Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Email
Answers.com

meat

 
(mēt) pronunciation
n.
  1. The edible flesh of animals, especially that of mammals as opposed to that of fish or poultry.
  2. The edible part, as of a piece of fruit or a nut.
  3. The essence, substance, or gist: the meat of the editorial.
  4. Slang. Something that one enjoys or excels in; a forte: Tennis is his meat.
  5. Nourishment; food: "Love is not all: it is not meat nor drink" (Edna St. Vincent Millay).
  6. Vulgar Slang.
    1. The human body regarded as an object of sexual desire.
    2. The genitals.

[Middle English mete, from Old English, food.]


Search unanswered questions...
Enter a question here...
Search: All sources Community Q&A Reference topics

There are three types of meat: 

      • red meat (beef, lamb, mutton, bison)

      • white meat (veal, pork, rabbit, poultry)

      • dark meat (game)

A distinction is also made between butcher's meat (beef, veal, mutton, pork and variety meats [offal]), poultry and game.

Tips for buying meats

The tenderness of meat varies depending on which part of the animal the cut comes from. The area around the ribs and loin (back) of the animal provides the most tender cuts. The rear end of the animal (thigh or leg) produces cuts of medium tenderness, while the toughest cuts come mostly from the front end (flank, shank, breast, shoulder, neck and the ends of the ribs). The older the animal, the less tender the meat will be. Use tender cuts for short cooking methods, tough cuts for long cooking. Allow for about 2-3.5 oz (55-100 g) of cooked meat per person.
Choose meat that is fine-grained, firm and smooth to the touch. Beef should be a bright, shiny red, mutton a dark pink, lamb a paler pink, pork pink and veal more or less pink (grain-fed veal is pink, milk-fed veal is white). Avoid meat that is dull or has an unusual color; it is probably not fresh.

Tips for preparing meats

Some cuts of meat require more elaborate preparation in order to tenderize them and enhance their flavor, or to ensure they do not dry out during cooking.

Marinating

Consists of letting the meat rest for a few hours in a liquid mixture that is usually acidic and flavored in order to improve its taste. The container in which the meat and marinade are placed should be well-covered and refrigerated.

Larding

Consists of inserting thin strips of fat in the piece of meat using a larding needle. This provides a lean piece of meat with sufficient fat so that it doesn't dry out during cooking.


Barding

Consists in wrapping a wide strip of fat (a "bard") around a piece of roasting meat to prevent it from drying out during cooking.

Tips for storing meats

Meat is highly perishable. Raw or cooked, it should never remain at room temperature for more than 2 hr. Various methods are used to extend its keeping quality. Meat treated in these ways must be of good quality and in good condition. 

Smoking consists of impregnating the meat with smoke. It dries the meat and gives it a darker color and smoky taste. Smoked meats keep for 6-7 days in the fridge and 1-2 months in the freezer.

Curing or salting consists in salting raw meat to reduce moisture content and enhance flavor. 
It can be combined with smoking or drying. The meat should be desalted before cooking. 

Drying was originally carried out using the sun in countries where the air is dry and hot. It is also done industrially using freeze-drying. Drying can be combined with smoking and curing.

Freeze-drying is a recent, fairly expensive method that turns the meat's water content from an ice state into a gas state. Freeze-dried meat contains less than 2% water.

Irradiation uses radiation to kill the pathogenic bacteria present on the meat. It is a relatively little-used method, as its health repercussions are not yet known.

Freezing must be carried out quickly to prevent large ice crystals from forming, which affect the quality of the meat. Wrap the meat well to prevent its drying out and its fat becoming rancid in contact with air. Defrost the meat slowly, preferably in the fridge, to avoid the loss of juices that results in reduced flavor and nutritional value. Never refreeze completely defrosted meat unless it is cooked beforehand.

Tips for cooking meats

Remove excess fat before cooking. Monitor meat for dryness; add minimal fat or other liquid as needed. Degrease the sauce: place it in the fridge (a layer of fat forms on the surface that can easily be removed), or use paper towels placed gently on the surface to soak up the fat.
Tenderize meat: using a utensil to break its fibers, enzymes (certain fruits contain these, including papaya, kiwifruit, fig and pineapple) or an acidic ingredient (vinegar, yogurt, cider, wine, beer, citrus or tomato juice).

Roasting

Consists of cooking meat in an oven or a closed barbecue; it suits tender roasts, thick meat cuts and poultry. Place meat on rotisserie grill or in oven, placing a container underneath to collect the juices. To make sauce base, place meat directly on meat bones or trimmings. Season. Roast in 350°F (175°C) oven; semitender or tougher roasts, however, are best cooked slowly at 325°F (160°C). Once cooked, let meat rest for 5-15 min or wrapped in aluminum foil (shiny side facing the meat).

Broiling (oven) or Grilling (barbecue)

Consists of cooking meat under the broiler of an oven or on the barbecue; it suits tender cuts and poultry. If needed, tenderize meat. Make cuts in fat surrounding meat and season it if desired (only add salt at the end of cooking). Preheat oven broiler or barbecue to a high temperature. Place meat about 4-5 in. (10-12 cm) from heat source and cook a few minutes on each side, turning (using tongs to limit loss of juices) when droplets appear on surface (no more than twice). Leave oven door slightly open and do not cover barbecue. Do not prick meat, and wait a few moments before serving so juices settle evenly.

Pan-frying

This method suits tender or tenderized steaks, ground meat and poultry. Season meat and brown it in pot with a thick base and sides using a small quantity of fat (omit if using a nonstick pan). Cook uncovered over medium-high heat a few minutes on each side; avoid stewing meat (heat too low) or letting it stick (heat too high). Turn when droplets appear on surface of meat (no more than twice). Add salt at the end of cooking, if desired.

Braising

Consists of cooking meat on a low temperature and using wet heat; it suits semitender and tougher steaks and roasts. Trim meat of fat and season or flour. Sauté meat in a little hot fat or oil on all sides to brown it. Season (salt after cooking unless meat is breaded or floured), insert thermometer if using a roast, then add a little liquid. Cover and cook over low heat or in the oven at 325°F (160°C). Degrease cooking liquid before serving. If it is not concentrated enough, bring to a boil (without the meat) and reduce.

Poaching

Similar to braising but using more liquid; it suits roasts or other pieces of meat that are tougher. Before poaching, if desired, flour and sauté meat on all sides over medium-high heat; only salt at the 
end of cooking. Immerse meat in a cold or just-simmering liquid. For richer stock, add salt at the beginning of cooking, don't sauté the meat in fat or oil, and immerse it in a cold liquid. Add desired seasonings and simmer gently until meat reaches the desired tenderness. Degrease before serving.

Microwaving

Suits most meats. Use pieces similar in size and arrange in a circle inside microwave, the thickest part toward the outside. Cook covered. Most meats can be cooked on the highest setting, but less tender cuts benefit from being cooked slowly. Baste meat with marinade or various sauces to improve flavor and appearance. Check internal temperature at several points.


Meat Doneness
Doneness, when referring to meat, signifies two things: 

      • First, the cooking temperature (gauged with a food thermometer) at which potential harmful pathogens on the meat are killed, making the meat safe to eat. 

      • Second, the desired look, taste, and texture of the meat for the person consuming it. 

Below are temperatures for different degrees of doneness. The amount of time it takes to reach a certain degree of doneness depends on the thickness of the meat, amount of fat and bone, starting temperature of the meat and pan, and other factors. Check the meat periodically. A thermometer works better for thick roasts than for thinner steaks and chops. Note: Roasts will continue to cook after being removed from the oven, so the temperature will rise slightly.

MeatInternal Temperature
Beef, Veal, Lambchops, steaks, roasts125°F–135°F/52°C–57°Crare
135°F–145°F/57°C–63°Cmedium-rare
145°F–155°F/63°C–68°Cmedium
155°F–165°F/68°C–71°Cmedium-well
170°F/77°Cwell done
*The USDA recommends cooking these roasts to 145 °F/63° C for safety.
Porkchops or roasts155°F–165°F/68°C–71°Cmedium
170°F/77°Cwell done
*The USDA recommends cooking pork roasts to 160 °F/71°C for safety.
Ground meat160°F/71°C




Browse other meats: Introduction | Beef | Veal | Pork | Lamb | Venison | Rabbit | Ground meat

Browse other foods: Vegetables | Legumes | Fruits | Nuts and Seeds | Seaweeds | Mushrooms | Cereals and Grains | Fish | Crustaceans | Mollusks | Herbs, Spices and Seasonings | Meats | Variety Meats | Delicatessen Meats | Poultry | Dairy Products | Sugars, Cocoa and Carob | Fats and Oils | Binders and Leavenings | Coffee, Tea and Herbal Teas


Flesh and other edible parts of animals, particularly mammals, used for food. Not only the muscles and fat but also organs such as the liver, kidney, and heart are consumed as meat. Meat is valued as a complete-protein food, containing all the amino acids necessary for the human body. It is digested slowly, largely because of the presence of fats. Worldwide, pork is the most widely consumed meat; beef is second. Mutton and lamb, goat, venison, and rabbit are other common meats. The U.S. produces and consumes about a third of the world's meat, while much of the world's population eats little if any meat, though it is generally prized.

For more information on meat, visit Britannica.com.

Generally refers to the muscle tissue of animals or birds, other parts being termed offal. 150-g portions of meat of all types are rich sources of protein and niacin; most are rich sources of vitamin B2 and iron; sources or good sources of vitamin B1.

Venison, horse meat, goose, and game birds are exceptionally rich in iron; pork is exceptionally rich in vitamin B1. The fat content and proportions of fatty acids differ considerably between individual carcasses, species, and cuts of meat.

