Political Theory

unity of gov't and people

ability to mobilize in a hurry

ability to sacrifice for common good

They are capitalist

command economy

union government.

Yes it is. The progressive party is just a more popular way of saying communism.

The Constitution protects the right of the people to freely exercise any religion they choose. It also prohibits Congress from establishing an official religion, the way King Henry VIII did when he created the Anglican church. One of the reasons many people emigrated from England was that the government persecuted members of religions other than Anglican and it forced or intimidated many to become Anglican against their will.

The nature of the state varies according to which author is cited. Generally, philosophers and political theorists roughly agree it is a set of coercive institutions that hold a monopoly of power in a given region and enforce its rule.

Because we need other humans for communication

legitamacy (apex approved)

Karl Marx Wrote on communism

Communism is a threat to the parasite ruling classes under capitalism, as it will mean a world without rulers or armies or poverty. It will make the world far more stable than capitalism, where the profit motive and short-term gains are behind global heating.

Such people would be described as socialists, or in the more extreme case, communists.

The law and the constitution are not necessarily superior to ethics, however, they are more clearly defined, and they are enforced by the government. There are certainly some cases in which a particular individual has a better understanding of ethics than the police, judges, or other officials with whom he or she may be dealing. There are also lots of cases in which individuals have less understanding or less concern for ethics than government officials do. But in either case, governments have considerable power with which to enforce the law.

The essence of politics is to empower the welfare of every individuals.

It usually called the federal government and individual agencies are mostly called the United States __________. ( Department of .., Court of ... , Treasury, etc,)

It is centered in Washington, DC.

1. Peace and Security in the country.
2. A functioning impartial media which informs the citizens of things happening both within the region and globally.
3. A system of engaging the people's wills into action.
4. A willing population.
5. An at least 80% literate nation, Democracy is useless with illiterate population who doesn't know whom to choose.

yes he is

A democracy may be better thought of as a one party system of social development where intelligence and wealth clash with social characteristics in culture for a poor intellectual scholar a democracy brings policy to bear stability. Nature is what it should be a tree has no less or more than you see so we don't see it as nationality if its eucalyptus in America it gets both names for style and character if well to do that's offered too the sense of equitable policy relates to no advantage given, none will be expected to be endeavored.

We hold these truths to be close to humanity but without imagi9nation our society is afraid to take the responsibility to police and embrace a stable democracy.

#1 Open communication directory assistance to department and level of authority permanent record of information exchanged, including resolution or pending issue.

#2 If a person has a Social Security number they are a citizen. If they have no right to vote they can't be taxed that SS# is the only reason there should be why they could not vote besides a mental disability or lack of competency. Knowledge and access to internet resources to review and post your choice should be respected no matter whom or what you are, personally, professionally or as far as your criminal record is concerned. In a nation of laws everyone is suspect but without an open unsettled conviction there would be no loss of right to vote unless the government feared there were so many people with records that it made them look bad for over legislating condemning us with too many statutory restrictions. The cost of liberty should only be education and that can't be arranged if we need crowbar city. Private industry "living in luxury" having their own penitentiaries.

#3 I think anyone charged with the duty of controlling any aspect of government should be held accountable for any actions taken whether on their own initiative or under orders when there is reason to believe something is wrong they should not proceed due to the experience of that person.

#4 Government may be occupied by a regime that disrespects the public will as if it were possessed with a mind of its own collective personality as republics have often done at local, state, and federal levels disrespecting the constitution is impossible once the government constitutes their intent in a bill or any common manner of notice that is an authorization… if there is no rejection (public outcry). It's on us!

This point is difficult for Americans as their government was installed and ordained upon them as far as its mainframe I don't believe it has been allowed to be altered in 221 years. The people involved with national and international issues used the democratic process in Washington and even that may be historically reported as hands showing or simply proposed yeas' and nay's in all fairness.

Direct Democracy would require every voting members to be briefed and an opportunity to debate an overwhelming river of issues so only the most valuable financial, commercial, international, interstate, maritime, national and special interest issues are addressed no doubt in trust. Generally small potatoes in this age would be under 10 million dollars. That could even be going overseas to improve diplomacy with a rebel faction ~ opposing an enemy of our nation. But there should never be less than 3 heads involved in expediting that commitment. Our founding fathers convey that prophesy regarding judgment credibility. Check George Washington's Will and see 1799 an item of intelligent introspection into his mentality a man/master of great advantage!

#5 Being "alive" mental health: drugs, religion, military, monetary, civil or any addicting or persisting power can lead to submissive mental response and behavior changes that alter the quality of life. Without knowledge even communication skills fail and happiness can change to sadness a serious burden for social review and our growing united we stand concern.

Budgets are not public concern if there is no fault of the public and they have no power to cure, to pound them with notice of over due bills is a form of harassment... in a stable democracy this could not evolve, it would be policed out in its primordial stage by the family oriented nature of government by the governed! Public funding for budget reports (radio announcements) would be better spent on analysis of infrastructure corruption where injustice is implied by thriving economy and no doubt oppression of public reports of waste and abuse. But this is not a democracy it may be an aid used in a constitutional republic to insure intelligent choices are made respecting congressional representatives from the populations' perspectives, and 100 senators older wisdom. The more experienced members. The more heads the more need to reiterate:

Open communication directory assistance to department and level of authority permanent record of information exchanged including resolution or pending issue.

A stable democracy is a well policed sociopolitical investment in liberty rewards that type of governed by the governed interactive system evolves no lies and fewer detentions. Because it takes time to commit crimes of social imperfection they are identified as mistakes before they become embarrassing and lead to the need for war to cover the godfathers score.

Without war there would hardly be no need for federal taxation of income without incorporation of city municipalities there would be no mystery in human liability or shuffling of responsible parties. There could be repairs to our justice system that would require competition in legal matters where courts have occupied our governments as monopolies calling their agents honorable… Friends Romans and countrymen ~ lend me your ear Julius Cesar was called an Honorable man much the same as a land pirate detention of political or wealthy people fetched Rome great ransoms how much has government changed? Now they order bail and call you innocent to get you to pay rent to the tyrant we pray to Gods and they rant. The 13th amendment ratified as of 1812 regarding Titles of Nobilities may invite superior wisdom and a respectable stable democracy to boot some day if we never let it be.

We could learn about integrity, princes and pals moral churches without walls or cathedrals. Experience that fathers know best if they can survive and know their history leads our clan

Destiny

May grow

to know liberty

Adam Smith, a Scottish economist, provided the philosophy for capitalism. His most well-known work is The Wealth of Nations, published in 1776.

A basic problem in non-democratic societies is that dictatorial rulers can kill or imprison anyone, for any reason. Hence, the foundation of democracy is thought to be the right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.

Karl marx

Indeed, Karl Heinrich Marx is often called "the father of communism" as he was the one who wrote the first document enounciating the principles of the Communist doctrine and the purpose of the already existing Communist movements.

He published The Communist Manifesto in 1848, having written it together with another Communist theoretician, Friedrich Engels. The ideology that he inspired was called Marxism but 20th century Communism had very little to do with Marxism in practice.

The united Kingdom is a Parliamentary system,a system of government where in the ministers of the executive branch are drawn from the legislature, and are accountable to that body, such that the executive and legislative branches are intertwined. In such a system, the head of government is both de facto chief executive and chief legislator.

An ambivalent question... From a moral point of view fighting for anything is wrong, but from a political point of view i guess it is right to fight for your nation. This really depends on your own belief, i doubt that there is some universal truth to such a question.