How would a Christian's belief in the creation story affect their actions?
Answer: A christian belief in creation could have a number of affects on action.
1. Accountability -understanding that we are accountable to the creator for our actions.
2. Respect for Life- both our own and others, including the whole creation, since everything has been created by God, we respect creation because it is His handiwork.
3. The environment- responsible environmentalism, since God has made humankind to be in a position of 'dominion' over the creation, where we look after, as well as use the creation for our needs.
4. Meaning- as people made 'in the image of God' we are made for relationship with Himself and with each other. Life has purpose and meaning since we are not merely blobs of matter on a speck of a planet in a vast universe. We are His special creation.
If the bible said god created the world then how come there were people before him b c?
Have protists evolved from earlier life forms?
It is now thought that, although green plants probably evolved from the green algae and animals from some other early forms, most modern protists have followed independent evolutionary lines. So, ******No****** they have evolved individually!
Can dream catchers be used for different reasons if made differently?
no it can not it is for when you have bad dreams and the dream catcher is to cacth the bad dreams you were havin
De-creation is when sin triumphs over evil. Genesis is like a 3 act play:
Creation------God creates (and everything is good)
De-creation--Sin destroyes
Re-creation--God saves
In de-creation, sin triumphs over evil and that is the cause of the shortening life spans.
How many things did God create?
The universe and everything in it.
Day by day, God created the universe and its contents (Genesis ch.1).God created the universe out of nothing (Exodus 20:11, Isaiah 40:28; Rashi commentary to Genesis 1:14; Maimonides' "Guide," 2:30).Note that the Torah, in describing the Creation, deliberately employs brevity and ellipsis, just as it does in many other topics. See the Talmud, Hagigah 11b.
See also:
Yes, that is what tradition states (Genesis ch.1 - 2). See also:
What are Arguments against intelligent design behind evolution?
Every argument against evolution falls into several categories.
1.) It could disprove something if it were true, but that something would not be evolution.
2.) There are no arguments for Intelligent design, all they have are arguments against evolution (and sometime plate tectonics, cosmology, mathematics's, or oceanography).
3.) Every single argument made against evolution or any other natural science in defence of intelligent design (also known as creationism as determined by a conservative Christian judge) has been used as an argument against intelligent design and backing up the science that the creationists are trying to ignore.
Summary: Take any creationist claim, summarize it, and take the reverse of that and you get the scientific arguments against intelligent design and for evolution.
Human rationality is the logical thought process that judges when is right and what is wrong .This innate quality differentiates humans from beasts who act by instincts. Even in holy scriptures God cannot be blamed for the fall of man as He gave man the willful rationality to know and choose from what is right (good) and what is wrong (evil).
We give our children "rules" that we expect them to obey so that they can become loving adults and responsible, productive members of their community. To a child not all of these rules seemdirectly related to being a productive member of society - such as having to be in bed by 8:30, or having to wait until after dinner to eat dessert. Even as they approach adulthood we set curfews for them that they rarely think are fair or reflective of their own perceived maturity. None-the-less we know that if they will obey, in time, they will come to their own understanding of the wisdom of these rules.
God has likewise given us "commandments" to help us navigate the eternal laws. If our child doesn't understand the reason we have made a rule, we expect him to ask us, not just ignore it for lack of understanding. Sometimes their level of reasoning is not developed enough for a thorough discussion of the matter and must be put into simpler terms. Heavenly Father will help us to gain an understanding of his commandments if we but ask with real intent and are patient enough to let him show us. "Ask and ye shall receive". I think this applies to knowledge perhaps more than anything else.
Obeying the commandments keeps us in harmony with God, in communion with him, and on that path back to him and that great eternal round. Of course the greatest commandment is to love him. Obedience to all other commandments naturally follows out of a great love for him.
When we have sinned, we have created a chaos that moves us out of harmony with God/the eternal laws, and that must be rectified.
