Which of the following helped spread Protestantism throughout Europe?
The invention of the printing press
What rules are there for pentacostal people?
1. Don't kill someone.
2. Don't eat dead animals you find in the road.
3. When someone cuts you off in traffic, see #1.
4. When you run over a raccoon, see #2.
5. be nice.
Why do people speak in tongues in some churches but not in other churches?
Different people experence the power of the Holy Spirit in different ways. This was pointed out by Saint Paul in 1Corinthians 12:27-31, where he mentions various spiritual gifts such as the ability to heal, or to prophesy, or to speak in tongues. These are just different ways in which the Holy Spirit reveals its presence within someone. As Paul suggests, one gift of the spirit is no better or no worse than another gift of the spirit.
However, different churches have different traditions about how people should behave during worship services. In some churches worshippers try to remain quiet so as not to disturb or distract the people around them. But in other churches the worshippers feel less restraint, and urged by the power of the spirit, some of them may begin to speak in tongues.
Before Jesus ascended to Heaven, he told his original followers that they would be baptized with the Holy Spirit. And modern Christians can be baptized in the same way. The gift of tongues is just one of the powers that the spirit may give them.
And just because someone doesn't speak in tongues, that doesn't mean that he or she isn't filled with the spirit. Anyone who believes in Jesus and accepts him as their savior can obtain salvation, regardles of whether the person speaks in tongues.
AnswerPeople get baptised by the Holy Spirit when the Holy Spirit wants when you get baptised so not all Christians can speak in tongues this doesnt mean they wont in the future. Also some people like to speak in tongues in the privacy of their own house so they save it for their house.
Explain how the Catholic Bible differs from the Protestant bible?
The Bibles used by Catholics and Protestants are not the same. The first thing to know is that Catholics have more then the bible to follow. They have a lot of other scriptures to go by as well. Some Catholics don't follow them correctly and other Catholics see that as sin to not follow it (that's the correct way). Like dressing modestly is a big problem right now. people rebel. Catholics and Protestants use the word "apocrypha" differently. There are OT books that are considered apocryphal by all Christian churches, including Catholicism. There are other books, called "Deuterocanonical" by Rome, that are considered part of the canon by Rome, and are considered apocryphal by other Christian churches. These Deuterocanonical books are: Tobit, Judith, First and Second Maccabees, The Book of Wisdom, and Ecclesiasticus (NOT to be confused with Ecclesiastes, which is accepted as canonical by all Christian churches). Protestant churches do not accept the deuterocanonical books as canonical, and you will not find them in their bibles.
Another difference are the texts from which the translations were made.
The Catholic Bible is sourced primarily from the Latin Vulgate and Codex Vaticanus. The early Protestants used the Textus Receptus. This difference is not so pronounced today with many different versions available for Protestants being sourced from additional texts.
Special note on The Jerusalem Bible:
As biblical scholarship opened up in the mid-20th century, Catholics began to pay more attention. The Dominican Biblical School in Jerusalem was called upon by a French publisher (Editions du Cerf) to rise to the occasion and produce a French translation from the best available texts. The result was a single-volume translation of the entire Bible in 1956 known popularly as La Bible de Jerusalem. This French version, of very good quality with full textual critical aparatus of a very scholarly nature, was translated into English. But the English was not simply taken from the original French. Some books were first drafted from the French into English and then compared word for word with the Hebrew, Aramaic and Greek, and other books were drafted into English from the ancient texts first and then compared word for word with the French. The desire was to be as completely faithful to the original texts as possible, while preserving the intent and scholarship of the original French materials.
The General Editor of the English translation effort was Alexander Jones, and those who are not aware of this will be fascinated to learn that among the major contributors to the work was J. R. R. Tolkien of literary fame.
This English version is called The Jerusalem Bible, and it contains the standard books of the Catholic canon. Notes are paraphrased from the first (I believe) English publication; Doubleday, Garden City New York, 1966.
