0
UFOs
This category are on questions on Unidentified Flying Objects (UFOs). These can include mysterious planes in history or traditional flying saucers and their sightings in history.
1,051 Questions
Their primary weakness at this point is that they don't appear to actually exist! If aliens ever do show up in real life, their weaknesses will depend on their biology and technology, which cannot be predicted in advance.
Nobody no's I am affraid because nobody can be positive that aliens exist so (That I know of) Nobody can answer your question correctly HOWEVER if I use my imagination ... I would guess that its weakness is guns OR homosapians (Humans :] ) We may scare them so much. ALTHOUGH it is only a guess ... Sorry can't answer this question correctly :(
There are no aliens known to exist, just a bunch of anecdotes, and no matter how high you stack anecdotes, they never become evidence. We hope there is other life out there, and we consider it likely. But someone has to be the first form of intelligent life in the universe, and there is no evidence that it isn't us. Whoever it was would look up at the vast universe and think it was so large it must full of life. And they'd be wrong.
For a while people thought they'd found fossil life in a Mars meteor. But since then it has been pretty well established that the "fossils" were just tiny lumps of mineral, too small to have ever held a working supply of anything resembling DNA.
if you mean the extraterrestrial type(also means aliens), it is because the universe is just so huge that earth just can't be the only place where life has arisen. but the vastness of space also means that it is ridiculous that UFOs, etc, are visiting earth. they are probably sitting on their own planet, asking themselves the same questions, far, far away.
You could ask the same question about humans. why do we exist? What is our purpose? (if it's to get drunk and yell at each other, we passed with flying colors.)
There is no scientific reason to assume there are aliens. I'd like there to be, at least I think I do. But someone somewhere has to be the first form of intelligent life in the universe, and there is no evidence that we aren't it.
Have any UFOs ever actually been seen on earth?
A UFO is any unidentified flying object. If you saw a strange looking aircraft in the air and could not tell what it was, it would be a UFO. In the context of your question, though, I assume you mean vehicles used by other life forms from elsewhere in the universe.
There have been many, many reports of UFO sightings, many of which were investigated and easily identified as everything from balloons to strange birds or aircrafts.
There have also been many reported sightings of UFOs presumably used as vehicles used for travelling by other life forms in the universe. Most of these were and still are unidentified and those that may be actual sightings of space aliens have been kept as confidential information by various governments to prevent public fear and panic.
Was Gen Colin Powell briefed on UFOs?
He was briefed about G.W. Bush's UFO experience. On others, I'm not sure.
Do Aliens already run the earth?
Obviously the answer is "of course not." If they don't, then clearly that's the correct answer. If they do, they don't want you to know it, so the only answer they'll let stand is "no."
There is no reason to think aliens even exist, let alone come here in flying saucers. People see a blob of light in the sky that is really an aircraft or balloon, something like that, but in their mind they pretend they are watching an alien craft. The reason they glow? The objects that aren't reflecting light, don't get noticed and reported as flying saucers!
That's a really good question. From everything I have ever learned about UFOs they can hover completely silent and without lights. We use lights to see and/or be seen. I doubt alien crafts rely on external lights to see where they are going, their navigation equipment would be far more advanced than that. So the only other logical reason would be to be seen. We can only assume they want us to know of their presence. We can only guess at the reason for this.
well i see your doing the ksc workbook thingy too =)
There have been some mention or leaks about United Nations alien UFO peace talks. Apparently, some intelligent beings are making some racket on earth about wanting to know the truth. There are some who are causing the alien UFO flying saucers or intelligent being spacecraft not of earth origin to make headline news in places on earth. The alien intelligence above have now decided to share their knowledge with some of their chosen delegates on earth. Some of their chosen delegates are not as educated as those in charge would like to believe. There are some old beliefs that humankind has taught and programmed all human beings to believe as their superiors and leaders on earth taught them to believe. The belief in all leaders of nations forming a new world order backfired. There are no peace talks going on between the heads of state and the aliens or supreme intelligent beings of the universe. But, would you believe that the Supreme Intelligent beings have an alliance with certain alien hybrid children that have grown up on earth and are here to spread the news of what will be changing on earth in the future. These children of earth who have their sixth senses open and have been open-minded their whole lives are here with a different mind set and knowledge than what is typically taught academically in school therefore the rules of the nations-states do not apply. So, we may have to change much of what we think to be normal on earth and accept that the paranormal may have something of value to offer us as an intelligent species on a flying orb through space that we cannot control any more than we an control the sun, the moon, the wind, and the natural elements. The Genie is out of the bottle, the alien is out of the UFO, the alien hybrid is a female and says, "I ain't gonna go away so deal with it!" There is going to be some changes made on earth and those who will still be alive to share in the rising or ascension process of our Golden Era also known among the American Indian tribes and Shamans as the Sixth Sun may want to take notice. As Jeff Foxworthy and other humorists writers might say, "You may be a redneck if you see a UFO land on your neighbors lawn, and think that he recently invested in a new finagled trash can." I am an alien hybrid. What makes me know so? Experience on earth. Why would anyone care? I have no idea, but apparently being truthful about who you are on earth and sharing your experiences is something that is happening more and more on earth with other alien hybrids that prefer to be called ascension beings
What is the timeline of the crop circles?