AnswerNot all religions have a God. Consider Buddhism where the Buddha explicitly said he was not a god and that the existence or otherwise of god is not necessary to the practise of Buddhism. AnswerThis is one loaded question, but an excellent one and it's a good sign you are doing a lot of thinking and searching for a good belief system. We are created to know right from wrong and God gave us the freedom to use our minds for good/evil. You see it all around you. When you think evil is gaining by a lot, along comes a miracle. If we all gave up and decided because bad things happen to good people then evil would simply win. As worn out and sad as we can get at times it's proof there is a Supreme Being out there that keeps us putting one foot in front of the other no matter how tired we are. If we are really listening and looking we will realize we are truly never really alone.As a Christian myself I am always reminding myself not to come across pompous or with all the answers as it does say in the Bible that we should not do so. I remember the quote that says, "For those who have not sinned cast the first stone." Well, I'm almost 65 and I haven't seen any stone throwing yet!
Man makes the changes in morality. If you study the Puritans it was a form of control. It was the Puritans (so-called clean of heart) that the true meaning of religion slipped between the cracks and burned so-called witches at the stake. We can go back into history and see how much of this went on in the name of God as well as wars. God didn't ask any such thing from any of us.
Each one of us has the power to see things in a clear light as to whether they are evil or not (not just because someone is different in their values, religion, etc.) and change things if we wish too or, we can simply sit back and let things go astray. It's up to each one of us. It could be something as simple of helping a lonely person get help, sitting with the sick, helping the poor, being a good friend, or simply loving those close to you. You don't have to be famous and make a name of yourself to be counted on the list God may have.
AnswerSince the original question postulated (I think) something about religions having a god that created rules upon which the definition of sin is based, but "the commandments can't be from God," let me step in and say that the presumption is incorrect. The definition of morality comes from the definition of sin, both of which come from God.1)Loss of this person's physical and mind capabilities and skills: The amount of physical and mental work, plus special skills, like reading, cooking e.t.c. this person could do are lost.
2)Loss of this person's personality: You are no more able to talk to this person, learn more about him/her and make social relations between both.
3)Dead body: A corpse will appear, which will start decay, stink and bring infection. if not taken a proper care.
Also, if you are interested, why do people do good acts, like helping an old lady, then, go to the link, titled "psychological egoism", I've posted bellow.
A Short Answer
Morality, or Natural Law, is place into our being by God.
Firstly, God is not the author of confusion, but man certainly is.
Secondly, the two passages are talking about two entirely different subjects separated in time by over 2500 years.
In the first example in Genesis 11, God confounded or confused the language of man due to his disobedience and pride as well as false worship of himself and his own achievements. This is talking about the human race generally in terms of providing historical information, which, in the telling, also explains the origin of different language groups on the earth.
In the second group of passages, the context is specifically the New Testament church, and within that, the church at Corinth, which had a problem with disorder. This disorder or confusion was of their making not God's.
Out of the two New Testament passages the first, from 1 Corinthians 1:27, set out in its context below is not relevant to the issue of confusion since it is discussing something different.
The verses directly below are talking about the Gospel. The Greek word translated as confound in the KJV is kataischunoand it means 'to put to shame', thus having a somewhat different meaning from the idea of confusion. If the context of the passage is read, without even knowing the Greek, it is clear that the Gospel message is being compared to other types of 'wisdom', other ways of behavior, and other belief systems. The Gospel message of salvation through the cross of calvary confounds or 'shames' these. We could say it thoroughly refutes them, even though they regard it as foolishness. This is the argumentation in the passage below and so it doesn't really apply to the idea of confusion at all.
