answersLogoWhite

0

Jim Crow Laws

A discussion of state and locally legislated segregation laws that were enacted between 1876 and 1965 that proposed the factually unbalanced idea of "separate but equal" public facilities such as busing, schools, restaurants and entertainment venues, and other aspects of daily life for African-Americans.

638 Questions

When changes in one factor are accompanied by the changes in another the two factors are said to be blank and one is thus able to blank the other?

When changes in one factor are accompanied by changes in another, the two factors are said to be correlated, and one is thus able to predict the other.

When did The Brink of Law end?

The Brink of Law ended on 2007-02-09.

Is segregation a good reason to break the law?

no

This simplistic answer tells us nothing. Altough we must endeavor NOT to break laws, Civil Disobedience is sometimes the only way to bring attention to a problem.

How many fugitive slave laws were passed before the civil war?

There was the old Fugitive Slave Law, dating from about 1790, which had fallen into disuse.

The new Fugitive Slave Act was part of the Compromise of 1850. It was launched in a bad, overheated atmosphere. The terms of the Compromise mostly favoured the North, so there had to be a big dramatic gesture to appease the South. It said, in effect: "We can't offer you much chance of new slave-states, but my goodness we'll crack down on those runaways!"

It turned every citizen into an unpaid slave-catcher, obliged to report anyone who looked as though they might be a runaway, on pain of a heavy fine. The best-selling novel 'Uncle Tom's Cabin' was written as a protest against it.

Who was explicitly protected by the 'separate but equal' principle?

No one was explicitly protected by the "separate but equal" doctrine; however, the principle benefited whites over African-Americans. Plessy v. Ferguson, (1896), the case that gave rise to the phrase, legally sanctioned racist "Jim Crow" laws that discriminated against African-Americans.

What was Jim Crow Laws?

The Jim Crow laws were a series of racial segregation laws that were enacted in the United States, at state and local levels, between 1876 and 1965. The laws kept African Americans from having equal rights with white Americans.

What is the main idea behind Jim crow?

They mandated de jure racial segregation in all public facilities, with a supposedly "separate but equal" status for black Americans. In reality, this led to treatment and accommodations that were usually inferior to those provided for white Americans, systematizing a number of economic, educational and social disadvantages.

Show a list of the black codes?

It restricted their economic rights, they couldn't vote, they couldn't hold office, they couldn't serve on a jury nor could they receive a public education.

Is there such a thing as a sorrow of crows?

Don't think so, I think there's sorrow of a magpie or however that rhyme goes. The collective noun for crows is 'murder'; a murder of crows.

Use the law of segregation in a sentence?

offspring get one factor from each parent because of the Law of Segregation.

What is the scare crows name in the Wizard of Oz?

The scarecrow does not have a name, he is known as "Scarecrow"

When reconstruction ended did the southern states pass the Jim krowe law to help African Americans?

No. They passed them to separate whites from blacks and keep African-Americans in an inferior social and economic position.

Were Jim Crow Laws constitusional?

Jim Crow Laws twisted in favor of the US Constitusion

How was racial segregation in 1940 and 1941?

I just finished reading "The Bluest Eye," by Toni Morrison and if you haven't read it, it deals with issues on racial segregation in 1941. Mostly the Jim Crow laws were still in effect, but it seemed to be that the darker your skin was the worst off you were, and if you happened to have lighter skin you were able to advance in society. But whats worse is that African Americans in this time period actually thought that white was beautiful and Black ugly

What was the purpose of lunch counter sit in?

The purpose of lunch counter sit-ins was to protest segregation. A key principle of non-violent activism in response to oppression is civil disobedience.

In the United States, prior to the Civil Rights Act of 1963, it was illegal for blacks to sit at counters reserved for white customers; it was illegal for blacks to ride in the front of the bus and not yield their seats; it was illegal for blacks to use or enter facilities designated 'white only.'


Willfully (and civilly) violating an immoral law is a moral imperative. Scheduled sit-ins harnessed the power of numbers to drive the point home and overwhelm opposition; whereas one person who disobeyed could easily be removed and jailed, dozens were sure to overwhelm the capacity of local government to cope with the protest, and likely fill the local jail to overflow.


Additionally, this drew media attention to the issue, which in turn strengthened the Civil Rights Movement by keeping these issues popular.