From the standpoint of "timeline" there can be many answers. Crop circles have been appearing for centuries, if not millennia. The bishop of Lyon was summoned to the king of France in the year 800, in order to explain the weird patterns that kept appearing in the fields surrounding Lyon. People feared the work of the devil. There is historical record concerning the forming of a ring in grass near Assen in the north of the Netherlands, in August 1590. According to eyewitnesses the ring was formed by dancing, mythical, humanoid beings and it involved a swirling gust of wind. "The circle remained from the day after... till the next winter when the plough cut it out". The earliest known crop circle image is the "Mowing Devil", a woodcut made in Hertfordshire, England in 1678 and can be found at the related link.
In 1686 Robert Plot's National History of Staffordshire was published, in which several pages were dedicated to the crop circle phenomenon, and the oldest photo of a crop circle was taken in 1937. If timeline is referring to when the crop circles appear; the typical season runs from approximately July to August, but circles do appear in other months. Agricultural crops are not the only place circles are found. There are tree circles, meadow circles, sand circles, and ice and snow circles recorded, to name a few. The best website to view crop circles is the Crop Circle Connector, at the related link below.
UFOs are merely unidentified objects that fly or appear to do so.
They may be weather balloons, meteors, satellites or other objects. Their speed is dependant on what they are.
What they are not is alien space craft.
When did people start talking about UFO?
from 1940s people seriously started talking about UFO..during WW2 Small metallic spheres and colorful balls of light repeatedly spotted and occasionally photographed worldwide by bomber crews named foo fighter.....
in 1947 an incident of UFO crash took place in Roswell,New Mexico.....
but if you really want to know the history of ufos then there are many ancient photos or tales concerning UFOs....
hope i provide you some reliable information :)
What crashed in the desert at Roswell New Mexico in 1947?
Depending upon who you trust to give the truth, it was either a weather balloon or a UFO.
How do we know that people aren't aliens?
If they cannot bend their little finger, they are usually an space alien. This has been known since the late 1960's.
I assume you are talking about space aliens, regular aliens are just people from another country!
What are the release dates for UFO Encounter of the Third Kind The Rendlesham UFO Case - 2012?
UFO Encounter of the Third Kind The Rendlesham UFO Case - 2012 was released on:
USA: 24 January 2012
What is meant by the statement the reason that something exists is that nothing is unstable?
The Jocaxian Nothingness [Nada Jocaxiano]
João Carlos Holland de Barcellos
translated by Debora Policastro
The "Jocaxian Nothingness" (JN) is the "Nothingness" that exists. It is a physical system devoid not only of physical elements and physical laws, but also of rules of any kind.
In order to understand and intuit JN as an "existent nothingness", we can mentally build it as follows: we withdraw all the matter, energy and the field they generate from the universe. Then we can withdraw dark energy and dark matter. What is left is something that is not the nonexistent. Let us continue our mental experiment and suppress elements of the universe: now, we withdraw physical laws and spatial dimensions. If we do not forget to withdraw anything, what is left is a JN: an existent nothingness.
JN is different from the Nothingness we generally think of. The commonly believed nothingness, which we might call "Trivial Nothingness" to distinguish it from the JN, is something from which nothing can arise, that is, the "Trivial Nothing" follows a rule: "Nothing can happen". Thus, the "Trivial Nothingness", the nothingness people generally think of when talking about "nothingness", is not the simpler possible nothingness, it has at least one restriction rule.
Jocax did not define the JN as something in which nothing exists. Such definition is dubious and contains some contradictions as: "If in the nothingness nothing exists, then, nothingness itself does not exist". No. First, Jocax defined what it means to exist: "Something exists when its properties are fulfilled within reality". Therefore, JN has been defined as something that:
1- Has no physical elements of any kind (particles, energy, space, etc.)
2- Has no laws (no rules of any kind).
Being so, JN could have physically existed. JN is a construction that differs from the "trivial nothingness" since it does not contain the rule "Nothing can happen". That way, Jocax liberates his JN from semantic paradoxes like: "If it exists, then it does not exist" and claims that this nothingness is SOMETHING that could have existed. That is, JN is the simpler possible physical structure, something like the minimal state of nature. And also the natural candidate for the origin of the universe.
We must not confuse the definition of the NJ with rules to be followed. It is only the declaration of a state. If nature is in the state defined by conditions 1 and 2 above, we say it is a "Jocaxian-Nothingness". The state of a system is something that can change, differently from the rule that must be followed by the system (otherwise it would not be a rule). For example, the state "has no physical elements"; it is a state, not a rule because, occasionally this state may change. If it was a rule it could not change (unless another rule eliminated the first one).
Being free of any elements, JN does not presume the existence of any existing thing but its own and, by the "Occam's Razor", it must be the simpler state possible of nature, therefore with no need for explanations about its origin. JN, of course, does not currently exist, but may have existed in a distant past. That is, JN would be the universe itself - defined as a set of all existing things - in its minimal state. Thus we can also say the Universe (being a JN) has always existed.