AnswerBible translations developed for Catholic use are complete Bibles. This means that they contain the entire canonical text identified by Pope Damasus and the Synod of Rome (382) and the local Councils of Hippo (393) and Carthage (397), contained in St. Jerome's Latin Vulgate translation (420), and decreed infallibly by the Ecumenical Council of Trent (1570). This canonical text contains the same 27 NT Testament books which Protestant versions contain, but 46 Old Testament books, instead of 39. These 7 books, and parts of 2 others, are called Deuterocanonical by Catholics (2nd canon) and Apocrypha (false writings) by Protestants, who dropped them at the time of the Reformation. The Deuterocanonical texts are Tobias (Tobit), Judith, Baruch, Ecclesiasticus (Sirach), Wisdom, First and Second Maccabees and parts of Esther and Daniel. Some Protestant Bibles include the "Apocrypha" as pious reading.As a side note:
The Bible is the most preserved work of literature in our history. In fact, there are approximately 5,600 original manuscripts still today. When the Catholic church translated into English in 1966, it used as many of the original texts as there were. What is most interesting is that in 1415 AD, Erasus translated to English using 5 copies of a German translation. Then King James used Erasus translation to come up with the KJV of the bible. Ever wonder why there are differences???? These differences are very minor other than the KJV not including the Apocrypha as God had originally inspired. If we all agree that the Bible is inspired by God, then how can we as man decide later that those books we don't agree with are not?
Roman Catholic Answer
It was Protestantism that removed these "deuterocanonical" books from the Bible, many centuries later. And contrary to the myth, the early Church did indeed accept these books as Scripture.
The seven disputed books are: Tobit, Judith, 1 and 2 Maccabees, Wisdom of Solomon, Ecclesiasticus (or Sirach), and Baruch. Catholic Bibles also include an additional six chapters (107 verses) in Esther and three chapters (174 verses) in Daniel.
According to major Protestant scholars and historians, in the first four centuries Church leaders (e.g. St. Justin Martyr, Tertullian, St. Augustine, St. Ambrose, St. Cyprian, St. Irenaeus) generally recognized these seven books as canonical and scriptural, following the Septuagint Greek translation of the Old Testament, following the Council of Rome (382), and general consensus, finalized the New Testament canon while also including the deutercanon, in lists that were identical to that of the Council of Trent (1545-1563).
There's a scholarly consensus that this canon was pretty much accepted from the fourth century to the sixteenth, and indeed, the earliest Greek manuscripts of the Old Testament: the Codes Sinaiticus (fourth century) and Codex Alexandrinus (c. 450) include the (unseparated) deuterocanonical books. The Dead Sea Scrolls found at Qumran did not contain Esther, but did contain Tobit.
According to Douglas and Geisler, Jamnia (first century Jewish council) was not an authoritative council, but simply a gathering of scholars, and similar events occurred afterward. In fact, at Jamnia the canonicity of books such as Ester, Ecclesiastes, and the Song of Solomon was also disputed. Since both Protestants and Catholics accept these books today, this shows that Jamnia did not "settle" anything. The Jews were still arguing about the canonicity of the books mentioned earlier and also Proverbs into the early second century.
And St. Jerome's sometimes critical views on these books are not a clear-cut as Protestants often make them out to be. In his Apology Against Rufinus (402) for example, he wrote:
When I repeat what the Jews say against the story of Susanna and the the Hymn of the Three Children, and the fables of Bel and the Dragon, which are not contained in the Hebrew Bible, the man who makes this a charge against me proves himself to be a fool and a slanderer; for I explained not what I thought but what they commonly say against us (Apology Against Rufinus, book II, 33)
Significantly, St. Jerome included the deuterocanonical books in the Vulgate, his Latin translation of the Bible, (And he defended the inspiration of Judith in a preface to it.) All in all, there is no clear evidence that St. Jerome rejected these seven books, and much to suggest that he accepted them as inspired Scripture, as the Catholic Church does today. But St. Jerome (like any Church father) does not have the final authority in the Church. He's not infallible. The historical evidence, all things considered, strongly supports the Catholic belief that these books are inspired and thus indeed part of Holy Scripture
from The One-Minute Apologist by Dave Armstrong; Manchester, NH: Sophia Institute Press, 2007
The main difference is the books presented in the Bible. Catholic Bibles contains the Deuterocanonical (or "second canon") books. If the Protestant Bible contains these they will refer to them as the Apocrypha.