See also beef, lamb, veal, pork, rabbit, hare, goat, horse, venison, duck, chicken, goose, partridge, turkey, pheasant, grouse, quail, pigeon; and heart, kidney, liver, oxtail, sweetbread, tongue, tripe.

noun

  1. Something fit to be eaten: aliment, bread, comestible, diet, edible, esculent, fare, food, foodstuff, nourishment, nurture, nutriment, nutrition, pabulum, pap, provender, provision (used in plural), sustenance, victual. Slang chow, eats, grub. See ingestion.
  2. The most central and material part: core, essence, gist, heart, kernel, marrow, nub, pith, quintessence, root1, soul, spirit, stuff, substance. Law gravamen. See be.


n

Definition: core, gist
Antonyms: exterior, exteriority, outside

meat, term for the flesh of animals used for food, especially that of cattle, sheep, lambs, and swine, as distinct from game, poultry, and fish; sometimes it is inclusive of all animal flesh. The chief constituents of meat are water, protein, and fat. Phosphorus, iron, and vitamins are also contained in meat, especially in some of the edible organs (e.g., liver). Although meat is digested more slowly than starches or sugars, it has a high food value, with more than 95% of the protein and fat being digested; the fattier meats (e.g., pork) take somewhat longer to digest than the leaner ones. The edible parts of a carcass include lean flesh, fat flesh, and edible glands or organs, such as the heart, liver, kidneys, tongue, tripe, brains, and sweetbread. The comparative toughness of meat depends on the character of the muscle walls and connective tissue, the part of the animal from which the meat is taken, and the age and condition of the animal. Ripening meat, i.e., hanging it for a time at a temperature just above freezing (or, in a more recently developed technique, at a high temperature) permits enzyme action and the formation of lactic acid, which tenderizes it. Good meat may be recognized by a uniform color; a firm, elastic texture; being barely moist to the touch; and having a scarcely perceptible, clean odor. The choicer cuts should be of fine texture and well marbled with fat. Cooking meat not only softens tissues, kills parasites and microorganisms, and coagulates blood and albumen, but makes the meat more palatable by developing its flavors or introducing new ones by means of seasonings and sauces. Meat, where available, has been a staple food since prehistoric times. The meat supply, obtained at first by using the raw flesh of animals found dead, was augmented by trapping; then, as humans developed their tools and a community life, by hunting; and finally, by the domestication of animals. Meat has been subject to prohibitions (see vegetarianism), as well as to butchering regulations on religious and hygienic grounds. Meat consumption has been commonly based on the supply, lamb and mutton being preferred in the Middle East, veal in Italy, and pork and beef in most of Europe and the Americas. The leading producers of meat for export are Argentina, Australia, and New Zealand.


For most human beings, meat is a highly desired food, but it is more of a treat than a staple. Meat, whether obtained from hunted or domesticated animals, is more expensive than staple carbohydrate-rich foods because of the investment in land and labor required to produce it. This reality is often the justification for reserving meat, or the best parts of it, for those with higher status. In a majority of the world's cultures, this elite is men and, sometimes, the women and children attached to them. Furthermore, when there is enough meat to go around, the preferred parts, usually the muscle, go to these same individuals.

It is this special status of meat that makes it of particular interest in human culture, psychology, and cuisine. Meat is also the only class of food that is frequently formally proscribed by certain religions, cultures, or cultural subgroups.

Ambivalence and the Psychology of Meat

The stakes are high with meat. Meat is both the most tabooed—and the most favored—food across the human race, in both developed and traditional cultures. Meat is a magnet of ambivalence for human beings. It is meaningful, in both the positive and negative sense. Eating meat is both attractive and repulsive. Hunting, too, is problematic. It is a skilled accomplishment at the same time that it is a destructive act. Meat provides a food for humans that is more similar to humans than any other type of food. The similarity means that the biochemical composition of meat is much like that of humans, so that, by eating it, humans get all the nutrients they need. The meat of any mammal is a complete, or almost complete, food, in contrast to vegetable foods. But this similarity means that microorganisms living in the meat are also likely to find a happy home in humans. Meat is thus the most nutritive and most infective food humans eat.

You Are What You Eat

It is quite natural and sensible to believe that a person takes on the properties of the food he or she eats. In general, when A and B are mixed, the resulting product shows properties of both A and B, so why should this not occur when A eats B? The problem, of course, as understood through the lens of biochemistry, is that after digestion the components of various foods, foods as different as beef and bananas, are the same molecules: amino acids, sugars, and so on. From this perspective, the identity of an eaten food is lost by the time it is digested. Nonetheless, the belief remains, and it is present in the thinking of almost every traditional culture. This "principle" is behind such notions as eating owls improves vision, eating swift animals increases running speed, eating rapidly growing plants speeds up growth, and the appearance of foods, including their color, can influence humans' appearance. "You are what you eat" is not just a primitive superstition; it is believed, implicitly, by educated people in technologically advanced cultures.

It follows from "you are what you eat" that the consumption of animals will impart some of their animal properties to the person consuming them. Although many animals have desirable attributes, they all share the property of not being human. And it is a major theme, across cultures, that humans are superior to, and qualitatively different from, animals. Yet, consumption of animals, according to the "you are what you eat" principle, would render humans more animal-like, that is, less distinctively human. This belief contributes to human ambivalence about eating meat, and may partially account for the disgust aroused by animal foods in some people.

Meat and the Human Primate

Primates show substantial variation in the types of diets they consume; however, there is a general focus on fruits. Some, particularly large primates, move to a more folivorous (leaf-eating) diet, and some consume a moderate amount of small animals, including insects. The larger stomachs and colons that characterize folivorous animals contrast with the smaller colons and stomachs of the carnivores. Frugivores (fruit eaters) typically have a gut that lies between the carnivore and the folivore extremes, and this is what humans have. This type of gut, and the associated general-purpose set of teeth, are well suited to generalist or omnivorous feeding habits, which characterize humans and chimpanzees. Humans can be distinguished from other primates, including chimpanzees, in their ability to hunt animals larger than themselves. This hunting capacity, related to the movement from the forest to savannah environment, has major implications for human nature and human evolution. First, it introduces the possibility of a substantial amount of meat in the diet. In addition, the demands of hunting encourage elaborate communication and cooperative effort as well as the creation of weapons and the technology that goes with them. The yield that results from killing a large animal encourages sharing, communal eating, and preservation technologies. It is fair to say that the shift to a diet with more meat in it, with the inclusion of large animal hunting, was a major force in human evolution. In an important sense, meat as food has shaped human nature.

Meat in Traditional Society

It is presumed that the hunter-gatherer mode of existence, with varying degrees of reliance on vegetable and animal products, was the situation of Homo sapiens prior to the appearance of domestication and agriculture. However, this should be recognized as a presumption. Studies of the diverse range of existing cultures that rely to a large degree on hunting and gathering suggest that meat, even at this stage of human cultural and biological evolution, assumed a central role. Meat is generally the favored food, the center of celebrations and social gatherings, and the food selectively available to adult males, the most powerful and high-status members of most hunter-gatherer societies. This situation probably results from a combination of the caloric density of meat and the fact that meat, unlike any particular vegetable, is a complete food. On the other hand, the relative rarity of meat, which usually constitutes much less than half of the diet, encourages rules for its selective distribution.

Even among hunter-gatherers, however, there are signs of ambivalence to meat. Most food taboos of hunter-gatherers, and they are extensive, are about meat. Taboos are sometimes general, namely that certain types of animals are forbidden as food. On the other hand, most taboos are conditional, restricting the eating of meat, or certain parts (muscle, innards) to particular groups. Generally, the adult males get the greater amount of meat, get to eat the preferred animals, and get the preferred parts (usually muscle). But there are many exceptions to this general rule. Meat or animal taboos, whether in hunter-gatherer or technologically developed cultures, seem to have a few general characteristics. In what has been referred to as "zones of edibility," tabooed creatures tend to be those very close to humans (humans themselves, primates, or companion animals), those very different from humans, and/or those that are rarely encountered.

Domestication

Meat figures prominently in what might be called the two most important transitions in human evolution: the development of complex cultures and sophisticated technologies. Just as hunting had a major influence in shaping human nature, the combination of agriculture and domestication laid the foundation for high densities of humans and the subsequent elaboration of culture. By making the human food supply more independent of the seasons and of short-term extremes in weather, agriculture and domestication set the stage for major changes in human life. Domestication made it possible for humans to be the only mammals that could have continued access to the almost perfect mammal food of infancy, milk; it also frequently made meat a less scarce resource. Just as hunting helped encourage the upright posture, the development of hand skills, and major cognitive developments, agriculture and domestication of animals freed humans to develop a wide range of impressive technologies.

Meat in Developed Societies

The tables have begun to turn on meat in today's affluent, developed world. The excitement of meat hunting has given way to factory farming. The butchering of the carcass takes place out of sight of almost everyone, so that the skills involved in butchering as well as hunting are almost gone. The caloric density of meat has lost much of its appeal because the threat to human health is too many calories, rather than too few. Similarly, the nutritional completeness of meat is a less salient virtue, what with the great variety of plant foods available in any neighborhood supermarket. The epidemiological revolution has shifted health risks from minimal diets, unbalanced diets, and infections spread by humans through food and other products, to degenerative diseases like heart disease and cancer. And animal fat has been implicated as a risk factor for heart disease. Finally, the affluence of modern societies permits the development of great sensitivities to nature and the morality of using animals as food; with many options available, it is possible to allow moral concerns to influence diet. Vegetarianism is on the rise, for both moral and health reasons, and many of the nonvegetarians in the urban developed world are queasy about the actual process of killing animals. This attitude appears even in the slaughterhouse itself, where responsibility for killing the animals is diffused across a number of different people and roles. In Britain, the United States, and Canada, the human approach to meat has become increasingly ambivalent. The human primate still loves the taste and smell of meat, while cultural knowledge and sensitivities argue against it.

