Genocide

Armenian Genocide is a internationally contentious issue. While, there are several high-profile nations such as France and Switzerland which have taken a political stand on the historical factuality of the "genocide", there is no internationally accepted truth. There are political negotiations between the Turkish and Armenian governments so as to resolve the contested viewpoints in an internationally transparent forum, whereby both sides will bring forth their historical documents. However, such a forum has not taken place yet. Turkish viewpoint states that Armenian-Turkish citizens living under the jurisdiction of the Ottoman Empire (predecessor to present-day Turkey) were never the target of any genocidal campaign. This claim is supported by the historical fact that Armenian populace living in the western side of the country were not affected by any killings, deportations or internships. Armenian population were forced to relocate during the latter part of the World War One, as a result of the civil unrest in eastern Turkey caused by this population (that were relocated.) Turkish historical records indicate that Armenian-Turkish nationals had joined in the war effort of the invading Russian armies, by means of scouting, joining ranks in the said army as well as forming irregular forces. Turkish side contends that there are historical records showing such irregular forces attacking villages and cities, killing Turkish and Kurdish co-nationals within the Ottoman zone of control. Turkish side further argues that Istanbul government responded by having the Armenian-Turkish nationals relocated by force to the Arabic part of the Empire, which constitutes the present Syria and Lebanon. There are records of civilians dying in this relocation effort, caused partially by lack of nutrition during war-time shortages as well as simple neglect on the side of officials in charge. Finally, Turkish side shows historical documents proving that any army or government officials involved in this mishandling of relocation were executed following their civil trials post-war. In other words, the death of Armenian-Turkish citizens were treated with due care, and the wrong doers punished. ___ The Turkish government stubbornly refuses to admit that the Ottoman Empire committed genocide. There is plenty of evidence from non-Turkish sources.

The Armenians.

it was the time

To sit back and do nothing

What this system causes is the persecution and an eventual genocide though living, of innocent people, although they were promised be protected under the 'Supreme Law' the most ancient treaty, that garranteed to protect them of their aboriginal culture and lands, a garrantee that the united states was trusted, the six nations united nations. Through years of war, and the "literal" mass destruction of a misunderstood and misrepresented diverse race of people, a family, a history that has been over commercialized, told untrue, hidden to cover these miscarriages of justice. matrilinial leaves the other half of this family the children of seneca fathers and white mothers left out of their garranteed protection, as if they were invisable and do not exist as a part of any first nations family, protected under the constitution of the united states for which it was written. a genocide caused by the very law or lack of it, that was created for their protection, isn't it ironic, don't you think. These who are being alienated from their families, culture, like ripping someones soul out without actually killing them. how in America, we can deny this is still happening, for what you have done to the least of these you have done unto me, "something about being put on a census"

About five years before the storyline began, Uchiha Itachi and Uchiha Madara killed their entire clan in one night. The only exception was Itachi's younger brother Sasuke. See the related link below for more detailed information.

While the Revolutionary War was being fought in the main colonies, the British and its Iroqouis Indian allies fought a guerrila style war in the western areas. Many American settlements in what becamewestern New York and western Pennsylvania were underprotected and subject to raids by the Indians and British. Cherry Valley, New York was the site of the worst raid of the time. Virtually all men, women and children were either killed or taken prisoner by the Indians and the town burned.

It was called euthanasia ('mercy killing') and code named T-4. The Nazis also continued to kill the mentally and physically handicapped along with Jews, Gypsies and homosexuals during World War 2. But they still used euthanasia to gas them

Pol Pot did not want to have power of cambodia, since he was working with the cambodian government every else had a place they were chose,so the only place left for Pol Pot was having control over cambodia and that is all.......

The Rwandan genocide teaches us that meaningless conflicts can cause unimaginable tragedy. It is therefore better to focus our attention on loving others, not forcing them conform to our customs or beliefs.

Yes and No.

