General and Special Relativity

Charles Law - the expansion (when heated) or contraction (when cooled) of gases. E.g. when you leave a balloon outside in the heat it will pop from the gas inside expanded, but when you put it in a freezer it will shrink as the gas inside contracts.

To change an object's velocity, you can apply a force in the direction you want it to accelerate. This force can be produced by pushing, pulling, or using any other method of applying force to the object. Additionally, altering the mass of the object or the direction of the force can also change its velocity.

The invariant quantities such as angular momentum, linear momentum and possibly energy (although that is generally considered thermodynamics) are all still conserved in special relativity.

What does happen however is that the equations for these invariants do change. For example, linear momentum according to Newton is simply mass times velocity but in Einstein's theory it becomes mass times velocity times a new thing called the gamma factor (which is almost equal to unity at low velocities so Newton did not detect it, but becomes very large close to the speed of light (the gamma factor is infinite at the speed of light)).

Special relativity also predicts the existence of spin which is related to angular momentum, but spin does not exist in Newton's theory.

The object casting the shadow moved, the source of light moved, the object upon which the shadow was cast moved, the shadow was viewed through a prism or a piece of glass that moved, stress or fear influenced the perception of the person seeing the shadow, some translucent or semi-opaque cloud or puff of smoke moved across the field and momentarily highlighted the shadow, or the shadow was never really there in the first place. There may be other possibilities, but they are not obvious to me at the moment.

Generally yes, but it really depends on the specific situation.

-- If the work is done to lift the object, then the object's potential energy is increased.

-- If the work is done to accelerate the object, then the object's kinetic energy is increased.

-- If the work is done to move the object against friction, then the energy supplied

is dissipated, and the object's energy may or may not change, depending on whether

or not it is somewhat heated by the dissipation.

No, grass is not a compound; it is a complex organism made up of various elements like carbon, hydrogen, oxygen, and nitrogen. Grass is a living plant that consists of a multitude of compounds such as cellulose, proteins, chlorophyll, and water.

The process of obtaining pure petrol from crude oil is called refining. During refining, crude oil is processed in a refinery to separate and purify the various components, including petrol, through processes such as distillation and fractional distillation.

Mass and energy curve space and time according to Einstein's theory of general relativity. Einstein's theory rests on the basis that the speed of light is the same for every observer and that inertial and gravitating masses are the same. Ultimately this is thus also the reason why mass and energy curve the structure of spacetime.

Later it was understood that general relativity is (one of) the consequences of a Universe having so-called local Lorentz invariance. The details are a bit technical but basically this is saying that the laws of physics are the same everywhere in space and time.

You might ask, well, why does the Universe have local Lorentz invariance?

In that case, I am afraid, I do not know the answer, perhaps that in the future physics will offer us a deeper insight to the nature of reality.

A hydrophone is the instrument commonly used to measure sound underwater. It works by converting sound waves into electrical signals that can then be analyzed and recorded. It is a vital tool in various fields like oceanography, marine biology, and underwater acoustics.

There is currently no experimental evidence to prove the existence of tachyons, hypothetical particles that travel faster than the speed of light. Theoretical frameworks, such as some interpretations of quantum field theory, suggest their existence, but they still remain purely theoretical and have not been detected.

A person moving in the same frame as the moving mirrors would not be able to observe any change in the time it took the photon to travel between the two mirrors. It would not matter if the direction of travel was parallel or perpindicular to the motion of the photon, and this null effect would continue even if the observer was travelling at 99.9999% of the speed of light.

You are calculating the kinetic energy of the object using the formula KE = 0.5 * m * v^2, where m is the mass and v is the speed of the object. This formula gives you the energy associated with the object's motion.

Einstein's work on the Photoelectric effect, which won him the Nobel prize in 1921 was a bulwark of Quantum Mechanics. Einstein went off in another direction because of his inate suspicion that Quantum Mechanics has severe internal difficulties. Quantum Mechanics and Relativity have not yet been reconciled--but they are moving together slowly. Quantum Gravity seems to be key to the issue and may be resolved by String Theory.

The derivation of the equation needed to answer your question is a bit intense, so I'm going to skip it and just write down the result:

∆tE/√[1 - (3GMi/ri)/c2 - v2/c2] = ∆tM.

∆tE is the elapsed time of an atomic clock on Earth.

∆tM is the elapsed time of an atomic clock on the Moon.

