What did southerners think congress should protect?
Southerners thought congress should protect their borders.
How did northern Democrats feel about Lincoln's Emancipation Proclamation?
They did not want to give up there slaves.( I don't know much, but I'm an 8th grader, so..)
What part of Black History was the emancipation proclamation?
It stops slavery throughout the United States
Why doesn't the Emancipation Proclamation declare immediate freedom for all people held as slaves?
Because Lincoln has to be careful not to upset slave-owners in the four border-states that have remained loyal. Otherwise those states may fall into the arms of the Confederacy.
When it was issued in 1863 the emancipation proclamation declared free only those slaves in?
The Emancipation Proclamation freed slaves in 10 states that were still in rebellion in 1863. It did not, however, take into account slaves that were in bordering Union states. These remaining slaves were freed on the state and federal level.
Perhaps it is in the Bible, but by faith alone you know that God works in His time. The Hebrew people were God's chosen ones. They were filled with faith that God would one day free them. God works in mysterious ways no one can understand.
On July 12, 1862, President Lincoln decided that he would confidentially inform Secretaries Seward and Welles of his decision to issue an emancipation proclamation. His plans were to present a draft of his document to a special session of the cabinet on July 22nd. Both men were his most trusted cabinet members and they treated Lincoln's draft as being strictly confidential.
What did the emancipation proclamation announced?
All slaves in areas under rebellion (the south) were free of slavery. The slaves in non rebelling states (the north) were still in slavery
Because the Emancipation Proclamation made Black enlistment in the US. Army legally authorized and Black regiments started to be formed. Eventually 166 Black regimental units were formed: At the beginning they were designated as "Colored", Ultimately all became "U.S.Colored Troops". In all 178,975 soldiers in the Union Army were Blacks, of whom 2,870 were killed in battle..
Why did the president Lincoln issue the emancipation proclamation?
The first answer to my edit is based on sound reasoning. This edit will supplement what has already been written.
The Emancipation Proclamation by President Lincoln was a strategic move to serve the his main purpose for fighting the Civil War. Lincoln always believed that the Federal Government had no right, under the US Constitution to outlaw slavery. He tried to assure the South before he took office that he had no intention to abolish slavery where it already existed. As history has shown us, this made no impact on the leaders of the South. They were concerned about Lincoln's motives and they were concerned that the Southern "slave" States would eventually be a huge minority of States that had legal slaves.
To fully gauge the impact, the later results, and reasons for the Emancipation Proclamation the following information is important:
A. In 1865 Lincoln ratified the 13th Amendment to the US Constitution which outlawed slavery;
B. Many freed slaves and the peoples of Afro-American society would continue to experience limited freedoms & prejudice. Many of these issues took almost 100 years to be resolved;
C. Based on Lincoln's earlier stated ideas regarding slavery, the emancipation of slaves was not the first reason that Lincoln engaged the Union in the Civil War. In fact, he even saw it as a potential threat to the goal of keeping the Union unified. (note. as an aside, the concept of manifest destiny, already in the minds of many leaders, would be thwarted by the secession. )
D. In truth, Lincoln was a pragmatist and a man of moderation. No one, who could see that over 600,000 men would be killed, that the War would take over 4 years to settle, added to the massive destruction, and bitter ed divisiveness over decades, could have wanted such a war. Somehow, someway, the slavery issue would have had to be solved without the costs of this Civil War.
E. To the horror of the Abolitionists, it would become clear that abolishing slavery was not why the Union could field large armies of young men whose call to duty was to save the Union. Most Northerners were against slavery. There is no doubt about that, however they were not going to war, a war that would destroy so many families, to end slavery.
F. Lincoln believed that turning the war into an abolitionist crusade, might result in North en Democrats & border State Unionists to withdraw their support.
G. And, once again, Lincoln did not believe he had any authority to free anyone's "slaves". He even hoped that if the South thought that a compromise of sorts could be worked out, the South would return to the Union. Lincoln ignored critics would found it absurd that the South would give in if the North had the possibility of making the reunified Union, slave free. The critics would have to ignore the fact that prior to and during the upcoming war, the Federal Capital itself had legal slavery.
H. During the early stages of the War, Union generals wielded their military powers to undermine slavery. Lincoln reversed their actions of freeing slaves in some Territories, and even removed these generals.