Disgust

Disgust is a powerful emotion, and animal products often arouse it. Almost all foods that are labeled as disgusting in a number of cultures are of animal origin. It is odd, because "dis-gust" means 'bad taste', and meat is one of the best-tasting foods to humans. It is odd also because, given the superior nutritional properties of meat, it should not be the target of the strongest negative food-related emotion.

Meat preference may be a human predisposition, but it is probably not present in infants. Ironically, there may be some predisposition to find meat disgusting, but this as well is not present in the first few years of life. Human infants eat, or at least try to eat, everything they can get into their mouth. Feces, the universal core of disgust, and itself an animal product, is attractive as a food to human infants, as it is to other young and adult mammals. Presumably the odor of decay, associated as it is with microorganism-infested meat, would be innately repugnant, but there is no evidence for an infant aversion to this odor. Nor is there evidence for such an aversion in other primates or mammals. By age two or three, in Western developed cultures (which have provided all of the data up to this time), children have a clear aversion to feces, and a variety of other animal products, especially those that are decayed. This is probably the result of toilet training, although there is no account available of the actual process through which this aversion to feces and decay is aroused.

The foods that are disgusting to adults, cross-culturally, are almost entirely of animal origin, beginning with feces and, for Americans, extending widely to many of the edible parts of animals. Indeed, considering all of the possible animal foods (insects, mollusks, reptiles, amphibians), it is quite remarkable that Americans consume only four or five species of mammals, a few species of birds, no amphibians and reptiles, a moderate number of the many species of fish, only a few types of shellfish, and no insects. Furthermore, the meats eaten by Americans exclude many parts of edible animals; consumption is almost exclusively limited to muscle, and, in general, not the heart or tongue, although these are muscles. So far as is known, this idiosyncratic selection of animals and animal parts as acceptable food has no nutritional or health basis.

These facts lead to the conclusion that disgust at animal products, and the avoidance of most animal products, has an ideational base; it is based neither on taste (most of the "disgusting" types of meat have never been tried) or actual health risks. It is the idea of eating lizards, cow eyes or intestines, or insects that is upsetting and expressed as disgust, somewhat parallel to the formal taboos in other cultures against the consumption of many types of animals or animal parts.

Humans are clearly adapted to a partial meat diet and to liking the taste of meat, especially when it is cooked. But there are some negative sides to meat eating. Perhaps most important is the threat of microbial contamination; because animals are more like humans than plants are, animals are more likely to harbor microorganisms that can afflict humans. This microbial load also makes animal flesh vulnerable to decay after death. Many have argued that the use of many spices originated as a culinary means of discouraging spoilage of meat. During the twentieth century most of the microbial risks were overcome with controlled raising, preparation, and storage of meats. However, as feeding a population of billions a diet with substantial amounts of meat became the goal, a new problem arose: it takes much more out of the environment to make a pound of meat than a pound of vegetable starch or fruits and vegetables. This was not much of a problem when there were fewer humans, and when animals were hunted rather than herded. For some it has become a serious issue that threatens the welfare of our planet.

Plants, of course, as the alternative food source, have their own problems. They are more likely to contain toxins, and they are less calorie dense and less complete nutritionally. As with the minimization of the microbial risks of meat consumption by technological rearing and preparation techniques, the risk of plant toxins can be reduced both by a culture-based selection of appropriate plant products to eat and by the development, through agriculture, of staple plant-based starches that are essentially toxin-free.

Meat and Vegetarianism

Most people in the Third World eat relatively little meat, mostly because of its cost and rarity. They would eat more if they could. On the other hand, in some religious groups, such as orthodox Hindus, all meat is prohibited. And within some meat-eating cultures, individuals or groups of individuals reject meat as food. This type of vegetarianism has a history that goes back at least to ancient Greece. Historically, this type of elective vegetarianism has been motivated primarily by moral or religious concerns, often having to do with negative reactions to the killing of animals or the psychological effects of consuming animals. Within many developed cultures, vegetarians invoke, in addition to moral, religious, or aesthetic concerns, worries about the long-term health effects of eating meat. Some vegetarians can be classified as either health or moral vegetarians, though most long-time vegetarians express a little of both motivations. Interestingly, moral vegetarians are more likely to find meat disgusting than are health vegetarians. When meat becomes disgusting, it is much easier to avoid it.

Vegetarianism seems to be growing in the Western world, impelled by health and moral motivations. For most people who choose this path, it is usually a long development over time, frequently a movement from rejection of a small category of animal products (for example, baby mammals or red meat) through larger and larger spheres of rejection (adding poultry, fish and shell-fish, eggs and dairy products, and nonfood animal products). For many, the sequence stops at some point along this trajectory. People also often slide backwards, either abandoning a particular level of rejection for a less stringent set of prohibitions or completely abandoning the vegetarian style.

Mad Cow Disease

Although in general Americans seemed to be the most concerned group about the diet-health link as the twentieth century ended, the advent of mad cow disease engaged Europeans more than Americans. Mad cow disease (bovine spongiform encephalopathy [BSE]) is quintessentially about meat. Mad cow is doubly animal: it involves not only animal meat—beef—but also feed consumed by cows, animals that are normally vegetarian, that contains animal parts. Studies of risk perception by psychologists indicate that people tend to exaggerate risks when they are catastrophic, hidden, delayed, and not understood. Mad cow disease meets all of these conditions and adds the predisposition to be emotionally involved with foods of an animal nature. It is hard to believe that as much fuss would be made if this were mad broccoli disease. It is also just as likely that "mad broccoli disease," because it would not originate with diseased animals, would not lead to a delayed, unexpected, hideous, and certain, death.

Safe Meat Production

With the appearance in the 1990s of bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE; more familiar to the public as "mad cow disease") in England and France, and the deaths caused by its spread to humans who ate meat from diseased cows, vigilance with respect to safe meat production became even more critical. In spite of research demonstrating that the disease had been spread in herds that had eaten feed that contained meat products, some feed suppliers in the United States were found continuing the practice in 2001, and, without enough USDA inspectors to monitor meat production from start to finish, the public cannot be sure that the meat they eat does not come from cows infected with BSE.

Robin Kline

Bibliography

Billing, J., and P. W. Sherman. "Antimicrobial Functions of Spices: Why Some Like It Hot." Quarterly Review of Biology 73 (1998): 3–49.

Chivers, D. J. "Diets and Guts." In The Cambridge Encyclopedia of Human Evolution, edited by Ed S. Jones, R. Martin, and D. Pilbeam, pp. 60–64. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press, 1992.

Diamond, J. Guns, Germs, and Steel: The Fates of Human Societies. New York: Norton, 1997.

Douglas, M. Purity and Danger: An Analysis of Concepts of Pollution and Taboo. London: Routledge, 1966.

Fiddes, N. Meat: A Natural Symbol. London: Routledge, 1991.

Kass, L. The Hungry Soul: Eating and the Perfecting of Our Nature. New York: Free Press, 1994.

Kelly, R. L. The Foraging Spectrum: Diversity in Hunter-Gatherer Lifeways. Washington, D.C.: Smithsonian Institution Press, 1995.

Miller, W. I. The Anatomy of Disgust. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1997.

Nemeroff, C., and P. Rozin. "The Makings of the Magical Mind." In Imagining the Impossible: Magical, Scientific, and Religious Thinking in Children, edited by K. S. Rosengren, C. N. Johnson, and P. L. Harris, pp. 1–34. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2000.

Rhodes, R. Deadly Feasts: Tracking the Secrets of a Deadly New Plague. New York: Simon and Schuster, 1997.

Rozin, P., and A. E. Fallon. "A Perspective on Disgust." Psychological Review 94 (1987): 23–41.

Rozin, P., J. Haidt, and C. R. McCauley. "Disgust." In Handbook of Emotions, edited by M. Lewis and J. Haviland, 2d ed., pp. 637–653. New York: Guilford, 2000.

Simoons, F. J. Eat Not This Flesh: Food Avoidances from Prehistory to the Present. 2d ed., rev. and enl. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.

Tambiah, S. J. "Animals Are Good to Think and Good to Prohibit." Ethnology 8 (1969): 423–459.

Twigg, J. "Food for Thought: Purity and Vegetarianism." Religion 9 (1979): 13–35.

Vialles, N. Animal to Edible. Translated by J. A. Underwood. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994. (Original edition: Le Sang et la chair: Les Abatoirs des pays de l'adour. Paris: Fondation de la Maison des Sciences et l'Homme, 1987.)

Washburn, S. L., and C. S. Lancaster. "The Evolution of Hunting." In Man the Hunter, edited by R. B. Lee and I. Devore, pp. 293–303. Chicago: Aldine, 1968.

Whitehead, H. Food Rules: Hunting, Sharing, and Tabooing Game in Papua New Guinea. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2000.

—Paul Rozin

Word Tutor:

meat

Top
pronunciation

IN BRIEF: The flesh of animals used as food. Also: The part that can be eaten.

pronunciation I have known many meat eaters to be far more nonviolent than vegetarians. — Gandhi (1869-1948)

Tutor's tip: Our coach would "mete" (apportion) out the "meat" (the edible part of animals) at our meals before a track "meet" (sporting competition) to ensure we didn't gain weight.

LearnThatWord.com is a free vocabulary and spelling program where you only pay for results!

sign description: The thumb and middle finger of one hand pinches the meaty part of the other hand. Often you will fingerspell the type of meat after this sign, such as HAM.




