Torts

== == Probably not. Moving someone else's property without their consent is a civil matter, and the estranged spouse would have to prove you did it intentionally. You could say you "didn't know" whose stuff it was and that you had no reason to know she hadn't consented. The goods were not "stolen" as you did not intend to keep them and there was no robbery as the estranged spouse wasn't present. The worst you might face is replacement of goods if they were damaged or lost and the estranged spouse could prove you were negligent.

Yes it is their property and must be taken through the proper authorities. YES YOU CAN, DEPENDING ON THE ITEMS IT CAN BE CHARGED ILLEGAL POSSESION OR ROBBERY. YOU MUST BE VERY CAREFUL WERE YOU MOVED THE ITEMS TO. IF IT WAS NOT A SAFE PLACE THERE CAN BE ALSO A CIVIL SUIT FOR THE VALUE OF THE ITEMS. ALWAYS VARIFY WITH A LAYWER IN CASE I'M WRONG. I'M NOT A LAWYER, BUT I KNOW A GREAT DEAL. GOOD LUCK AND NEXT TIME BE MORE COUSIOUS. BYE BYE.

After you have established that the restaurant is liable for your injuries (see discussion page and links below), you can sue for the actual damages you sustained. That includes pain and suffering and medical bills. If you believe you have a legal claim, it is important that you see a personal injury lawyer right away to avoid having your lawsuit dismissed for being past the statute of limitations.

Not in a criminal trial. However, the outcome of a civil trial may be different depending upon the ground rules agreed to by the opposing attorneys at the outset of the suit.

There are three special cases of immunity from tort liability. They are intrafamily immunity, governmental immunity, and charitable immunity. Intrafamily immunity is immunity from a tort action brought by an immediate family member. Governmental immunity is immunity of a governmental agency from a tort action. Charitable immunity is immunity of a charitable organization from a tort action.

The common term is "damages" or money damages".

hi

You should consult an attorney for the best advice. However, it does not seem that you have a solid case here. Perhaps you failed to mention something on your application, a reference check came back negative, you failed a drug test, your background check didn't clear... or any other number of reasons. Most states in the U.S. are "at-will" employers - which mean they can terminate employment (or offer of employment) with or without cause at any time. You should, however, be advised as to the reason for their change in heart for an opportunity to clear up any misunderstandings. Think about it this way - if the employer is like this now, how are they going to be when you are up and working for them? Hmm. Good luck! * Yes. If you have definite proof that you had been hired by the company, preferably written correspondence of some sort.

The plumber would need to sue you in court in order to get a judgment lien in his/her favor.

If you get a notification that you are being sued you should appear on the date in the summons and plead your case.

You should ask the person who re-did the work to accompany you as a witness. If that's not possible then obtain an invoice from them that lists exactly whet they did, the new charges and that the repairs done by the first plumber were substandard and needed to be repaired. You should have evidence that the second plumber is licensed in your area. Before and after photos are great evidence if you have any. A photo of the work area can be helpful if you need to explain what was done and what the problem was.

You should also have proof of what you hired the first plumber to do (a copy of the contract) and any money you paid for that work. Keep copies of any emails between you and the plumber.

If the plumber records a mechanic's lien against your property it will have a relatively short life. The plumber must take steps to obtain a formal judgment lien. As long as you don't hear from the court that a case has been filed against you then you should just collect your evidence and keep it in a file until you receive a summons. You must appear on the date set forth for the hearing. If you don't the plumber will get a default judgment and you will have lost your opportunity to fight his claim.

It depends on the county and province or city,town, etc... You would actually have to go to the courthouse or what have you to obtain the information on the type of suit and requirements on such. also, you would have to figure out the paperwork needed, as well as the restrictions, timewise as well as authority involvement wise. your question is so vague, even i can't tell you what to do. hope this little bit helps.

You can ask for them as part of the underlying lawsuit.

That doesn't mean you will win.

Directed verdict. This occurs when at the end of a party's case, the judge determines that there is no evidence to support the party's claim or that the evidence presented does not meet the applicacble burden of proof, the judge may direct the jury to render a verdict for the other party.

there isnt one

You'll have to edit for yourself - but here's some forms.

