Scientific Method

Queen Isabelle Hides Exellent Puppies Carefully

Scientific investigation is based on observations. Observations refer to any information we collect about the

physical universe using our senses (sight, sound, smell, taste, and touch.) The factors or conditions being

observed are called random variables (or experimental variables) because our observations of them can vary

from one trial to the next. A random variable can be either discrete or continuous

you can conduct the experiment but it will not prove anything because you will not have anything to compare it to. For example, if you soak a potato in salt water and it grows in size, how would you know if it was the water or the salt that made it grow? You would have to soak a potato in plain water and one in salt water to see what happens.

international system of units

urmmm .. shows cause and effect
has high control which lead to high reliability & validity

It depends on the specific weight of the special sort of stones. 1 cubic meter of water weighs 1 tonne.

The members of a population may be small or hard to find. Indirect observation is when it would be easier to observe what the animals left behind, like a nest or tracks, rather than the organism themselves. Ex: If there are 120 nests in an area, you can find the number of swallows by multiplying 120 by , or 480 swallows.

== == Inference is when u, what the heck, i don't know.

IU

lets say thare is a black, blue ,red, and brown cat that is big and has small feet. the details are the observation

the details are black, blue, red, brown, big, small feet.

you observed how they look.

Experimenter Bias, also known as Experimenter Expectancy, is made up of all the things an experimenter might unwittingly do to influence the results of an experiment to resemble his hypothesis. You could consider this a self-fulfilling prophecy to some extent.

something that is observed and can generally not be measured.

If you mean "What method is used to make a resultant vector into its components?" then the answer is called "resolution" and you can google it for details. If you mean "What method is used to detirmine a resultant vector?" well that one doesn't have a name as far as I know. Basically, you set up a visual representation of the forces and use trigonometry to find the length and direction of the resultant. Now, to find the resultant, you would draw a diagonal line. You can then make a triangle where one side has a length of 6 and the other 8. Because these two sides are at a 90 degree angle, you can use the pythagorean therum (a^2 + b^2 = c^2) to find the diagonal line which is the resultant vector. Hope this helps :) -Angelic Endeavor Minor Edit By Me: I had trouble formatting the pictures, I hope it works this time. Edit 2 By Me: I can't get the visual aid to work so you'll have to use your imagination, sorry. :(

This is one of the basic principles of the scientific method. Let's say you do an experiment and you change two things at once. How do you which thing you changed affected the result of the experiment? By keeping everything exactly the same as before and changing one thing at a time, you know that any change in the result of the experiment was due to the change in that one thing.

Let me use an example. Let's say you are measuring how fast you can drink water (don't ask me why you would do that experiment!). So you could vary a few different things to test... like change the water temperature from hot to cold, change the shape of the container you are drinking from, or maybe even how thirsty you are! But if you want to know the affect of the temperature of the water (can you drink a cold glass of water as fast as a room-temperature glass or a glass of hot water?), you don't want to change from a cup to a squeeze-style bottle at the same time. If changed both things at once, you wouldn't know whether you could drink it fast because of the temperature or because of the container, right? But if you compare different temperatures water, all from the same container, you know that whichever you can drink faster was because of its temperature!

Not much info in the question, but try this. IF the Model 60 is a .22 long rifle, and a semi-auto, you very well might run into failures to feed or eject of you use sub-sonic, or standard velocity, ammunition. Most semi-autos are set up to work with the high velocity, or supersonic, .22 ammunition. Standard velocity ammo is often manufactured as high quality target rounds. The reason for this is that, since the bullet does not exceed the speed of sound, it won't make a sonic boom..or crack, in this case. The theory is that breaking the sound barrier makes a .22 bullet a little less accurate. For small game hunting and most other uses, the high velocity round is plenty accurate, and tends to put small game down a lot more reliably and humanely, especially if hollow point bullets are used. Since the subsonic rounds are a little slower because they're a little less powerful, they may not alway generate enough pressure to activate a common blowback action semi-auto rifle. If you try high velocity ammo and it works fine, you have the answer to your question.

*** Good info there, also try this: Clean your feed ramp. Subsonic ammunition is usually very soft, and can foul the entire action. Ammunition such as Aguila and others that offer very low velocity subsonics don't provide enough force to properly cycle the action. If you're getting a lot of cases that 'stovepipe' where the spent case is not fully ejected from the action, you're probably using a subsonic that's too slow. Try Remington or CCI subsonics. They both function nicely in all my .22 semiautos, including my venerable old Mod 60. ______________________________ I'll also add that in .22lr bulk packs, avoid Remington Golden like the Swine Flu. They are inconsistant at best...maddening with squibs & short-powder on a regular basis. Sub-sonics tend to be spotty in performance with semi-auto's that use standard blowback actions.

The scientific management approach, developed by Frederick Winslow Taylor in the early 20th century, emphasizes optimizing work processes to improve efficiency and productivity. It involves systematically studying tasks to identify the best methods and practices, standardizing work procedures, and using metrics to measure performance. This approach advocates for the division of labor and specialized training, aiming to maximize output while minimizing costs. Overall, it seeks to apply scientific principles to management to enhance organizational effectiveness.

Francis Crick was an English scientist who won the Nobel Prize for medicine. He had the attitude that conventional science did not have all the answers, and he believed in investigating all possibilities in the areas in which he worked. This led him to be one of the people who discovered DNA in the 1950s.

line graphs

In general terms, a "scientific attitude" consists of a disciplined commitment to careful observation and experimentation as the surest means of obtaining new knowledge or refining already-established knowledge of empirical phenomena. It may be developed through formal educational programs or through conscious choice on the part of an individual who engages in self-guided study and practice of a scientific nature.

Multiple activities are involved in executing the scientific method. These include the formation of a hypothesis/thesis, research, reading, experimental testing, modeling, citation of sources and peer review.