0
United Nations
Founded in 1945 after the second world war, the United Nations is the police of the world. Their goals include international security, social progress, equality in human rights, and world peace.
1,740 Questions
What is 5 member of the original un?
The original five members of the United Nations Security Council, established in 1945, are the United States, the Soviet Union (now represented by Russia), China, France, and the United Kingdom. These nations were granted permanent membership and have the power to veto substantive resolutions. Their status reflects their significant roles in World War II and their influence in international affairs.
Who is the United Nations main spokesperson?
The main spokesperson for the United Nations is the Secretary-General's spokesperson. As of my last knowledge update in October 2023, the spokesperson is Stéphane Dujarric, who has held the position since 2014. He represents the Secretary-General and communicates the UN's positions and responses to various issues and events globally.
Why person from neutral nation are appointed as the secretary general of un?
The appointment of a person from a neutral nation as the Secretary-General of the United Nations is often seen as a way to promote impartiality and credibility in the role. Neutral nations are generally perceived as less likely to be influenced by the political agendas of powerful member states, allowing them to mediate conflicts and foster dialogue more effectively. This neutrality can enhance the Secretary-General's ability to represent the interests of the entire international community and maintain a balanced perspective on global issues. Moreover, it can help build trust among diverse member states, facilitating cooperation and collaboration within the UN framework.
Are Ukraine protesters right to protest?
Yes, Ukraine protesters are exercising their right to free expression and assembly, which are fundamental democratic principles. Protests often arise from grievances related to government policies, corruption, or social issues, and they play a crucial role in advocating for change. In Ukraine's context, many protests have aimed to address significant political and economic challenges, reflecting the people's desire for reform and accountability. Thus, their protests are a legitimate means of voicing concerns and seeking a better future.
In which branch of the united nations does every member nation have an equal vote?
Every member nation of the United Nations has an equal vote in the United Nations General Assembly. In this branch, each country, regardless of size or power, has one vote, and decisions are made based on majority voting, although certain decisions may require a two-thirds majority.
Where is telephone country code 888?
Country code +888 (dialed as 00 888 from many places) is used for major international disaster relief operations, coordinated by the United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (UN OCHA). These numbers are temporary, and may be reused in a future relief effort.
(The plus sign means "insert your international access prefix here." From a GSM mobile phone, you can enter the number in full international format, starting with the plus sign. The most common prefix is 00, but North America (USA, Canada, etc.) uses 011, Japan uses 010, Australia uses 0011, and many other countries use different prefixes.)
What does Ban Ki-moon mean when he uses the term Aryan perfection in his speech?
Ban Ki-moon's use of the term "Aryan perfection" likely refers to the historical concept of Aryan racial superiority, which was propagated by the Nazis during World War II. This ideology promoted the idea that individuals of Aryan descent were superior to others based on their perceived physical and genetic traits. By using this term, Ban Ki-moon may be highlighting the dangers of such discriminatory beliefs and advocating for inclusivity and equality.
What is an example of an acrostic for united nation?
An acrostic for "United Nations" could be:
U - Unity N - Negotiation I - International cooperation T - Treaty enforcement E - Equality D - Diplomacy
Each letter represents a key aspect or value associated with the United Nations.
List professional societies and activities in civic public or international affairs?
professional societies and activities in civic public or international affairs
Did the UN vote for Israel as a nation?
The question as posed is rather convoluted. I want to say "YES" to the "essence" of the question, i.e. the UN did take a vote integral to Israel becoming a country, but I have to say "NO" since the UN did not actually vote Israel into existence.
The UN voted (affirmatively) on the legitimacy of the Jews of Palestine declaring independence as a state distinct from the more numerous Arabs of Palestine. This vote legitimized the Israeli Declaration of Independence, but did not cause it.
Most people incorrectly believe when the UN passed UNGA Resolution 181 (II) on November 29, 1947, that the UN "created" a Jewish State (Israel) and an Arab State (Palestine) on the map. This is not the case. What the UN Resolution does provide for is the permission for the different ethno-religious groups in Mandatory Palestine to declare a state. In the case of most mandates, the understanding was that the mandate would eventually become independent as one new state, like Iraq or Syria had. The case of Palestine was therefore unique and needed the permission to deviate from the traditional path of independence. Because of there being two states, provisional borders had to be provided, which is why a map was used, but those borders would only come into play if both sides decided to remain at peace.
The Jews acted on the permission granted to them by UN Resolution 181 by declaring independence on May 14, 1948 (nearly six months after the Resolution was passed) and therefore creating the State of Israel.
Why was the framework convention on climate change created by the united nations-?
The Framework Convention on Climate Change was created by the United Nations so there would be a large number of countries dedicated to the reduction of greenhouse gases. It went into effect on March 21, 1994.
Has the IPCC been wrong before?
Unfortunately the IPCC's record is far from good when it comes to getting things right.