Do Protestants believe in the trinity?
They know there is a pope, believe in him no. There is only one Holy Father and he is Jesus. Do you think The pope would die for our sins. When jesus walked among the people he did not use a pope mobile. And the protestant's bible have pictures of God not the pope!
What is the most religious city in America?
Saudi Arabia is likely to be the most religious state in terms of the strength of faith amongst it's population followed by other Muslim majority countries like yemen, Pakistan etc.
Can a Protestant receive communion in a Catholic church?
Catholic Answer No. First of all, Methodists do not have the Eucharist, they have a memorial service that they commemorate the Last Supper but they do not believe that it actually is the Body and Blood of Christ. Secondly, any real, active participation in a Protestant service in their church is not permitted to a Catholic as we have the fullness of Christ's revelation and we are supposed to be bringing the truth to them and bring them back to the Church, not showing support for error. But they have been baptised, and thus are Christians, so we must show respect and brotherly love, concern, etc.: NOT support for the errors.
Native snails live between 10-15 years, while African snails live about 7 years.
How many people in the UK go to church?
well it would be hard to answer that. it really depends on what church your talking about, and what the church is about, like Christianity or Islam or Jews. but no one can really say for sure. it is always changing no mater what you were talking about
Who is the angel of protection?
This comes around people who are sick. They bring along the healing balm.
Because people want so much in there life, they cant sit around and take in the fact that if they stop protesting, they will get what they want.
What are the differences between what Catholic and Protestant priests wear?
This is a difficult question to answer because there are over 33,000 denominations of Protestantism so to make a comparison between the Catholic Rite of Marriage with the custom of all 33,000 is a daunting task.
One big difference is that the father of the bride does not "give" her away as she is not his possession, but marries of her own free will.
Catholic: believe it should be conducted in a church
What is the largest Protestant church?
The Eastern Orthodox Church, which is a communion of 25 autocephalous and autonomous churches in communion with the bishop of Constantinople, the Ecumenical Patriarch, claims about 225 million members. This makes it the second-largest Christian communion, after the Catholic Church's 1.1 billion members.
[Some statistics for Pentecostal/Charismatic Christians claim as many as 500 million, but this cannot be considered a single denomination. The largest Pentecostal denomination, the Assemblies of God, has about 57 million members worldwide. By comparison, there are nearly 100 million Charismatic Christians who are members of the Catholic Church. Both are included in the total 500 million.]
When was Evangelical Lutheran Church in America created?
Danske Evangelist Lutheran Kirke was created in 1875.
What common belief does roman Catholics Protestants and Eastern Orthodox followers share?
