Who Would Win

A stoat would win it easily, it is almost twice as heavy!

Most likely Frankenstein because he's much stronger.

--Improved--

I think that Dracula would win against Frankenstein because he would just have to bite Frankenstein to restore his health. It's like he has a built in healing spell for himself.

• A badger would win , because there strength is stronger than three squirrels that can run really fast.

Yes. They have strong heads and thick bodies with a lot of muscles and strength that can easily knock down the polar bear by charging. The musk ox can also gore the polar bear too death, or knocking the polar bear with its head.

Both cats are close in weight. Smilodon has the huge, nine inch killing canines. But the tiger is faster on his feet, and and is just as powerful. If smilodon does not get a clean bite with his canines, the tiger most likely will win.

Both are good dogs. The English Bull is slightly larger. Both are loyal and when trained correctly make wonderful family pets.

The Knight --- because he was real.

There's actually alot of historians who think ninja never existed. At least, not in the form that we in the west imagine them. These are creations of a later time period that romanticized the past. In reality regular Samurai would be engaged in the kind of scouting and sabotage and intelligence gathering activities normally given to Ninja. It was just a specialized subgroup. But they wouldn't have dressed in black or done any of the stuff we associate with ninja.

But let's pretend they exist. I would claim that the question depends on circumstance. A knight is heavily armored to survive on the battle field where there's a ton of mayhem going on. A ninja is lightly equipped for mobility and stealth. If they met where the ninja had the element of surprise or perhaps in some kind of wide open arena where there were no other threats, he could simply wear the knight down until the opportunity to strike a vulnerable spot came along. But if they met in a castle with restricted movement or in a battle where the ninja couldn't just play cat & mouse all day, the knight is better equipped.

Ostrich, the ostrich has enough kicking power to snap the lion's with one kick. Also can break ribs with one kick

A elephant would kill the grizzly bear because it can stab the grizzly bear with those tusks.
that may be true but also the grizzly bear is moreaggressive and if the elephant gets scared all it can do is charge forward or run away

The fisher would probably win such a battle.

The hawk is what people say, regarding that it can fly and is fast. But in the fairy tail of the tortoise and the hare then the tortoise would win because it has more brains and is not so full of itself.

The simple answer is we can't know at all. Largely of what we know about Dinosaurs is speculative, because we have to make a lot of speculations about them. Spinosaurus in particular is only known from few fossils, with large rages is size estimates ranging from 41 to 59 ft in length and 7.7 to 23.0 tons in weight . Spinosaurus would of been bigger and therefore stronger as well as having some nasty claws, T-Rex had a much meaner bite backing it up.

Now T-Rex fans will flip out over the Jurassic park 3 fight, where they will argue the T-rex was a juvenile, but will leave out the Spinosaurus was also smaller the what is currently estimated to be as well.

Some will argue the Spinosarus only ate fish, and while is undoubtedly did eat fish it is also incredibly likely it ate other dinosaurs. It is also believed that Spinosarus would switch between fish and meat, competing with both large Crocodilian and other Theropods, like Carcharodontosaurus, who was also bigger than T-Rex.

So untimely we really can't known, and people will argue for both sides and both will site facts, be really we don't know.

While kestrels share some similarities with other relatives of the raptor group, they are in fact members of the Falcon Family (Falconidae), not the Hawk Family (Accipitridae). Their simalarity to the Eurasian Kestrel is the source of the name "Kestrel."

a tiger would win

It depends entirely upon what's being referred to as a Leviathan.

The bible refers to it as a sea monster, whilst not truely defining it (Wikipedia doesn't in the first section)

Whilst It's often called a whale in other sections.

Whilst in others it's referred to as a snake/serpent or sorts.

Compare this to a Megaladon which is 15.9-20.3 metres long, and I'd say the details will make the difference.

Megaladon would beat the whale, but perhaps not the traditional monster it's often thought of as being.

It depends on the size of the raccoon and how many Yorkies you are talking about.

Wild animals would rather run than fight. They will fight if cornered and they can do a lot of damage. I would suggest that you try to keep your pet (s) away from confrontations with raccoons as any injury to the dog would cost you money at the Vets, so in effect, you would lose.

It depeneds enitrely on where the fight was to occur. If the fight was in water, then the alligator would probably win. On land, the bear would destroy the alligator. Overall though, the bear would win.

Gaur, bears won't mess with an adult bovid.

Here is my knowledge. Acrocanthosaurus was 40 feet long and wieghed 5 tons, while Allosaurus is 36 feet long and tiped the scales at 7,500 pounds. Acrocanthosaurus was larger and coul take more damage, while Allosaurus had speed and eyesight on its side. Who would win? Probably Acrocanthosaurus.

Probably nothing, as the males tend to be sterile.

I Would Say Either But I Have To Go With The Assassin Bug Because Assassin Bugs Have A Deadly Bite Or "Kiss."

Powers Between The Two Creatures:

Tiger Beetle:

1. Speed.

2. Carnivorous Diet.

3. Sharp Mandibles.

4. Ripping Ability.

Assassin Bug:

1. Proscobis For "Kissing" Or Biting.

2. Carnivorous Diet.

3. Ability To Rip Out Skin And Flesh To Succsefly Kill It's Prey.

4. Spree Killing.

Hmmm.

Fight: A Tiger Beetle Is Speeding Out On A Woodlouse And Kills The Woodlouse. An Assassin Bug However Appears To Share The Spoils, But The Tiger Beetle Won't Let Her, (The Assassin Bug Is Female, The Tiger Beetle Is Male.) The Assassin Bug Then Does Something Else And Plans To Eat The Tiger Beetle Itself. The Tiger Beetle Tries To Chase Off The Assassin Bug, The Assassin Bug Returns And Battles For A Fight, The Tiger Beetle Runs In The Way And The Assassin Bug Tries To Bite On The Beetle But Fails To Bite. The Assassin Bug Rears Up As A Threatening Posture But The Tiger Beetle Pushes The Assassin Bug Off, The Tiger Beetle Bites The Assassin Bug And Brings It Around But The Assassin Bug Got Her Proboscis To Bite On The Beetle. The Assassin Bug Drinks Up The Blood And Murderers The Beetle With A Kiss.

Yep, Assassin Bug Wins Alright!

This is all theoretical since fighting animals intentionally is just bad.

That depends on what type of pig. English Mastiff's are huge and have large powerful jaws. However, there are little teeny tiny pigs and then some great big ones with tusks. If you are going for a one on one with one of those, my vote goes to the pig. I have heard of some dogs being ripped up by them. They are also very solid, where as the English mastiff is more leggy.

Allosaurus was 28 to 32 feet long and weighed somewhere between 2,200 and 8,800 lb depending on whose estimate you use. Tyrannosaurus rex was 40 feet long and weighed 12,000 to 26,000 lb. Tyrannosaurus rex would almost definitely defeat and kill an Allosaurus in a fight unless the Allosaurus managed to escape. Note that they never would have encountered each other, though, because Allosaurus died out about 97 million years before Tyrannosaurus evolved.

If I understand you question, the coyote is far more dangerous than wolves due to the fact that they lack shyness around humans. Wolves are actually safer than a dog mainly due to their shyness around people. In fact, wolf attacks are extremely rare and there have been no recorded fatal attacks in the past 150 years. Though recently there have been two fatal attacks in the past. One was a hiker (they think it could also be a bear) and a teacher from who moved to alaska.

The only reason wolves would attack you is if they either have rabies or your harassing them. Coyotes on the other hand are practically death machines.