Mohandas Gandhi

Porbsndar is located in Gujarat

Ratna

ang bobo nyo

Noble Nature. Magnanimity

janhagir fardoon

SHOCKED !

Mahatma Gandhi

russia

May be

vincent george

His death and of course his quest of the truth.

i believe yes

It is in1930

No

Martin Luther King, Jr., the Dalai Lama, Lech Wałęsa, Stephen Biko, Aung San Suu Kyi, and Nelson Mandela. (Oh and Barack Obama says he is inspired by Gandhi too.)

diversity based on society

Gala Eluard (or Gala Dali) was Dali's wife, he stole her from his friend. She inspired him by taking care of his business matters. She is probably partially responsible that we know Dali and his work today!

because he was like the father of nation literally, he guided almost every one in india. thats why they call him the great soul. and i think also because every and any human would atleast wanna attack back when someone hits you or harrase you in any way like fight u or curse u etc.... but gandhi never even lifted a finger on the british even when they were torturing gandhi to death.

and yes i am a indian.

just saying.

Anirudha Bapu (Dr. Aniruddha Joshi aka Bapu). See Related links..

hnbdvdsevdehbhs mdkociuenfyryr hiehbdyrbsnkdidhd

The assassin, Nathuram Godse, was a social reformer , and a freedom fighter, erroneously perceived as a Hindu nationalist by the media. He killed Gandhi because , Gandhi in his zeal to look "fair, secular and equal" to the world actually actually cowed down under Islamic Fundamentalist pressure and compromised the interests of 30 million Hindus , that eventually led to their massive genocide. In today's context the parallel to this would be something like this. Islamic Fundamentalists wowing to destroy the West and Israel, carry out 9/11. As a response to that The President instead of ordering airstrikes in Pakistan / Afghanistan actually actually says "sorry" to the terrorists and announces a special state called "Islamabad" in USA specially for Moslems where Sharia Law would be allowed. He appeals to the local Christian population that initially occupied that land to evacuate the place to make "place for our moslem brothers". Some people can't stand it and shoot him down. This is just an imaginary situation. No disrespect for The President. We know out President GWB was anything but that but that would be a perfect comparison to help understand Godse's position.
Refer to the the following lines from Godse's own testimony ( available uncensored in Google Docs) that help expound the situation that led Godse to kill Gandhi :-

" From August 1946 onwards, the private armies of the Muslim League began a massacre of Hindus. The then Viceroy, Lord Wavell, though distressed at what was happening, would not use his powers under the Government of India Act of 1935 to prevent the rape, murder and arson. The Hindu blood began to flow from Bengal to Karachi with little retaliation by the Hindus. The Interim Government formed in September was sabotaged by its Muslim League members right from its inception, but the more they became disloyal and treasonable to the government of which they were a part, the greater was Gandhi's infatuation for them. .............
One of the conditions imposed by Gandhi for his breaking of the fast related to the mosques in Delhi occupied by the Hindu refugees. But when Hindus in Pakistan were subjected to violent attacks he did not so much as utter a single word to protest and censure the Pakistan Government or the Muslims concerned. Gandhi was shrewd enough to know that while undertaking a fast unto death, had he imposed some conditions on the Muslims in Pakistan, here would have been found hardly any Muslims who could have shown some grief if the fast had ended in his death. It was for this reason that he purposely avoided imposing any conditions on the Muslims.
He was fully aware from past experience that Jinnah was not at all perturbed or influenced by his fast and the Muslim League hardly attached any value to the inner voice of Gandhi. Gandhi is being referred to as the Father of the Nation. But if that is so, he has failed in his paternal duty in as much he has acted very treacherously to the nation by his consenting to the partitioning of it. I stoutly maintain that Gandhi has failed in his duty. He has proved to be the Father of Pakistan. His inner-voice, his spiritual power, his doctrine of non-violence of which so much is made of, all crumbled against Jinnah's iron will and proved to be powerless.

"



At the time of Gandhi's death, an Islamic Fundamentalist driven demand to investigate the role of Hindu Organizations in the death of Mr Gandhi was readily conceded by the then ruling party Indian National Congress ( which BTW across its 70+ year ruling span also became notorious for harboring the world largest Swiss Bank accounts and the dubious distinction of the most Corrupt Political Party in the globe ). So called "Hindu Fundamentalist" leaders were thrown in jail, tortured and made to falsely confess relations with Godse . A few months later after all investigations proved these claims baseless , they had to be released.

Mohan Kauns

he was a moderate

popularity of Gandhi among Indians, inside the party. It earned hin International reputation

Ganghi Spread his message of nonviolent resistance with people of different collor in boats.

There are two ideas at work here. First, what is "young?" and second, how do you define a "working marriage?" A young person can be defined by a) "legal age," b) in relation to another person's age, or c) in relation to one's own future. Assuming that you don't mean "legal age," then that leaves us with an age 1) relative to someone else's and 2) relative to one's own future. If you mean relative to someone else, then how "young" you are depends on the other person. Generally, when someone says, "they're too young to be married," that person means in relation to what he or she thinks is appropriate. Taking such advice should be based on your confidence in the source. An advisor such as Dr. Laura would certainly advise you to wait until 24 or 25 so that your own mind will be mature enough (in her opinion). If you mean relative to your own future, then how do you mean that? If you yourself think you are at a "young age," perhaps you have doubts already as to the appropriateness of marriage at this time. If you have some dreams which may be at stake, then you must measure (somehow) what you are giving up vs. what you are getting. As to what a "working marriage" is, there are many views. To a "young" mind, especially a female's young mind, a working marriage is somewhere between bliss and Heaven. This is a worthy goal, but is it attainable? Is it even desirable? Perfection is temporary at best, and those with experience know this as a fact. In that respect, being young means being inexperienced. Experience, however, doesn't always make us mature or wiser. Often, real life leads to disappointment. In this society of instant gratification, disappointment does NOT lead to a greater work ethic; it leads to surrender. In marriage these days, this generally means separation and/or divorce. The old ways of working through problems and accepting what you have are alien to the get-'er-done modern boys and girls. But perhaps you have more down-to-earth goals. Have you considered premarital counseling? This can be as easy as talking to a pastor, minister, rabbi, etc. He (or she) will ask you how you both view Spending Money, Saving Money, Sex, Children, In-Laws, Holidays, and more. There's no way to solve every issue beforehand, but if you have the major ones in agreement, you are more likely to succeed. Plan well. The question is, do young people have the fortitude, wisdom, and faith to make it work? After seeking wise counsel, you should have the answer. Good luck!