answersLogoWhite

0

🌎

Ethics and Morality

Ethics is about what we should – and should not - do. It includes identification of basic principles, e.g. the prerogatives of property owners; and the application of those principles to actual situations, e.g. copyright protection of intellectual property over the Internet.

2,801 Questions

Can you provide some examples of absolute ethics in action?

Absolute ethics are moral principles that are considered universally true and applicable in all situations. Examples of absolute ethics in action include the belief that murder is always wrong, the principle of honesty in all interactions, and the idea that all individuals have inherent dignity and worth. These principles guide ethical decision-making and behavior regardless of circumstances or personal beliefs.

Can you provide examples of perfect and imperfect duties in ethics?

Perfect duties in ethics are those that must always be followed, such as the duty not to lie or the duty not to harm others. Imperfect duties are those that are important but not always required, such as the duty to help others in need or the duty to develop one's talents.

Can you provide an example of both right and wrong ethics in a professional setting?

An example of right ethics in a professional setting would be a doctor fully disclosing all relevant information to a patient before a medical procedure. An example of wrong ethics would be a financial advisor misleading a client about potential risks in an investment to make a commission.

Can you provide an example of heteronomous morality in action?

Heteronomous morality is when a person follows rules or moral principles set by an external authority, such as parents or society, without questioning or understanding the reasons behind them. An example of this could be a teenager obeying a curfew set by their parents without understanding the importance of safety or respecting their parents' wishes.

Can you provide an example of Kantian ethics in action?

An example of Kantian ethics in action would be a person choosing to tell the truth, even if it may harm them or others, because they believe in the moral duty to always be honest, as Kant's philosophy emphasizes the importance of following universal moral principles.

Are ethics subjective?

The question of whether ethics are subjective is a complex one. Some people believe that ethics are subjective, meaning that what is considered right or wrong can vary from person to person or culture to culture. Others argue that there are objective ethical principles that apply universally. Ultimately, the answer may depend on one's perspective and beliefs.

What are the disadvantages of obedience?

The problem with obedience is that the person or hierarchy that you are obeying may not be giving you the right orders or instructions to obey. You abdicate your own responsibility to make the right decisions, when you are perfectly obedient to another person. The classic example of this was the famous excuse offered by Nazis following WW II, that they were "only following orders". If you are ordered to do something that you know to be wrong, it is better to be disobedient. Of course, it is also true that in many cases it is quite correct to be obedient, since we often are given correct orders which will help us to succeed at whatever it is that we are doing. So as with all things in life, there is a balance. You have to use your judgment to know when it is better to obey, and when it is better to disobey.

What is ingraining ethical process in life and work?

The 'ingraining ethical process in life and work' refers to the development of ethical ideals and habits through living one's life and doing one's work. While not always noticeable, this process does happen in numerous daily ways over the course of time; for example, by cultivating a strong sense of the virtue of rising early in one who has for many years been forced to rise early in order to get to work on time.

Where can one find information on professional ethics?

One can find information on professional ethics on Georgetown University's online library. Georgetown University's libraries are open the the public and has a large collection of books regarding professional ethics.

Why is it important to recognise and value an individual as a person?

Well, honey, recognizing and valuing an individual as a person is important because, surprise, they are a living, breathing human being with thoughts and feelings just like you. It's called basic human decency. Plus, showing respect and appreciation for others can create stronger relationships and foster a more positive and inclusive community. So, basically, don't be a jerk - treat people with the respect they deserve.

What basic knowledge is required to be an ethical hacker?

Basic Knowledge of Networking...

As well as you must have great interest in Ethical Hacking...

You must learn Ethical Hacking from a institute and get a certificate of Ethical Hacking.. Known as Certified Ethical Hacker

Does legalism have festivals?

Legalism doesn't have festivals like Christmas or Halloween if that's what you're asking. Legalism is all about strict adherence to laws and rules, not about throwing a party. So, no, Legalism doesn't have festivals. It's more of a "follow the rules or else" kind of vibe.

What is the Contribution of Roberto del Rosario?

Oh, my friend, Roberto del Rosario was a talented inventor from the Philippines who contributed greatly to the world. He invented the Karaoke Sing-Along System, bringing joy and music to countless people around the globe. His creativity and innovation have left a beautiful mark on the world, inspiring others to follow their own creative passions.

Who said There's something immoral about abandoning your own judgment?

Oh, dude, that quote is from the famous philosopher Noam Chomsky. He's all about questioning authority and thinking for yourself. So, like, if you want to ditch your own judgment, he'd probably give you a virtual high-five... or a disappointed head shake, who knows?

Why is loli so taboo?

Loli (or lolicon) is taboo because it is animated pornography featuring girls between 12 and 16. It is basically another word for animated child pornography. Where loli *usually* does not involve real children, it is not sexual turn on that most people feel should be encouraged, especially when considering that the real act is illegal and a form of abuse. The topic of child pornography in general, fantasy or not, is overall a taboo.

