What would the future look like in year 3000?
the hiumen rase wil split in to 2 different spijis from david
How do you predict sandstorms?
Dust storms are most likely to occur on hot summer days under certain atmospheric conditions, so meteorologists can frequently predict the possibility of these storms.
When is season 4 of my little pony coming out?
There is no way of knowing for sure, but in the past, seasons have usually been added to Netflix about a month after the season finale. It has been announced that there will be a hiatus in season six starting June 11. If the current season follows what season 5 did, the first half of season six will probably appear on Netflix some time during that hiatus.
When do Ronnie and jack have a baby in eastenders?
We don't know really know actually ,
I do know that Jack proposes to Ronnie and did you also know that Ronnie has also just go married in real life!
Yes Danielle dies because she gets hit by a car, and also her baby with Owen dies because Archy hits her in the belly. She then goes to hospital and then she escapes. She is then arrested with charges of murder, but the police didn't have enough evidence to charge her. xxx hope it answer your questions!!
What is one way to predict an earthquake?
yes
Yes it is.In fact as already available(see,O.P.Misra,J.L.Lavoine(North Holland,1986,p.82)and Misra(2002,Chapt.7)the correct Definition & Structure of Function in the sense of Logic of American Logician Alonzo Church. The answer is Schwartz Distribution & Its Value About A Point(Schwartz Distribution acts globally and not point by point),the measurement taken on Instruments can be errors free. Present Science & Technology are Statistical due to deficiencies in Definition & Structure of Function y=fX). Thereby, we can not forecast any of the Disasters properly. As stated Schwartz Distribution & Its Value About A point do not require Statistics nor Probability.Why Forecasting is not possible? the reason may be Scientists would have to learn 20th centuriy inventions based on 20th century mathematics. This is fact that present system of Science & Technology based on 17th century calculus its essence of the system would disappear. Thereby, Scientists do not want to take/learn latest inventions of 20th century. Therefore, any disaster such as Climate Changes/Earth quakes can not/would not be predicted till Scientists do not adopt new inventions as mentioned. First of all International Union of Mathematics/International Congress of Mathematicians had published about Schwartz's Prize to be awarded at "Oslo" and it has been published on P.1, of Professor Laurent Schwartz,Google.com but now a days it has come on p.5. Can one can believe on such persons those who have not respect to the truth of American Logician Alonzo Church Logic And Schwartz work? These can be hindrance in the forecasting of Disasters as mentioned. If Such Spam would be continued in Science & Technology how the progress may be possible?
Are scientists close to being able to accurately predict earthquakes?
yes. Many scientist have predicted earthquakes accurately before they occur, unfortunately they can only predict them a couple of seconds before they occur in your area and they are already occurring a few miles from where you live. But our government will spend a lot of money on earthquake predictions so when the big one hits there will be no money left to restore your house but there will be enough money to rebuild all the banks, savings and loans, stock brokers homes and buildings. This is similar to the 700 billion dollar bail out for the crooks that robbed the banks.
Oprah's audience is predominantly female, white, and over the age of 55. Nationally 7.4 million people watch Oprah daily -- about 2.6% of American households. Four percent of American women (about 5.7 million) watch her daily, compared with 1.2% of men (1.7 million people). Overall, 2% of all 18- to 49-year-olds watch Oprah. 7.4 million watch Oprah daily. It was just stated in an article that was linking her power and influence with Obama's.
Do the witches' prophecies predict the future or do they make the future that unfolds?
That's an interesting question. I think in the play it is just meant to be a prediction, but of course any time you predict something, then you have the chance of affecting the outcome. Anyone who hears the prediction and who changes their actions because of it could be said to be fulfilling the prophecy, or to be causing it. How much does the prediction actually cause the prediction to happen? I don't think that it is something that we can ever answer and be sure of the answer.
How do scientists predict a drought?
redicting the size, location, and timing of natural hazards is virtually impossible, but now, earth scientists are able to forecast hurricanes, floods, earthquakes, volcanic eruptions, wildfires, and landslides using fractals.
