Who Would Win

Most poisonous snakes are immune to their own venom, as their body's systems recognize the proteins in their venom (really, just modified saliva) as part of their own body. Interestingly, some non-poisonous snakes are also immune, as the King snake.

Perhaps , an Indian Mongoose a creature renown for being capable of persevering against the King Cobra .

The rhino is slightly heavier but the hippo is longer. Hippo's teeth can measure 50 cm. rhino's hor is twice as big and rhinos are more aggressive. I'll say the rhino will win in a slight advantage.

Bearded Dragon, They are a lot tougher and bigger, There is practically no contest, A Bearded Dragon is considered very tough for its size (18 inch) and will kill or scare most things the same size as it away, They are stocky and have pretty powerful jaws, They are also a lot more territorial than a Chameleon.

Male Bearded Dragon vs Male Veiled Chameleon both fully grown I would say the Bearded Dragon will be the one celebrating for sure, Chemeleon are normally higher but Height does not make up for power.

lion ya but the cheetah might get scared and outrun the lion before that.
Lion by far. Cheetahs are actually a bit delicate for big cats, although what they lack in brute strength they have in speed. Still, a cheetah would not be able to take down a Lion.

Gorilla Wins Because It Is Bigger, More Heavier And More Intelligent. Gorillas And Giant Pandas Look Like Eatchover And Act Like Eatchover As They Both Eat Bamboo. Sorry If This Offends You In The Gorilla Killing The Giant Panda Part.

In a fight black mamba would won because inland taipans are not much aggracive as black mamba.Black mamba is the 2nd biggest venom snake in the world and the fastest snake on land.

Cheetahs can be fast as a car and an ostrich runs about 35-40 mph

It will have to depend on the adaptations of either.

We know what the adaptations of lions are. But what we do not know are the adaptations of dragons, if they even existed. However we do know the adaptations of the Komodo Dragon and some dinosaurs. It also depends on the size of the dragon.
We have no idea what the size of a dragon is because as far as we know, they are mythical creatures (despite being portrayed in many cultures that have never, ever communicated with each other). They might have even been mistaken for non-mythical creatures (because we now understand that unicorns, for example, were actually Indian War Rhinos that were mistaken for horned horses by the Ancient Greeks and Genghis Khan).

The Komodo Dragon's bite is toxic because their mouths are teeming with bacteria. One untreated bite from a Komodo Dragon will become infected quickly, causing the prey a lot of pain and slowing them down, making them an easy target to finish off. So if dragons were small (if they existed), this might have been their way of subduing prey.

However if dragons were huge, mighty beasts similar to a Tyrannosaurus Rex or Spinosaurus, then their weapons of choice would be their jaws, claws (in the case of the Spinosaurus anyway), feet and tail. These creatures could crush other creatures with their powerful jaws, slash them with razor sharp claws or talons, smash or whip them with their tails and stamp on them with their feet.

Then there are also tiny dragons. For example there is a lizard called Draco Volans (Flying Dragon) which is native to Indonesia. And yes, it does look like a miniature dragon, with wings too. These miniature dragons are rather defenceless and prefer to camouflage themselves in order to avoid danger. It eats ants and termites.


So, in a fight...
If the dragons were as fair-sized as the Komodo, then the battle would be a very close one. The lion would be most likely to win because it is more agile, provided he doesn't get bitten.

However if the dragons were huge dinosaur-sized beasts, then the lion would stand no chance and the clear victor would be the dragon.

If the dragons were tiny like the Draco Volans, then the lion would win in a fight with it, undoubtedly. If the lion can find it, considering it's really good at camouflage.

