Genocide

Yes, The white race is made up of recessive genes that when mixed with blacks or others dominate gene is destroyed. Basically do you see many Mulattos with blond hair and blue eyes? There are some rare exceptions, but most turn out Like Barack Obama.

They do not resemble white in any ways other than a hint of lighter skin color.

This combined with the falling birth rates of the white race world wide will lead to the extinction of the white race.

_______________________________________________________________

No. Please review the definition of genocide. Before you believe rants, look at real definitions. Genocide is the "intentional" killing or destroying of a race. Unless people are "mixing" with the sole intention of killing white people, this is a no go. Don't believe everything you read on the net, read a book first. Start with the 1948 UN Convention of Genocide Prevention. It lays out the definition of genocide for you. It is true that white people have recessive genes. There is also a theory that they are the product of leper communities that continued to interbreed, hence the recessive traits. Traits that result in the "lack of", such as blue eyes and blond hair. This is not proven though. Lets stick with the facts.

The reason for the "Mountain Meadow Massacre" can be summarized in two words, "fear" and "hatred". The justification behind the attack had to have been motivated by these extremely powerful emotions. One would have had to walked in the shoes of the attackers to understand their rational, but in reviewing the atrocities that they had been subjected to since the begining of the LDS church, the mind does not have to wonder very far to find cause for fear and hate.

The massacre was led by John Brown & his four sons. There was also three other men from the Pottawatomie Rifles involved.

He was killed because ha had just betrayed those with whom they had taken the country with....they had decided to make Rwanda a country lead by hutu only, and this is not what Rwandans who had exiled wanted( they wanted to share the power. When Habyarimana agreed to sign the treat his "allies", if i may say, got mad at him and that's when he was killed before he reach the Kigali airport.

The genocide took place in the context of the Rwandan Civil War, an ongoing conflict beginning in 1990 between the Hutu-led government and the Rwandan Patriotic Front (RPF), which was largely composed of Tutsi refugees whose families had fled to Uganda following earlier waves of Hutu violence against the Tutsi. Most of the dead were Tutsis and most of those who perpetrated the violence were Hutus. The genocide was sparked by the death of the Rwandan President Juvenal Habyarimana, a Hutu, when his plane was shot down above Kigali airport on 6 April 1994.

Immigrant ghettis are a special area or nighbourhood that is full by Immigrants or a specific immigrant.

Nazi propaganda dehumanized Jews by comparing them to animals. That dehumanization helped people to desensitize themselves and see Jews as the "other," something outside what they believed to be human and valuable, which made killing them somehow okay. You see similar mental strategies used when talking about slavery, or even illegal immigration.

Although we would like to prevent all atrocities, it is simply not possible to do so. If the US have the resources and have the international support to help stop atrocities, then it may be justified in some circumstance. But by no means should there be an "obligation". As well, how can we "prevent" atrocities without interfering with other countries soveriengty? Unless there is clear evidence of genocide, we cannot interfere simply based on the grounds of speculative "prevention".

Well, they are both genocides, a deliberate attempt to wipe out a specific race or species. Also, the genocide's were well organized. There were forced racial/religion markers, in Rwanda people had to have special ID's, the holocaust had yellow stars. Those are some similarities that i know. The main difference is the fact that most people didn't know what was going on in the holocaust and if they did couldn't really escape, but in Rwanda it was broadcasted on the radio, and people were able to escape a little bit more. I hope I helped!

GOOGLE IT... yeah.. its just that easy.

All three of these massive crimes (Armenian Genocide, the Nazi Holocaust, and the Rape/Massacre of Nanking) are GENOCIDESthat took place in the first half of the 20th century.

Camps in the Syrian desert were used by the Ottoman Empire during the Turkish genocide of the Armenians in 1915-1917.

Holocaust

The term "ethnic cleaning" or "ethnic cleansing" was not applied until the wars following the breakup of Yugoslavia in the late 20th century. So the Nazi genocide was not called ethnic cleansing, although today you could use that term to describe it.

At the time, the Nazis called it "solving the Jewish problem" and other euphemisms. When initially widely recognized by the populations of the allies, it was called murder.

1.5 million was the number of deaths in the Armenian genocide.

The Armenian Genocide in the Ottoman Empire took place from 1915-1917.

There was no objection, but the word genocide was not created till 1943 ...

dictatorships and the rising of the new world order.

No parrallel. No comparisons can be made. Time is different. Causes are different. Scenario different. May be only little thread what is common is Ethnic clensing

This treaty condemned the destrution in whole or in part of a national, racial, or religious group.

Feel like as everyone of us, as we are not there in Darfur. But in a broader sense, Its a genocide, recognised. We have to raise our voice to stop it. Do it pls.