What methods do scientists use to predict volcanic eruption?
Seismic activity (earthquakes and tremors) always occurs as volcanoes awaken and prepare to erupt and are a very important link to eruptions. Some volcanoes normally have continuing low-level seismic activity, but an increase may signal a greater likelihood of an eruption. The types of earthquakes that occur and where they start and end are also key signs. Volcanic seismicity has three major forms: short-period earthquake, long-period earthquake, and harmonic tremor.
Patterns of seismicity are complex and often difficult to interpret; however, increasing seismic activity is a good indicator of increasing eruption risk, especially if long-period events become dominant and episodes of harmonic tremor appear.
Using a similar method, researchers can detect volcanic eruptions by monitoring infra-sound-sub-audible sound below 20 Hz. The IMS Global Infrasound Network, originally set up to verify compliance with nuclear test ban treaties, has 60 stations around the world that work to detect and locate erupting volcanoes. [1]
Seismic case studiesA relation between long-period events and imminent volcanic eruptions was first observed in the seismic records of the 1985 eruption of Nevado del Ruiz in Colombia. The occurrence of long-period events were then used to predict the 1989 eruption of Mount Redoubt in Alaska and the 1993 eruption of Galeras in Colombia. In December 2000, scientists at the National Center for Prevention of Disasters in Mexico City predicted an eruption within two days at Popocatépetl, on the outskirts of Mexico City. Their prediction used research that had been done by Bernard Chouet, a Swiss volcanologist who was working at the United States Geological Survey and who first observed a relation between long-period events and an imminent eruption.[1][2][3] The government evacuated tens of thousands of people; 48 hours later, the volcano erupted as predicted. It was Popocatépetl's largest eruption for a thousand years, yet no one was hurt.
Iceberg tremorsIt has recently been published that the striking similarities between iceberg tremors, which occur when they run aground, and volcanic tremors may help experts develop a better method for predicting volcanic eruptions. Although icebergs have much simpler structures than volcanoes, they are physically easier to work with. The similarities between volcanic and iceberg tremors include long durations and amplitudes, as well as common shifts in frequencies. (Source: Canadian Geographic "Singing icebergs")
Gas emissionsGas and ash plume erupted from Mount Pinatubo, Philippines.As magma nears the surface and its pressure decreases, gases escape. This process is much like what happens when you open a bottle of soda and carbon dioxide escapes. Sulphur dioxide is one of the main components of volcanic gases, and increasing amounts of it herald the arrival of increasing amounts of magma near the surface. For example, on May 13, 1991, an increasing amount of sulphur dioxide was released from Mount Pinatubo in the Philippines. On May 28, just two weeks later, sulphur dioxide emissions had increased to 5,000 tonnes, ten times the earlier amount. Mount Pinatubo later erupted on June 12, 1991. On several occasions, such as before the Mount Pinatubo eruption and the 1993 Galeras, Colombia eruption, sulphur dioxide emissions have dropped to low levels prior to eruptions. Most scientists believe that this drop in gas levels is caused by the sealing of gas passages by hardened magma. Such an event leads to increased pressure in the volcano's plumbing system and an increased chance of an explosive eruption.
