0
Communication
Communication is how we send messages to each other. It can be wordless, like body language. It can be written like a letter or message. It can also be spoken. Communication is very different from one situation to another.
1,837 Questions
What verbal and nonverbal barriers to communication were present?
Some verbal barriers could include language differences, unclear or ambiguous statements, or use of jargon. Nonverbal barriers may include lack of eye contact, crossed arms, or distracting gestures that can hinder effective communication.
It depends. If you use it in a sentence like "She had had the food taken from her so she was starving" or something it's okay.
Yes.
Past perfect is had + past participle and sometimes had - which is the the past participle of have - is used.
We had had a nice day until James stood on the wasp nest.
The army had won the battle before they crossed the border.
Past perfect is usually used to talk about something that happened in the past (past perfect) before something else that happened in the past (past simple).
In the first sentence had a nice day happened before James stood on the wasp nest.
To more examples to make it clearer.
We had taken tea before the sun rose up.
We had had tea before the sun rose up.
How do you address a letter to more than one judge?
You can address the letter by writing "Honorable Judges" or "Dear Judges." In the body of the letter, you can be more specific by addressing them individually as "Judge [Last Name]" to ensure clarity and respect.
How do you Addressing a judge but do not know their name?
You can address the judge as "Your Honor" or "Sir/Madam." It is best to show respect and professionalism when addressing a judge in court.
What was the importance of having a written law code?
Having a written law code helped to establish clear rules and regulations that everyone could access and understand. It promoted consistency, fairness, and accountability within a society, as well as providing a basis for resolving disputes and ensuring justice was served.
We all have an inherent need for love and affection from others, even though we don't always know how to obtain it. Everyone wants to be understood... and some of that understanding can come through explanation. Some of it can't. Relationships aren't college classes where you can give some lectures, have the other person ace the test, and then you've arrived. It takes time, attention, and understanding of some things that the other person can't verbalize for whatever reason... sometimes they haven't realized things themselves (not everyone is good at self-knowledge), and sometimes certain subjects are too hard to talk about, due to a trauma in the past.. or just too emotional to talk about without breaking down. People have to be dedicated to understand other people... patient, and committed. On the other side, it is an excellent point that we need to externalize and work at knowing others. We can't just crawl into our shells and wait for other people to find us out. The answer here is that getting to know one another is an individual process. You can't take what works for one person and always expect it to apply to someone else. We have to work at being open to other people, so they can get to know us on a deeper level than mere aquaintance... and we also have to be patient and open when learning about others. It is a process we all need to work at, not something we can just have for wanting it.
Technically, if one is hungry, one should go eat; if someone is hungry, he should go eat. However, it has long been the custom of English speakers to use "they" (an imported, Scandinavian word, by the way) as the third person singular pronoun of unspecified gender when the antecedent is "someone" or "a person" and so forth. Political mis-correction insists on the awkwardly unnecessary "he-or-she" in that context, but the old way is best, at least in speech. In writing, try to avoid using the ugly he-or-she by restructuring the antecedents into the plural.
What are some examples of discourse communities?
Some examples of discourse communities include academic communities (e.g. scholars, researchers), online gaming communities, medical communities (e.g. doctors, nurses), professional communities (e.g. lawyers, engineers), and fan communities (e.g. sports fans, music enthusiasts).
How would you write an opening statement for mock trial of stealing a car?
For an ongoing project, I'm trying to pull together the notes on opening statement I've gathered over the years. For what it's worth, here is the result of my work so far:
Organizing the Opening --The opening should summarize the evidence in a way that presents the theme of the case.--One simple method of organization: A short opening sentence or two that presents the theme of the case; a short 125-word overview of the case to orient the jurors and give them an aid to understanding the facts that follow; then a re-telling of the "story" chronologically.
--Another method of organization modeled after a screenplay: Begin by introducing time and place, then introduce your client (the protagonist), then introduce the complicating element (what's gone wrong), then relate events chronologically in a way that suggests the story should end happily.
--Keep this in mind when writing the opening: Make a list of the points you want (or need) to make. These are your headings. Then write the facts that will establish each point. You'll then relate the facts to the jury, not the "point." However, in relating the facts, the point will be obvious to them. (Example: Point--my client is a careful driver. Facts to make the point: "Mr. Jones looked both ways before pulling out, saw that he could pull out, entered the lane, then proceeded to the stoplight. He stopped behind the car in front of him. A split second later, he heard a screech, then felt the impact of the defendant's car crashing into the back of his").
--End the opening with something like this: "At the conclusion of the case, I will return to speak to you again, and I will ask you to find in my client's favor."
Do's for Opening Statement--Begin in the formal way: "May it please the Court."--Be brief.
--Look at each juror.
--Begin by telling the jurors something important. If you want to introduce co-counsel or explain how the trial is going to work, do it after you're well into your opening.
--Speak in simple English using short, ordinary words.
--Use the words you choose to create images in juror's minds.
--Present your position without quarreling with your opponent.
--Create empathy for client by describing personal facts about him--a view into your client's life.
--Make a point by repeating it in different ways.
--Use visual aids and portions of depositions.
--Show the jurors the standard jury instructions as a way to demystify the process.
--For plaintiffs, who go first: Deal with the defendant by telling the jury what they should expect to hear from him; keep the defendant on the defensive.
--If you decide to preempt the defense by introducing weaknesses, do it in a positive way. Not this: "You will hear that Jim had a bad back before the accident, but that doesn't mean he shouldn't recover." But this: "Jim was all but recovered from a painful back injury when the defendant crashed his car into the back of Jim's car."