Do good things happen to good people?

Generally people who act and treat others well are treated well by others.
That is not to say that good things happen to them more than people who are less pleasant. Misfortune happens to the good, bad and the indifferent in equal measure. As does good fortune.

What are the attributes of a human act?

Although not all philosophers agree, a human act must be a physically possible movement of the human agent and that agent cannot perform an act of which he or she is unaware.

.

Sources Of Values?

The sources of values are:

1. Family

2. Friends and Peers

3. School

4. Church

5. Community/Society

6. Media

What is participatory ethics?

participatory ethics is an integral part of business ethics these are the action some of which are guided by common interest and some share interest all participatory involved in the business.

participate and cooperative to produce a common goods for the betterment of the society and organisation.

the goods can only be reliased through the participation of all parties.

through participation may be profitable by participating party of the society,but some of parties have to participate have the survival.

What is professional satisfaction?

Professional satisfaction is reflected by how well you are happy with the job you do. If you have made accomplishments in your career you may have professional satisfaction.

What are the causes of immoral behavior in secondary schools in Kenya?

The same things that cause immoral behaviour elsewhere.

Curiosity. Lack of guidance and discipline.

That immorality will differ depending on the society and the ethics held by that group.

Who does the earth belong to?

The earth belongs to the people who live on it.

Wrong answer. The earth doesn't BELONG to anybody. We're just temporary residents of it. We should try to take care of it so that it's around for our descendants, and even despite our best efforts to screw it up, it probably will be.

The earth has been around for almost four BILLION years, whereas mankind has only been here for a million or two - figuratively speaking, a mere blink of an eye. It's been covered, alternately, with volcanoes and with ice, with acid rain and methane gas clouds, and struck by huge meteors which extinguished the lives of virtually every living thing. Despite what you might think, a stray styrofoam cup, or the smoke from a cigarette isn't gonna destroy the earth.

It pains many people to even think it, but as a race, humanity ain't nothing special. That doesn't mean what we should be slobs - just that we need to get over ourselves. In the grand scheme, you and I and everybody else are just temporary collections of junk with opposable thumbs and a few brain cells, that just happened to learn to walk on two feet.

What is ethics concerned with?

Ethics is concerned with defining what is right or wrong, and guiding behavior based on moral principles and values. It involves determining what actions are permissible, permissible, or obligatory in various situations. Ethics helps individuals and societies make decisions that align with their values and principles.

What are the ethical issues of artificial selection?

Many people feel the use of genetic engineering in food and farming is wrong, that it goes against nature or their spiritual beliefs. Others think it's wrong because it allows big companies to gain more control of the food chain.

The fact is that genetic engineering allows scientists to take a gene from one species and insert it into a completely different species with which it could never naturally breed. Thus it is possible vegetarian, halaal, kosher and other rights may be infringed. We should consider whether we should have the right to experiment with the blueprint of life and commercialise living organisms.

  • Consider the series micro-organism-plant-animal-human. Should we draw a line limiting genetic manipulation at some point? If so where, and on what grounds?
  • Which potential benefits, if any (e.g. therapeutic medicines), might be thought to justify animal genetic manipulation, which would not? What criteria might we apply?
  • In what sense does genetic modification by biochemical methods differ ethically from age-old selective breeding practices? Are we exceeding ethical limits even in selective breeding?
  • What constitutes proper and improper human use of animals? Should animals ever be used in research? Do animals have "rights", as we think of "human rights"?
  • Should animal organs, e.g a pig's heart genetically modified to counteract tissue rejection, be transplanted into humans to overcome the large and inevitable shortfall in donor organs?
  • Should we eat foodstuffs which had been genetically manipulated using human genes? Why, or why not? How does this affect religious and other groups with strong dietary laws?
  • Should anyone be able to patent a genetically modified animal or plant? If not, how else could a company protect the results of a huge research programme?
  • Is the profit motive too dominant a driving force in research in biotechnology? What other criteria are important? Are we reducing animals, and nature in general, to the status of just commodities?
  • What other system of funding might you apply?
  • How great are the potential risks involved in releasing genetically modified organisms into the biosphere without knowing all the possible consequences?
  • Is genetic engineering to make a staple crop more resist in marginal conditions (e.g. drought, cold) a potential boon for Third World agriculture, or another danger of increased dependence on rich "developed" countries?
Some Wider Questions about Genetic Engineering
  • How should we handle an emotive issue about which opinions are apt to be polarised at a very fundamental level? How do you assess a "gut reaction" ethically?
  • It is an "expert technology", but how do we make the "experts" accountable to society?
  • How should the public be represented in what goes on?
  • How do we handle issues of information and misinformation, the media and lobbying?
  • How far should commercial secrecy be allowed, and how far should a firm be obliged to publish?
  • What are our motives in genetic engineering? - commercial, humanitarian, curiosity, professional kudos, national interests, to improve mankind, ...?

Are there better medical or biotechnical things to be doing with our research money than genetic engineering?