Gender inequality can lead to limited opportunities and rights for women, such as access to education, employment, and decision-making roles. It perpetuates harmful stereotypes and discrimination, creating a cycle of unequal treatment and power dynamics. Addressing gender inequality is key to achieving a more equitable and just society for all individuals.
What is Institutional Discrimination?
Discrimination occurs when a dominant group, or members of, imposes negative intolerance or treatment towards a subordinate group. Joe Feagin classified four major types of discrimination: isolate, small-group, direct institutionalized, indirect institutionalized.
Direct institutionalized discrimination occurs when prearranged actions sanctioned a community by intentionally discriminates against a subordinate group. In the case of Plessy vs Ferguson, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that establishments should have separate but equal facilities.
Indirect institutionalized discrimination occurs when sanctioned actions unintentionally discriminate against a subordinate group. Dress codes could indirectly affect a particular religious group. Jobs that celebrate Christmas must be careful not to offend or discriminate against other religious groups.
Cultural anthropologists who focus on revealing how legal systems discriminate against?
Cultural anthropologists who focus on revealing how legal systems discriminate against specific groups or communities study how power dynamics, biases, and inequalities shape these systems. They analyze how laws, policies, and practices can perpetuate discrimination based on factors like race, gender, ethnicity, or socioeconomic status. By examining the social and cultural contexts in which legal frameworks operate, they aim to advocate for more equitable and just legal systems.
What are the examples of discrimination against ex-offenders?
Discrimination against ex-offenders can take the form of being denied employment opportunities, housing, or educational opportunities based on their criminal record. They may also face social stigma and exclusion from certain community resources or services. Additionally, ex-offenders may face challenges in accessing healthcare, government benefits, or voting rights due to their criminal history.
This pattern is called redlining, where individuals or communities are denied access to housing or financial services based on their race or ethnicity. It was a discriminatory practice historically used by banks and lending institutions to restrict access to mortgages and loans in certain neighborhoods, particularly those with minority or changing demographics.
How does hate speech cause violence?
Answer 1
It doesn't ! - The opposite, - that the SUPPRESSION of hate speech causes violence, - may well be true.
Example:
Article 134 of the Yugoslav criminal code in early 1990s punished with up to ten years imprisonment the person who "incites or fans national, racial or religious hatred or discord between peoples and nationalities".
Answer 2
Hate Speech has the ability to incite individuals to take violent action. Words stir passions and can bring generally peaceful people to the point where they seriously consider harming another person. Almost every Western government has passed laws restricting hate speech in order to protect its citizenry. The enforcement of these laws, contrary to Answer 1's perspective, actual prevents social strife. For example, the Yugoslav provision above was designed to prevent the types of genocide that occurred during the Yugoslav Wars in the 1990s. By silencing individuals who argue that their enemies are subhuman and worthy of death, fewer people are willing to commit heinous crimes.
No, black people do not always steal. This stereotype is false and harmful. It is important to avoid making assumptions about individuals based on their race.
Are black people more violent?
No, there is no evidence to suggest that black people are inherently more violent than people of other races. Violence is a complex issue influenced by a variety of social, economic, and environmental factors. It is important to avoid generalizations and stereotypes about any group of people.
What percent of black males have been to prison?
Approximately 34% of black males will be incarcerated at some point in their lifetime, according to the Bureau of Justice Statistics. This statistic highlights the disproportionate impact of the criminal justice system on this demographic group.
What do you do if you get mugged?
If you ever get mugged, you should always think of what you do. Before anything goes wrong, ask someone to help you. If no one wants to help you, you should get advice before being mugged.
M. C.
I'm looking for a second chance too. No i don't have a criminal background but i have made some very poor choices. I think the fact that we realise that shows we have grown and do deserve a second chance. I want nothing more
Racism is prejudice, discrimination, or antagonism directed against someone of a different race based on the belief that one's own race is superior. It can manifest in various forms, such as systemic racism, institutional racism, or individual acts of prejudice. Racism undermines social cohesion and perpetuates inequality and injustice.
What can students do to combat and prevent prejudice discrimination and violence today?
Students can combat prejudice, discrimination, and violence by educating themselves about different cultures and perspectives, speaking out against injustices when they witness them, promoting inclusion and diversity within their community, and actively supporting initiatives and organizations that work towards equality and peace. By actively engaging in these actions, students can help create a more tolerant and compassionate society.