Ground deformationSwelling of the volcano signals that magma has accumulated near the surface. Scientists monitoring an active volcano will often measure the tilt of the slope and track changes in the rate of swelling. An increased rate of swelling, especially if accompanied by an increase in sulphur dioxide emissions and harmonic tremors is a high probability sign of an impending event. The deformation of Mount St. Helens prior to the May 18, 1980 eruption was a classic example of deformation, as the north side of the volcano was bulging upwards as magma was building up underneath. Most cases of ground deformation are usually detectable only by sophisticated equipment used by scientists, but they can still predict future eruptions this way. The Hawaiian Volcanoes show significant ground deformation; there is inflation of the ground prior to an eruption and then an obvious deflation post-eruption. This is due to the shallow magma chamber of the Hawaiian Volcanoes; movement of the magma is easily noticed on the ground above. Thermal monitoringBoth magma movement, changes in gas release and hydrothermal activity can lead to thermal emissivity changes at the volcano's surface. These can be measured using several techniques:The most famous volcanic landslide was probably the failure of a bulge that built up from intruding magma before the Mt. St. Helens eruption in 1980, this landslide "uncorked" the shallow magmatic intrusion causing catastrophic failure and an unexpected lateral eruption blast. Rock falls often occur during periods of increased deformation and can be a sign of increased activity in absence of instrumental monitoring. Mud flows (lahars) are remobilized hydrated ash deposits from pyroclastic flows and ash fall deposits, moving downslope even at very shallow angles at high speed. Because of their high density they are capable of moving large objects such as loaded logging trucks, houses, bridges, and boulders. Their deposits usually form a second ring of debris fans around volcanic edifices, the inner fan being primary ash deposits. Downstream of the deposition of their finest load, lahars can still pose a sheet flood hazard from the residual water. Lahar deposits can take many months to dry out, until they can be walked on. The hazards derived from lahar activity can several years after a large explosive eruption.
A team of US scientists developed a method of predicting lahars. Their method was developed by analyzing rocks on Mt. Rainier in Washington. The warning system depends on noting the differences between fresh rocks and older ones. Fresh rocks are poor conductors of electricity and become hydrothermically altered by water and heat. Therefore, if they know the age of the rocks, and therefore the strength of them, they can predict the pathways of a lahar.[5] A system of Acoustic Flow Monitors (AFM) has also been emplaced on Mount Rainier to analyze ground tremors that could result in a lahar, providing an earlier warning.[6]
Did george orwell predict the future?
George Orwell, while a supporter of Socialism, did not advocate Communism. He makes his viewpoint rather clear in his work Animal Farm George Orwell, while a supporter of Socialism, did not advocate Communism. He makes his viewpoint rather clear in his work Animal Farm
How can barometers be used to help predict the weather?
If it goes down the weather gets worse. If it goes up it get sunny and nice.
What do the three witches predict in their greetings to Macbeth?
The Weird Sisters greet the two men with distinct prophecies. Banquo is told though he would not be king, he would be the father of kings. Macbeth was told he is already is the Thane of Cawdor and he will be king,
What tool do scientists use to predict earthquakes?
Five instruments that may be used in an attempt to predict an earthquake are the following:
1. Creepmeter, which straddles the fault line and shows when the soil above the earth's crust starts to move as part of an earthquake;
2. Global positioning system, which shows when the earth's crust starts to shift as part of an earthquake;
3. Laser light, which straddles the fault line and shows when a light beam from one side isn't transmitted in the expected amount of time or to the expected place on the other;
4. Magnetometer, which shows the changes that are made to the magnetic field by the underground activities leading to an earthquake;
5. Strain meters, through the coordinated use of the seismograph and seismometer, to show the presence of the vibrations that lead up to and are part of an earthquake.
What is an instrument used to detect and record earthquakes?
There are two instruments, which are basically the same thing. There is the seismograph , and a more specific tool measures the waves on what is called the Richter scale. Earthquakes are given a number from one to ten, ten being the strongest. The strongest earthquake that their ever was, was measured a 9.3.
How do you predict how tall you will be?
Try this:-
With someones help, take your shoes off and stand against a wall pressing your back and the back of your head against the surface. Ask the person helping you to place a book flat on the top of your head and mark the under edge of the book where it touches the wall with a pencil. Then using a tape measure measure the distance from the base of the wall up to the mark. This measurement will tell you how tall you are.
What is the definition of a useful prediction?
== == Here are various elements that I think a useful prediction would have: It must be theoretically possible to disprove the prediction through objective, observable, independent events. (Good luck with: "I predict that it will be a colder than normal winter, because Yog Sothoth will close the Gate at the moment of the Winter Solstice!") The prediction should concern something of general interest and not something nonsensical. (No one will be interested in your prediction that there will be a noontime for the next seven days in a row!) The prediction should be based on a hypothesis about how some system or process works. Independent events (events that you are not manipulating in any way) should verify your prediction at a rate well beyond chance. Of course, not all predictions will do this, but the ones that do will usually point to other interesting questions that will end up shedding light on the hypothesis. The prediction should be repeatable and verifiable by independent researchers (it should not be a one-time prediction).
