0
Discrimination
Discrimination is the ability to discern differences between objects. The word is frequently used to denote prejudice against a race, gender, ethnicity, national origin, or social grouping. Currently, there are laws to protect people against discrimination.
2,240 Questions
What measurements tools do sociologists use to calculate prejudice?
Some sociologists use what is called the Likert Scale after asking a series of open-ended questions There is a test format that Harvard uses to test people's prejudice: Implicit Association Test (IAT) Here is some information that I have taken directly from the Harvard's education website about this kind of testing: Background Information Psychologists understand that people may not say what's on their minds either because they are unwilling or because they are unable to do so. For example, if asked "How much do you smoke?" a smoker who smokes 4 packs a day may purposely report smoking only 2 packs a day because they are embarrassed to admit the correct number. Or, the smoker may simply not answer the question, regarding it as a private matter. (These are examples of being unwilling to report a known answer.) But it is also possible that a smoker who smokes 4 packs a day may report smoking only 2 packs because they honestly believe they only smoke about 2 packs a day. (Unknowingly giving an incorrect answer is sometimes called self-deception; this illustrates being unable to give the desired answer). The unwilling-unable distinction is like the difference between purposely hiding something from others and unconsciously hiding something from yourself. The Implicit Association Test makes it possible to penetrate both of these types of hiding. The IAT measures implicit attitudes and beliefs that people are either unwilling or unable to report. Origins and Measurement with the IAT The IAT was originally developed as a device for exploring the unconscious roots of thinking and feeling. This web site has been constructed for a different purpose -- to offer the IAT to interested individuals as a tool to gain greater awareness about their own unconscious preferences and beliefs. Many years ago, Fyodor Dostoyevsky wrote: "Every man has reminiscences which he would not tell to everyone but only his friends. He has other matters in his mind which he would not reveal even to his friends, but only to himself, and that in secret. But there are other things which a man is afraid to tell even to himself, and every decent man has a number of such things stored away in his mind." These lines from Dostoyevsky capture two concepts that the IAT helps us examine. First, we might not always be willing to share our private attitudes with others. Second, we may not be aware of some of our own attitudes. Your results on the IAT may include both components of control and awareness. Understanding and Interpreting IAT Results Although the IAT was developed for research use, it has clear potential for application outside the laboratory. Our goal, in developing website demonstrations of the IAT, is to make this technique available for educational purposes (including self-education). The IAT may be especially interesting if you find that it reveals an automatic association that you could not control. For example, you may believe that women and men should be equally associated with "science" - yet, your automatic associations may show that you (like many others) associate male (more than female) with science. How might you use experiences with these various tests to think about the implications of unconscious thoughts and feelings? We can tell you about the types of questions we considered after taking the age IAT: "What does it mean that we show an automatic association between old and unpleasant? What is the source of such knowledge? Should we be disturbed by the fact that we possess such associations? If we are (and indeed we are!), what might we do about it?" We urge caution in using the IAT to reach conclusions about yourself or others. You might wonder, for example, if this test can be used to make decisions about yourself (e.g., what should I buy, where should I go to school, etc.) If you are female, and you show a greater association between male and science (as the majority of men and women do), should you decide to avoid a scientific career? Our opinion is: Most definitely not! This test result might instead prompt you to take note of the broad reach of gender stereotypes and to ask what it means to be setting out towards a scientific career in a world in which so many people automatically associate science with male (including perhaps yourself). Can (or should) people use this test to make decisions about others? Can one, for example, use this test to measure somebody else's automatic racial preference, and use it to decide that they should or should not serve on a jury? We assert that the IAT should not be used in any such way. Especially at this early stage of the IAT's development, it is much preferable to use it mainly to develop awareness of one's own and others' automatic preferences and stereotypes. Using the IAT as the basis for making significant decisions about self or others could lead to undesired and unjustified consequences. We hope you have been able to take something of value from the experience of taking one or more of these tests. Looking to the future: We shall periodically