Eating meat sometimes indicates that one is getting to the heart of the matter or finally getting down to the "meat of an issue." Meat can also represent a bold and hearty grasp of the dreamer's needs.


noun
noun

1:
The penis. (1595 —) .
Black Scholar She was in his arms...and grabbing his erect meat (1971).

2:
The female genitals. (1611 —) .
G. Greer It would be unbearable, but less so, if it were only the vagina that was belittled by terms like meat (1970). See also to beat one's meat at beat verb.



Previous:measly, meany, mean
Next:meat rack, meat ticket, meat tool

1. flesh and other tissues of farm animals for human consumption.
2. the edible parts of nuts or fruit seeds. Called also kernels.

  • m. and bone meal — meat meal that contains more than 4.4% phosphorus because bones have been included; used as a protein feed supplement.
  • conditionally admissible m. — see freibank system.
  • m. inspection — examination of all meat sold for human consumption to ensure that it is wholesome and free from any disease that might be communicated from the animals to humans. Includes antemortem examination of the living animal, examination of the carcass, the head and the viscera.
  • m. intoxication — hepatic encephalopathy.
  • m. juice ELISA — a serological test for Salmonella spp. that measures the presence of antibody in ‘meat juice’ collected from the diaphragm after slaughter. Widely used in Europe for monitoring infection prevalence and herd status in national control/eradication programs for salmonella infection in pig herds.
  • knackers’ m. — meat from animals dead on arrival or of insufficient quality to go into the human food chain; killed at a separate establishment. It is not always possible to keep this meat separate from butcher's meat—illegal substitutions are serious offenses but the rewards are high.
  • m. meal — a by-product of meat-packing or abattoir industries containing about 50% protein but varying depending on the material included and whether preparation is by a wet-cooking or tankage process, or a dry-cooking method. A popular protein supplement for all classes of livestock. Use for food-producing animals now restricted because of the risk of transmitting the agents causing spongiform encephalopathies.
  • mechanically recovered m. — meat harvested by putting a carcass through an industrial process to separate it from the bones, instead of carving it off by hand knife.
  • m. packing plant — abattoir.
Random House Word Menu:

categories related to 'meat'

Top
Random House Word Menu by Stephen Glazier
For a list of words related to meat, see:

  See crossword solutions for the clue Meat.
Varieties of meat

Meat is animal flesh that is used as food.[1] Most often, this means the skeletal muscle and associated fat and other tissues, but it may also describe other edible tissues such as organs and offal.[1] In commerce, meat is generally used by the meat packing industry in a more restrictive sense—the flesh of mammalian species (pigs, cattle, lambs, etc.) raised and prepared for human consumption, to the exclusion of fish, poultry, and other animals. Usage varies worldwide by culture, and some countries such as India have large populations that avoid the consumption of all or most kinds of meat. Game or bush meat is also generally distinguished from that produced by agriculture.

The consumption of meat has various traditions and rituals associated with it in different cultures such as kosher and halal and its production is generally regulated by state authorities as well. This article is mainly focused on that process from primary production to consumption.

Contents

Etymology

The word meat comes from the Old English word mete, which referred to food in general. The term is related to mad in Danish, mat in Swedish and Norwegian, and matur in Icelandic, which also mean 'food'. The word "mete" also exists in Old Frisian (and to a lesser extent, modern West Frisian) to denote important food, differentiating it from "swiets" (sweets) and "dierfied" (animal feed).

One definition that refers to meat as not including fish developed over the past few hundred years and has religious influences. The distinction between fish and "meat" is codified by the Jewish dietary law of kashrut, regarding the mixing of milk and meat, which does not forbid the mixing of milk and fish. Modern Jewish legal practice (halakha) on kashrut classifies the flesh of both mammals and birds as "meat"; fish are considered to be parve, neither meat nor a dairy food. The Catholic dietary restriction on "meat" on Fridays also does not apply to the cooking and eating of fish.

The Latin word carō "meat" (also the root of 'carnal', referring to the 'pleasures of the flesh') is often a euphemism for sexual pleasure, effected from the function performed by fleshy organs. Thus 'meat' may refer to the human body in a sensual, or sexual, connotation. A meat market, in addition to simply denoting a market where meat is sold, also refers to a place or situation where humans are treated or viewed as commodities, especially a place known as one where a sexual partner may be found.

"Meat" may also be used to refer to humans humorously or indifferently . In military slang, "meat shield" refers to soldiers sent towards an enemy to draw fire away from another unit.

History

Paleontological evidence suggests that meat constituted a substantial proportion of the diet of even the earliest humans.[2] Early hunter-gatherers depended on the organized hunting of large animals such as bison and deer.[2]

The domestication of animals, of which we have evidence dating back to the end of the last glacial period (c. 10,000 years BP),[2] allowed the systematic production of meat and the breeding of animals with a view to improving meat production.[2] The animals which are now the principal sources of meat were domesticated in conjunction with the development of early civilizations:

  • Sheep, originating from western Asia, were domesticated with the help of dogs prior to the establishment of settled agriculture, likely as early as the eighth millennium BC.[3] Several breeds of sheep were established in ancient Mesopotamia and Egypt by 3500–3000 BC.[3] Presently, more than 200 sheep breeds exist.
  • Cattle were domesticated in Mesopotamia after settled agriculture was established about 5000 BC,[4] and several breeds were established by 2500 BC.[5] Modern domesticated cattle fall into the groups Bos taurus (European cattle) and Bos indicus (zebu), both descended from the now-extinct aurochs.[4] The breeding of beef cattle, cattle optimized for meat production as opposed to animals best suited for draught or dairy purposes, began in the middle of the 18th century.[6]
  • Domestic pigs, which are descended from wild boars, are known to have existed about 2500 BC in modern-day Hungary and in Troy; earlier pottery from Jericho and Egypt depicts wild pigs.[7] Pork sausages and hams were of great commercial importance in Greco-Roman times.[7] Pigs continue to be bred intensively as they are being optimized to produce meat best suited for specific meat products.[8]

Other animals are, or have been raised or hunted for their flesh. The type of meat consumed varies much in different cultures, changes over time, and depends on different factors such as the availability of the animals and traditions.

Modern agriculture employs a number of techniques, such as progeny testing, to make animals evolve rapidly towards having the qualities desired by meat producers.[23] For instance, in the wake of well-publicised health concerns associated with saturated fats in the 1980s, the fat content of UK beef, pork and lamb fell from 20–26 percent to 4–8 percent within a few decades, both due to selective breeding for leanness and changed methods of butchery.[23] Methods of genetic engineering aimed at improving the meat production qualities of animals are now also becoming available.[24]

Even though it is a very old industry, meat production continues to be shaped strongly by the rapidly evolving demands of customers. The trend towards selling meat in pre-packaged cuts has increased the demand for larger breeds of cattle, which are better suited to producing such cuts.[25] Even more animals not previously exploited for their meat are now being farmed, especially the more agile and mobile species, whose muscles tend to be developed better than those of cattle, sheep or pigs.[25] Examples include the various antelope species, the zebra, water buffalo and camel,[26] as well as nonmammals, such as the crocodile, emu and ostrich.[27] Another important trend in contemporary meat production is organic farming which, while providing no organoleptic benefit to meat so produced,[28] meets an increasing demand for numerous reasons.

Growth and development of meat animals

Agricultural science has identified several factors bearing on the growth and development of meat in animals.

Genetics

Trait Heritability[29]
Reproductive efficiency 2–10%
Meat quality 15–30%
Growth 20–40%
Muscle/fat ratio 40–60%

Several economically important traits in meat animals are heritable to some degree (see the table to the right) and can thus be selected for by breeding. In cattle, certain growth features are controlled by recessive genes which have not so far been controlled, complicating breeding.[30] One such trait is dwarfism; another is the doppelender or "double muscling" condition, which causes muscle hypertrophy and thereby increases the animal's commercial value.[30] Genetic analysis continues to reveal the genetic mechanisms that control numerous aspects of the endocrine system and, through it, meat growth and quality.[31]

Genetic engineering techniques can shorten breeding programmes significantly because they allow for the identification and isolation of genes coding for desired traits, and for the reincorporation of these genes into the animal genome.[32] To enable such manipulation, research is ongoing (as of 2006) to map the entire genome of sheep, cattle and pigs.[32] Some research has already seen commercial application. For instance, a recombinant bacterium has been developed which improves the digestion of grass in the rumen of cattle, and some specific features of muscle fibres have been genetically altered.[33]

Experimental reproductive cloning of commercially important meat animals such as sheep, pig or cattle has been successful. The multiple asexual reproduction of animals bearing desirable traits can thus be anticipated,[33] although this is not yet practical on a commercial scale.