It is a true clash of the titans. The Python as with anaconda is one of the largest snakes in the world. while king cobra is not larger than python. But it has venom.If they 2 fight then if there is a 25 foot python and a 16 foot king cobra it is very tough for king cobra to win because pythons are longer than cobra but king cobra has venom while the python is a non-venomous snake. But the python has size.Python uses its size as a weapon while killing a larger prey.But king cobra is smaller.So the one who attacks on the opponent first will be the winner . If the python attacks first on the king cobra and get a good grip on the neck and tail of the king cobra then the king cobra will be dead within 15 minutes. At the other end if the king cobra attacks python it will be a chance for king cobra. But the size of the python will many time to kill the python with venom.In that time the python had already killed the king cobra

Alligators are fresh water animals, sharks (with a few exceptions) are salt water. Crocodiles are salt water animals, and they probably eat as many sharks as sharks eat crocodiles.

~

All a shark would have to do is bite the Alligators stomach when it goes for air

Crocodile, most likely. Hard to say, though, really.

Crocs, especially big ones, can kill most any mammal, even a tiger. But on land, crocs have been killed by tigers. There are videos showing tigers killing crocodiles.

The hippo would win by holding the bull's head and dragging it to drown it, using its monstrous jaws and a huge weight advantage. The bull would not do much with its horns/hooves/weight since the hippo has thick hide to protect itself from horns/hooves/claws/teeth. If a bull and a hippo fought, the hippo would win no matter what.

While both the cheetah and the tiger are large, wild cats, when comparing cheetah vs. tiger there are some significant differences. The cheetah is very fast, running up to 60 mph in short bursts, while the tiger runs about half that speed. Cheetahs also live and hunt in packs, while tigers are solitary animals and spend most of their lives alone.

This is very close, but I'll say crocodile. The squid is longer up to 43 ft but is only 800 pounds. while a crocodile is not that long, only 23 ft but is is alot heavier, at 3000 pounds. Also the squids weapon wont harm the crocodile that badly because of its hard skin, while the crocodiles 5000 psi bite of a croc can kill the squid, so croc wins.

In such a contest, the chances are good that both animals would die. The tiger, being much quicker and more powerful, would easily be able to get the neck bite in the dragon, and end the fight quickly. But, if the dragon got a bite on the tiger before it was killed, the tiger would eventually die from septocemia, or blood poisoning, as the saliva of the komodo dragon teems with bacteria that can be lethal. One way the dragon hunts is to ambush a prey animal such as a deer, and if the deer does not die in the initial attack, the dragon simply follows the scent trail of the animal until it dies, sometimes days later. Tigers are certainly able to kill reptiles as large as Komodo dragons, as they have been known to kill mugger crocodiles as large as 12 feet long. As in nature most times, however, large predators tend to avoid each other, so a fight most likely would not take place.

Cheetahs are the fastest land animal, so they would win a race against a human.

A ferret would win, housecats fight domestic ferrets a lot and the ferret usually drives the cat off. Cats have greater weaponry, skill and size but ferrets have greater speed, agility, mobility, ferocity, and strategy. No wonder they would win!

A sperm whale could easily overpower an orca, but a pod of orcas is a real challenge. The orcas can give the whale a lot of damage, work together, and communicate. There's one thing the orcas don't have though. A sperm whale has a sonar. If the whale makes a high enough noise the world's biggest dolphin can be stunned. The second biggest animal in the world will either swim away or eat them. The sperm whale wins 8 out of 10 fights.

tiger

i'd say tyrannosaurus because it had a much stronger bite force than giganotosaurus did. though it's possible for giganotosaurus to beat t-rex. but the might not have fought because t-rex lived in north America and g-rex(giganotosaurus) lived in south America. g-rex was a pack hunter. so 1 t-rex wouldn't stand a chance against a pack of g-rexes.

A LIGER V.S. A TIGER WOULD BE GREAT FIGHT BUT A LIGER WOULD PROABLY WIN. IF THE LIGERS WERENT SO SPOILED THEY COULD PROABLY EAT TIGERS A LIGER V.S. A TIGER WOULD BE GREAT FIGHT BUT A LIGER WOULD PROABLY WIN. IF THE LIGERS WERENT SO SPOILED THEY COULD PROABLY EAT TIGERS