)

Louis XIV (France)

Phillip II (Spain)

It Depends on The King is he wants to have a Congress or to become an Autocrat

A good sentence for despotic would be

The despotic person had autocratic feelings.

False

No

Belileaving that's ones own culture is better than others cultures

look for it in the book :D

To obey and pay taxes.

All European governments seemed similar, but they're actually different regarding structure in their governments

No, quite the opposite. Read his words to see he didn't.

Traditionally, an absolute monarch would only admit to having responsibilities to God, not to the people, and only the absolute monarch gets to say what his (or rarely, her) responsibilities are. Louis the fourteenth famously said "L'état c'est moi" meaning I am the state. The people in such a country exist to serve the monarch, the monarch does not exist to serve the people.

An absolute monarch is a ruler (king or queen) who does not allow anyone to disagree with them. Their rule is law. During the Enlightenment the people in countries around the world were encouraged to take charge of their lives, their politics and their countries. In order for the people to take charge their ruler must be willing to work with them - an absolute monarch would not be willing.

It depends entirely on the absolute monarchy in question. There are still absolute monarchies in some parts of the world, like Saudi Arabia or Brunei Darussalam

Juan Carlos I of Spain is not an absolute monarch. An absolute monarch rules absolutely, that is without restriction or encumbrance of any kind. Spain is a Parliamentary Monarchy in which the country is governed by an elected government.

When you take your dick in insert in into a mouses assshole.... don't ask CAUSE IT HAS BEEN DONE!!

The generals of his own army ruled the twelve districts of England. He tore up constitutionalist documents. He closed down pubs, brothels, theaters, art houses, and more. He held absolute power and did not use Parliament.