Dictatorship

The Dictator is a very funny and hilarious movie comin out in 2012. It's so funny that it will make laugh so hard out loud in the theatres. This is actually the funniest movie ever to come out in 2012. You will never forget this movie in a long time.

I'm not sure if the answer is yes or no but its one of those how about you look it up.

Clash of the 'tators

Belgium

It really depends on the dictators in question and who is being referred to specifically with "the world". If the question is specifically asking about how Britain and France appeased the dictators of Germany and Italy prior to World War II, it was by ceding Germany control of the Czech territory called the Sudetenland in the hopes that this would stop Germany's ambitions in 1938. As history shows, this attempt to create peace through concessions to a malevolent dictator was not successful and, in fact, galvanized his push for further conquest.

Yes. Usually just the dictator and his cronies.

Because it is not easy for them to control. People could use it to communicate and undermine the power of a dictatorship. It is also a way for the users to make contact with people in other countries and exchange information. Dictators can control their own media and put out their own propaganda and control how much can be seen from other countries, but it is harder to do that with the internet.

Belarus is often known as "the last European dictatorship".

the life of Macbeth

The president's authority comes from the people.

Fear of Germany and the U.S.S.R.

have no authority over individuals, exercise unlimited government, place limits on the freedom fo government

New England

Neither. Spain is a Constitutional Monarchy. However, it acts as a de facto republic in that the King is really only the Head of State and stays out of most political affairs.

50-100 dollars.

Yes and No.

There is no proper Leninst Government in the Middle East in comparison to the governments of China and Vietnam which are true Leninst governments. A Leninist government is a government where the Single Party effectively rules and all people in the Party are interchangeable because they all represent the Will of the Party and not their own personal beliefs. The leaders of the Party all meet in a Chamber where they vote on policy and then perform it.

In the Middle East, you do have Single Party states such as Ba'athist Syria or formerly Ba'athist Iraq. However, the people of these parties are not interchangeable and may have different ideas about governance. Additionally, the leader of the country (the Assads in Syria and Saddam Hussein in Iraq) has his own unique perspective which the rest of the Party follows rather than having to come to consensus with other party members.

they both have a leader and both are a type of government.

none of them try to be like them, though some claim they are him.

Monarchy as a basis of government can be a form of dictatorship and theoretically has a King or Emperor as the executive and a set of nobles or nobility with privileges that the King may, or may not be able to take away. The nobility may have influence on a monarch, but ultimately the monarch dictates legislative functions. The typical Western archetype of dictatorship now prevalent in mass media is when executive, legislative and even judicial function is represented in one person who is the boss, eg King Abdullah, Saddam or Gaddafi? This narrow conception of dictatorship is useful in demarcating in the public mind celebrated monarchical dictatorships of recent Western history from other forms of dictatorship outside the West. Thus the same people who celebrate the fall of a third world dictator celebrate a visit by the English Queen, unable to draw parallels between the two; between the other's dictatorship of today, and their own dictatorships of recent history. A monarchy has succession of power based on birth right but a dictatorship does not necessarily have the same.

Not necessarily with fear. However, due to the nature that the assumption of power took, it is highly probable that the dictator will require to maintain an element of fear in his/her subordinates to dissuade any attempts to overthrow them.

Fear is therefore highly likely, although not inevitable.

Authoritarian :) - novanet

monarchy

"Dictator" is a description of Castro's power and inability to be replaced, but "President" is his actual title as the ruler of the country. According to the Cuban Law, Castro is the President of Cuba, so he is addressed as such.

It entirely depends on the structure of the dictatorship.

There are numerous dictatorships with relative freedom of religion. Ancient and Medieval China, for example, were absolute dictatorships, but permitted numerous different faiths (Shenism, Daoism, Mahayana Buddhism, Theravada Buddhism, Islam, Christianity, and Judaism) to freely worship within their borders. There are other dictatorships which either (1) have a single acceptable religion (such as Catholic Spain of the 1500s), (2) allow some religions but ban others (such as the Rashidun Caliphate of the 600s which accepted Islam, Judaism, and Christianity, but banned Hubalism, Rahmanism, and other henotheisms), (3) actively repress all religions (such as the Soviet Union).