Last Supper

maybe never

The evangelist Luke, was not among the Apostles during the Passover meal - aka the Last Supper. He would later travel with Paul and write his Gospel and the Book of Acts.

He pulled away from them about a stone's throw, knelt down, and prayed, "Father, remove this cup from me. But please, not what I want. What do you want?" (Luke 22:41-42)

There is probably little doubt that all of the disciples gave some argument that they would be loyal to Christ no matter the outcome. To say that they fought during the last supper is rather an over statement. I expect there was some concern as to who it was that would betray him for many said "Is it I lord?". I think that they were more troubled than anythng. It probably started when Christ made the under statement.

Quote. Matthew 26:31 reads "Then saith Jesus unto them, All ye shall be offended because of me this night: for it is written, I will smite the shepherd, and the sheep of the flock shall be scattered abroad.

32 But after I am risen again, I will go before you into Galilee.

33 Peter answered and said unto him, Though all men shall be offended because of thee, yet will I never be offended". Unquote.

Respectfully

In 1498, if you mean the one by Leonardo. There are hundreds of others.

The three most important features of Leonardo da Vinci's "The Last Supper" are the depiction of emotional expressions, the use of perspective, and the arrangement of figures. The emotional expressions of the apostles convey their shock and betrayal at Jesus' announcement of impending betrayal. Da Vinci's masterful use of linear perspective creates a sense of depth, drawing the viewer's eye toward the central figure of Jesus. Additionally, the grouping of the apostles into threes enhances the composition and highlights the narrative of the moment.

First, we have to understand that the Jewish Calendar at the time of Christ was different than the Roman Calendar we use today. Like Genesis, a day begins at sunset and ends on the following sunset.

Some scholars have dated the Passover Meal, aka 'The Last Supper' as beginning at sunset Wednesday, April 25, 31 AD. He instituted the annual memorial of taking bread and wine to remember Him and the New Covenant He was establishing - not fully implemented until the Millennial Rule of Christ. He also instituted the custom of washing another's feet to show humility of serving others.

Some Christians groups established the Eucharist custom to picture this event. They do it daily and not annually sometimes using a wafer and do not wash feet.

Jesus

Stairs were a regular architectural feature of multistory buildings in 32 AD.

The apostle called the beloved disciple by Jesus was the disciple John, who was the youngest of all the disciples. And also died last , as ,many were killed. before theoir time John sat with Jesus on the table next to Jesus.

I'm not sure, but I have a very good original copy. The rare expensive copy is the one where there is an empty unprinted white plate. I think that a few people have mixed up Raphael Morghen with Raphael.

This is a very difficult question to answer, since it depends on whether you are asking about the historical meaning or the religious meaning. For many historians, Jesus (who was Jewish) was celebrating the Passover at the last supper, and that meal was a seder, a special ritual dinner in which unleavened bread (matzah) is eaten and the story of the exodus from Egypt is retold. In this interpretation, Jesus would have observed the traditional celebration of the Passover along with his followers and friends.

But for most Christians, the Last Supper was a symbolic meal in which Jesus announced to his apostles that he would become the sacrifice that would save sinful humanity. He was quoted as saying that the unleavened bread represented his body (which would be broken on the cross), and the wine his blood, which would be willingly shed for forgiveness of sins.

The problem is that Jesus left no writings, so we do not know if he truly changed the Passover liturgy; as a Jew, it is doubtful he would have done so, since Jews do not believe in human sacrifice, nor vicarious atonement (a person dying for the sins of another is not part of traditional Jewish thought, as stated in Ezekiel chapter 18 and elsewhere in the Hebrew Bible). But for Christians, the Gospels are regarded as the truth, so there is a strong belief that the Last Supper was a foreshadowing of what Jesus was about to do. And while it may have been based on Jewish practice, Christians believe that Jesus had the authority to change it, since he was the Son of God.

There is no cup with wine in the Catholic Church, wine in the Catholic Church is normally held in a flagon or cruet. This is poured into the Chalice shortly before consecration, at that time it becomes the Blood of Christ, whole and entire, there is no wine left whatsoever, only the appearance.

cabbage

After the disciples received the holy ghost in the upper room, they went all over the world and spread the word of god.

The Bible does not specify the specific house.

However, some traditions suggest that it was the house of the mother of John Mark (the possible author of the second gospel) although there is no specifioc biblical evidence for this.

The feast of Maundy (or Holy) Thursday commemorates the institution of the Eucharist (Holy Communion) at the Last Supper. The word "maundy" comes from the Latin word mandatum (commandment) which is the first word that Jesus spoke to His apostles after He washed their feet (John 13:34):

• "Mandátum novum do vobis dicit Dóminus, ut diligátis ínvicem, sicut diléxi vos."

• "I give you a new commandment: Love one another as I have loved you." The biblical the events of the first Holy Thursday were:

• The eating of the Easter lamb or the paschal meal

• The washing of the disciple's feet

• The institution of the Most Holy Eucharist

. • The first Mass at which Jesus Christ is the eternal high priest

. • The first Communion of the apostles

. • The first conferring of Holy Orders

• The foretelling of Judas' betrayal and Peter's denials

• The farewell discourse and priestly prayer of Jesus

• The agony and capture of Jesus in the Garden of Olives

Matthew and Mark have Jesus announced his betrayal at the Last Supper while they were eating. "Now when the even was come, he sat down with the twelve. And as they did eat, he said, Verily I say unto you, that one of you shall betray me."Luke and John have Jesus announced his betrayer after they have eaten the Last Supper.