revise the IATs that you can sample at this site. We shall also continue to update the information that the site provides on developments in psychological understanding of the unconscious or automatic roots of thought and feeling. Ethical Considerations You are likely already aware that the IAT has potential to reveal troubling aspects of 'human nurture.' It therefore poses significant possibilities for misuse. If you are considering use of the IAT in research, this source of concern will of course be taken into account in developing your research plans, in accordance with safeguards present in the institutional setting of your research. Although the IAT was developed for research use, it has clear potential for application outside the research laboratory. The following possible misuses might arise when operating outside the laboratory (and therefore operating beyond the scope of safeguards present at research institutions). First, people may use the IAT to make decisions about themselves: what should I buy, where should I go to school, etc. These seem, at least on the surface, to be acceptable (I may use any method I like, including looking at tea leaves, to decide that I want to work at Firm X, Y or Z rather than at Firm A, B or C). Second, people may use it to make decisions about others: for example, one use might be to ensure that people showing a certain degree of automatic racial preference cannot participate in decision-making in racially sensitive situations. Third, people may use it to investigate others' likes and dislikes, causing them harm in the process. Project Implicit, along with the investigators who have been involved in developing the IAT, urge careful consideration of costs associated with these possible misuses in contemplating any applications of the IAT. All this information can be found on Harvard's website: https://implicit.harvard.edu/implicit/research/
It can be scary or different to deal with people of different races, there are many bad stereotypes out there that cause us to behave in a way that could be taken as racist behaviour. Try to be as open minded as possible, and don't judge people as "bad" just because they are different. That doesn't mean that you shouldn't still use common sense, there are still bad people out there of all races, and you should use common sense to keep youself safe. All people deserve your respect, until they show reason otherwise, but all people should have to earn your trust, trust should never be given too freely.
Yes, racism exists. It is a system of discrimination and prejudice based on perceived racial differences that impacts individuals and communities in various aspects of life. Addressing racism requires active efforts and initiatives to promote equality and challenge discriminatory beliefs and practices.
What measures the threshold of speech reception and speech discrimination?
The Speech Reception Threshold (SRT) measures the lowest level at which speech can be understood 50% of the time. Speech discrimination is measured by the Word Recognition Score (WRS), which assesses the ability to correctly repeat or identify spoken words.
Is racism still alive in modern US?
This measure is quite accurate and conclusive in revealing the presence of any possible bias that can be associated or linked to visual stimuli (it probably can't be used to ascertain biases that do not have visual representations).
Less than 10 years ago, the IAT definitely demonstrated strong racial biases present within the subject populations.
I do not know how that data has matured and you would be best off obtaining the results yourself.
Opinion:Yes, people find a way to hate people who are different from themselves. Many of the less intelligent of the country have attitudes about other races. Some of the truly hate blacks, but they they hate Jews as well. There are whites who find a way to diminish Blacks, Jews, Hispanics, Orientals or anyone who looks or acts different. There are Blacks who diminish Whites and Jews; even Jessie Jackson, who seeks equality for Blacks, is guilty of racist rhetoric. On one occasion he claimed that Judaism is a "dirty" religion.Prison brings out the true feelings of many people. Black, Hispanic and White Supremacist gangs are constantly fighting.
Opinion:Yes, racism exists in modern USA, and, in my opinion, usually the most racist are those that are always complaining about someone else being racist; perfect example is Jessie Jackson. Answer:Racism is a very specific form of discrimination, predicated on the existence of easily identifiable ethnic groups or outward differences. The fact is that every single person on this planet, every person who has and will ever live is racist to some degree. It is hard-wired into human behavior, into all animal behavor for that matter.Think about it this way: from the earliest memories of humans, we have been identifying those around us and with whom we come into contact who are different. It is difficult, nearly impossible not to. It is a survival instinct. It is something we share intimately with the rest of the animal kingdom. To do otherwise is to invite destruction. We, all of us, live our entire lives inside our own skin. It is the only reality we know. Everything we see, hear, smell, touch, and taste is filtered through our own senses and experiences, and is defined by our ability with and awareness of that filtering.
