Probability

In order to solve this you need the null hypothesis value

also level of significance only helps you decide whether or not to reject the null hypothesis, is the p-value is above this then you do not reject the null hypothesis, if it is below you reject the null hypothesis

Level of significance has nothing to do with the math

The number of permuations of the word "hawaii" are 6! /2! = 720/2 = 360. You divide by 2! because the letter "i" occurs twice.

There are four 9's and 48 non-9's. The odds against a 9 is 48 to 4.

no

Well since you have half of your mother's genes, and half of your father's genes' I'd say about 50/50

The probability for a single random choice, is 6/13.

4 different ways.

here is a chart.

2= 1,1

3=2,1 or 1,2,repeated

4=2,2 1,3(one repeat-3,1)

hope is helpful.

I suggest you get any book by Joseph Campbell, particularly "THe Power of Myth."

when he married Elizabeth fay and invented the cotton gin

24

The probability of drawing two Aces from a standard 52 card deck is (4 in 52) times (3 in 51) or (12 in 52851) or (4 in 17617) or about 0.0002271.

Since there are only four aces in a standard 52 card deck, the probability of being dealt five aces is zero.

Well, honey, when dealing with compound events, you gotta subtract the probability of the event not happening from 1 to get the probability of it happening. It's like making sure you cover all your bases - can't have any sneaky probabilities slipping through the cracks. So, subtracting is just a fancy way of making sure you've accounted for all the possibilities.

you gay

The word "spineless" has 9 letters, including 3 s's and 2 e's, so the number of distinct permutations of the letters is:

9!/(3!2!) = 30,240

The probability is 1 out of 36, or about 3%, I think.

The answer depends on whether or not the first card is replaced before drawing the second.

25%

6!

Six factorial.

6 * 5 * 4 * 3 * 2

= 720

=====

1/12

There are 3 ways to roll a sum of four, 5 ways to roll a sum of eight and 1 way to roll a sum of 12. That makes 9 out of 36, or 1/4.

Employers are less likely to approve coalition bargaining because it tends to equalized the affected unions' benefits - hence bargaining strength. For example, a union which historically has not negotiated top-notched wages and benefits for particular class of employees will now be aligned with a union which has historically done so for the same class of employees. The net result would be higher operating expenses for the employers who most assuredly would have to equalized the wages and benefits as a starting point to negotiations. By contrast, unions would more likely approve of multiemployer bargaining because the unions (which have finite resources) would expend less time and money because of the lack of overall time spent at the bargaining table. The unions would therefore be free to use the resulting time and cost savings for other union purposes, such as pending arbitrations and mediations. Also, employers would also disfavor multiemployer bargaining because of the danger of trade secrets being revealed to its competitors during the negotiation process. By: Troy Horton, Esq.

George's chances are 1 in 3. His sister's chances are 1 in 5. The two probabilities are unrelated, nor is the fact that they are twins.

There are 13 red heart cards and 13 red diamond cards. There are 4 six cards; 2 of which are red. So, on a standard deck of 52 playing cards how many cards are red or 6 is 13+13+2 = 28.