Environment

Heat regulation in livestock is of great economic significance, because mammals attempt to maintain a constant optimal body temperature. Low temperatures tend to prolong animal development and high temperatures tend to retard it.[33] Depending on their size, body shape and insulation through tissue and fur, some animals have a relatively narrow zone of temperature tolerance and others (e.g. cattle) a broad one.[34] Static magnetic fields, for reasons still unknown, also retard animal development.[34]

Nutrition

The quality and quantity of usable meat depends on the animal's plane of nutrition, i.e., whether it is over- or underfed. Scientists disagree, however, about how exactly the plane of nutrition influences carcase composition.[35]

The composition of the diet, especially the amount of protein provided, is also an important factor regulating animal growth.[36] Ruminants, which may digest cellulose, are better adapted to poor-quality diets, but their ruminal microorganisms degrade high-quality protein if supplied in excess.[37] Because producing high-quality protein animal feed is expensive (see also Environmental impact below), several techniques are employed or experimented with to ensure maximum utilization of protein. These include the treatment of feed with formalin to protect amino acids during their passage through the rumen, the recycling of manure by feeding it back to cattle mixed with feed concentrates, or the partial conversion of petroleum hydrocarbons to protein through microbial action.[38]

In plant feed, environmental factors influence the availability of crucial nutrients or micronutrients, a lack or excess of which can cause a great many ailments.[39] In Australia, for instance, where the soil contains limited phosphate, cattle are being fed additional phosphate to increase the efficiency of beef production.[40] Also in Australia, cattle and sheep in certain areas were often found losing their appetite and dying in the midst of rich pasture; this was at length found to be a result of cobalt deficiency in the soil.[39] Plant toxins are also a risk to grazing animals; for instance, fluoracetate, found in some African and Australian plants, kills by disrupting the cellular metabolism.[39] Certain man-made pollutants such as methylmercury and some pesticide residues present a particular hazard due to their tendency to bioaccumulate in meat, potentially poisoning consumers.[38]

Human intervention

Meat producers may seek to improve the fertility of female animals through the administration of gonadotrophic or ovulation-inducing hormones.[41] In pig production, sow infertility is a common problem, possibly due to excessive fatness.[42] No methods currently exist to augment the fertility of male animals.[42] Artificial insemination is now routinely used to produce animals of the best possible genetic quality, and the efficiency of this method is improved through the administration of hormones that synchronize the ovulation cycles within groups of females.[43]

Growth hormones, particularly anabolic agents such as steroids, are used in some countries to accelerate muscle growth in animals.[43] This practice has given rise to the beef hormone controversy, an international trade dispute. It may also decrease the tenderness of meat, although research on this is inconclusive,[44] and have other effects on the composition of the muscle flesh.[45] Where castration is used to improve control over male animals, its side effects are also counteracted by the administration of hormones.[43]

Sedatives may be administered to animals to counteract stress factors and increase weight gain.[46] The feeding of antibiotics to certain animals has been shown to improve growth rates also.[46] This practice is particularly prevalent in the USA, but has been banned in the EU, partly because it causes antibiotic resistance in pathogenic microorganisms.[46]

Biochemical composition

Numerous aspects of the biochemical composition of meat vary in complex ways depending on the species, breed, sex, age, plane of nutrition, training and exercise of the animal, as well as on the anatomical location of the musculature involved.[47] Even between animals of the same litter and sex there are considerable differences in such parameters as the percentage of intramuscular fat.[48]

Main constituents

Adult mammalian muscle flesh consists of roughly 75 percent water, 19 percent protein, 2.5 percent intramuscular fat, 1.2 percent carbohydrates and 2.3 percent other soluble non-protein substances. These include nitrogenous compounds, such as amino acids, and inorganic substances such as minerals.[49]

Muscle proteins are either soluble in water (sarcoplasmic proteins, about 11.5 percent of total muscle mass) or in concentrated salt solutions (myofibrillar proteins, about 5.5 percent of mass).[50] There are several hundred sarcoplasmic proteins.[51] Most of them – the glycolytic enzymes – are involved in the glycolytic pathway, i.e., the conversion of stored energy into muscle power.[52] The two most abundant myofibrillar proteins, myosin and actin,[53] are responsible for the muscle's overall structure. The remaining protein mass consists of connective tissue (collagen and elastin) as well as organelle tissue.[49]

Fat in meat can be either adipose tissue, used by the animal to store energy and consisting of "true fats" (esters of glycerol with fatty acids),[54] or intramuscular fat, which contains considerable quantities of phospholipids and of unsaponifiable constituents such as cholesterol.[54]

Red and white meat

Meat can be broadly classified as "red" or "white" depending on the concentration of myoglobin in muscle fibre. When myoglobin is exposed to oxygen, reddish oxymyoglobin develops, making myoglobin-rich meat appear red. The redness of meat depends on species, animal age, and fibre type: Red meat contains more narrow muscle fibres that tend to operate over long periods without rest,[55] while white meat contains more broad fibres that tend to work in short fast bursts.[55]

The meat of adult mammals such as cows, sheep, goats, and horses is generally considered red, while domestic chicken and turkey breast meat is generally considered white.

Meat nutritional information

Typical Meat Nutritional Content
from 110 grams (4 oz or .25 lb)
Source calories protein carbs fat
fish 110–140 20–25 g 0 g 1–5 g
chicken breast 160 28 g 0 g 7 g
lamb 250 30 g 0 g 14 g
steak (beef top round) 210 36 g 0 g 7 g
steak (beef T-bone) 450 25 g 0 g 35 g
Further information: Nutrition, Foodborne illness, Health concerns associated with red meat

All muscle tissue is very high in protein, containing all of the essential amino acids, and in most cases is a good source of zinc, vitamin B12, selenium, phosphorus, niacin, vitamin B6, choline, riboflavin and iron.[56] Several forms of meat are high in vitamin K2,[57] which is only otherwise known to be found in fermented foods[citation needed], with natto having the highest concentration.[57] Muscle tissue is very low in carbohydrates and does not contain dietary fiber.[58] The fat content of meat can vary widely depending on the species and breed of animal, the way in which the animal was raised, including what it was fed, the anatomical part of the body, and the methods of butchering and cooking. Wild animals such as deer are typically leaner than farm animals, leading those concerned about fat content to choose game such as venison. Decades of breeding meat animals for fatness is being reversed by consumer demand for meat with less fat.

Red meat, such as beef, pork, and lamb, contains many essential nutrients necessary for healthy growth and development in children. Nutrients in red meat include iron, zinc, vitamin B12, and protein.[56] Most meats contain a full complement of the amino acids required for the human diet. Fruits and vegetables, by contrast, sometimes lack several essential amino acids contained in meat. It is for this reason that people who abstain from eating all meat need to plan their diet more carefully to include vegetarian sources of all the necessary amino acids.[59] (See Section Issues of Meat for more details.)

The table in this section compares the nutritional content of several types of meat. While each kind of meat has about the same content of protein and carbohydrates, there is a very wide range of fat content. It is the additional fat that contributes most to the calorie content of meat, and to concerns about dietary health.[citation needed]

Production

Meat is produced by killing the animal in question and cutting the desired flesh out of it. These procedures are called slaughter and butchery, respectively.

Attesting to the long history of meat consumption in human civilizations, ritual slaughter has become part of the practice of several religions. These rituals, as well as other pre-industrial meat production methods such as these used by indigenous peoples, are not detailed here. This section will instead provide an overview of contemporary industrialized meat production in dedicated slaughterhouses from cattle, sheep and pigs.

Transport

Upon reaching a predetermined age or weight, livestock are usually transported en masse to the slaughterhouse. Depending on its length and circumstances, this may exert stress and injuries on the animals, and some may die en route.[60] Unnecessary stress in transport may adversely affect the quality of the meat.[60] In particular, the muscles of stressed animals are low in water and glycogen, and their pH fails to attain acidic values, all of which results in poor meat quality.[61] Consequently, and also due to campaigning by animal welfare groups, laws and industry practices in several countries tend to become more restrictive with respect to the duration and other circumstances of livestock transports.

Slaughter

Animals are usually slaughtered by being first stunned and then exsanguinated (bled out). Death results from the one or the other procedure, depending on the methods employed. Stunning can be effected through asphyxiating the animals with carbon dioxide, shooting them with a gun or a captive bolt pistol, or shocking them with electric current.[62] In most forms of ritual slaughter, stunning is not allowed.

Draining as much blood as possible from the carcase is necessary because blood causes the meat to have an unappealing appearance and is a very good breeding ground for microorganisms.[63] The exsanguination is accomplished by severing the carotid artery and the jugular vein in cattle and sheep, and the anterior vena cava in pigs.[64]

Dressing and cutting

After exsanguination, the carcase is dressed; that is, the head, feet, hide (except hogs and some veal), excess fat, viscera and offal are removed, leaving only bones and edible muscle.[65] Cattle and pig carcases, but not those of sheep, are then split in half along the mid ventral axis, and the carcase is cut into wholesale pieces.[65] The dressing and cutting sequence, long a province of manual labor, is progressively being fully automated.[65]

Conditioning

Under hygienic conditions and without other treatment, meat can be stored at above its freezing point (–1.5 °C) for about six weeks without spoilage, during which time it undergoes an aging process that increases its tenderness and flavor.[66]

During the first day after death, glycolysis continues until the accumulation of lactic acid causes the pH to reach about 5.5. The remaining glycogen, about 18 g per kg, is believed to increase the water-holding capacity and tenderness of the flesh when cooked.[67] Rigor mortis sets in a few hours after death as ATP is used up, causing actin and myosin to combine into rigid actomyosin and lowering the meat's water-holding capacity,[68] causing it to lose water ("weep").[69] In muscles that enter rigor in a contracted position, actin and myosin filaments overlap and cross-bond, resulting in meat that is tough on cooking[70] – hence again the need to prevent pre-slaughter stress in the animal.

Over time, the muscle proteins denature in varying degree, with the exception of the collagen and elastin of connective tissue,[71] and rigor mortis resolves. Because of these changes, the meat is tender and pliable when cooked just after death or after the resolution of rigor, but tough when cooked during rigor.[71] As the muscle pigment myoglobin denatures, its iron oxidates, which may cause a brown discoloration near the surface of the meat.[69] Ongoing proteolysis also contributes to conditioning. Hypoxanthine, a breakdown product of ATP, contributes to the meat's flavor and odor, as do other products of the discomposition of muscle fat and protein.[72]

Spoilage and preservation

The spoilage of meat occurs, if untreated, in a matter of hours or days and results in the meat becoming unappetizing, poisonous or infectious. Spoilage is caused by the practically unavoidable infection and subsequent decomposition of meat by bacteria and fungi, which are borne by the animal itself, by the people handling the meat, and by their implements. Meat can be kept edible for a much longer time – though not indefinitely – if proper hygiene is observed during production and processing, and if appropriate food safety, food preservation and food storage procedures are applied. Without the application of preservatives and stabilizers, the fats in meat may also begin to rapidly decompose after cooking or processing, leading to an objectionable taste known as warmed over flavor.