I. The War began in April 1861, and the fighting continued with both sides losing men. With the power and huge military advantages of the Union, this was not expected in most quarters of the North. Lincoln saw the problems a longer than expected war would bring.
J. In defiance of his own ideas, the pragmatic side of Lincoln knew he needed another reason to continue the war. He hoped that adding a popular, moral attachment to the war might prove to be a favorable tactic. His hope was that an emancipation would encourage a deeper commitment to victory and he had nothing to lose except his own integrity. He could place that aside if emancipation could help end the War ( it didn't in real terms and the idea that the despotic and quasi democratic Europeans would side with the United States & not recognize the Confederacy was a "hope". (More on this later. )
K. Lincoln also hoped that emancipation would generate international support and deny the Confederacy of possible European allies. It was reasoned that no external power would want to be allied with a nation fighting for Slavery. Freeing the slaves would hurt the Southern economy and thus weaken its military strength. Also, Lincoln saw a new source of manpower, the freed slaves, joining the military.
L. The War dragged on and as the Summer of 1862 was upon the nation, Lincoln decided to issue the emancipation as an act of justice and a military edict to help end the War. As now the pragmatic politician, the timing of such an announcement was of most importance At all costs the emancipation could not appear as a desperate measure. It might have, as the Union had suffered a number of defeats against a "put together at the last moment army of the South".
He announced it to his cabinet in July, 1862. Luckily when the horrible battle of Antietam was over in September & the South withdrew from Maryland, this was the chance as Lee's retreat, if you will, could be seen as a Northern victory. In military terms it was a tactical draw. When an attacking army loses less men than the defenders, it's the reverse of a natural battle.
If it was a Union victory, & McClellan was praised for pressing the attack on Lee's army, which McClellan did, it did not save his job. George B. McClellan lost his job as leader of the Army of the Potomac on November 3, 1862.
M. Antietam is said by some historians as the end of the Confederacy's bid for recognition from Europe. In my view, European governments had no intention of recognizing the Confederacy. They had little to gain. Many astute European statesman and military men saw the potential of the United States. Many saw it as a rival "power to be". However, it was not lost on them that a successful
new group of "Americans" could result in "two new powers to be".
The Europeans had outlawed slavery long before the US Civil War. That's true enough, but they did not outlaw enslaving entire populations in their colonial empires. France "engineered" the construction of The Suez Canal as example with the use of "forced labor" in 1869. At any given point in time, 30,000 laborers by force were involved in the construction. Thousands of them died.
Most political scientists mark 1928 as the year Great Britain attained the same civil rights status as the United States.
N. On September 22, 1862, Lincoln issued his preliminary Emancipation Proclamation. He took great care to make it clear that it was an executive order allowed to him as the Commander in Chief under the Constitution. Because of that, the proclamation allowed for the liberation of slaves only in areas that were in rebellion and thus under martial law. Bottom line was that slaves were liberated in areas where the Federal Government had no power.
Lee's retreat out of Maryland ( a Union slave State ) prompted Lincoln to call for the surrender of the Confederacy and for its States to rejoin the Union by December 31, 1862. If that didn't happen then their slaves would be declared free men. Based on the example of Maryland, it needs to be again said that Lincoln, personally against slavery, was not as President implacable opposed to slavery; his avowed purpose was always to preserve the Union no matter it took to do so. So whether by preserving slavery, destroying it, or by keeping it in some States and not in others, the Union had to be preserved.
O. Lincoln's Final Emancipation Proclamation on January 1, 1863 specifically listed those areas where slaves were to be free. Slave owners who were loyal to the Union were exempt and allowed to keep their slaves. Based on the 1860 census, this meant that over 800,000 slaves or 21% of slaveswere to remain in bondage. The "keep Europe out " plan was ridiculous in that the Union could have slaves but the areas not within Union control were not.
P. The Proclamation was almost as controversial as the suspension of US Civil Rights. It caused political disputes in the North and among the rank and file of the US Army. It was early on that Lincoln in the interest of national security had suspended civil liberties in the Union. The suspension of habeas corpus resulted in the summary arrests which imprisoned thousands of Federal citizens.
Some were forced to take loyalty oaths and simple economic rights were also suspended. Some of the Federal "activities" were issues not settled until after the War.
In tact below is the initial answer which has enough good information worth keeping.