When is it predicted the world will end?
Most people don't even think about the world coming to an end at all, let alone on a specific year. However for those who do, Mayan calenders pointed out the specific date of December 2012 as the year that something big was going to happen. Earth is long overdue for a: 1) Meteor /asteroid impact 2) Humungus earthquake (eg San Andreas fault in California)
3) Explosion of Yellowstone Supervolcano 4) Comeback of Rick Astley Also in the year 2012 scientists expect the Earth's and the Sun's magnetic fields will be in sync at the peak of Solar Cycle 24. Mioara Mandea , a scientist at the 'German Research Centre for Geosciences' in Potsdam, said the changes "may suggest the possibility of an upcoming reversal of the geomagnetic field". The resultant huge climatic reversals would cause such things as Equatorial regions to become Polar, fertile areas to become deserts, and destroy electricity grids because of their vulnerability to the greatly-increased magnetic radiation in much the same way as would an EMP (Electromagnetic Pulse) from nuclear-missile detonations. (Needless to say there is little publicity on this because there is nothing anyone can do about it.) Many would see this as the end of the world, but God said the end of the world would be sudden and by fire:- Mat 24:14 And this gospel of the kingdom will be preached throughout the whole inhabited earth as a testimony to all the nations, and then the end will come.
2Pe 3:10-13 ISV But the Day of the Lord will come like a thief. On that day the heavens will disappear with a roaring sound, the elements will be destroyed by fire, and the earth and everything done on it will be exposed. (v.11) Since everything will be destroyed in this way, think of the kind of holy and godly people you ought to be (v.12) as you look forward to and hasten the coming of the day of God, by which the heavens will be set ablaze and dissolved and the elements will melt with fire. (v.13) But in keeping with his promise, we are looking forward to new heavens and a new earth, where righteousness is at home.
Most people don't give any thought at all to even the possibility of the world ending, but for those who do most believe it is either in 2012 or some time later at some indeterminate time: statistics and therefore proportions are unavailable. No matter what the cause or date, by this time no-one would believe that global warming was caused by human emissions!
What may happen in the future?
Our leaders will be fair. Our politicians will stop lying. There will be no disease or hunger. No one will be afraid. The lion will lie down with the lamb.
Or
Our leaders will continue as they are. Politicians will become more corrupt (if that is possible). Death, disease, starvation and war will increase. No one will dare venture from their home. The lion will eat the lamb.
Is there a predicted end of the world by any scientists?
Who in history predicted 2012?
What do you think what will happen in 100 years?
i think in a 100 years animal from a long time will come back and part of Antarctica will flod some states and Alaska will sink in to the ocon and the clamet will change much hootter
Why didn't Marx's predictions occur?
Marx's predictions, thus far, have been very accurate.
Wage competition and the control of the means of production, as well as increased mechanization of traditionally human-held labor, leads to the widespread misery of the majority with the sole enrichment of a small minority.
Where Marx was wrong: Revolution. Marx, toward the end of his life, believed that an immediate revolution was necessary to stop inevitable collapse and free workers from the oppression of the state and of wage competition. It is important to remember that Marx was alive when the world was plagued with widespread slavery, and women were treated as property. In this context it is understandable that he would find that his "inevitable revolutions" were moving too slowly.
He did however predict that the revolution against the aforementioned causes of decay were inevitable. In the light of the recent financial meltdown, he appears to have been correct here.
Why did Mayans predict the end of earth in 2012?
they didn't. Publishers haven't published calender for 2011 yet. Do you think the world'll going to end in 2011. No.
They just ran out of their calender.
Besides, the whole calender ending stuff can be extended into 5000 more years.
All they were going to do when they reached "The great cycle" is to reset the calender and something of a massive ceremony.