Famous Artworks

It isquite misunderstanding when we look at Deviance picture,

1. It is just an imagination.

2. It is not true because Jesus is not a hypocrite, while the bible teaches long hair for man is a shame for man, Jesus and his disciples should have short hair or bold head.

3. The famous picture could be the evil plan of devil to make Mary Magdalena issue later.

4.Encient Jews used to eat from same plate and drink from same vessel. It is is clear from the scripture that he took bread (NOT BREADS) and vessel (NOT VESSELS). It is believed to be a big bread good enough for the whole family at that time (BIG FAMILY).

5. If they want to eat from same plate, a rectangular table is totally inconvenient it should be a round table.

6. When it is a round table ,there is no question of who was in centre bible doesn't say anything about centre. but it says the disciple whom Jesus loved the most was leaning on his shoulder.

They show the mood and tone of the painting, and the way that da Vinci paints the mouth is an illusion whether she is smiling or not.

No, the painting was not seriously damaged on that occasion. However, it is true that a strip has been taken off on each side, but this must have been done much earlier.

She is not actually laughing, just a smile. The meaning of her smile has been debated since the painting was done.

It is a twig of Digitalis, foxglove.

I am not 100% but I think there was only 40 copies made of Veronica's handkerchief and iIwas told that there should be a number over a number on the back of it like 3/40. This might be of help to

Also:

If it came from the Vatican, has the proper authntication document and wax seals and is in good condition it should be worth $200.00 to $400.00. These were touched to the genuine veil of Veronica and are third class relics. They were produced over 100 years ago for about 50 years. These were produced by the hundreds, perhaps thousands.

No one knows anything about the woman in the painting. Many art experts think it could have been a self portrait. He had the painting with him when he died and had carried it with him for many years.

Dean Cornwell - I don't know the year.

His first painting was the weeping woman painted in France and went for $320.00 Answer 2: The above is pure nonsense. Picasso's earliest painting in a museum, was painted in 1895. The 'Weeping Woman' is from 1937.

Being the art-icon it is, "The Scream" is thought to be priceless, the way "Mona Lisa" is priceless. It is on the other hand insured for something like 200 million dollars. That should give u some idea. On an auction, it would probably set an all time record and go for something in the neigbourhod of 3-400 mill dollars.

Leonardo De Vinci was the greatest painter of his time and his work is revered today. He kept three paintings with him to his death. The Mona Lisa was one of them. Too precious to part with. It had the enigmatic smile of several of his works. The hands are another trademark. Shown as an expression of a persons demeanor and character. The "smile" perhaps the refection of the persons soul. His power of expressing so much detail with shadows is in evidence here. The Mona Lisa and "Our Lady of the Rocks" share that and an obscura background. Layers of lacquer painted over the back ground to give it depth. This small picture can never have a price put on it. It belongs to a world that needs this beauty. It is for all to see, not for one person to possess.

Ephemeral art refers to art pieces that are made to last for only a short period of time. An example would be the intricate sand art of Buddhist monks. They spend hours making beautiful sand art and when they are finished, they just clear it all away. The point of this is for the monks to ponder on the transient nature of life.

Vincenzo Peruggia's motive for stealing the Mona Lisa from the Louvre was to return the painting to Italy because he hoped the Italian government would give him a reward. Peruggia wanted to return the painting to its native land because he believed that all the Italian art in the Louvre had been stolen by Napoleon -- including the Mona Lisa. Peruggia selected the Mona Lisa because she was small and easy to carry. Unfortunately for Peruggia, the Mona Lisa had not been stolen by Napoleon at all. It came to France with Leonardo da Vinci when he went there to work at the court of King Francis I. King Francis either purchased the Mona Lisa from da Vinci or from one of his heirs.

Head of Christ.

First Donatello sculpted two Davids. Then Verrocchio sculpted one. Then Michelangelo sculpted one.

Which do you mean by 'the second'?

I dont know what the value is, only that I have one! Anyone else want to chime in??

It is called Flamingo zone.

Who is the artist ?

It's not Flamingo zone, It's called Saxaboogie by Harry Bluestone

It is called The Red Vineyard.

Munch used the figure and the landscape to communicate personal feelings and ideas.

The answer is; 1st off, he didn't paint it in the first place, Michelangelo did. 2nd, It's called the creation of Adam. 3rd, Adam has a belly button. Just thought I'd throw in a trick question for everyone to enjoy.

Yes, The techniques used, such as sfumato and aerial perspective were both discoveries of renaissance and humanism and the background landscape we see on the Mona Lisa is a typical use of both. Furthermore, the knowledge of anatomy, dealing with the inner life of the painted person is also very popular in the time of the renaissance.

People sometimes buy aboriginal artwork for the remembrance of the past of aborignals or they just have the painting for no reason

It is an oil painting, expressing Picasso's anger at the bombing of the town of Guernica.

Why did Leonardo da Vinci paint this?

Because his employer requested him to do so. Leonardo worked for Ludovico Sforza, Duke of Milan, for nearly eighteen years (1482-99). The Duke decided he wanted this particular religious scene painted and Leonardo, decided painting it made perfect financial sense.

Why is it falling apart?

Leonardo da Vinci, tried using new materials for the Last Supper. Instead of using tempera on wet plaster (the preferred method of fresco painting, and one which had worked successfully for centuries), he thought he'd give using dry plaster a whirl. His experiment resulted in a more varied palette, which was Leonardo's intent. What he hadn't taken into account was that this method wasn't at all durable. The painted plaster began to flake off the wall almost immediately, and people have been attempting to restore it ever since.

hope i helped :)

if not use wikipedia ok