18For the preaching of the cross is to them that perish foolishness; but unto us which are saved it is the power of God. 19For it is written, I will destroy the wisdom of the wise, and will bring to nothing the understanding of the prudent. 20Where is the wise? where is the scribe? where is the disputer of this world? hath not God made foolish the wisdom of this world? 21For after that in the wisdom of God the world by wisdom knew not God, it pleased God by the foolishness of preaching to save them that believe. 22For the Jews require a sign, and the Greeks seek after wisdom: 23But we preach Christ crucified, unto the Jews a stumblingblock, and unto the Greeks foolishness; 24But unto them which are called, both Jews and Greeks, Christ the power of God, and the wisdom of God. 25Because the foolishness of God is wiser than men; and the weakness of God is stronger than men. 26For ye see your calling, brethren, how that not many wise men after the flesh, not many mighty, not many noble, are called: 27But God hath chosen the foolish things of the world to confound the wise; and God hath chosen the weak things of the world to confoundthe things which are mighty; 28And base things of the world, and things which are despised, hath God chosen, yea, and things which are not, to bring to nought things that are: 29That no flesh should glory in his presence.
The passage below is relevant in that it discusses the need for proper order in the church at Corinth, which evidently had a problem with this issue. The confusion which apparently was a problem here was created entirely by the Corinthians.
26How is it then, brethren? when ye come together, every one of you hath a psalm, hath a doctrine, hath a tongue, hath a revelation, hath an interpretation. Let all things be done unto edifying. 27If any man speak in an unknown tongue, let it be by two, or at the most by three, and that by course; and let one interpret. 28But if there be no interpreter, let him keep silence in the church; and let him speak to himself, and to God. 29Let the prophets speak two or three, and let the other judge. 30If any thing be revealed to another that sitteth by, let the first hold his peace. 31For ye may all prophesy one by one, that all may learn, and all may be comforted. 32And the spirits of the prophets are subject to the prophets. 33For God is not the author of confusion, but of peace, as in all churches of the saints.
God judged the proud activities of the people at Babel and there confused their language and created many where there previously was one. This is not the same as saying that God is the author of confusion as mentioned in relation to the church at Corinth. The latter relates to a situation in the early church which required correction. There is no contradiction since the two passages are talking about two entirely different things.
Ferdinand de Saussure whose theories were influential in the origins of postmodernism studied?
Ferdinand de Saussure studied linguistics.
Why didn't God make the world in one day?
Quite possibly this is an unanswerable question, since almighty God has not revealed in detail why this is the way things were done.
It is true that the objects in the sky observable to the naked eye were made 'for signs and for seasons.' Thus, even ancient man used the sun and the moon and the stars to tell the passing of time and the seasons. This could also be one reason why the world was made in seven days, since, given God's omnipotence He needed only a moment of time to create.
The creation account deals with the world as God made it and in its second part deals particularly with man and his place in that world. Man lives in a tri-universe of space time and matter. The use of seven day time period is indeed a convenient way of ordering time, with the allowance, taken advantage of by many of a day of rest. This time period is somewhat independent of the times and seasons signified by the heavenly bodies. As indicated by Mark 2:27 'the sabbath was made for man..' that is for his benefit. The seven day time period of the week being the setting in which this 'sabbath' sits.
Will the seven plagues occur at the end of time?
For the source and detailed information concerning this subject, click on the related links section (The Seven Last Plagues) indicated below.
What problem might there be with using Genesis as a factual explanation of creation?
There isn't one. The more information the scientific community discovers or revises, the more in agreement they become to the Genesis account.
With that being said, because we humans 'interpret' data differently, there are differences of thought in the details. Even with the Creation account, there are too many variations due to 'theories' postulated and accepted - fully or partially. But if we all learn to let the Bible interpret itself and read everything in its full context, there is hope that all will come together sooner rather than later. But come together they will.
The story of saul is found how many times in the new testament?
It is found once in the book of Acts.
How has the Theory of Evolution changed Christians' minds about Genesis?
It is true that mankind has changed the 'Christianity' of Jesus and the Apostles over the centuries. Those who 'hold fast' to the original teachings are not affected by the 'molecule to man' theory of evolution.
The term Christian is an all inclusive one for nearly 2.1 billion adherents. Though the majority is being more flexible in attempting to incorporate a 'melding' of minds/ideas for whatever purposes they may have, the 'little flock' does not accept evolution in any of its current forms - including 'theistic' evolution.
What is the meaning of advaita?
It is the doctrine of the oneness of the individual soul and the Supreme God which is the Ultimate Reality.