Also - you need to bring with you an Order Granting the Motion for the judge to sign - I am looking for that myself - right now.

http://dentoncounty.com/dept/main.asp?Dept=38&Link=629

For now I'm making the Rule 536 form at the above link work for me.

True

Yes and no. If the plaintiff prevails at the trial level and the defendant files a timely appeal, the defendant becomes the "appellant" and the plaintiff is the "appellee". In a particular case, the roles are the same in that each party is arguing the same "side". The plaintiff wants to keep a judgment and the defendant wants the judgment reversed - the same factual record and principles of law will apply. How the court interprets those facts, however, and reviews those principles of law, may be different than it was at the trial court below. For example, findings of fact are reviewed with substantial deference, and will only be reversed for abuse of discretion. Findings of law are reviewed "de novo," which means "like new". In this sense, the roles plaintiff and defendant may have switched because the defendant - as appellant - may be required to show that the lower court judge abused her discretion, and carries the burden of proof for this in the appeal. At trial, the plaintiff carries the burden of proof (usually a preponderance of the evidence). So the plaintiff carries the burden of proof in the underlying case, but the appellant must prove an "error" on appeal.

Sometimes, you will see that, at the trial level, the plaintiff's name is listed first in the case caption, whereas the appellant's name is first in the caption on appeal. For example, if Smith sues Doe, the case name will be Smith v. Doe, and Smith, as the complaining party, will have the burden of proving up her case. If Smith wins at trial and Doe appeals, the case caption may be restyled as Doe v. Smith. Doe is now the "moving party," and has the burden of proving that the trial court erred when it found for Smith. When the evidence is presented at trial, Smith fill go first, followed by Doe. But on appeal, appellant Doe goes first. They both still have the same theories as to underlying liability, but who's "moving" (or asking the court to enter an order in their favor) has reversed.

If it was me, I would get the best lawer possible, and tell every news crew that I could find the details.

A tort is a failure to fulfill a private obligation as imposed by law. It is between a person and a person (the state is not involved), and the things that classify as torts are outlined by statutes.

Go to the Clerk's office, give the Clerk information to identify the file and ask to see or get a copy of the petition. Papers filed in a court clerk's office are open to the public even if you are not a party to the case. That's how the media gets all the juicy details in celebrity divorce cases.

It depends on the type of case you have. Certain claims are ideal to bring as a class action. For example, shareholders might sue a public company for stock losses when its believed the executives engaged in fraud or insider trading. Individuals might also bring a class action after buying a defective product. Other claims, like personal injury claims from dangerous prescription drugs are better suited to individual group lawsuits. For more detailed information, I suggest you call a plaintiff class action attorney. Most do not charge for a telephone consultation. Good luck.

In general a plaintiff who receives a judgment for personal injury or wrongful death can execute the judgment against all property belonging to the defendant until the judgment award is satisfied. Anyone named as a defendant in a personal injury or wrongful death suit should retain legal counsel immediately and refrain from discussing the matter with anyone other than their legal representative.

9 mos. -1yr

The broad answer to your question is "yes", although the cause of action would not be for "burglary" as such. Instead, the elements of the criminal offense of "burglary" would be similar to a civil claim for "theft", "conversion", "trespass to chattel" or such other civil cause of action as your jurisdiction may allow.

The distinction is that "burglary" is a crime and as such, is considered to be a wrong against society and a violation of penal law. It is prosecuted by a government entity and carries with it a criminal penalty of some sort, such as a fine or imprisonment.

In contrast, your goal is probably compensation for property or money that was taken from you, damaged, or detained. That is the essence of a civil suit in which you seek money damages. You, as the aggrieved party, would file a civil suit against the wrongdoer. It is your burden to prove liability (fault) and damages (that which you lost as a result of the wrongful act).

It depends on who caused the damage, and what the agreement with insurance is.

by any reasone you can. you could get expelled anywhere. likely for something way over the school board policy like hitting a teacher or bringing a knife or gun to school. things like that

It can be both, criminal charges can apply under the FCC regulations and any state statutes and the "hacker" can also be sued for damages in civil court.