Methods of preparation

A spit barbecue at a street fair in New York City's East Village.

Fresh meat can be cooked for immediate consumption, or be processed, that is, treated for longer-term preservation and later consumption, possibly after further preparation. A common additive to processed meats, both for preservation and because it prevents discoloring, is sodium nitrite, which, however, is also a source of health concerns, because it may form carcinogenic nitrosamines when heated.[73]

Meat is prepared in many ways, as steaks, in stews, fondue, or as dried meat like beef jerky. It may be ground then formed into patties (as hamburgers or croquettes), loaves, or sausages, or used in loose form (as in "sloppy joe" or Bolognese sauce). Some meat is cured, by smoking, pickling, preserving in salt or brine (see salted meat and curing). Other kinds of meat are marinated and barbecued, or simply boiled, roasted, or fried. Meat is generally eaten cooked, but there are many traditional recipes that call for raw beef, veal or fish (tartare). Meat is often spiced or seasoned, as in most sausages. Meat dishes are usually described by their source (animal and part of body) and method of preparation.

Meat is a typical base for making sandwiches. Popular varieties of sandwich meat include ham, pork, salami and other sausages, and beef, such as steak, roast beef, corned beef, pepperoni, and pastrami. Meat can also be molded or pressed (common for products that include offal, such as haggis and scrapple) and canned.

Issues with meat consumption

Fresh meat in a Mexican supermarket
Kangaroo meat at an Australian supermarket

Ethics

Ethical issues regarding the consumption of meat can include objections to the act of killing animals or the agricultural practices surrounding the production of meat. Reasons for objecting to the practice of killing animals for consumption may include animal rights, environmental ethics, religious doctrine, or an aversion to inflicting pain or harm on other sentient creatures. The religion of Jainism has always opposed eating meat, and there are also many schools of Buddhism, Hinduism and Sikhism that condemn the eating of meat. Some people, while not vegetarians, refuse to eat the flesh of certain animals, such as cats, dogs, horses, or rabbits, due to cultural or religious taboo. In some cases, specific meats (especially from pigs and cows) are forbidden within religious traditions. Some people eat only the flesh of animals which they believe have not been mistreated, and abstain from the meat of animals reared in factory farms or from particular products such as foie gras and veal.

Health

See Articles: Vegetarianism and Vegan

A 1999 metastudy combined data from five studies from western countries. The metastudy reported mortality ratios, where lower numbers indicated fewer deaths, for fish eaters to be 0.82, vegetarians to be 0.84, occasional meat eaters to be 0.84. Regular meat eaters and vegans shared the highest mortality ratio of 1.00. The study reported the numbers of deaths in each category, and expected error ranges for each ratio, and adjustments made to the data. However, the "lower mortality was due largely to the relatively low prevalence of smoking in these [vegetarian] cohorts".[74]

In recent years, health concerns have been raised about the consumption of meat increasing the risk of cancer.[75] In particular, red meat and processed meat were found to be associated with higher risk of cancers of the lung, esophagus, liver, and colon, among others, although also a reduced risk for some minor type of cancers.[75] Another study found an increase risk of pancreatic cancer for red meat and pork.[76] That study also suggests that fat and saturated fat are not likely contributors to pancreatic cancer. Animal fat, particularly from ruminants, tends to have a higher percentage of saturated fat vs. monounsaturated and polyunsaturated fat when compared to vegetable fats, with the exception of some tropical plant fats;[77] consumption of which has been correlated with various health problems. The saturated fat found in meat has been associated with significantly raised risks of colon cancer,[78][79] although evidence suggests that risks of prostate cancer are unrelated to animal fat consumption.[80] USDA claims (see Dietary Guidelines for Americans) that consumption of meat as a source of protein in the human diet is crucial,[36] have been resoundingly contradicted by recent studies.[81][82][83]

The correlation of meat consumption to increased risk of heart disease is controversial. Some studies fail to find a link between red meat consumption and heart disease[84] (although the same study found statistically significant correlation between the consumption of processed meat and cancer), while another study, a survey, conducted in 1960, of 25,153 California Seventh-Day Adventists, found that the risk of heart disease is three times greater for 45-64 year old men who eat meat daily, versus those who did not eat meat.[85][86] in 2010 involving over one million people who ate meat found that only processed meat had an adverse risk in relation to coronary heart disease. The study suggests that eating 50g (less than 2oz) of processed meat per day increases risk of coronary heart disease by 42%, and diabetes by 19%. Equivalent levels of fat, including saturated fats, in unprocessed meat (even when eating twice as much per day) did not show any deleterious effects, leading the researchers to suggest that "differences in salt and preservatives, rather than fats, might explain the higher risk of heart disease and diabetes seen with processed meats, but not with unprocessed red meats."

A 2009 study by the National Cancer Institute revealed a correlation between the consumption of red meat and increased mortality from cancer and cardiovascular diseases.[87] This study has been criticized for using an improperly validated food frequency questionnaire,[88] which has been shown to have low levels of accuracy.[89][90]

In response to changing prices as well as health concerns about saturated fat and cholesterol, consumers have altered their consumption of various meats. A USDA report points out that consumption of beef in the United States between 1970–1974 and 1990–1994 dropped by 21%, while consumption of chicken increased by 90%. During the same period of time, the price of chicken dropped by 14% relative to the price of beef. In 1995 and 1996, beef consumption increased due to higher supplies and lower prices.

A recent study by the Translational Genomics Research Institute showed that nearly half (47%) percent of the meat and poultry in U.S. grocery stores were contaminated with S. aureus, with more than half (52%) of those bacteria resistant to antibiotics.[91]

Cooking

Meat can transmit certain diseases, but complete cooking and avoiding recontamination reduces this possibility.[92]

Several studies published since 1990 indicate that cooking muscle meat creates heterocyclic amines (HCAs), which are thought to increase cancer risk in humans. Researchers at the National Cancer Institute published results of a study which found that human subjects who ate beef rare or medium-rare had less than one third the risk of stomach cancer than those who ate beef medium-well or well-done.[93] While eating muscle meat raw may be the only way to avoid HCAs fully, the National Cancer Institute states that cooking meat below 212 °F (100 °C) creates "negligible amounts" of HCAs. Also, microwaving meat before cooking may reduce HCAs by 90%.[94]

Nitrosamines, present in processed and cooked foods, have been noted as being carcinogenic, being linked to colon cancer. Also, toxic compounds called PAHs, or polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, present in processed, smoked and cooked foods, are known to be carcinogenic.[95]

In vitro and imitation

Main articles: Imitation meat, In vitro meat

Various forms of imitation meat have been created for people wishing to reduce or eliminate meat consumption for health, environmental, or ethical considerations, but who still wish to taste the flavor and texture of meat. They are typically some form of processed soybean, (tofu, tempeh), but they can also be based on wheat gluten or even fungus (quorn).

In vitro meat, also known as cultured meat, is animal flesh that has never been part of a complete, living animal. Several research projects are currently experimentally growing in vitro meat, but no meat has yet been produced for public consumption.[96] The goal is to grow fully developed muscle organs, but the first generation will most likely be minced meat products.

Environmental impact

The UN Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) has estimated that direct emissions from meat production account for about 18% of the world's total greenhouse gas emissions. The FAO figure accounts for the entire meat production cycle - clearing forested land, making and transporting fertiliser, burning fossil fuels in agricultural machinery, and the front and rear end emissions of cattle and sheep.[97] In tracking food animal production from the feed through to the dinner table, the inefficiencies of grain fed meat, milk and egg production range from a 4:1 energy input to protein output ratio up to 54:1, in the opinion of Roger Segelken.[98]

The largest meat consumers (2003)[99]
 Rank  Country Consumption per capita (in kg)
1 United States 123
2 Spain 121
3 Australia 118
4 Austria 112
5 Denmark 111
6 New Zealand 109
7 Cyprus 108
8 Ireland 102
9 Canada 98
10 France 98

See also

References

  • Lawrie, R. A.; Ledward, D. A. (2006). Lawrie’s meat science (7th ed.). Cambridge: Woodhead Publishing Limited. ISBN 978-1-84569-159-2. 