G is the gravitational constant = 6.67428 X 10-11 m3/(kg s2)

c is the speed of light in a vacuum = 299,792,458 m/s

v is the average orbital speed of the Moon = 1022 m/s

Mi and ri are the sums of the masses and radial distances, respectively, of all of the objects with a gravitational influence on the moon. In this answer, I'm going to approximate these two values by only considering the masses and radial distances for the Earth, the Moon, and the Sun. Because of this approximation, the value for ∆tM that I'm going to list below will a bit lower than the actual value.

So, after plugging in all of the numbers into the above equation, with ∆tE = 4 billion years, the value for ∆tM is 4000000059.5 years. So the atomic clocks would be about 59.5 years apart.

Fluorine even combines with argon, krypton, xenon, and radon. Even in dark, cool conditions, fluorine reacts explosively with hydrogen. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fluorine Fluorine even combines with argon, krypton, xenon, and radon. Even in dark, cool conditions, fluorine reacts explosively with hydrogen. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fluorine

simple.. there will be no life.

It will be dark.

While true it would be dark, don't tell the many thousands of organisms hanging around hydrothermal vents at the bottom of the oceans [where there is no light] that they aren't alive.

It has to do with the nature of space and time or more accurately, the nature of spacetime. It turns out that both space and time are relative and how much space and time you experience depends on your frame of reference.

For example, imagine you were to travel in a spaceship at 99% the speed of light to a distant star that was a 100 trillion kilometers away .

Those left at home would see the distance you traveled to be 100 trillion kilometers and would consider the time it took you to be about 10 years.

However, you in the spaceship would only measure the distance to the star to be 14 trillion kilometers instead of 100 trillion kilometers and you would think it only took you 1.4 years to travel there instead of 10 years.

If you traveled even faster at 99.99% the speed of light you would measure the distance to be 1.4 trillion kilometers instead of 14 and you would think it only took you 0.14 years instead of 1.4.

If you traveled even faster at 99.9999% the speed of light you would measure the distance to be 0.14 trillion kilometers instead of 1.4 and you would think it only took you 0.014 years instead of 0.14, and so on.

The closer to the speed of light you travel the shorter the distance becomes for you and the less time it takes you.

As you can see "space and time becomes less and less" for you in the spaceship relative to us here on the earth.

What it comes down to is that different people see space and time differently, depending on the "frame of reference" from which they are looking at things.

Note however that it would be impossible for you to travel at exactly the speed of light because it would theoretically take you an infinite amount of energy to get up to that speed. Light can do it because it has no "rest mass".

For light when it travels from one point to another at the speed of light, from its point of view, it experiences no passage of time and there is no distance between the two points.

This answer could be yes or no, depending on if we are absolutely sure if the universe is flat or a closed (curved) universe, which we are currently not sure of.

If the universe is flat, the answer would be no because the universe would be expanding and traveling faster than the speed of light, so you could never see the back of your head.

The answer would be yes, if the universe was closed, because it can keep going and get back to where it started like we can walk in straight line on earth and end back where we started.

=================================

And don't forget that even if it's closed, you would have to wait several billion years,

until the light from the back of your head made the trip around the universe and

wound up back where you are now.

No matter how 'powerful' your telescope is, it can't reduce the time light needs to

travel from one place to another. More 'power' only allows it to detect dimmer light.

The energy required for a spaceship to travel at 90 percent of the speed of light would be substantial due to the relativistic increase in kinetic energy as speed approaches the speed of light. The energy required can be calculated using Einstein's mass-energy equivalence formula, E=mc^2. The exact amount of energy would depend on the mass of the spaceship and would be calculated as the difference in energy between its rest mass and its kinetic energy at that speed.

A guy/girl driving a car is a good example of this question because when guy/girl is driving his/her body is in rest but also in motion because of the movement of car hope its the answer of the question

No, both light in air and radiation from a microwave oven travel at the speed of light in a vacuum, which is approximately 299,792 kilometers per second. Therefore, they both travel at the same speed.

Dr. Ronald Mallett is a theoretical physicist known for his research on time travel using general relativity. His work focuses on the concept of closed timelike curves to potentially create a time machine. However, at present, there is no experimental evidence or technological application to support the actual existence of time travel.

1. The emergence of new religious movements and sects that challenged traditional Puritan beliefs.
2. Increasing diversity and cultural exchanges due to colonial expansion and immigration.
3. Growing social and economic inequalities that led to discontent and questioning of Puritan values.
4. Intellectual movements, such as the Enlightenment, that promoted rational thinking over strict religious doctrines.
5. Political changes, such as the English Civil War and the Glorious Revolution, that shifted power dynamics and challenged Puritan authority.