The most notable case was the so-called Himalaya-Gate affair, when the organisation released an alarmist report in 2007, claiming that the Himalyan glacier will have melted by 2035. As it transpired the report was without any scientific basis and was based on a report an IPCC employee ("expert reviewer" Murari Lal) had read in the New Scientist magazine. The New Scientist article itself was drawn up from a short telephone call with an obscure Indian scientist called Syed Hasnain, who it transpired had absolutely no scientific evidence to support his claim.
The report (printed in 1999) had gone unnoticed until 2005, when without the necessary scrutiny, it was used by the WWF as a campigning tool to prove that glaciers were melting. It was then picked up without any scrutiny or peer review by Lal and the IPCC as they prepared their 2007 report.
Another faux-pas of the IPCC was Amazon-Gate when the IPCC claimed that up to 40% of the rain forests in the Amazon were at risk from global warming and would likely be replaced by "tropical savannas" if temperatures continued to rise.
The scientific-looking report, on which this claim was based, was a non-peer reviewed article for the WWF, by an Australian policy analyst and a freelance journalist for the Guardian newspaper (not even experts let alone scientists!).
The IPCC was forced to withdraw it's 2007 prediction that sea levels would rise by 18-59 cm over the course of this century due to "two technical errors" in it's calculations.
What scandals has the IPCC been part of?
The IPCC has also been involved in a number of scandals including:
Climate-Gate - e-mails obtained from the Climate Research Unit at the University of East Anglia suggested that facts inconvenient to the global warming case were being deliberately hidden/obscured.
Himalaya-Gate - Alarmist report by the IPCC that the Himalyan glacier will have melted by 2035. As it transpired the report was without any scientific basis.
Amazon-Gate - The IPCC claimed that up to 40% of the rain forests in the Amazon were at risk from global warming and would likely be replaced by "tropical savannas" if temperatures continued to rise.
The scientific-looking report, on which this claim was based, was a non-peer reviewed article for the WWF, by an Australian policy analyst and a freelance journalist for the Guardian newspaper (not even experts let alone scientists!).
But the biggest scandal to date is the IPCC's claim, made in 1995, that it had found "a "discernible human influence" on the earth's changing climate. The claim was inserted by the report's lead author, Ben Santer of the Lawrence Livermore government laboratory, after the IPCC's consulting scientists had agreed a draft that specifically said no such "human fingerprint" had been found.
Due to this deliberate reversal of the report's findings, Santer also altered the trajectory of every IPCC document since. He argued that the alteration that it was justified based on two of his own studies, which "cherry-picked" the earth's temperature record from 1963-1987, deliberately ignoring temperatures that didn't confirm the Greenhouse theory. Thus the "discernible human influence" as claimed by the IPCC remains without scientific support to this day.
How do imperial nations rule other countries?
The Roman emperors tolerated the religions and customs of the conquered peoples. They allowed them to continue to worship their religions, follow their customs and use their customary laws at the local level. They also let the local ruling classes run most of the local affairs. The role of the provincial governors of the provinces (conquered territories) was restricted to defence and maintenance of the legions stationed in the provinces, tax collection, public works and the arbitration of disputes the locals could not resolve by themselves. This policy had two advantages: it reduced the administrative load of the provincial governors and it facilitated the integration of the locals into the ideology and the economy of the empire. A less tolerant policy would have led to too many rebellions and would have threatened the stability of the empire.
In 225 BC the emperor Caracalla extended full Roman citizenship to all the freeborn in the Roman Empire. Prior to this, the provincials, the people outside Italy who had been conquered or were under Roman influence, enjoyed the rights of jus gentium (the law of nations). Nation in the Latin was the word for ethnicity and just gentium was a sort of natural law which was regarded as "innate in every human being." The rights it conferred were considered to be held by all persons. They were based on the notion that the concept of justice sprung from the natural reason of the human mind rather than ethnicity and that they applied regardless of citizenship. Through this, the provincials enjoyed the protection of Roman civil law in their dealings with Roman citizens. Cases between Romans and non-Romans were adjudicated by the praetor peregrino, the chief justice for foreigners, who was supposed base his rulings on fairness and on Roman civil law.
Being part of the empire also provided economic benefits and, sometimes, security. The empire developed thriving trading networks and the Romans encouraged the peoples in the provinces to increase the production of manufactures agricultural goods for trade. The wealthy and middling class benefitted from this. The exploited poor did not. The Roman legions stationed in the provinces helped with maintaining order. In the frontier areas they also provided protection from raids from across the border. The troops were also customers for local traders.
What is the difference between the United Kingdom and the United Nations?
The United Kingdom is a country made up of four nations (England, Scotland, Wales, and Northern Ireland) located in Europe. The United Nations is an international organization composed of 193 member states with the goal of promoting peace, security, and cooperation among countries worldwide.
In the context of the United Nations what is an observer state?
An observer state is a state that is not a full voting member of the United Nations General Assembly, but it is sometimes a full sovereign state, or part way to being one, has some form of international recognition and it is allowed to participate in UN debate.