Footnotes

  1. ^ a b Lawrie, 1.
  2. ^ a b c d Lawrie, 2.
  3. ^ a b Lawrie, 3.
  4. ^ a b Lawrie, 5.
  5. ^ Lawrie, 6.
  6. ^ Lawrie, 7.
  7. ^ a b Lawrie, 8.
  8. ^ Lawrie, 9.
  9. ^ Chrisafis, Angelique "France's horsemeat lovers fear US ban The Guardian, June 15th 2007, London.
  10. ^ Alan Davidson (2006). Tom Jaine, Jane Davidson and Helen Saberi. ed. The Oxford Companion to Food. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN 0-19-280681-5, pp. 387-388
  11. ^ Turner, E. 2005. "Results of a recent analysis of horse remains dating to the Magdalenian period at Solutre, France," pp 70-89. In Mashkour, M (ed.). Equids in Time and Space. Oxford: Oxbow
  12. ^ Rupert Wingfield-Hayes (29 June 2002). "China's taste for the exotic". BBC News. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/programmes/from_our_own_correspondent/2074073.stm. Retrieved 2007-05-15.
  13. ^ "Vietnam's dog meat tradition". BBC News. 31 December 2001. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/asia-pacific/1735647.stm. Retrieved 2007-05-15."Vietnam's dog meat tradition". BBC News. 31 December 2001. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/asia-pacific/1735647.stm. Retrieved 2007-05-15.
  14. ^ Desiree Caluza (2006-01-17). "Dog meat eating doesn’t hound Cordillera natives". Philippine Daily Inquirer. http://news.inq7.net/regions/index.php?index=2&story_id=63272&col=36. Retrieved 2006-10-27.
  15. ^ Podberscek, A. L. (2009). "Good to Pet and Eat: The Keeping and Consuming of Dogs and Cats in South Korea" (PDF). Journal of Social Issues 65 (3): 615. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.2009.01616.x. http://www.animalsandsociety.org/assets/265_podberscek.pdf.  edit
  16. ^ Francis H. Fay (June 1960) "Carnivorous walrus and some arctic zoonoses". Arctic 13, no.2: 111-122. http://arctic.synergiesprairies.ca/arctic/index.php/arctic/article/viewFile/3691/3666
  17. ^ Schwabe, Calvin W. (1979). Unmentionable cuisine. University of Virginia Press. p. 168. ISBN 9780813911625. http://books.google.com/books?id=SiBntk9jGmoC.
  18. ^ Hanley, Susan B. (1999). Everyday things in premodern Japan: the hidden legacy of material culture. University of California Press. p. 66. ISBN 0520218124. http://books.google.com/?id=f7E5a9CIploC&pg=PA66&dq=dog#v=onepage&q=dog.
  19. ^ Schwabe, Calvin W. (1979). Unmentionable cuisine. University of Virginia Press. p. 173. ISBN 9780813911625. http://books.google.com/books?id=SiBntk9jGmoC.
  20. ^ Alan Davidson (2006). Tom Jaine, Jane Davidson and Helen Saberi. ed. The Oxford Companion to Food. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN 0-19-280681-5, pp. 491
  21. ^ "Carapulcra de gato y gato a la parrilla sirven en fiesta patronal". Cronica Viva. http://www.cronicaviva.com.pe/index.php/regional/costa/3749-carapulcra-de-gato-y-gato-a-la-parilla-sirven-en-fiesta-patronal-. Retrieved 1 December 2011. 
  22. ^ "A Guinea Pig for All Times and Seasons". The Economist. http://www.economist.com/node/2926169. Retrieved 1 December 2011. 
  23. ^ a b Lawrie, 10.
  24. ^ Lawrie, 14.
  25. ^ a b Lawrie, 11.
  26. ^ Lawrie, 11 et seq.
  27. ^ Lawrie, 13.
  28. ^ Lawrie, 11, citing Ollson, V., Andersson, I., Ranson, K., Lundström, K. (2003) Meat Sci. 64, 287 and noting also that organically reared pigs "compare unfavourably" with conventionally reared ones "in some respects."
  29. ^ Table adapted from Lawrie, 17.
  30. ^ a b Lawrie, 18.
  31. ^ Lawrie, 19.
  32. ^ a b Lawrie, 21.
  33. ^ a b c Lawrie, 22.
  34. ^ a b Lawrie, 23.
  35. ^ Lawrie, 25.
  36. ^ a b Lawrie, 26.
  37. ^ Lawrie, 27.
  38. ^ a b Lawrie, 30.
  39. ^ a b c Lawrie, 29.
  40. ^ Lawrie, 28.
  41. ^ Lawrie, 31.
  42. ^ a b Lawrie, 32.
  43. ^ a b c Lawrie, 33.
  44. ^ Lawrie, 35.
  45. ^ Lawrie, 36 et seq.
  46. ^ a b c Lawrie, 39.
  47. ^ Lawrie, 94–126.
  48. ^ Lawrie, 126.
  49. ^ a b Lawrie, 76.
  50. ^ Lawrie, 75.
  51. ^ Lawrie, 77.
  52. ^ Lawrie, 78.
  53. ^ Lawrie, 79.
  54. ^ a b Lawrie, 82.
  55. ^ a b Lawrie, 93.
  56. ^ a b http://www.beef.org/uDocs/whatyoumisswithoutmeat638.pdf
  57. ^ a b Schurgers, L. J.; Vermeer, C. (2000). "Determination of phylloquinone and menaquinones in food. Effect of food matrix on circulating vitamin K concentrations". Haemostasis 30 (6): 298–307. PMID 11356998.  edit
  58. ^ "Dietary Fiber". Ext.colostate.edu. http://www.ext.colostate.edu/pubs/foodnut/09333.html. Retrieved 2010-05-01. 
  59. ^ "Vegetarian eating - Better Health Channel". Betterhealth.vic.gov.au. http://www.betterhealth.vic.gov.au/bhcv2/bhcarticles.nsf/pages/Vegetarian_eating?OpenDocument. Retrieved 2010-05-01. 
  60. ^ a b Lawrie, 129.
  61. ^ Lawrie, 130.
  62. ^ Lawrie, 134 et seq.
  63. ^ Lawrie, 134.
  64. ^ Lawrie, 137.
  65. ^ a b c Lawrie, 138.
  66. ^ Lawrie, 141.
  67. ^ Lawrie, 87.
  68. ^ Lawrie, 90.
  69. ^ a b Lawrie, 146.
  70. ^ Lawrie, 144.
  71. ^ a b Lawrie, 142.
  72. ^ Lawrie, 155.
  73. ^ Ronald B. Pegg; Fereidoon Shahidi (2004). Nitrite Curing of Meat: The N-Nitrosamine Problem and Nitrite Alternatives. John Wiley & Sons. ISBN 0-917678-50-8. 
  74. ^ Timothy J Key, Gary E Fraser, Margaret Thorogood, Paul N Appleby, Valerie Beral, Gillian Reeves, Michael L Burr, Jenny Chang-Claude, Rainer Frentzel-Beyme, Jan W Kuzma, Jim Mann and Klim McPherson (September 1999). "Mortality in vegetarians and non-vegetarians: detailed findings from a collaborative analysis of 5 prospective studies". American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 70 (3): 516S–524S. PMID 10479225. http://www.ajcn.org/cgi/content/full/70/3/516S. Retrieved 30 October 2009. 
  75. ^ a b Cross, Amanda; Leitzmann, MF; Gail, MH; Hollenbeck, AR; Schatzkin, A; Sinha, R (2007). "A Prospective Study of Red and Processed Meat Intake in Relation to Cancer Risk". PLoS Medicine (the Public Library of Science) 4 (12): e325. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0040325. PMC 2121107. PMID 18076279. http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pmcentrez&artid=2121107. 
  76. ^ Nothlings, U.; Wilkens, L. R.; Murphy, S. P.; Hankin, J. H.; Henderson, B. E.; Kolonel, L. N.. "Meat and Fat Intake as Risk Factors for Pancreatic Cancer: The Multiethnic Cohort Study - Nöthlings et al. 97 (19): 1458 - JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute". JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute (Jnci.oxfordjournals.org) 97 (19): 1458. doi:10.1093/jnci/dji292. http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/full/97/19/1458?maxtoshow=&HITS=10&hits=10&RESULTFORMAT=&fulltext=pancreatic+red+meat&searchid=1&FIRSTINDEX=0&resourcetype=HWCIT. Retrieved 2010-05-01. 
  77. ^ "Nutrients, Vitamins, Minerals and Dietary Information". Nutristrategy.com. http://www.nutristrategy.com/nutritioninfo2.htm. Retrieved 2010-05-01. 
  78. ^ "What You Eat May Influence Colon Cancer Relapse". American Cancer Society. 2007-08-21. Archived from the original on 2008-04-19. http://web.archive.org/web/20080419131054/http://www.cancer.org/docroot/NWS/content/NWS_1_1x_What_You_Eat_May_Influence_Colon_Cancer_Relapse.asp. Retrieved 2008-07-21. 
  79. ^ Taylor, E F; Burley, V J; Greenwood, D C; Cade, J E. "Meat consumption and risk of breast cancer in the UK Women's Cohort Study". British Journal of Cancer 96 (7): 1139–46. doi:10.1038/sj.bjc.6603689. PMC 2360120. PMID 17406351. http://www.nature.com/bjc/journal/v96/n7/full/6603689a.html. Retrieved 2010-05-01. 
  80. ^ Park, S. Y.; Murphy, S. P.; Wilkens, L. R.; Henderson, B. E.; Kolonel, L. N. (2007). "Fat and meat intake and prostate cancer risk: The multiethnic cohort study". International Journal of Cancer 121 (6): 1339–1345. doi:10.1002/ijc.22805. PMID 17487838.  edit
  81. ^ Rejecting meat 'keeps weight low', BBC News, March 14, 2006.
  82. ^ American Dietetic, A.; Dietitians Of, C. (2003). "Position of the American Dietetic Association and Dietitians of Canada: Vegetarian diets". Journal of the American Dietetic Association 103 (6): 748–765. doi:10.1053/jada.2003.50142. PMID 12778049.  edit
  83. ^ Maggie Fox, Meat raises lung cancer risk, too, study finds, Reuters, December 10, 2007; Cross, A. J.; Leitzmann, M. F.; Gail, M. H.; Hollenbeck, A. R.; Schatzkin, A.; Sinha, R. (2007). "A Prospective Study of Red and Processed Meat Intake in Relation to Cancer Risk". PLoS Medicine 4 (12): e325. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0040325. PMC 2121107. PMID 18076279. http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pmcentrez&artid=2121107.  edit
  84. ^ http://circ.ahajournals.org/cgi/content/abstract/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.924977v1
  85. ^ Snowdon, D. A.; Phillips, R. L.; Fraser, G. E. (1984). "Meat consumption and fatal ischemic heart disease". Preventive medicine 13 (5): 490–500. PMID 6527990.  edit
  86. ^ major Harvard University study
  87. ^ Sinha, R.; Cross, A. J.; Graubard, B. I.; Leitzmann, M. F.; Schatzkin, A. (Mar 2009). "Meat intake and mortality: a prospective study of over half a million people". Archives of Internal Medicine 169 (6): 562–571. doi:10.1001/archinternmed.2009.6. ISSN 0003-9926. PMC 2803089. PMID 19307518. http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pmcentrez&artid=2803089.  edit
  88. ^ De Abreu Silva, E. .; Marcadenti, A. . (2009). "Higher red meat intake may be a marker of risk, not a risk factor itself". Archives of Internal Medicine 169 (16): 1538–1539; author 1539 1539. doi:10.1001/archinternmed.2009.278. PMID 19752416.  edit
  89. ^ Salvini, S.; Hunter, D. J.; Sampson, L.; Stampfer, M. J.; Colditz, G. A.; Rosner, B.; Willett, W. C. (Dec 1989). "Food-based validation of a dietary questionnaire: the effects of week-to-week variation in food consumption". International journal of epidemiology 18 (4): 858–867. doi:10.1093/ije/18.4.858. ISSN 0300-5771. PMID 2621022.  edit
  90. ^ Rosner, B.; Gore, R. (Nov 2001). "Measurement error correction in nutritional epidemiology based on individual foods, with application to the relation of diet to breast cancer" (Free full text). American journal of epidemiology 154 (9): 827–835. doi:10.1093/aje/154.9.827. ISSN 0002-9262. PMID 11682365. http://aje.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/pmidlookup?view=long&pmid=11682365.  edit
  91. ^ US Meat and Poultry Is Widely Contaminated With Drug-Resistant Staph Bacteria
  92. ^ Corpet, Denis; Yin, Y; Zhang, X; Rémésy, C; Stamp, D; Medline, A; Thompson, L; Bruce, W et al (1995). "Colonic protein fermentation and promotion of colon carcinogenesis by thermolyzed casein". Nutr Cancer (Nutr Cancer.) 23 (3): 271–81. doi:10.1080/01635589509514381. PMC 2518970. PMID 7603887. http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pmcentrez&artid=2518970. 
  93. ^ "National Cancer Institute - Heterocyclic Amines in Cooked Meats". Cancer.gov. 2004-09-15. http://www.cancer.gov/cancertopics/factsheet/Risk/heterocyclic-amines. Retrieved 2010-05-01. 
  94. ^ "Heterocyclic Amines in Cooked Meats - National Cancer Institute". Cancer.gov. 2004-09-15. http://www.cancer.gov/cancertopics/factsheet/Risk/heterocyclic-amines. Retrieved 2010-05-01. 
  95. ^ "PAH - Occurrence in foods, dietary exposure and health effects" (PDF). http://ec.europa.eu/food/fs/sc/scf/out154_en.pdf. Retrieved 2010-05-01. 
  96. ^ Siegelbaum, D.J. (2008-04-23). "In Search of a Test-Tube Hamburger". TIME. http://www.time.com/time/health/article/0,8599,1734630,00.html?imw=Y. Retrieved 2009-04-30. 
  97. ^ Black, Richard (2008--09-03). "Shun meat, says UN climate chief". BBC. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/7600005.stm. Retrieved 2009-05-14. 
  98. ^ "U.S. could feed 800 million people with grain that livestock eat". News.cornell.edu. 1997-08-07. http://www.news.cornell.edu/releases/Aug97/livestock.hrs.html. Retrieved 2010-05-01. 
  99. ^ FAO (2009): FAOSTAT. Rom.

