Bill of Rights

No, because he hasn't been assigned to be quartered there by the military or our government. You have to do the regular eviction, such as would be done with anyone.

Also, in almost 250 years, the only credible third amendment case was Engbloom v Carey in 1982. And it doesn't apply in your case.

what do you think is the most effective and efficient way to protect and insure the rights of the consumers.

Abraham Lincoln didn't violate the Tenth Amendment; the South seceded in defiance of the Constitution, being forbidden from doing so by Article I, Section 10, Clause 1; Article VI, Section 2; and the Tenth Amendment itself.

Article I, Section 10, Clause 1 clearly prohibits the states from forming an alliance with each other in place of the federal government: "No state shall enter into any treaty, alliance, or confederation..."

Article VI, Section 2 (Supremacy Clause) subordinates state laws to the US Constitution, federal laws and US treaties when there is a conflict between them:

"This Constitution, and the laws of the United States which shall be made in pursuance thereof; and all treaties made, or which shall be made, under the authority of the United States, shall be the supreme law of the land; and the judges in every state shall be bound thereby, anything in the Constitution or laws of any State to the contrary notwithstanding."

Amendment X acknowledges the powers granted to the federal government OR prohibited to the states both protect and limit States' interests. Secession is definitely NOT supported by the Constitution.

"The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the states respectively, or to the people."

John Locke (:

What does the magon I don't know

December 15. 1791

enumerated

10

Yes, along with freedom of speech.
" Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."

The first 10 amendments

Law enforcement, as such, does not violate the bill of rights. Violations come from errors or malfeasance on the part of the enforcers.

the king now had absolute power

Freedom of speech: You can say what you want.(As long as it is not slander.) Freedom of press: You can print what you want in a newspaper.(As long as it is not libel.) Freedom of religion: You can pick what religion you want to practice. Freedom of assembly: You can gather together with other people. Freedom of petition: You can write to the government if you are not pleased about something.

right

On June 22, 1944, President Franklin D. Roosevelt signed the "Servicemen's Readjustment Act of 1944," better known as the "GI Bill of Rights." (see http:// www.gibill.va.gov/education/GI_Bill.htm) About 14 million veterans of World War II were eligible to attend college free under the Bill. About 2 million men and women actually did attend colleges and universities. There was much debate in Congress concerning the passage of the bill, but it only took our legislative branch six months to pass what many consider one of the most important bits of legislation to come out of Congress during and after the war years. Mr V

The Second amendment should not be abolished . The right to bear arms is the shield and sword of the constitution. Limiting who "legally" owns a gun is not gonna stop crime or gun violence .Criminals will find a way to receive and use guns just as they do now. Not only that but what gives a foreign country the right to tell us as free people who does and does not have the right to protect ourselves and our families. If passed by the U.N. and ratified by our Senate, it will almost certainly force the U.S. to:

1.Enact tougher licensing requirements, creating additional bureaucratic red tape for legal firearms ownership.

2.Confiscate and destroy all "unauthorized" civilian firearms (exempting those owned by our government of course).

3.Ban the trade, sale and private ownership of all semi-automatic weapons (any that have magazines even though they still operate in the same one trigger pull -- one single "bang" manner as revolvers, a simple fact the ant-gun media never seem to grasp).

4.Create an international gun registry, clearly setting the stage for full-scale gun confiscation.

5.In short, overriding our national sovereignty, and in the process, providing license for the federal government to assert preemptive powers over state regulatory powers guaranteed by the Tenth Amendment in addition to our Second Amendment rights.

This amendment states that no person shall be tried without a grand jury (unless there is a special case.), no person is to be tried and punished for the same crime more than once, and if a person's property is put to use by the government, the person has the right to be compensated (paid) for it.

Here's the great, easy, understandable website:

https://sites.google.com/site/billofrightsprojecthgftw/home

The Antifederalists, who were actually the ancestors of today's Democratic Party, were a political party which arose, as the question notes, to oppose the ratification or acceptance of the US Constitution. Many of the members believed that their new nation, the United States of America, required a plan of government that was better organized and promoted greater efficiency than the old Articles of Confederation, which was approved by the Continental Congress during the Revolutionary War. But what they saw in the newly-proposed Constitution, and what they DIDN'T see in it, concerned them. The new national government would be very strong and very efficient, but its strength would weaken the states, and this new Federal government could become as harsh as the British government the states had just fought against and defeated. Although the Federalists pointed out that no rights of the states, or of the people in the states, would be taken away, the Antifederalists were quite unhappy because none of the rights they valued were even mentioned, much less guaranteed, in the Constitution. The Federalists, particularly James Madison, Alexander Hamilton and John Jay, (and who would become, respectively, our 4th President, our 1st Secretary of the Treasury, and our 1st Chief Justice of the US Supreme Court), wrote a series of articles known as the Federalists Papers to try to explain the new Constitution to the states in order to win their approval of it. But the papers didn't promise to protect the rights of the states or of the people and the Antifederalists were not satisfied. As a matter of fact, they were so successful in opposing the Constitution that only the quiet promise of the Federalists to add a Bill of Rights to the Constitution (which they did in 1791) made it acceptable to all 13 states. The Antifederalists, who in 1801 brought about the selection of Thomas Jefferson as our 3rd President, would go on to rename themselves first the Republicans, and then the Democratic-Republicans, and finally just the Democrats.

yes it did

Well also the declaration of independence has the three rights

1)Life

2)Liberty

3)Pursuit of happiness

Bill of rights it is the first amendment of the Virginia Declaration of rights

Babouche means snail.

In Morocco is a traditional snail soup called babouche. The soup is very spicy and eat the snail with a needle or toothpick to pull it out.

were there any changes or modifications proposed that were not included in the 10th amendment

Yes, though not in a customary sense. There were prison guards who were provided apartments as part of their compensation package. When they went on strike, some members of the National Guard were moved in to guard the place.

Suit was brought, as they were put into the guard's homes. Engblom v Carey was the case, and it was found in favor of the prison guards.