Matthew and John have Jesus identify his betrayer. Mark and Luke have Jesus did not identify his betrayer. Matthew have Jesus disclose his betrayer by an implied affirmative answer to Judas'. Judas asked; "Master, is it I?" Jesus said unto him, Thou hast said" John have Jesus disclose his betrayer by giving Judas a sop. "Jesus answered, He it is to whom I shall give a sop, when I have dipped it. And when he had dipped the sop, he gave it to Judas Iscariot." Luke have Satan enter Judas before the Last Supper. John have Satan enter Judas after the Last Supper.

One thing you might be is a Christian.

It really depends on what you mean by "Bible" and "missing." Among the various religious traditions of the world, there are various beliefs about the "Bible" (I assume you mean the Christian Scriptures).

For example, Jews don't believe that any of the New Covenant books are divinely inspired. Muslims go even further, holding that much of the Old Covenant has been corrupted (only to be restored in the Qu'ran). Among Jews there is dispute over which parts of the Old Covenant tradition is divinely inspired as well (e.g., the Dead Sea Scrolls and other Jewish pseudepigrapha, the works of the mystics, &c).

Furthermore, among Christians there is not a universal agreement on the canon of Scripture either. Protestants believe that the deutrocanonical books ("apocrypha") are not part of sacred Scripture, while most Orthodox churches and the Roman Catholic Church believe they are. Yet still, several Orthodox churches hold books to be inspired which are not recognized by the Roman Catholic church. And of course, there have also always been the Christian pseudepigraphal works as well (as exemplified by the [mainly] Gnostic corpus discovered at Nag Hammadi).

All of this does not preclude, of course, the possibility of a single, completely accurate canon (nor even necessarily preclude one from the knowledge of such a canon by purely human means); this is just to say that the words "Bible" and "missing" carry a *huge* amount of baggage that needs to be sorted before the question can be answered properly.

I will assume you mean something along the lines of "are there really sixteen chapters missing from [some major Protestant Bible translation as compared to some other major Protestant Bible translation]?" This is commonly asserted by those who believe that all modern Protestant Bible translations are in some way inferior to the 1611 edition of the King James translation, and is the only context which makes sense to me, given the above considerations.

If that is the intent of the question, the answer is that it is very possibly true (or it could be said the other way, i.e., the one translation "inserts" 16 chapters, rather than the other "missing" them). The reasons for this are complex, and essentially come down to choices the translators had to make when they encountered different ancient manuscripts of the same passage, which had different readings from each other regarding some word or phrase, or where one lacked (or included) some bit that was present (or missing) in the other. These differences are called "variant readings" (or just "variants" for short), and the act of choosing between two or more variants to arrive at a reading is known as "collation."

The science behind this collation process is known as "Textual Criticism" (probably a poor choice of words, since it has nothing to do with "Higher Criticism," which is actually *critical* of the historical truth and accuracy of the Christian traditions). This science is used by everyone trying to reconstruct any ancient text from multiple fragments / editions. That means that the same principles for selecting between variants are used to determine what Plato originally wrote, as are used to determine what the evangelist Mark originally wrote.

So long answer short--some Protestant Bible translations omit (or include, depending on your perspective) certain words, phrases, or even entire sections of text (e.g., the last portion of Mark 16), because the translators of that version believed those textual choices best represented the original text as the authors wrote it. The issue is complicated, and to properly explain it would take a book-length treatment (of which there are several), dealing with issues such as manuscript families, individual manuscript pedigree, common scribal practice and errors, &c. Suffice it to say that no Protestant Bible translation willingly omits any portion of text that another translation includes, unless the translators felt it was not part of the original text as penned by an inspired writer, based on rigorous Textual Critical analysis.

i have the orignal brunozetti last supper painting, and i would like to know the value of it. the date on it is 1836.

I also have an oil painting of Brunozetti's "last supper" that was my great grandmothers. it hung in the living room of my grandmother's home in Italy and then was passed down to my father.

mine is not dated and i am afraid to look on the back as the nails are nailed through the wood backing and i wouldn't want to ruin it. it definitely is an oil painting and it is starting to crackle on the canvas. I cannot find any signs that this has been a copy.

it sure does need a cleaning though and some minor repair.

any information would be greatly appreciated

God's will for Jesus is like it is for us as Christians, timing. Jesus was completely tuned into the Father's will so he didn't want certain things said until the proper time, at and after Pentecost when the disciples would be telling everything about him. We need to be tuned into God's timing as well so we don't get discouraged or get ahead of God's plan for us. If we do, we will not succeed as God wants us to.

Those that were to be drawn by the father to the gospel before his death were to be drawn by their hearing in the spirit not by the testimonies of others. 144000@gmx.us

No, it is not, if you mean the one by Leonardo. There are several hundred others..

Nothing is really known about this artist. He may have been an engraver from the late 18th or early 19th century. The only piece that comes up with his name is a drawing of the Last Supper.