External links


Translations:

Meat

Top

Dansk (Danish)
n. - kød

idioms:

  • be meat and drink to    lige noget for en, at nyde noget

Nederlands (Dutch)
vlees, voedsel, kost, eetbaar gedeelte, essentie, diepte, liefhebberij

Français (French)
n. - (Culin) viande, chair, (fig) essentiel, nourriture (arch)

idioms:

  • be meat and drink to    (fig) se repaître de

Deutsch (German)
n. - Fleisch, Essen, Substanz

idioms:

  • be meat and drink to    etwas intensiv genießen

Ελληνική (Greek)
n. - κρέας, σφάγιο, σάρκα

idioms:

  • be meat and drink to    είμαι πηγή χαράς για

Italiano (Italian)
carne

idioms:

  • meat and drink    causa di gran piacere

Português (Portuguese)
n. - carne (f)

idioms:

  • be meat and drink to    ser tudo para

Русский (Russian)
мясо, мякоть, еда, добыча, любимое занятие, снабжать пищей, отведать пищи

idioms:

  • be meat and drink to    доставлять огромное удовольствие кому-л.

Español (Spanish)
n. - carne, comida, meollo, sustancia, materia

idioms:

  • be meat and drink to    una fuente de gran placer, ser algo placentero para

Svenska (Swedish)
n. - kött, (ätligt) innanmäte, (väsentligt) innehåll, kuk (vulg.), fitta (vulg.), villebråd, måltid

中文(简体)(Chinese (Simplified))
肉, 食物, 餐

idioms:

  • be meat and drink to    极大的享受

中文(繁體)(Chinese (Traditional))
n. - 肉, 食物, 餐

idioms:

  • be meat and drink to    極大的享受

한국어 (Korean)
n. - 고기, 만찬, 즐거움

idioms:

  • be meat and drink to    대단한 즐거움의 원천이 되다

日本語 (Japanese)
n. - 肉, 果肉, 身, 内容, 要点

idioms:

  • be meat and drink to    何よりのものである

العربيه (Arabic)
‏(الاسم) طعام, لحم, وجبه الطعام الرئيسيه‏

עברית (Hebrew)
n. - ‮בשר, בשר ושתייה, ארוחה (מיושן), אוכל מסוג כלשהו (מיושן), החלק האכיל של פירות, אגוזים, ביצים, רכיכות וכו', תוכן ממשי, התמצית או החלק העיקרי של, פעילות או מקצוע אהובים‬


 
 
Related topics:
carnophobia
venison
curing

Related answers:
Does chicken meat is red meat? Read answer...
Is McDonald\'s meat real meat? Read answer...
Which meat is red meat? Read answer...

Help us answer these:
Does meat sauce contain meat?
Does meat tenderizer dissolve meat?
Is fish meat the healthiest meat?

Post a question - any question - to the WikiAnswers community:

 

Copyrights:

American Heritage Dictionary. The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, Fourth Edition Copyright © 2007, 2000 by Houghton Mifflin Company. Updated in 2009. Published by Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved.  Read more
Wiley Visual Food Lover's Guide. Copyright © 2009 QA International. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Wiley and the Wiley logo are registered trademarks of John Wiley & Sons, Inc. and/or its affiliates in the United States and other countries. Used here by license.  Read more
Britannica Concise Encyclopedia. Britannica Concise Encyclopedia. © 1994-2012 Encyclopædia Britannica, Inc. All rights reserved.  Read more
Oxford Food & Nutrition Dictionary. A Dictionary of Food and Nutrition. Copyright © 1995, 2003, 2005 by A. E. Bender and D. A. Bender. All rights reserved.  Read more
Roget's Thesaurus. Roget's II: The New Thesaurus, Third Edition by the Editors of the American Heritage® Dictionary Copyright © 1995 byHoughton Mifflin Company. Published by Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved.  Read more
American Heritage Dictionary of Idioms. The American Heritage® Dictionary of Idioms by Christine Ammer. Copyright © 1997 by The Christine Ammer 1992 Trust. Published by Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved.  Read more
Answers Corporation Antonyms by Answers.com. © 1999-present by Answers Corporation. All rights reserved.  Read more
Columbia Encyclopedia. The Columbia Electronic Encyclopedia, Sixth Edition Copyright © 2012, Columbia University Press. Licensed from Columbia University Press. All rights reserved. www.cc.columbia.edu/cu/cup/ Read more
$copyright.smallImage.alttext Gale Encyclopedia of Food & Culture. Encyclopedia of Food and Culture. Copyright © 2003 by The Gale Group, Inc. All rights reserved.  Read more
Word Tutor. Copyright © 2004-present by eSpindle Learning, a 501(c) nonprofit organization. All rights reserved.
eSpindle provides personalized spelling and vocabulary tutoring online; sign up free Read more
Sign Language Videos. Copyright © 2009 Signing Savvy, LLC. All rights reserved.  Read more
The Dream Encyclopedia. The Dreams Encyclopedia. 1995 ©Visible Ink Press (VisibleInkPress.com). All rights reserved.  Read more
 Oxford Dictionary of Modern Slang. Oxford University Press. © 1997, 2008, 2010 All rights reserved.  Read more
Saunders Veterinary Dictionary. Saunders Comprehensive Veterinary Dictionary 3rd Edition. Copyright © 2007 by D.C. Blood, V.P. Studdert and C.C. Gay, Elsevier. All rights reserved.  Read more
Random House Word Menu. © 2010 Write Brothers Inc. Word Menu is a registered trademark of the Estate of Stephen Glazier. Write Brothers Inc. All rights reserved.  Read more
 Rhymes. Oxford University Press. © 2006, 2007 All rights reserved.  Read more
Bradford's Crossword Solver's Dictionary. Collins Bradford's Crossword Solver's Dictionary © Anne Bradford, 1986, 1993, 1997, 2000, 2003, 2005, 2008 HarperCollins Publishers All rights reserved.  Read more
Wikipedia on Answers.com. This article is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License. It uses material from the Wikipedia article Meat Read more
Translations. Copyright © 2007, WizCom Technologies Ltd. All rights reserved.  Read more

Follow us
Facebook Twitter
YouTube