JN, as well as everything that can be understood by means of logic, must follow the tautology: "it may or may NOT happen". This tautology - absolute logical truth - as we shall see, has also a semantic value in JN: it allows things to happen (or not).
We cannot say that events in the JN must necessarily occur. Eventually, it is possible that nothing really happens, that is, JN may continue "indefinitely" (time does not exist in a JN) without changing its initial state and with no occurrences. But there is a possibility that random phenomena can derive from this absolute nothingness. This conclusion comes logically from the analysis of a system without premises: as JN, by definition, does not have laws, it can be shaped as a logical system without premises.
We shall interrupt a little in order to open up an explanatory digression. We are dealing with two types of "Jocaxian-Nothingness": the physical object named "JN", which was the universe in its minimal state with the properties described above; and the theory which analyses this object, the JN-Theory. The JN-Theory, the theory about the JN-object (this text), uses logical rules to help us understand the JN-Object. But JN-object itself does not follow logical rules, once there are no laws it must obey. Nevertheless, I do not believe we will let possibilities to JN-object escape if we analyze it according to classic logic. However, we must be aware that this logical analysis (JN-Theory) could maybe limit some potentiality of JN-Object.
Within a system without premises, we cannot conclude that something cannot happen. There are no laws from which we can draw this conclusion. That is, there is no prohibition for anything to happen. If there is no prohibition for anything to happen, then, eventually, something may happen. That is, the tautological logics remain true in a system without premises: "something happens or not". If something occasionally happens, this something must not obey rules and, therefore, would be totally random and unpredictable.
We call the first JN randomizations Schizo-Creations. This schizo-creations, once they come from something without laws, are totally random and, if we could watch them, they would seem completely "schizophrenic". Of course with the first randomizations, JN is no longer the original JN as now it owns something, that is, the JN transforms. Because JN is not limited by any laws, it may eventually also generate laws, to which its elements - now itself - would have to obey.
Let us show how the random generation of laws can produce a logical universe: suppose laws are generated randomly in a sequence. If a new law is generated and does not conflict with the others, all of them remain undamaged in the set of generated laws. However, if a law that conflicts with other laws previously generated appears, it replaces (kills) the previous laws that are inconsistent with it, since it must be obeyed (until a newer law opposes to it). Thus, in a true "natural selection" of laws, only a little set of laws compatible to each other would last. That answers a fundamental philosophical question about our universe: "Why does the universe follow logical rules?"
Thereby, the Jocaxian Nothingness is the natural candidate for the origin of the our cosmo, since it is the simpler possible state nature could present: a state of such simplicity there would not be the need to explain its existence. And, by logical consequence of this state, anything could be (or not) randomized, even our physical laws and elementary particles.
What does the quote 'Being ignorant is not so much a shame as being unwilling to learn' mean?
No. Being ignorant is not ever having the oportunity to learn. Being stupid is having the oportunity to learn, and not learning. There is no shame in ignorance. There is shame in making someone aware of their ignorance and then not helping to educate that person.
What is 'unidentified aerial phenomenon' in Spanish?
"Fenómeno aérospatiale no identificado" is a Spanish equivalent of "unidentified aerial phenomenon."
The Spanish word "fenómeno" is a masculine noun. Its singular definite article is "el" ("the"), and its singular indefinite article "un" ("a, one"). The adjective "aérospatiale" means "aerial." The adverb "no" means "not." The masculine adjective "identificado," from the past participle of the verb "identificar," means "identified."
All together, the pronunciation is "feh-NOH-meh-noh ah-EH-roh-spah-syahl noh ee-thehn-tee-fee-KAH-thoh."
Why do orb like ufo disappear after acertain amount of time looking at them?
possibly going into another dimension
If earths axis were not tilted could any area have both a hot summer and a cold winter?
If earth's axis were perpendicular to the plane of its orbit,
there would be no summer or winter. The climate at any
given latitude would be constant throughout the year.
What do people who claim to have been abducted by aliens say happened to them?
It would probally capture you and do some kind of genetic or sexual experiment to you. Then it would kill you.
It would do a sexual experiment to you and then scar you for life or kill you.
It would do a sexual or horomone experiment on you and test you. Then it might kill you.
Of course, the number of people who are actually known to have been abducted, is zero.
"UFO" does not mean alien spaceship. So far there is no scientific reason to think even one alien spaceship has ever landed on Earth. UFO just means "I saw something in the sky and I personally don't know what it was."
Was Richard Dreyfus turned into an alien at the end of close encounters of the third kind?
No. He is welcomed on to the ship by the aliens for the trip into space, as he is the only person who was invited to take the voyage into space that made it to the rendezvous point.
How many UFO sighting have occurred in Spokane Washington?
Of the dozens of UFO sightings over Washington State, here are the most recent according to NUFORC: Feb 4, 2012, Dec 31, 2011, Dec 23, 2012 (3x), Nov 15, 2011, Aug 28, 2011, Aug 17, 2011, July 29, 2011, July 22, 2011, July 3, 2011, April 8, 2011, Dec 15, 2010, Nov 18, 2010.
Below I have listed a site for more info.