They are all Christians. Protestants, Catholics, and Orthodox share a belief in the Trinity, Christ's deity, and basic doctrines such as Christ's Virgin birth. This puts the three main branches of Christianity in a separate category than the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints, Jehovah's Witnesses, the United Pentecostal Church, and the Unitarians, who each deny the Trinity and Christ's deity, or else redefine them in radically different ways. Protestantism and Orthodoxy largely agree against Catholicism on the following points: * Both Protestants and Orthodox agree that the Roman Pope is not infallible. Most Protestants no longer see any reason for the Papacy to continue to exist as an institution, while Orthodox are willing to give the Pope a "primacy of honor" due to the historical importance of Rome as a Christian center. But both agree that the Pope has no legitimate authority to manage other Churches. * Neither religion has a defined belief in Purgatory, the supposed in-between state where imperfect souls suffer to atone for their sins. Protestants tend to regard Purgatory as a heresy since they see it as a denial of the sufficiency of Christ's sacrifice. Orthodox tend to see Purgatory as a mere speculation unworthy of the status of dogma. * Orthodoxy does not believe in "original sin," the inherited guilt that humanity has due to Adam and Eve's sin. With the rise of evangelical Protestantism, which generally practices adult baptism and believes in an "age of accountability" when children become moral agents capable of being guilty of sin, the concept of "original sin" no longer plays a significant role in much of Protestantism, although the Reformers did speak of it. * Orthodoxy places a great deal of emphasis on the concept of "theosis," the gradual process where human beings are spiritually transformed into God's likeness, as typified by Christ. "God became man so man could become God" expresses this concept (although one must be careful to note that this does mean that men merge monistically with the deity). In comparison, evangelical Protestants place an increasing amount of emphasis on a concept called Sanctification, the process whereby the Holy Spirit transforms a believer into the image and likeness of Christ. While there are differences in terminology between evangelical Protestants and Orthodox on this issue, the two doctrines are striking in their similarly and provide the occasion for rich discussion between the two groups. Catholicism, on the other hand, places much more emphasis on man being redeemed from a fallen state, with the idea being that redemption restores us to a primeval innocence we lost in the Garden of Eden. Evangelical Protestants speak of both redemption and sanctification, and so seem to bridge the gulf between Catholicism and Orthodoxy on this issue. * The Orthodox use the original version of the Nicene Creed which says that the Holy Spirit proceeds only from the Father. The Roman Catholic Church edited this creed in 1054 A.D. to say that the Spirit also proceeds from the Son. This addition prompted the schism between Rome and Constantinople. Protestants have tended to use the Catholic version of the Creed, if they use the creed at all, and have followed Catholicism's tendency to emphasis the Father and the Son more than the Holy Spirit. In recent decades, however, Protestants have come to emphasize the Holy Spirit more. * The Eastern Orthodox continue to baptize by full immersion, like the fastest-growing Protestant groups. However, they baptize babies, which many Protestant traditions do not do (although some do). * Eastern Orthodoxy and evangelical Protestantism seem to both emphasize Christ's risen, gloried state and His active spiritual presence. By contrast, Catholicism seems to emphasize Christ's death and physical agonies on the cross. The Catholic Mass spends a great deal of time discussing Christ's death and symbolizing it in the Eucharist, while Christ's resurrection and second coming are only referred to in passing. Catholic depictions of Christ usually depict him on the cross, often with a bleeding crown of thorns and distended limbs. Orthodox icons, by contrast, show the glorified, risen Christ surrounded with divine energy, while Protestants usually show an empty cross to signify Christ's resurrection and triumph over death.
Orthodoxy and Catholicism agree on the following points against Protestantism: * Both groups call their clergy "priests" and have bishop-led church governments, although the definition of "priest" seems to have some variation between the two churches. Orthodox, like Anglicans, say that "priest" is only a contraction of the Greek word for elder, "presbyter." Orthodox priests are considered symbols of the presence of Christ in the community. Catholic priests, by contrast, are considered mediators between men and God. This difference is expressed in the Churches' different methods of Confession - in the Catholic Church, the priest listens to the penitent's confession, declares that the penitent is forgiven, and assigns acts of penance. In the Orthodox Church, the priest is merely a witness to the penitent's direct confession to God.
* Both agree that bishops should be ordained in a line of "apostolic succession" going back to the original apostles. * Both churches seem to prefer established relationships between the Church and the State, and are adverse to Church/State separation. The fastest growing Protestant traditions, like the Baptists and evangelicals, are generally avid proponents of Church/State separation. (Note that Catholicism encourages separation of Church and State in America due to Catholics' numerical minority, but opposes it in countries where Catholics are the majority.)
* Both Orthodoxy and Catholicism teach that the sacraments have real spiritual power, such as the transformation of the bread and wine into Christ's literal body and blood, and that salvation is dependent to some degree on partaking in the sacraments. Protestants usually regard salvation as coming through repentance and faith, with the sacraments being symbolic of the grace one receives through faith. The most recent edition of the Catholic Catechism, however, did concede that baptism has its salvific power as a result of one's faith, and both Orthodoxy and Catholicism have exceptions such as "baptism by blood" and "baptism by desire" that largely make baptism unnecessary for salvation as long as the deceased person didn't decline or seek to avoid being baptized.
