Who Would Win

dragons are more powerful than tigers

Depending on the size and strength of the mugger crocodile, the mugger crocodile has a better chance in water than on land. Since water buffaloes are very large and are adapted to swim in water, they are able to fight and maul a mugger crocodile with their horns if the crocodile is not careful. If the mugger crocodile and the water buffalo fought on land, the water buffalo would easily trample the mugger crocodile to death.

godzilla is the 2nd most powerful creature so I think it can take down a

freakishly large shark?

3rd megladon,2nd godzilla,kraken/leviathon

Gilla monster

i think a lion, but if a silver back gorilla is in a plane field in daytime, the gorilla can lift 1000 pounds, and is more intelligent, the gorilla could kill the lion with one swing of its mighty arm.

Of course the German Shepherd. They weigh up to 40Kg, compared to boxers weighing up to 32Kg; German Shepherds have a longer jaw with a bite force of 238psi, whereas the Boxers is 200psi; German Shepherds are more aggressive and would 9 times out of ten tear a boxer to pieces

The hippopotamus - is actually a very aggressive and dangerous animal, will attack boats and kill the passengers. And it out weighs the gorrilla by a few tons, has fangs about the size of a gorilla .

Killer whales are the largest type of dolphin. As the killer whale is the largest type of dolphin and some killer whales eat dolphins and other marine mammals the killer whale would win against any other type of dolphin. thats true but it depends on one thing if the dolphins alone dolphins do attack sharks but in groups so if the dolphin was alone yes the killer whale would win but in the froup i got to give it to the dolphins

It could be an even match-up between these two animals. Both hippos and rhinos have thick skin, and a hippo's jaws are powerful enough to cause a bit of damage to a rhino's hide. And yet a rhino has a horn that is sharp enough to gore the hippo. So it's possible that it could be a draw between these animals.

Obviously a cammel because if the horses name was ricky the cammel (who's name is morphias) would spit in ricky's eye and trip him then cuasing him to lose the race, i swear you ppl dnt think

-Geno Jimenez

It depends if lion is far away or not. If it is at a distance where it can sneak up on the bull from behind it has some sort of an advantage over a bull, but if the bull were face a lion in close combat the lion would indeed loose, resulting the bull as the winner.

The reason this is probable because, in the wild, a lone lion may try to hunt a Cape Buffalo bull, but since such an animal is built with a lot of power, sharp hooves and horns, and a very aggressive nature, such a beast is very intimidating for a lone hungry lion: even a pride of lions! This would be the same case with a domestic bovine such as a bull, especially one that has horns and a nasty temperament like that of a Spanish Fighting bull. Lions would much rather go after prey that runs away from them, not turn and fight them.

Probably the tiger. tigers have sharp teeth Should this scenario happen the would win, because of their powerful bite and strong defense.

This fight is most likely 50/50.

To solve this problem, we must first look at the combatants.

Tyrannosaurus

Weight: 6.4 tons

Length: 12.8 metres

Weapons: Bannana-shaped serrated teeth that could break through bones and an 8 ton bite force.

Advantages: Stronger bite force, probably more agile, larger brain.

Disadvantages: Much smaller, its arms were very small and weak, and it could probably take less wounds.

Spinosaurus

Weight: 12 tons

Length: 18 metres

Weapons: Long, deeply rooted teeth, a 3-5 ton bite force and long, hook-like claws on flexible arms.

Advantages: It was much larger, and its weak spots (head and neck) would be out of the reach of its opponent. It was more muscular and likely could take more damage.

Disadvantages: Slightly weaker bite force, and the fatty hump on its back would make it slightly less flexible.

The fight is almost completely balanced.

My opinion: Personally, I think the t-rex would have won because the spino. usually hunts for fish rather than dinosaurs while the t-rex regularly hunts, and also if spino falls, he dies because spino's spine is connected to the fin.

A killer whale, easily. They are three times the size of a Walrus and a Walrus has no teeth.

Assuming the scorpion and snake are of average size for their type. I would say the snake is going to win. I say this because a scorpions venom couldn't kill the snake. If it hit the snake right between the eyes, then maybe. But the likelyhood of that happening is slim to none. The snake would win, because even if it wasnt venomous, all it would take is one very good bite to break the scorpions exoskeleton.

It Depends, If The Crow Was Sick, Injured, Unexpecting, Old, Single Or A Wimp. The Cat Would Win Easily And Kill The Crow, However, Crows Are Good At Pecking And Attacking. Crows Are Also More Intelligent, Meaning A Crow Would Win And Scare The Cat Away If In A Group Or Is Normally Good At Attacking Being Single.

An ostrich is faster from a standing start; a horse is faster over distance.

A Red Fox Would Win Because It Is Bigger, Stronger, Heavier, Smarter And Quicker Than The Grey Fox. Also, The Grey Fox Does Not Have The Ability To Kill Animals By Doing That Nasty Bite Turn On The Neck That Red Foxes Sometimes Do. But Grey Foxes Are Suprisingly Good Climbers. If The Grey Fox Had A Chance To Get Up A Tree And The Red Fox Left. The Grey Fox Would Get Away.

Raccoons are known to attack cats and dogs. If you are worried your cat will be injured by raccoons then you should keep it inside, especially if there are raccoons around your neighborhood and backyard.

Well it depends on how you look at it, a bite from a rattlesnake would obviously be alot more serious than that of a kingsnake bite, but if it were like a fight with the two whichever one is bigger would most likely be the one to win, the KINGsnake gets it name from being impervious to venom, therefore the kingsnake could consume the rattlesnake without harm.

The black mamba is probably the fastest snake, but I would select the king cobra in a fight. The king cobra is a specialist hunter of other snakes while the mamba feeds namely on birds and small mammals. So experienced technique would give the cobra the advantage. Your correct the king cobra would dominate because it eats other snakes daily plus i think the king cobra would use its size and overpower the black mamba

There are examples of damage to triceratops done by a t-rex attacking from in front. Examination of the damage shows that the triceratops continued to grow more bone after the conflict, so the triceratops survived the attack. This implies that a triceratops could beat a t-rex.

On the other hand, there have been fossilized dung samples which show that T-rex ate triceratops. This may mean that triceratops was hunted by T-rex, but since T-rex is a scavenger, this could just mean they sometimes ate an already dead triceratops.

So, in answer to your question, we have direct reason to believe that a triceratops would sometimes win, and little *direct* evidence in the other direction. Given the size, armament, et cetera, it seems likely that sometimes one would win, sometimes the other, with the odds probably going to the T-rex.

it mainly depends on the circumstances. If the dolphin is alone, and trys to fight the shark, it will be killed. But if it was a pod of dolphins, the dolphins would have the upper hand. But as for your question, if the shark got into a fight with a GREAT WHITE, the shark would eventually either bite the dolphin, or the dolphin would run away.

Find more info at www.google.com or www.seaworld.org

Yes, a Gila Monseter grows up to 60 cm (2.0 ft) long, while a Comodo Dragon can grow to a length of 3 metres (9.8 ft).