The Definition of Advaita is Sajatiya Vijatiya Swagata Bheda Rahita.
Nice summary but wrong conclusion.
Read Stephen Meyer's Signature of the Cell or Darwin's Doubt or Michael's Bebe's A Mousetrap for Darwin and see the raging scientific debate between Darwin's innovative theory and the scientific evidence for a designer to explain the existence of living organisms.
"The urantia" usually refers to the Urantia Papers, published since 1955 as the Urantia Book. This "fifth epochal revelation", the recent of five Urantia Blessings to our planet, presents 2097 pages of revelatory text that is sometimes controversial in comparison to historical religious books.
But corroboration of some of this text by human sources is often possible. This "Gift of Revelation" section of Paper 92 helps explain the mystery:
Paper 92 - The Later Evolution of Religion
Section 4. The Gift of Revelation
"Revelation is evolutionary but always progressive. Down through the ages of a world's history, the revelations of religion are ever-expanding and successively more enlightening. It is the mission of revelation to sort and censor the successive religions of evolution. But if revelation is to exalt and upstep the religions of evolution, then must such divine visitations portray teachings which are not too far removed from the thought and reactions of the age in which they are presented. Thus must and does revelation always keep in touch with evolution. Always must the religion of revelation be limited by man's capacity of receptivity." (92:4.1)
"There have been many events of religious revelation but only five of epochal significance": (92:4.4)
1. The Dalamatian teachings. (early humans)
2. The Edenic teachings. (Adam and Eve)
3. Melchizedek of Salem.
4. Jesus of Nazareth. (Christ Michael)
5. The Urantia Papers.
Should you believe in Creation according to the Bible or in Evolution according to science?
Opinion It is quite acceptable for a person to believe both in creation as related in the Bible and science. What differs is whether the Biblical account is interpreted as being favoring a young or old earth. There are scientists who believe the Bible, and follow either evolutionary theory or that of Creationism. Both use the same facts, but interpret them from a different world view.
Opinion You can believe in Creationism, as it can make you feel better about the universe and your place in it. On a similar note, you could believe in Narnia, and feel good that such a magical kingdom exists. Alternatively you can 'believe' in what is actually true.
Opinion
You should believe in that which has the greatest chance of being an accurate belief, of being borne out by the facts. In this case, that means that you should believe in evolutionary theory - or rather, that you should accept that evolutionary theory is the single and best testable explanatory model that is consistent with observations in biology and palaeontology.
NOTE: I can find no such reference in the Watchtower, 1st April 1968
In the event that this was the case it was probably based on the assuption at the time that the creative days were 7000 years long. However, that is not currently the viewpoint from the Watchtower Society. Especially regarding how old the universe is.
Notice the wording of this statement from the Awake! magazine, 9/2006, page 19 ("When Was "the Beginning"?):
"The Genesis account opens with the simple, powerful statement: "In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth." (Genesis 1:1) Bible scholars agree that this verse describes an action separate from the creative days recounted from verse 3 onward. The implication is profound. According to the Bible's opening statement, the universe, including our planet Earth, was in existence for an indefinite time before the creative days began."
"Geologists estimate that the earth is approximately 4 billion years old, and astronomers calculate that the universe may be as much as 15 billion years old. Do these findings-or their potential future refinements-contradict Genesis 1:1? No. The Bible does not specify the actual age of "the heavens and the earth." Science does not disprove the Biblical text."
The opening words of Genesis, "in the beginning," could reach back billions of years into the past. The events of the six creative "days," or time periods of special creative works, are described as they would have appeared to a human observer if ther had been one present on the earth.
The Watchtwer Society has had to make adjustments from time to time on some matters as the spiritual "bright light gets lighter and lighter." (Proverbs 4:18); It is possible the witnesses once held this as the end of the creative days however they view the creative days as periods of time rather than 24 hour days..e.g. "in my grandfather's day"
No saint is evil at all. Evil is the opposite of saint. But when they turn evil they are no longer a saint