Deforestation and Habitat Loss

Yes, cutting down trees does affect the weather, because trees provide the world with oxygen and the rain-forest is known for its vast quantities of trees, so with less oxygen and more carbon dioxide the world gets hotter and hotter (not a good thing!). Giving is humans unbearably hot situations to live in!

The damming of the Colorado River in the Southwestern U.S. made agriculture possible in the desert. we all have study island why not help each other out and put all the answers on here i hate when there is not a answer... study island can smd (; (kinkkkaaayyy face) love k

people are obviously doing it because they can't satisfy their greedy needs. they need to make five-star buildings, hotels, multi-storyrd buildings, etc. they need to invest money and become rich. that's why people are still clearing forests even though deforestation has many harmful effects

If you were to destroy all the rainforests, it will definitely affect the lives of all living creatures including humans. There will be much lesser trees and plants for photosynthesis which releases oxygen. There will be lesser animals too. This would mean less food chain supply for humans and less oxygen for breathing. There is also the effect to the world's ozone layer.

Burning trees not only creates more carbon dioxide because of the smoke released from the burning, but also because trees help remove carbon dioxide from the atmosphere. They take in CO2 and release oxygen. The less trees there are, the more CO2 in our atmosphere.

Deforestation effects the air because trees take in co2 and if cut down then too much co2 :(

its ruining their habitats,; that's what id say. deforestation is when people cut down many trees in the forest. it destroys the trees many birds, monkeys, bugs, and many more animals may live in. wildlife conservationalists are trying to stop deforestation. :)

52,560,000 million trees get cut down a year

The Trees Buffer most of the noise in one area and reduces it in the other. When you cut a tree down, it increases noise in the other area due to no tree buffering the noise.

If an average family recycled all of their paper, this would save 3 trees worth of paper every 6 months.

Each person in the UK uses 15 trees worth of paper every year

Every year we need a forest the size of Wales to provide all the paper we use in Britain.

people cut down trees where they need them to build new buildings

Tourists erode areas they travel to in many different ways such as by walking along paths they are wearing away the path a tiny bit, this process is called abrasian. Pollution occurs when tourists litter areas that they travel to or if they drive a car to get to their tourist destination they are polluting the air with car fumes or if they travel by boat they are polluting the lakes or seas with oil and other toxic chemicals. Tourists can also disrupt habitats that animals live in by disturbing them or ruining their habitat.

Nobody knows :)

Mining operations in forest areas have also contributed to the destruction of forests.Mining activities cause soil erosion,while mine wastes and tailings pollute bodies of water.

About 1 and a half acres per second i think.

Limit the number of animals grazing on the land, achieved either through market conditions (i.e. waiting for the land to be overgrazed and degraded and let the ranchers solve the problem on their own), or perhaps through government subsidies (rewards for limiting) to limit the number of animals on the land.

The most common cause of deforestation is human removal of trees for lumber and/or to change the use of the land to farming. This was common in the early settlement of the US. In Brazil, and other rain forest areas, this change is less than ideal since the soil is not suitable for successful agriculture.

It is bad because if you are cutting down trees then there won't be any oxygen meaning that people could die and also animals need shelter from the trees so if they are cut down then the animals will die and some animals are only adapted to living in a tree area so animals and other species could get extinct.

There isn't any one particular reason to conserve natural resources. Rather, it is a variety of interest groups with loosely aligned goals of conservation.

Romantic interest: Writers like Emerson, Thoreau, and Muir connected with a sublime, or spiritual side of nature. God's true glory emerged in the interconnectedness and majesty of the natural world. Here, a sense of morality compelled people to protect "special" places.

Wise Use: The roots of the Conservation movement, proper, stem from the desire to use resources (such as timber or minerals) wisely in order to preserve them. Out of this school of thought arose the modern idea of sustainability.

Hunting: A major proponent of early conservation movements came from wealthy people who wanted to preserve hunting grounds. The tradition continues today as groups like Ducks Unlimited preserve wetlands. The stimulus here is an individualistic one: *I* want to preserve habitat so *I* can go hunting on it.

Socialism: Bob Marshall was a proponent of the Wilderness Act, but unlike the hunters, his motivation was socialism. He saw natural places as a place that belonged to ALL people, not just the wealthy elite who could buy large tracts of land or go to hunting preserves.

Playgrounds: Parks are preserved and managed at every level of government, each with its own agenda and focus. State parks are often focused on recreation, such as fishing, camping, biking, etc., while National Parks are often more focused on resource protection as a priority (though visitor experience is in the NPS mandate). Photographers, painters, hikers, climbers, campers, and others enjoy these areas. Hunters enjoy National Parks, but since hunting is not permitted in them, they often express to me some level of disappointment that they can't kill the most magnificent buck in the park.

Tree-Huggers and Animal Rights Activists: Some people have overpowering empathy for the life of an animal or a tree, and wish to preserve them out of selflessness. However, the problem with fundamentalism is that nature is a dynamic environment that is constantly changing; the life of any one tree is rather inconsequential. However, protecting the habitat of threatened species is critical to maintaining the biodiversity and natural balance of the world.

While there are differences and conflicts between these groups, they all have a similar goal of conservation. The bigger question is how best to go about conserving land. Perhaps this is why there are so many federal agencies that manage conservation-oriented lands: The U.S. Forest Service, the Bureau of Land Management, the National Park Service, and the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service to name a few. Each of these agencies has a different mandate. Plus, there are state, county, and city conservation groups, as well as non-profit groups committed to conservation buying and advocacy.

Deforestation the process of destroying a forest.

It is one of the two main causes of global warming.

The term is used today to refer to human beings and their replacement by agriculture.

It deals with farmers and loggers clearing land for agriculture.

Deforestation has contributed to the loss of a vast percentage of forests.

It has resulted in the reduction of Indigenous forests to four-fifths of their pre-agricultural area.

Currently, Indigenous forests now cover a mere 21% of the Earth's land surface.

paper

The wildlife is displaced. They will need to find another home that is suitable to their former habitat. Some wildlife will not survive.

no it is not because it tastes like green beens