* Both Orthodoxy and Catholicism have strong traditions of church art that include the use of idealized human forms, including depictions of Jesus, while Protestants have few if any human images in their churches due to the superstitious abuse of these images that was prevalent at the time of the Reformation. * Catholicism and Orthodoxy each claim that they are the one true Church - and that the other is a schismatic body that can no longer claim to be the one true Church. * Both revere the Virgin Mary and allow prayers to saints (actually, prayers are allowed to all dead Christians). Catholicism has dogmatically defined several doctrines in regards to Mary, such as her Immaculate Conception, that are not held as dogmas by the Orthodox. * Both Catholicism and Orthodoxy assert that the Bible must be understood in the context of "Holy Tradition," although Catholicism asserts that tradition consists of beliefs that are not found in the Bible, whereas Orthodoxy tends to view tradition as springing from the Bible under the guidance of the Holy Spirit over the course of Church history. * Protestant worship tend to be much simpler and Protestants easily adapt their worship styles to different time periods and cultures. Orthodox fiercely resist adapting their worship (although some do hold their services in the local language), and Catholicism similarly resisted change until they instituted a new form of the Mass during Vatican II.
Protestantism and Catholicism have the following points in common against Orthodoxy:
* Both Protestantism and Catholicism have strong missionary traditions that have spread their faiths across the globe. In comparison, Orthodoxy has performed little missionary work in recent times, and tends to be strongly associated with ethno-national groups such as Greeks and Russians. Catholicism retains some ethnic associations, such as among the Irish and Portuguese, but has believers in many countries where Catholics are not the majority (like Britain and Germany). Evangelical Protestantism has no ethnic identity whatsoever, and the ethnic associations of older mainline Protestant denominations, such as Anglicanism and Lutheranism, is largely diminished in modern times. The lack of missionary activity among the Orthodox is largely attributable to persecution from Communists and Muslims.
* Dating from the Reformation, some forms of Protestantism (particularly Anglicanism and Lutheranism, and to a much lesser degree, Calvinism) retained certain Catholic terms and ideas, such as infant baptism and belief in original sin. Other groups, like the Baptists and Anabaptists, largely jettisoned Catholic beliefs in total. In general, the larger number of Protestants in various denominations have moved more and more towards Baptist-like ideas, away from the Catholic remnants in their traditions, except for some within the Episcopal/Anglican Church. Meanwhile, Catholicism has dogmatically proclaimed more doctrines since the time of the Reformation, particularly in regards to Papal Infallibility and the role of the Virgin Mary, moving itself further away from doctrinal agreement with Protestants. The three branches of Christianity disagree with each other on which books belong in the Old Testament. Nearly all Protestants agree that the Old Testament should be limited to the Jewish Bible. Catholics add a number of books to the Jewish Bible, which they assert were viewed as authoritative by early Christians. The Orthodox also add these books, and several others, and assert that the Old Testament Christians should use is not the Masoretic Text of the Jewish Bible, but the ancient Greek translation of the Jewish Bible called the Septuagint, which disagrees with the Masoretic Text in many places. Orthodox think that this translation preserves the original wording of the text, which may have been lost or corrupted in the existing Hebrew manuscripts, or that the differences were inspired by God. It is worth noting that the Septuagint is frequently quoted in the New Testament. Many observers think that Orthodoxy places more emphasis on Christ's divine nature, as is evidenced by the unearthly quality of Orthodox icons, while Western expressions of Christianity place more emphasis on Christ's humanity, as evidenced by the more realistic art in Catholic churches, the tolerance of emotional expression in some Protestant churches, and the unparalleled amount of attention Catholicism places on Christ's physical suffering and death.