He wanted to take control of the rebellion and after the battle of Antietam, where the north won, he thought it was a good move to get re-elected. Also, by making that proclamation he made the war about slavery first and foremost. This ensured that Britain and France would not enter the war and aid the South....the people of Britain and France could not support a cause that supported slavery.
To turn it into a war on slavery.
He was hoping this would raise Northern morale (which it didn't) and keep the British from helping the Confederates (which it did). <--- Little unjustifed, because of the rebelling slaves in the States that Lincoln had put in both the preliminary document of the Proclamation followed by the actual one.
Lincoln wanted to STOP the Civil War, therefore stop the Northern States and Southern states fighting. He didn't want a war against slavery, he wanted it abolished. When Lincoln signed the paper, he stated, "If my name ever goes into history, it will be because of this act." His act meant that the rebellion would stop and war would end.
But this Proclamation resulted in his assassination. Therefore, John Wilkes Booth shooting him at that play he attended.
I see for that the Emancipation Proclamation, was a good delcaration. If you think about it, Abraham Lincoln's legacy is because he did something, that no one at that time would believe possible.
He is one of the greatest Presidents of the United States of America. Not all he did was bad, more so heroic.
Can you get emancipated after age 18 in Indiana?
1. the legal age is 18, so there is no need to get emancipated after you are able to leave with your parents permission.It would be just a waste of time to file for it.
2. Actually If you are under the age of 24 and are going to school you still aren't considered an "independent". Meaning you can still be claimed on your parents taxes and on your fafsa you have to fill it out as a dependent.
Did Abraham Lincoln sign the emancipation proclamation with his full name?
Yes= he signed his full name of Abraham Lincoln.
Is it true that The Emancipation Proclamation had an impact on the Union's efforts to win the war?
The first and the final Emancipation Proclamation had no effect on Great Britain or France with regards to the US Civil War. Great Britain continued to build Southern warships and send supplies passed the Union blockade whenever possible. France floated a major loan to the South after President Lincoln's proclamations. The London Times mocked the Emancipation noting it had no effect on Inion slave states. As a further example, when Vicksburg finally surrendered in July of 1863, General US Grant reported that he found over 66,000 British Enfield rifles there. High level British politicians such as Gladstone were still dealing in Confederate bond issues as late as 1863. In addition there remained an international law problem concerning the Union's blockade. There were voices that said the blockade "legally" created the Confederacy as an independent nation as a government cannot blockade its own ports. Keeping that issue aside, the Union still had a problem with the South. Sources in Great Britain noted that the the Confederacy had a central government, a constitution, voting rights and a standing army.
The Rebels had created a defacto independent nation.
British recognition was not present, however, Britain remained a major arms supplier to the Confederates.
As for France, the "Emperor" took full advantage of the US's occupation with the civil War. France sent over 30,000 troops to occupy Mexico and declared the Austrian puppet emperor Maximillian as the new ruler of Mexico.
Was the emancipation proclamation effective?
the emancipation proclamation was not very effective, but inspired many Americans of that time to become abolitionists
Did the emancipation proclamation live up to its name?
No because the blacks were still not really "free"
Why was the emancipation proclamation not enforcable?
The Emancipation Proclamation was not enforceable because:
1 - it had been released by President Lincoln only as a war measure, in his own capacity as Commander in Chief of the Union armed forces;
2 - it was directed to the ten Confederate States, whose territories were mainly not under Union's control;
3 - it couldn't be applied towards the so called Border States Border States;
4 - it was not a law passed by Congress;
5 - it didn't itself outlaw the slavery and didn't make the former slaves (the so called "Freedmen", which managed to become freed) citizens;
6 - It was only a war goal, claimed in addition to that of restoring the Union.
Why did the emancipation proclamation apply to the seceded states?
because it changed the way that they were run.
Why did it take so long for slavery to end in America after the Emancipation Proclamation?
i dont know find it somewhere else
Because they were losing all their battles in Virginia, and it would have looked like a desperate measure.
Let us start with an Organic Cell.
Cells vary greatly in their composition and size. For example: the smallest bacteria cell is about 0.1 micrometers in diameter (that's 10,000,000 of a meter). Although cells might differ widely in size, appearance and functions, they are all composed primarily
of 4 different types of atoms: Oxygen (8 electrons orbiting nucleus), Hydrogen (1 electron orbiting nucleus), Carbon (2 unpaired electrons orbiting nucleus) and Nitrogen (7 electrons orbiting nucleus). These four elements make up the majority of organic compounds.