Examples may include the Palestinian Authority or Vatican City.
How close have been the predictions of the InterGovernmental Panel on Climate Change - IPCC?
The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) is an organization set up by the World Meteorological Organization (WMO) and the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) in 1988. Its aims are to assess the impacts of human induced climate change, its impacts and possible adaptation and mitigation.
The IPCC, which is made up of many climate related scientists who perform their work on a voluntary base, does not conduct any research itself. It makes periodical assessments based on all the available mostly peer-reviewed scientific studies, papers and research published to date by climate related scientists (climatologists, biologists, paleo-climatologists, oceanographers, physicists, etc.) world-wide.
Their latest assessment from 2007 (the so called Fourth Assessment) was written by 620 authors and editors from 40 countries. Its next assessment is due in 2014.
To date, the IPCC's predictions have been pretty accurate, perhaps even too conservative some argue. For example, IPCC estimates from their first assessment report that the global temperature would increase by 0.15 °C and 0.3 °C per decade has proven to be true as over the last 10 years the global temperature increased 0.2 °C.
In its latest assessment the IPCC also predicted an increase in heat-waves, heavy rainfall, and increased flood risks, all of which have increased over the past few years.
How does the world bank help developing countries?
The World Bank helps developing countries by providing financial assistance in the form of loans and grants to support projects aimed at reducing poverty, promoting economic development, and improving infrastructure. Additionally, the World Bank offers technical expertise, policy advice, and capacity-building support to help countries implement sustainable development policies and programs.
Are there any regulations that are recognized globally?
Yes, there are certain regulations that are globally recognized, such as the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS), the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) standards, the Basel Convention on the Control of Transboundary Movements of Hazardous Wastes, and the International Maritime Organization (IMO) regulations for shipping.
The united nations has been most successful in what?
The United Nations has been most successful in promoting international cooperation and peacekeeping efforts among member states. It has also played a significant role in providing humanitarian aid and support to countries in need. Additionally, the UN has been instrumental in setting global standards and goals for sustainable development.
Why is the United Nations successful?
The United Nations is successful because it provides a platform for countries to address global issues through diplomacy, cooperation, and dialogue. Its structure allows for member states to work together on complex challenges such as peacekeeping, human rights, and sustainable development. Additionally, the UN has a broad mandate and a strong commitment to promoting international peace and security.
What do people talk about at the United Nations?
They talk about major international conflicts like wars and nuclear disarmament, they discuss global poverty and swine flu and climate change and things like that. They discuss major global issues and things that affect a lot of countries.
Why are all terrorists Muslims?
Muslim terrorists are more likely to announce that they are doing it in the name of Islam, thus bringing attention to their religion - so their acts of terrorism tend to get lumped together as if they were one monolithic organization rather than many disparate organizations. Make no mistake - much terrorism is occurring in the name of Islam, but that is hardly the only source of terrorism. Groups as disparate as Central American drug organizations, African warlords, European leftist organizations, and Japanese religious cults have been involved in terrorist attacks. With that said, a survey of reported terrorist incidents over the last 20 years shows a disproportionate number of incidents have been carried out by individuals who claim to be doing it in the name of Islam making it seem like "all" of the terrorist attacks are by Muslims.
Answer 1
It is not true that all world terrorists are Muslims. It is the media propaganda to fulfill political and religious world Agenda. When the terrorist is Christian or Jewish or Hindu, or any religion rather than Islam, he/she is named by his/her the nationality and not by the religion. If the terrorist is Muslim he/she is named by the religion Islam and not by the nationality. Consequently, they give the impression that terorists are only Muslims.
It is the opposite. Islam is against terrorism and against terrifying innocent people. Any Muslim who does terrorist acts against civilians is not reckoned Muslim and he/she is against Islam religion.
See, for more information, the related questions listed below.
Answer 2
It is a misconception and piosonous propaganda against the Muslims. Terrorism is not associated with any religion. Terrorists are found because there is INJUSTICE around us. There is lack of tolerance. We have divided ourselves on the basis of caste, color, creed, geographical bounds etc. Terrorists are the product of re-action of crulty, suppression, maltreatment, insult, and disgrace done to their nation, relatives or to them. They want revenge. Had there been the rule of Justice, there would have been no terrorists. When we suppress a nation, tribe or people, occupy their lands and destroy their houses and belongings, may be they have no alternative but to avenge themselves on the oppressors and sometimes on even innocent people. History shows Freedom Fighters termed as 'Terrorist' by the oppressors/invaders but heroes by their own nation. The Americans who fought against the British to win their freedom were called terrorists. The Irish people fighting against UK are still called terrorists. The Negroes were once called terrorists by the white people who occupied their lands and kept them in slavery for many decades. So, it is mostly from which angle you see things and by which yardstick you measure others. No religious group can claim to be 'clean' and 'just' in this regard.
