Monarchy

King Cophetua is a legendary figure from English folklore, often associated with a story that inspired various artistic works, including poetry and paintings. He is best known as a king who falls in love with a beggar woman, defying social norms and expectations. This tale is famously recounted in the poem "The Beggar's Opera" by John Gay and has been depicted in works by artists like Edward Burne-Jones. The story symbolizes themes of love transcending social class and the transformative power of affection.

What an ODD question!

*edit* What a terrible answer. If you have nothing to say, then say NOTHING.

I have heard this rumor that Henry VIII's sixth wife Catherine Parr had a third smaller and undeveloped breast or nipple, but have yet to see any evidence to support it. (don't always listen to everything your teachers tell you children)

It was also widely rumored in the days of Henry VIII that Anne Boleyn had a sixth (tiny undeveloped)finger as well as three nipples. These were considered common signs of being a witch and we can only guess as whether it was true or not since there were so many lapses in logic with the "reasons" behind beheading Anne.

The monarch orange because they are telling any hungry predator that they are poisonous. When the animal eats the monarch it does not kill the animal it just stuns it. It tells the predator that monarchs are not food and that they are not food and that they should not be messed with.

This is a very interesting question that has been debated at length by historians! Probably many of the reasons why Elizabeth I did never marry were diplomatic as well as being a matter of personal preference. Elizabeth's own advisors were opposed to the prospect of her marrying Robert Dudley, Earl of Leicester (whom historians have speculated was the only man she ever loved) because they believed, probably with some truth, that elevating a statesman to the position of king consort would create factions at court. It was generally a feature of court life in this era that those who were politically closest to the person of the monarch formed groups according to their interests, perhaps with regard to religion (i.e. in Elizabethan times perhaps Catholics vs. Protestants) or foreign policy. The opposed groups would be seeking to bring each other down and influence the Queen against their enemies. Allowing one of her subjects political supremacy to the extent of making him King could easily cause the court party to which he belonged to dominate, and this might create a climate of jealousy and an ethos in which backbiting and intrigue would flourish.

On the other hand, if Elizabeth I had married a foreign Prince, it was feared that he might make England into his satellite state and use her resources to finance his own country's wars, for example Philip II, when he'd married Elizabeth's sister Mary I got her involved in Spain's war against France which was unpopular with the English people at large, resulted in the loss of Calais, which was England's last foothold in France, and left the crown in debt to the tune of £300,000. Any husband of Elizabeth might also try to alter her religious views, which could ruin the climate of comparative religious tolerance that she'd worked hard to create.

So we might conclude that there were many advantages in Elizabeth's not marrying, although of course if she had married Elizabeth may also have produced heirs of her body. This would have been an undoubted political asset, as it would have prevented Mary Queen of Scots from continually asserting her right to be acknowledged as Elizabeth's heir.

because we lick ( like ) it

Queen anne came to the throne in 1702-1714

Charles B. Huggins was born on September 22, 1901.

Mary I was a staunch Catholic, in contrast to both her sister and her her half-brother, and predecessor on the throne, Edward VI.

Mary was almost rabid in her religious fervor, and indeed had more than 280 religious dissenters, primarily Protestants, burned at the stake over the course of her 5-year long reign, in what has become known as the Marian Persecutions.

In contrast, Elizabeth was very much more tolerant, following a personal motto of 'Video et Taceo', I see and hear nothing. While it can be said that she mostly held to the Protestant faith, indeed, she wouldn't have been permitted to take the throne if she had not, she still had some Catholic touches such as the crucifix, and downplayed sermons, a key Protestant belief. Most of all, she favored pragmatism, in religious beliefs.

Mary Barbour died in 1958.

She had 1, King Edward

Yes, he did. He had one legitimate son by his wife. His name was Edward of Middleham, and he died in 1484 at the age of 10. Richard also had two illegitimate children, John and Katherine. The identities of their mothers are not known.

Hugh was chosen by the graet nobles of northern france to be king

Annelies Marie from Denmark

he is a troublemaker

tall

finally - the sea, and the sea won

42

Bloody Disgusting was created in 2002.

I don't think so. The only type of hereditary rulers I can think of are the absolute monarchs of old. People such as the King of England, The Emperor of China. While yes England still has a monarchy, the monarch doesn't have much political power anymore. However in the olden days, if the monarch wanted something done, it was done law or no.

George V what?

There are a great many John Scotts out there. You would have to be more specific. John I. Scott is either unkown publicly ( at least through internet media ). Perhaps give the information you do know about him that would help in our search. Sorry I couldn't be of more assitance

Throne Room

A king protect their country from enemies because that is their duty as a king.