As you can see, cells are quite complex tiny structures. You can't possibly know the exact number of atoms in a cell but let's say you can find as many atoms in a single cell as stars in the sky.
Some sources told us that the average adult human body is made up of "50 million million" (50 trillion) cells, while others put the figure closer to 10 trillion. Science NetLinks, a resource for science teachers, stated that there are approximately "ten to the 14th power" (that's 100 trillion) cells in the human body.
That's a lot of atoms! This means that all of these cells, composed of trillions of atoms each, must have had to understand each other to know how much of what kind of atom to produce, where to go, how to interact, and how to unify to create the object it was destined to become. This works for all things that exist from the smallest bacteria, to the far reaches of the universe that have been created by nature, and not by man. When we talk about solid objects, such as rocks, or planets, we are talking about particles and molecules made up of atoms. Each object created has a specific function in order to adapt and unify itself with everything else around it. Kind of like the building blocks of our universe. Like a giant puzzle.
So just as the trillions of atoms that create a single cell work and cooperate with each other to unify and become what it is destined to, the particles and molecules that build and unify do so in a predetermined way to create the end result we know as our trees, mountains, planets, stars, and universe. How can we be so sure?
Something cannot exist in nothing. You must have something to make something. Imagine for a moment that the planet earth, was one of the 8 electrons orbiting the nucleus of a single oxygen atom amongst the other trillions of atoms that make up a cell. Supposed our concept of time was at such a rate that the all the electrons orbited at the same speed in which our actual planets do. We would see a sky full of trillions of atoms that much resemble our night sky, and as vast as our universe. To us, this would be the only universe we know of. We would not understand that our "universe" was confined to a single cell. The sight of a trillion other atoms in our "night sky" would have no significance to us. We would think of it much as we do here in our real life. A sky filled with stars, suns, each which have orbiting bodies around them. We would not realize that we are playing a very important role in interacting with the other "stars" in order to form the cell in which we exist. But it doesn't end there. Outside of our universe, our cell, our dimension, exist trillions and billions of other cells, each holding their own universe of atoms within. These trillions and billions of cells all come together to unify and create Bob here on the real Earth. In order for all of our universes (cells) to come together and unify in harmony to create Bob, each one of the trillions of atoms in a single cell amongst the trillions billions of cells in Bobs body would ALL have to be able to communicate with each other almost intelligently, to understand their specific important function to help piece the puzzle together properly, and create Bob. This must happen at the very point of the beginning, the very first single atom that emerged, and began building Bob.
Everything must interact in harmony in order for the final product to emerge. If an atom was able to make random choices of what it wanted to do or become, the puzzle would fall apart. There would be clashes between atoms, and the "universe" it was trying to create would fall apart. It is important that ALL things work in harmony in order to keep the fabric of creation knitted in unison. Every atom must know what all the other atoms will do next. Whether your life and my life work in the same fashion is hard to tell, but logic dictates it would, because we exist in a universe that works in unison, and in a predetermined creation.
What predetermined creation am I referring to? Our universe. Just like the predetermined universe that exists in a single cell, which exists in a dimension surrounded by trillions and billions of cells, our actual universe exists amongst billions and trillions of other universes in the dimension outside of ours. We are the same as a single cell in our body. We make up a small microscopic piece of a bigger puzzle. And because something cannot exist in nothing, the procedure is infinite. There must always be another dimension outside a dimension.
Now if this is the case, then everything must have to be predetermined, in order to know exactly what it's specific function is in creating the next dimension.
Therefore, all paths and choices and possibilities must already exist, in order to work in unison. All dimensions must know where they are going next in order to continue existing without breakdown.
This is why time as we know it does not exist, and is just a human made concept. We are trapped in a dimension of time that only allows us to see backwards. We can only live minute by minute. The 4th dimension (time), as we know it, blocks us from seeing time as one continuous line. Every choice you make, for example, deciding on if you want to go out and meet a friend, already exists. The only choice you actually make is the choice in which you decide to stay home or go out. From that point on, every possible outcome already exists. It has to, or the universe would fall apart. Creation must always know what it is going to do next. This is why I believe that if you pay enough attention to the things that happen around you, you can see the potential outcomes of every situation. The proof in that is easy. Simply look at events in your past that had happened, that lead to the next important events that happened that would not have if the 1st event never transpired.