The general war-portion of the Crusades does not qualify as a genocide. While it was a waste of life and led to death of numerous Arabs and Europeans who need not have died, wars to expand influence were common in the medieval period. Similarly, the Muslims fought numerous expansionary wars in Spain (700-1200 CE) and in the Balkans (1300-1600 CE).

If you wish to narrow the scope and discuss, for example, the mass-murder of the Jews and Muslims living in Jerusalem when the Crusaders conquered the city in the First Crusade, then it does qualify. It was a genocide as it involved numerous massacres of Jews and Muslims who were butchered because of their faith. When the Muslims retook the city in the Second Crusade, they let the defeated Christians leave the city peacefully, showing that a peaceful way of dealing with a possibly resistant population was available.

Mary had 4 servants, but I don't know their names.

they're are killing they're are killing * thry are killing http://wiki.answers.com/Q/User:Squish_15 01:50, 18 May 2009 (UTC)they are not just killing, there is also rape that happens and NO one does anything about it. People need to do something, anything to help these people... because all we are doing is standing around and watching them die!!!!http://wiki.answers.com/Q/User:Squish_15

The Port Arthur massacre was prepetrated by a person who was a social misfit of unsound mind. This answer will not include the person's name, because that is precisely what he/she wanted - notoriety and fame. He/she wanted to be known for the worst massacre in Australia's history, so none of the memorials at Port Arthur will even mention his/her name.

Turkey didnt get involved in the Armenian Genocide

Turkey opens offical archives but Armenia doesn't. WHY___??

---

Ive also come to notice that Ottoman Head of Military, a German General, Liman von Sanders wrote as:

-These traitorius people should be driven out of Turkish populated lands where they can not cause any turmoil.

Syria is also Ottoman land, dont forget.

The Armenian genocide, which took place during World War I, effectively came to an end as the Ottoman Empire collapsed and the war concluded in 1918. The defeat of the Ottomans and the subsequent establishment of the Republic of Turkey in 1923 marked a significant shift in power dynamics. International attention and pressure, along with the changing political landscape, contributed to the cessation of the systematic extermination and deportation of Armenians. However, the impact of the genocide continued to resonate in the region and remains a contentious historical issue.

The genocide was planned by members of the core political elite known as the akazu, many of whom occupied positions at top levels of the national government. Perpetrators came from the ranks of the Rwandan army, the National Police (gendarmerie), government-backed militias including the Interahamwe and Impuzamugambi, and the Hutu civilian population.

The genocide took place in the context of the Rwandan Civil War, an ongoing conflict beginning in 1990 between the Hutu-led government and the Rwandan Patriotic Front (RPF), which was largely composed of Tutsi refugees whose families had fled to Uganda following earlier waves of Hutu violence against the Tutsi. Most of the dead were Tutsis and most of those who perpetrated the violence were Hutus. The genocide was sparked by the death of the Rwandan President Juvenal Habyarimana, a Hutu, when his plane was shot down above Kigali airport on 6 April 1994.

The genocide took place in the context of the Rwandan Civil War, an ongoing conflict beginning in 1990 between the Hutu-led government and the Rwandan Patriotic Front (RPF), which was largely composed of Tutsi refugees whose families had fled to Uganda following earlier waves of Hutu violence against the Tutsi. Most of the dead were Tutsis and most of those who perpetrated the violence were Hutus. The genocide was sparked by the death of the Rwandan President Juvenal Habyarimana, a Hutu, when his plane was shot down above Kigali airport on 6 April 1994.

The genocide took place in the context of the Rwandan Civil War, an ongoing conflict beginning in 1990 between the Hutu-led government and the Rwandan Patriotic Front (RPF), which was largely composed of Tutsi refugees whose families had fled to Uganda following earlier waves of Hutu violence against the Tutsi. Most of the dead were Tutsis and most of those who perpetrated the violence were Hutus. The genocide was sparked by the death of the Rwandan President Juvenal Habyarimana, a Hutu, when his plane was shot down above Kigali airport on 6 April 1994.