Capitalism

Because of capitalism many industries came to the villages. Then many workers came there and started to work there and started to stay there. As a result many shops were came for them to purchase things. Then that city or village changed to big cities. Then there raised the problem of overpopulation, bad sanitation.

SO THE VILLAGES NOW CHANGED TO BIG CITIES BECAUSE OF INDUSTRIAL CAPITLISM

Capitalism has prevailed over communism because it provides individual incentives. The harder you work, the more you can get for yourself. Where as in communism, the essential philosophy can be defined by the Marx quote: "To each according to his need, from each according to his ability". Meaning every person should get what they need and every person should do what they are able to do. There is absolutely no connection between work and the fulfillment of individual need. This causes people to become lazy and do the bare minimum because ambition is worthless in communism. The ambitious men of society are made equal to those who desire nothing more than average. In capitalism, those ambitious men lay the seeds of growth and expansion. They do this primarily because they have something to gain. The bottom line is, it is very hard for an entire population to work for a greater good when they personally see little to no benefit. Their lives thus become a subsistence existence and society cannot progress and must inevitably collapse.

---- = crisis of capitalism = (19th century- ) Prediction in Marxism of the collapse of capitalism. A species of catastrophe theory, envisaging that the inherent contradictions of the capitalist system will lead, through political conflict, to the collapse or overthrow of capitalism. Twentieth century versions of this theory see the crisis of capitalism as being a legitimacy crisis rather than a simple economic or political one ---- = crisis of capitalism = (19th century- ) Prediction in Marxism of the collapse of capitalism. A species of catastrophe theory, envisaging that the inherent contradictions of the capitalist system will lead, through political conflict, to the collapse or overthrow of capitalism. Twentieth century versions of this theory see the crisis of capitalism as being a legitimacy crisis rather than a simple economic or political one

i your mama bed with lil wayne

Marx talked about the dictatorship of the proletariat as the transition between capitalism and Communism. This just meant the working class taking temporary control of the state and using it as part of the changeover to a classless society.

They are unrelated to each other, Democracy is a form of government which is chosen by the people, Capitalism is the form of society which says that everybody earns for what he works for, Socialism is the point of view which says that the government meddles with the income and living of the people (ex: unemployed people who get a job from the government),also Captalism is why Americas great and socialisism is the first step to communism and then comes fachism(prbly spelt it wrong) hpope i helped

what id said is true

A one-year-old e-commerce companyy! ;) Apex

They had a right to gain wealth and power.

Karl Marx's view was that over the course of many decades capitalism would develop and mature and eventually it would become a burden to humanity in that it would no longer be viable as a system. When this time came, the working classes would organize politically and overthrow capitalism and establish a socialist state that will repress the former ruling class, the capitalists, and would rule on behalf of the working class and establish socialism. As time progressed socialism too would develop and eventually blossom in the shape of communism, a classless world without war, poverty and racism.

Some companies paid them money to ignore these problems.

Conflict Perspective

Capitalism allows for more freedom for businesses than socialism does

?

The predominant criticism would be that business owners get rich while workers remain poor.

Large returns in a short period of time

Lenin argued that people should not speak of imperialism as a policy because the use of the term would imply that imperialism was something that gave capitalism a choice. Thus there was no science to it at all. Lenin argued that imperialism was a natural development that Marx had simply overlooked.

Pollution and social inequality

A capital intensive industry is one that uses a lot of money to get started. Many business startups fail at this stage because not enough investment was made.

No. Communism in the sense Marx, Engels, Lenin, Trotsky and others have meant it is in almost no way imaginable similar to capitalism, aside from the fact that both are better than the systems that came bfore them. Capitalism is better than feudalism and communism is better than capitalism. Communism in the sense most people mean it, Stalinism, has some more things in common with capitalism, both are very repressive and bureaucratic for example.

Answer this question… A politician demands that the government eliminate regulations on how much pollution a business can create.

State capitalism is when there is a free-market economy, but the government actively plays in the economy as an investor, manager, and organizer of various companies.

Generally speaking, Yes. Capitalists argue that the government should have no role or a minimal role in controlling and directing businesses. Socialists argue that the government should either own and direct business or use stringent regulations to guide business activities.

As a purely definitional question, the United States is a mixed economy, but is primarily a free-market capitalist economy. Most businesses are owned by private individuals and the government does not control investment or business choices.

As a historical question, the US economy developed in contrast to the mercantilist principles envisioned by the British colonial authorities. The colonies were designed to export raw materials back to Britain and then purchase finished goods from Britain. Since the prices of these commodities were very much inflated, many colonists became entrepreneurs, producing goods and services locally. Others starting smuggling businesses in order to bring locally produced goods or goods in foreign colonies (such as Spanish or French colonies) to the American doorstep. The entire American Revolution was fought over how American entrepreneurship and smuggling was providing an escape from the taxes imposed on British goods. Since private enterprise had become so much of the American identity, it was only natural that it would continue after the country achieved independence.