Civil Cases

You would have to write a letter to his office - stating your case and the reason for wishing to see him. But don't get your hopes up. If it is a criminal case or a case that requires the judgment of the court or hearing before a fact-finding agency, you will probably not be granted the opportunity.

kempe and kempe were medical specialists who believed that child abuse was a disease. they believed that child abuse could be prevented by treatment and counselling. they named the disease "battered baby syndrome" and they believed that parents who were abused themselves were at risk of doing it to thier own children, aswell as parents with mental health problems.

Marriott International, Inc. was founded in Washington, DC in May of 1927. It is a publicly traded company on the NASDAQ with the symbol MAR.

Contact the justice court in the jurisdiction where the defendant resides. If you are not sure what jurisdiction that is, contact any justice court. They will likely be able to direct you to the correct court.

Starts with primary court, followed up by District court which exercises horizontal power with Resident Magistrate's Court it has greater powers though,above all is the High Court of Tanzania,and the Highes Court in the hierarchy is Court of Appeal.

What is the third step to deposition

like a baws

It means a motion has been filed requesting the court to deny the original Motion to Compel petition or the judge actually denied the motion and it was entered into the court record as such. The exact wording defines which of the actions is being referred to.

I think there is no concrete answer to this one as philosophy and opinion play heavily in the issue. Therefore here are my opinions. Yes, as compensatory damage is to compensate the "injured" party for its losses[there can be many different forms]. The purpose of punitive damage is supposed to punish the offending party in the hope that it will prevent a repeat of the same offense, AND ACT AS A DETERRENT to OTHERS who may in the future be tempted to take advantage of the opportunity to commit similar offenses. There are many who feel that punitive damages are unfair as they raise the plaintiff's recovery beyond his loss. I can understand that feeling, BUT I still believe that severe financial punishment is warranted, if proportional to the offense and the POTENTIAL FUTURE RISK to the general public, if allowed to be repeated in the future. I COULD agree with the removal of punitive damages from payment to the plaintiff AND his ATTORNEY[S], IF AND ONLY IF, those funds were donated to charity, or to government programs RELATED to enforcement against the transgression which led to the lawsuit.j3h.

The money can always be "given" back, but that is not really what you are asking. Generally, settlement agreements waive and release the parties from future claims and future discoveries regarding facts. As such, unless the settlement agreement says differently, there will normally not be any obligation to undo the settlement agreement after new facts are discovered or confirmed. Also, in civil litigation, there is no "innocent" or "guilty" - only liable and not liable.

Yes. Most credit cards and other revolving accounts are unsecured. A consumer can be sued within the statute of limitations (as established by state law) and in accordance with the card holder agreement. If a judgment is granted, the creditor may place a lien against any real property, garnish wages and take any other action allowed by law.

Any consumer faced with such a threat/possibility needs to research their state's laws. Find out what the statute of limitations is in their state and whether or not their debt can be acted upon in the manner you have described.

Many Credit Card companies, sell account to third parties. Those are the people that initiate any legal action. Sometimes it is an agency that works with a law firm, sometimes it is group of collection attorneys. Every state has a set of exemptions (property exempt from creditors action) they can be used in bankruptcy or lawsuits. You can find out what those exemptions are and how they apply in your situation by doing a simple web search ("Name of State" bankruptcy exemptions)

Liens against an estate:

First, states limit the recourse (how much a creditor can collect) a creditor has to the value of the Decedent's estate. This means that creditor's cannot make the decedent's heirs and beneficiaries liable for the Decedent's debt. (Although debt collectors frequently misstate or avoid disclosing this information, hoping that a decedent's spouse or relative will pay the bill.)

Second, depending on your state, a surviving spouse may be liable for the decedent's debt beyond the value of the estate, in others state laws limit the surviving spouse's liability.

Third, depending on your state, some property, for example joint tenancy property, may pass free of creditor's claims (except for secured claims.)

Fourth, most states have a system to apportion the decedent's debts between various creditors, and apply priority- who gets paid first.

Fifth, most states, whether an estate is administered in probate or by a trust, have a "creditor's claim" procedure. This controls how a creditor may seek to enforce the debt against a decedent's estate, and reduces the statute of limitations.

Sixth, In California, for most unsecured non-government (think MediCal, Federal and State taxes) creditors, there is a universal one year statute of limitations for claims against a decedent which runs from the decedent's death. If a creditor does not file suit in this time (or file a creditor's claim against the decedent's estate or trust) they are barred from recovering the death.

Finally, proper application of state law to cut off a decedent's creditors normally requires the assistance of an attorney and filing of the appropriate pleadings in probate court.

Yes, you can request one if your civil trial is in federal court. The States are not required to provide jury trials in civil suits, unless the case involves a federally-created right, because the Seventh Amendment has not been incorporated (applied) to the States.

Your attorney, or the other side's attorney? In an hourly fee basis, your attorney can charge you for all of his or her time spent on a matter, including time spent conducting, preparing or responding to discovery. In a contingency basis, you do not pay your attorney for hourly fees, but you do pay your attorney's costs if you have a favorable outcome (i.e. settle the cases for value or obtain a judgment).

filling court and getting garsnishment and then appeals,you ae srtiil looking at 6 months,if still by then then u might wana set up some type of monthly plan

Yes, you can sue a person from another state if that person owes you money. Access your local small claims court to file the lawsuit.

Computer models are what type of computer it is. There are many different types of computer. It differs with the Brand, Operating system, Look, Function, Year, and more.

An example of an unethical attorney-client relationship is if an attorney reveals confidential information that the client told him or her in confidence. It is also unethical if the attorney threatens to blackmail the client.

Likely it is, but without knowing what state you are in, who can tell?? Simply tell them you want verification of the debt. IF they provide it, you will have to pay. IF NOT, forget it.

The answer is no, the plaintiff can dismiss the lawsuit at anytime if there are no substantial objections from the defendant.

Yes they are. They can be used in a court process and they can prove anything. They are proofs of correspondence between the two subjects as they have both names on them.

no, unless the judgment also allows interest to be figured in, that would be the extent of any extra monies allowed to be garnished. if they took more than they should've it may have been in error. you can contact them to see if they will willingly pay you back the difference, or you can take them to court and ask for interest on the difference of the monies.

Yes

What is Connecticuts law of garnishment on businuss lines of credit?

You can only sue a telemarketer in small claims court in New York city if the telemarketing company has a New York address. You must also be suing for money and this is pursuant to Civil Court Act section 1803.