Protestant and Catholic churches each contain Liberal theological movements. These movements generally hold that the Bible is not infallible but is instead a fallible human document, and that the miracles in the Bible are likely fables or metaphors and not real historical events. Liberal theology is dominant in Protestant denominations like the United Church of Christ and the Episcopal (Anglican) Church in North America and Britain. Liberal Catholics flowered after Vatican II, but have largely been silenced by the papacies of John Paul II and Benedict. Liberal Protestantism has declined in North America as evangelical Protestantism has risen in numbers. Charismatic or neo-Pentecostal spirituality that involves speaking in tongues and active use of "spiritual gifts" like prophecy and faith healing has a following in most Protestant denominations and the Catholic Church.
What three catastrophes struck Europe prior to the protestant reformation?
the Great Famine
the Hundred Years' War
the Black Plague
Did Jesus die for all our sins including the sins of Jews?
I am not sure if you mean "how" in the sense of in what manner did he die, or "how" in the sense of how is it that Jesus death covers our sins? So I am going to answer both.
First, he died in a most cruel way. The Roman method of impalement was to literally nail a person to an upright pole or stake, arms stretched above the head, with a nail the through the hands or wrists and a nail through the feet or ankles. The pole was then dropped into a hole with the person attached, so that the nails further tore the flesh of the victim. Then, with hands above head, and weight of body suspened in this manner, the person would eventially suffocate to death. For a time, they would push themselves up with their legs to get each breath, but as they grew more and more exausted, they could no longer do this, and would suffocate. If the death prolonged toward evening, the solders would come along and break the legs of the victim as necessary to prevent them from continuing to support themselves by their legs, and thus speed up the process.
Now from the aspect of how does his death cover sins, let's consider who Jesus was. He was God's son. He came to earth as a perfect and sinless man. The Bible calls him the "last Adam."-(1 Corinthians 15:45) Why does the Bible refer to him as the last Adam? Because, Adam was also a perfect man, that is, until he sinned. When Adam sinned, he brought imperfection upon all of us, since we are all his offspring. Adam could not father any perfect children since he was now imperfect himself, and all of his children were born after he sinned. Jesus sacrifice is called a "ransom" in the Bible.-(1 Timothy 2:6) A ransom is a price paid in exchange for a life. God has a law, 'an eye for an eye, tooth for tooth, life for life, like for like.'-(Deuteronomy 19:21). God also has another law that states that 'unless blood is poured out, no sins can be forgiven.'(Hebrews 9:22)As the last Adam, Jesus could present the value of his perfect life, and his blood to his father as a ransom in exchange for what the first Adam lost, a perfect human life. Without that sacrifice that Jesus paid, we would have no hope of release from the condemnation of Adamic sin (imperfection). So, upon the basis of his sacrifice, we can be forgiven for our sins that are due to imperfection, and receive everlasting life.
Do Protestants have Confirmation?
Some Protestant Churches do, such as Anglican(Episcopalian), Lutheran, Methodist, & Presbyterianism.
What were the major branches of Protestant reform?
11. Lutheranism 2. Reformed/Presbyterian 3. Independents ("non-established" protestant denominations) 4. Anglicanism
How many congregations in the Wisconsin Evangelical Lutheran Synod?
The Wisconsin Evangelical Lutheran Synod is based in Milwaukee. It has approximately 1,270 congregations in all 50 states, with a membership of about 400,000. It is the third largest Lutheran church body in the United States. It also supports foreign mission in more than a dozen countries around the world, including Japan, Taiwan, India, Zambia, Malawi, Cameroon, Brazil, Mexico, Grenada, Antiqua, St. Lucia, Russia, Bulgaria, and Nigeria.
Was the Church of Christ founded by an ex-Mormon?
No. "Mormon" is a nickname for the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. The Church of Christ is a seperate Christian denomination.
The original name of the "Mormon" church was the Church of Christ, however after a very short while the name was changed to the longer "Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints" in order to avoid confusion with the Church of Christ denomination and several other independent churches with the same name. The name change took place about 175 years ago.
Does a protestant church have a tabernacle?
I believe you are referring to the Altar and altar-communion rail. In that sense, yes. there is also the Reservation of the Sacrament- usually Dead center on the Altar, though some have it off to one side.
Who pays for Protestant weddings?
It depends upon the family, but traditionally, (in the West) the bride's family paid for the wedding.