Don'ts for Opening Statements Don't use notes. Opening is one of the few parts of trial you can plan for well in advance. Write out your opening and rehearse it.--Don't comment on the credibility of witnesses. (In Illinois, it's objectionable to say in opening that a witness is not telling the truth.)
--Don't tell the jurors the case is "interesting." Your opening should demonstrate why the case is interesting.
--Don't use the stock phrase "what I say isn't evidence." Once you say it, the jury will quit listening.
--Don't say "The evidence will show" at the beginning of each sentence. This is boring and repetitive. Instead, state the facts.
--Don't refer to your opening as a "story." Though it is, the jurors may misunderstand: a "story" is also something someone tells when they're being less than truthful.
--Don't be overdramatic. A highly dramatic, engaging "performance" may leave the jurors feeling like the rest of the trial is a letdown, just at the time you want them to be engaged and interested.
--Don't argue, which isn't permitted. How to tell if you're arguing: would the words you are saying ever come out of a witness'smouth? If not, you're probably arguing. (Example: "The accident caused Mr. Jones grievous, permanent harm." That's not how a witness would testify, and it's argument).
--Never promise more than you can deliver. Don't overstate or exaggerate any item of your case (calling an injury "permanent" when there is no evidence of permanency). You want the jurors to think later, "The case is even stronger than I expected."
From:http://www.illinoistrialpractice.com/2004/02/notes_on_openin.html
What is occupational discourse?
Occupational discourse refers to the language and communication patterns used in specific work settings or professions. It includes the terminology, jargon, and communication styles that are unique to a particular job or industry. Understanding occupational discourse is important for effective communication within that professional context.
Should atmosphere be capitalized in a sentence?
Capitalizing words only applies in a handful of circumstances:
1) The first word of a sentence.
2) The first word of a sentence in quotes, as with "This example is appropriate."
3) A proper noun (Jody, Empire State Building, Germany).
4) A person's title (Dr. Thugnor, Mr. Frotnip, Sir Henry Aith, or simply Doctor).
5) Compass points when they refer to regions ("I'm coming down from the North").
There are more rules that can be found at the related link below. However, to answer this question, "atmosphere" is not capitalized if it refers to air, but if you were referring to the name of a band, then you would capitalize it:
"The atmosphere was thick with dust."
"I bought the latest album from Atmosphere."
"I read Atmospheres Of Planets the other day."
I would say that sound's contrast is audio's dynamic which means how well different audio levels are heard. Some displays and graphics cards have option named "contrast" which means how well the difference between colours is seen.
An effective writer or speaker will adjust his language to his audience?
Yes, adjusting language to the audience involves considering factors like their level of understanding, cultural background, and interests. This helps ensure that the message is received clearly and effectively by the intended audience. It shows respect for the audience's perspective and enhances communication.
The classifications and feelings that words evoke are called their?
connotations. Connotations refer to the emotional or cultural associations that words carry beyond their literal meaning. These associations can influence how we perceive and interpret language.
What is the relevance cohesion to discourse analysis?
To understand the meaning of a sentence, you need to have a context; based on that we get connectivity, and this way cohesion is created to the text.
Cohesion: The order of statements relates one another by making sense.How does the informative/expository discourse is different from other types of discourse?
by their intended audience
The shade of someones skin However, the above relates to colour in one small context - a person's ethnicity. In general, it is difficult to describe colour except in terms of other colours. E.g. pink is a mixture of red and white, cyan is between green and blue, orange is between yellow and red etc. Scientifically, you can relate a colour to the wavelength of light it represents.
What is the history of nonverbal information?
Nonverbal communication has been a part of human interaction since ancient times. Prehistoric humans likely used gestures, facial expressions, and body language to convey messages. Over time, nonverbal communication evolved to include cultural variations in gestures, postures, and expressions, becoming an essential aspect of how we express emotions, convey attitudes, and communicate with others.
I assume you are referring to the Cornell System for note-taking. In this system, it does not seem to matter whether you are listening to a professor and taking notes, or whether you are reading something and taking notes. This system gives you tips for taking your notes effectively and making sure you have the key concepts.
It divides the page into a cue column (to help jog your memory and recall key facts-- this is NOT used while taking notes, but rather, it is used later, when you review your notes); a brief summary at the bottom of the page; and then the rest of the page is the note-taking area. I enclose a link to an example of how you use this method to take notes.
Explain the relation between text and discourse?
"Text" is written material. We discuss the text when we study a novel, drama, or short story. You might even call a letter to someone a text.
"Discourse" can mean spoken conversation or a written discussion of a single topic.
What part of the essay can be summative or evaluative?
The conclusion of an essay is typically where summative or evaluative statements can be made. This is where you can provide an overall assessment of the topic discussed in the essay and summarize the key points made throughout.
Give a sentence with the word lamb?
The shepherd led his flock of sheep, including the adorable lamb, back to the barn for the night.
Okay, you're clearly just looking to avoid doing homework. If you can't even separate the parts of this assignment, you really need this answer:
Drop out of school and get a job. Preferably a physical trade. You'll be much happier, you'll ultimately learn more, and you won't waste our tax dollars.
Unless you're in a private school, in which case you're just wasting your parents' money, so by all means stay in school until they throw you out and send you to a military academy.
Who are some well-known female theorists?
Some well-known female theorists include Judith Butler in gender studies, bell hooks in feminist theory, and Donna Haraway in science and technology studies. These theorists have made significant contributions to their respective fields and have influenced academic discussions on various social and cultural issues.