Lets imagine for a moment you are driving home. You suddenly decide to stop for a coffee, and quickly get back on the road. You lost 3 mins of your time doing this. Further down the road you come to a stop in a traffic jam. You notice up ahead on the highway, that a bridge has collapsed onto the road and killed many people beneath it. Had you not stopped for a coffee, this would have been you. Your choice saved your life. But in reality, every possible outcome already existed. It must because nature must always be in unison. It must always know how to deal with the outcome of every situation in order for things to continue working in unison. If not, like I said, things would begin to break down, and fall apart.
"Time is relative: it happens here, to me, differently than it happens there, to you. How fast time passes here depends on my position in relation to gravity and my relative motion. The same goes for you - but relative to your location and motion. But one thing is sure: we are both heading in the same direction. We are both getting older. Now, if I'm on a satellite above you, I am traveling much faster then you are and there is a corresponding difference in how fast time is passing. I can observe you getting older more quickly than I am: you can observe me aging more slowly. If, however, we both meet up at either your place or mine, we will then be aging at the same rate.
Physicists combine space and time into a four-dimensional "space time" which inextricably relates the measurement of space and the measurement of time together and neatly explains why speed (through space) affects the passage of time."
Imagine watching a movie that you have never seen. Half way through the movie, you know what has happened up to that point. You know the history of the story, but the future of the story is still unknown to you. However, this does not mean that the upcoming events and the end of the story does not already exist on the DVD. It is very possible to see the outcome of the story if you watch for the signs given to you. Much as it is possible to see the outcome of certain things in life by watching for the signs.
Pete
During the American Civil War (1861-1865) President Abraham Lincoln in 1862 signed the Emancipation Proclamation into law, freeing African slaves held in areas that the Federal Government did not control. After the war, the congress made full freedom and citizenship of former slaves national law as part of the U.S. Constitution with what are called the three Reconstruction Amendments, the 13th, 14th 15th. These ultimately gave all people equal rights under law. They relate directly to the Civil Rights Movement, and may now be said to directly pertain to the election of President Barack Obama, the first American president of African decent.
The Emancipation Proclamation: Issued during the American Civil War in late 1862, the Emancipation Proclamation consisted of a pair of executive orders issued by President Abraham Lincoln which declared free any slaves held in the confederate states which did not return to the Union by January 1, 1863. Lincoln's order was a war measure and was controversial at the time and even down to the present because it did not free any slaves except where the federal government had no power. It was not a popular decision at the time, south or north. Even Lincoln, being a man of his times, once suggested that freed slaves should be repatriated to Africa. But what Lincoln and his Emancipation Proclamation bravely did was to commit the United States to permanently ending slavery. It wasn't perfect, but it was a start. Yet it would take more than a century before the Voting Rights Act of 1965 was passed, essentially completing what the Emancipation Proclamation began.
The Thirteenth Amendment: the first of the three "Reconstruction Amendments" legally ended slavery. The text reads, "Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime where of the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction." The amendment was proposed on January 31, 1865, signed by President Lincoln and ratified on December 6, 1865.
The Fourteenth Amendment is the citizenship amendment. It was proposed on June 13, 1866, and ratified on July 9, 1868. It effectively conferred full U.S. citizenship on former slaves.It requires the states to provide equal protection under the law to all people, regardless of race, color, creed, or national origin. The 14th Amendment was applied strongly in the famed Supreme Court case of Brown v. Board of Education (1954) which helped to overturn so-called "Jim Crow" laws and outlawed racial segregation in the United States.
The Fifteenth Amendment guarantees all citizens the right to vote. It prohibits any state government from denying any citizen the right to vote based on that citizen's "race, color or previous condition of servitude" (that is, slavery). It was ratified on February 3, 1870 and also played a powerful role in Brown v. Board of Education (1954).
The Civil Rights Movement: Taken together, the Emancipation Proclamation, the three Reconstruction Amendments and the Brown v. Board of Education supreme court decision of 1954 may be said to have led ultimately to the Civil Rights Movement in the United States which culminated in the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the National Voting Rights Act of 1965, but not without a great deal of heartbreak, bloodshed, terror, assassination and murder. Getting human beings to recognize one another as simply human turns out not to be simple. Yet we United States have just inaugurated our first nonwhite president, an event many of us from the Vietnam and Civil Rights generation never imagined we would live to see. Hope springs eternal ….