Try this: the next time you find yourself in a public place, find a place to sit where you will be comfortable. It matters little if you can be easily or not so easily observed by the others--in fact it might actually work better if you can be observed by others; it might jump start the experiment. Now, sit comfortably, close your eyes, and just use your other senses to perceive the people around you. Don't ask questions, don't make assumptions, just experience them. Listen to what they say, smell them, feel their presence as they pass (and no this is not some mystical, mumbo jumbo exercise--just do it).
What do you perceive? You might smell perfume or cologne, maybe even BO. You will certainly hear snippets of conversations about personal lives and experiences being shared.
Now. Think about what you heard and smelled and felt with regard to yourself. Did any of it seem alien? The obvious answer will be yes. Did any of them talk to each other about you and what they thought you might be doing? If so, your experiment may have become more interesting.
What does this prove? Well, we are all different, as similar as we can be, we are all very different. You, like every other person who has ever lived, have done the racist/discriminatory thing...you have observed and identified the differences, the strangers in your midst. Where it becomes a problem, like every other form of human information processing and resultant behavior is what you do with it, what you choose to do with it. If you use the information you gathered to isolate or ostracize anyone, you are a reactionary racist. No one can make judgment on why you do what you do, but everyone can make judgment on what action you take.
Accept the fact that you (the person reading this now) and everyone you know and don't know is a racist. But, never accept the negative choices anyone makes as a result of that perspective.
In the event you choose not to do the Racism Experiment, just read what previous contributors have written. See any finger pointing?
Segregation is enforced separation of races.
It also means to separate things. A classroom can be segregate as to age, abilities, or sex. During meiosis the chromosomes also under go a segregation process.
Experts on racism include scholars specializing in critical race theory, sociologists studying race relations, psychologists researching biases and discrimination, and activists advocating for racial equality and social justice. These experts often have a deep understanding of systemic racism, its historical context, and its impact on marginalized groups.
What are the solutions of religious discrimination?
Some solutions to religious discrimination include promoting education and awareness about different religions, implementing anti-discrimination laws and policies, fostering interfaith dialogue and understanding, and encouraging diversity and inclusivity in society. It is essential to address prejudice, stereotypes, and biases to create a more tolerant and accepting environment for all religious beliefs.
What are the effects of religious discrimination?
Religious discrimination can lead to negative impacts such as exclusion, harassment, and even violence against individuals based on their religious beliefs. This can result in feelings of alienation, decreased self-esteem, and impede one's ability to fully participate in society. Additionally, religious discrimination can perpetuate stereotypes and prejudice, fostering a climate of intolerance.
How have christians fought prejudice and discrimination?
Christians have fought prejudice and discrimination through promoting messages of love, acceptance, and inclusivity based on teachings of Jesus. They have also advocated for social justice, worked to change laws and policies that perpetuate discrimination, and actively engaged in dialogue and community outreach to promote understanding and reconciliation. Additionally, many Christian organizations have provided services and support to marginalized communities to combat prejudice and discrimination.
Did the Buddhists accuse Ngo Dinh Diem of religious discrimination?
Yes, Buddhists accused Ngo Dinh Diem of religious discrimination due to his policies that favored Catholics in South Vietnam. This led to protests and unrest, eventually contributing to his downfall.
How can we stop discrimination by religious?
To stop discrimination based on religion, education and awareness are key. Promoting understanding and tolerance of different religious beliefs can help combat prejudice and discrimination. Additionally, enforcing laws that protect religious freedom and punish discriminatory behavior can deter such actions.
Anti-Sunnism refers to prejudice or hostility towards Sunni Muslims, who make up the majority of the Muslim population worldwide. It can manifest in discrimination, violence, or marginalization based solely on one's Sunni identity or beliefs. Such attitudes can arise for a variety of reasons, including sectarian tensions, political rivalries, or ideological differences.
What are the causes of religious discrimination?
Religious discrimination can be caused by factors such as prejudice, ignorance, fear of the unknown, stereotypes, and cultural differences. It can also stem from deep-seated beliefs or biases that lead to discriminatory practices against individuals or groups based on their religious beliefs or practices.
How does religious discrimination start?
