Dictatorship

The US supported Fulgencio Batista not because he was a dictator but because he was more favorable to US concerns than the Communists who eventually took over.

All are correct

What can be described as a new political system that developed after World War 1 was the fascist dictatorship. In this system "pioneered" by Benito Mussolini in Italy, one powerful leader's political party was elected into power, or "muscled" its way into power and outlawed all opposition parties.They often had a para-military support group. In Italy it was the "Black Shirts" and in Germany, Adolph Hitler formed the "Brown Shirts".

Fascist dictatorships appealed to a nation's nationalism and promised to fix the nation's economic problems.

Fascism, also a Spanish political system often flourished when democratic governments failed economically.

Generally speaking, populations that supported fascist governments were not "hate mongers". They overlooked clear violations of normal political practices as a trade off for economic growth and political pride transferred into nationalism.

how about no

Enlightened despots maintained absolute power while implementing reforms aimed at modernizing their states and promoting the welfare of their subjects. They retained control over key aspects of governance, including legislation, military, and economic policies, often centralizing authority to ensure stability and efficiency. Despite their benevolent intentions, these rulers typically suppressed dissent and maintained censorship to protect their rule and prevent challenges to their authority.

Ceausescu did it

Adolf Hitler.

Any problem whose solution could not be agreed upon could be tossed out to a dictator during the republic. The consuls did not always agree and the tribunes could veto their decision if they did. Most of these problems were of a military nature, but civic matters were also addressed as during the dictatorship of Sulla.

The office of dictator was created during a dire emergency. It was not a situation when the consuls could not agree, but was the immediate and direct way ( as per the Republican Romans ) to deal with the crises. The term of a dictator during most of the republic was a limited one, often perhaps a year at most. If the emergency was still not solved the dictator could be appointed for an additional amount of time and /or a new dictator could be appointed if the first one failed.

Angola and Mozambique

Josip Broz Tito

Not too bad an example

appeasement

Puerto Rico does not have a dictator. Puerto Rico is a commonwealth (but not a state) of the United States. I believe it has a governor, but that is about it.

Despite what some people may think, Australia has never had a dictator. Since Federation, we have been a Constitutional Monarchy with regular democratic elections.

Lemurs are a type of primate, and primates are simply referred to as males and females, with the exception of the man and woman references for human primates. So, no, a male lemur is not called a dictator.

What makes you think it is?

The answer is NO its not..next time sharpen up on ur general knowledge!!

No it is a noun. An adjective is a descriptive word. If you were to say 'merciless dictator' merciless would be the adjective.

or

If you were to say he is dictatorial, 'dictatorial' is an adjective.

Hitler

Sulla

Venezuela

I think the base word is dictate.

Adolf Hitler

One of the biggest reasons that Cuba failed to rise up again, was because Castro didn't want them overflowing his dictatorship. He needed to be supported.

Josef Stalin dictator over the Soviet Union

Porfirio Diaz

Joseph II, son of Maria Theresa and brother of the infamous Marie Antoinette, queen of France during the French Revolution.

One could also make the case that his mother, Maria Theresa, was also an enlightened despot, but the more common answer is Joseph.