Contract Law

Ethics and legality are two different things. If it is not forbidden by law or the Ba Association's Canon of Ethics they can speak to whomever they wish.

Simply put- A unilateral contract can be modified or changed by one party and a bi-lateral must be agred upon and accepted by both contractual parties involved.

Breach of contract is a civil case. It is between two private parties, typically the government is not involved. The courts provide a place for the dispute to be worked out peacably.

contract will specify the delivery of tons of produce per day, which will fluctuate according to weather conditions or other variables. The custom harvester also contracts with the grower to produce the crop.

yes, to attempt something and to have intent to deceive is enough.

You must remember that unless and until that car is paid off, IT'S NOT YOURS - YOU DON'T OWN IT! You have entered into a contract that allows you to use the car and he allows you to use it BUT, only as long as you make regular payments on it (sort of like "renting" it, but not quite the same). If you are behind in the payments - and you know that he is looking for the car in order to re-possess it - and you are intentionally hiding the car from him - then, yes, under THOSE circumstances he probably could convince law enforcement that you had appropriated (a nice word that means 'stolen') his property converted it to your own use. Suggestion: Contact the seller and come to some kind of agreement about the car - you COULD be the big loser in this one.

false

You can cancel the contract in 3 days, provided you have not taken delivery of the vehicle. Once the RV leaves the lot, it's yours. Timing is everything. The phrase "there is no cooling off period" is in effect only after the vehicle has left the lot. They WILL presure you (i.e. lie to you) to move forward. stick to you guns, do not take delivery. and if need be, send a registered letter before the 3 days is up.

An offer is a specific proposal to enter into an agreement with another.

An offer is vital to the formation of an enforceable contract.

An offer, and the acceptance of the offer, creates the contract.

Privity of contract means actually being a part of the agreement. You cannot put obligations on someone that is not a party to the agreement.

Contract System. And 'feed' is a typo on the crossword puzzle page.

The title is in your name, so you hold all the rights.

Two important rules govern revocation: an offer can be revoked any time before it is accepted, and a revocation becomes effective when it it received by or communicated to the offeree.

it depends on the contract that you have with your original agent. If you are on sole agency, then yes. if you are on a joint agency contract and if they have not introduced the buyer and they are on a winner takes all basis, then no

Verbal agreements are enforceable. There are some contracts that have to be in writing depending on the time frames and whether real property is involved.

Perhaps, depending on context, "final investment decision".

It is when a company set out how much they will put aside for contractors when working out expenses for a job.

An 'interested' witness is one who has some kind of material stake in the outcome of the case and may not necessarily be an un-biased witness.

Discharge of contract is a document saying you have met all your obligations under an agreement. This is common with a car title when the finance company sends you a discharge saying you have paid for it all.

d. ignorance of the law d. ignorance of the law

Yes

The third party adopts the rights and obligations of one of the parties under the old contract

limitation of liablity

A. Will cause an Antideficiency Act (ADA) violaton because the contract price exceeds the amount of OMA available at the XVIII Airborne Corps.

B. Will cause an ADA violation unless the contracting office shows that she neither knew no should have known that the XVIII Airborne Corps had only $275,000 in the OMA account.

C. Will cause a ADA violation if the XVIII Airborne Corps's major command (FORSCOM) lacks sufficient OMA funds in its formal subdivision to cover the overobliation.

D. Will not cause a ADA violation if Congress enacts either a continuing resolution authority (CRA) or a permanent appropriation before the vendor seeks payment for the supplies.

E. Will not cause an ADA violation because the OMA account at the XVIII Airborne Corps was a target/allowance and an obligation in excess of a target/allowance can never result in an ADA violation.