Religious discrimination can start due to prejudice, stereotypes, or biases that individuals or groups hold against a particular religion or its followers. It can also be fueled by ignorance, fear, or misinformation about certain religious beliefs or practices. Additionally, historical conflicts or tensions between different religious groups can perpetuate discriminatory attitudes and behaviors.
it's because calling stories in the bible myth can e insulting to someone of that religion, dependng on ow strongly theyfeel towards thei religin. , personaly, don't care i it's called a myth or not but others may think the exact opposite and it's just easier to say it' politically incorrect.
How can a person learn what is politically correct statements?
You learn part of this by staying informed and being around different people. But there are also some simple hard and fast rules you can use too.
1. Slurs are never appropriate, even when discussing politics or conversing with people you consider hateful or bigoted.
2. A transsexual woman is not a "tranny," "shemale," nor "he-she," and when you use pronouns, simply use the ones that correspond to how the person is trying to present and their inner identity.
3. The word "oriental" should only be used in reference to food or objects, never people. Use Asian to refer to people unless you know their exact nationality. You may own an oriental rug or enjoy an oriental meal, but you have Asian neighbors.
4. Try to use medical terminology, gender identities, ethnicities, and sexual orientations as adjectives rather than nouns. Someone would be a "transgender person," not "a transgender."
5. Use "who" to refer to people, and "that" to refer to objects and concepts. It is easy to use "that" when you really mean to use "who."
Example: "This belongs to Jody who is in my math class."
6. Avoid language that implies that someone has a fault. While "hearing impaired" might sound better, it implies there is something wrong with the other person. Also, the term "impaired" is also used to denote substance abuse, so it is not a flattering term. The term deaf is much easier to say and implies nothing other than the fact that someone cannot hear.
7. Calling someone a "pervert" or calling a behavior "perverted" will likely offend others. But if you must speak from that angle, "sexually-motivated" may be a better word choice. That speaks to the motivation without judging the behavior nor the people who practice it.
8. If in doubt, use the terminology that the other person is using. If a transsexual person uses the term transsexual, then they might not like it if you interchange the term transgender.
What can you do to help stop religious discrimination?
from :G.David Shanth Raj
I think all of should take a note of the following
Indian life is interdependent and people are born into groups, castes,religions communities so We should look at other religion with a positive attitude and
we should understand and respect different cultures and religions
Governments should not support to the persons with certain belief or organisations with religious orientation by issuing supportive GO's like Endowments III of 747 and 746, to avoid religious discrimination
Inhuman act should not associate in the name of spiritual act
People should not break the social harmony for political gain
Is it racist to call someone a pine cone?
No, referring to someone as a pine cone is not inherently racist. However, context and intent play a significant role in determining whether the use of this term is appropriate or offensive. It is important to be mindful of how our words can impact others.
What other word would you use instead of mulatto?
The politically correct term is "biracial" or "of mixed race."
No, Russian is not a race. It is a nationality or an ethnicity, referring to people from Russia or of Russian descent. Race refers to a classification based on physical characteristics, while nationality or ethnicity refers to cultural or geographical identities.
Do all acts of discrimination and segregation lead to eliminationism?
Not all acts of discrimination and segregation lead to eliminationism, which is the belief or advocacy for eliminating an entire group of people. However, discrimination and segregation can create environments that foster hatred and dehumanization, ultimately increasing the risk of eliminationist ideologies taking hold. It is important to address discrimination and segregation to prevent such extreme outcomes.
Practices that promote equality and inclusion in a school setting help create a culture where diversity is valued and everyone is treated fairly and respectfully. This can help foster understanding, empathy, and a sense of belonging among students and staff, which in turn reduces the likelihood of discrimination and promotes a more positive and inclusive environment for all.
How did Jane elliott teach her class about prejuduce and discrimination?
Jane Elliott, an American teacher, conducted the "Blue Eyes/Brown Eyes" experiment where she divided her students based on eye color to demonstrate discrimination. She created an environment where one group was treated unfairly to simulate real-world prejudices and educate her students on the impact of discrimination. This exercise allowed students to experience discrimination firsthand and to reflect on the harmful effects of prejudice.
How Does Inclusion Reduce Discrimination?
By including or being included within a group or structure you are making no distinction in a favouring of or against a person or thing based on the group, class, or catergory rather than on individual merit.