What is Steinbeck's view on racism in 'Of Mice and Men'?
by getting into crooks life and showing that black people weren't as bad as people said they were.
by the end of chapter 4 we see candy standing up for crooks in front of curleys wife, showing that crooks was worth protecting and wasn't that different
even the conversation crooks has with Lennie shows how as children you are inocent and don't realise racism and treat everybody kindly but as they grow up they feel it is the norm to follow everyone else and abuse people who are different and maybe at one time they might have played with as children.
Langston Hughes uses juxtaposition, a literary device that places a person, a concept, a place, and idea, or a theme parallel to another, in order to show the contrast between the two. Consider the following: Arcie cooks and cleans on Christmas Eve, does not have a Christmas tree, and has to leave little Joe with the landlady, while the Missus and her two children shop on Christmas Eve "for more things for the tree." Arcie and little Joe have to walk in the snow, whereas the Missus "came near driving though a stoplight." Noted are but a few examples. Hughes's short story overflows with lines that invite comparison.
Does discrimination still exist today any examples?
Yes, discrimination still exists today in various forms, such as racism, sexism, ageism, and discrimination based on gender identity or sexual orientation. For example, pay inequity between genders, prejudice against certain ethnic groups, and barriers faced by individuals with disabilities are all examples of persistent discrimination in society.
In romiette and julio how does racism effect them?
Racism affects Romiette and Julio in the novel by creating barriers to their relationship due to societal prejudices and stereotypes based on their different ethnic backgrounds. They face discrimination and opposition from those around them, which leads to conflict and challenges in their relationship. The racism they experience highlights the larger issues of inequality and prejudice in their community.
Note: this question calls for opinions, and here are some from our contributors. It should be noted that the term "racist" was not in common use when Marx lived. Some sources do acknowledge that he displayed certain prejudices, and those prejudices can be seen in some of his writings.
what our contributors said:
Yes, in at least one way. He despised the Jewish race, even though he himself was
born to Jewish parents (but baptized as a youth, when his family converted to Christianity). Marx would refer people who held theories and philosophies that were contrary to his as "dirty Jews." Marx also saw in Jews a love of religion that he himself thought was simply a tool for the upper class to use to oppress and suppress the lower classes. Marx despised virtually every religious denomination and the people who belonged to them.
* The person above me does not realize that Marx was basing his opinions on his own untested theory of Communism/socialism. The modern era of capitalism and neo-imperialist America has dawned upon us, a vast majority of Western Europe is atheist and the conclusive answer is that Marx was wrong in suggesting that Religion helped the upper class control the working class. Therefore modern day 'neo-marxism' can let go of the religious theories that Karl Marx enthused, Capitalism has proved much stronger and independent from other forms of authoritarianism. All the masses need for complete blind co-operation with the Imperialist world is a mass amount of commodities.
I conclude in suggesting that Karl Marx was not racist only hateful to capitalists, and to express this discontent he used typical and acceptable insults of his time. Neo-Marxism is not racist nor should it be anti religion unless it is deemed necessary.*
A Rejoinder:
Respectfully, speaking, the above answer in asterisks, fails to distinguish between the FACT of Marx's anti-Semitism and the partial REASON for his anti-Semitism. Take for example this quote from an article by James B. Whisker in the Journal of Historical Review entitled "Karl Marx Anti-Semite," and can be accessed via Related Links, below.
"Marx made specific charges against the Jews in his polemic. Jews worship Mammon, not God. Jews practice usury. Their true religion is predicated upon the acquisition of money through any and all means. The emancipation of all Europeans means the emancipation from Jewry: "emancipation from usury and money, that is, from practical, real Judaism, would constitute the emancipation of our time." Jews seek to control the world through the control of money: "What is the object of the Jew's worship in this world? Usury. What is his worldly god? Money. . . . What is the foundation of the Jew in this world? Practical necessity, private advantage. . . . The bill of exchange is the Jew's real God. His God is the illusory bill of exchange." Marx further alleges: "Money is the one zealous god of Israel, beside which no other god may stand. Money degrades all the gods of mankind and turns them into commodities. Money is the universal and self-constituted value set upon all things. It has therefore robbed the whole world, of both nature and man, of its original value. Money is the essence of man's life and work which have become alienated from him: this alien monster rules him and he worships it."
The author of the article describes Marx's views toward Jews in particular not just capitalists. Marx does not say Catholic, Lutheran, Protestant, Muslim, Calvinist or any other specific religious capitalists, worship Mammon, practice usury or have a religion based on the acquisition of wealth. He states that "Jews" are guilty of these. He states that this is the Jew. The worship of Mammon (material wealth), practice of usury and preoccupation with wealth are charges that have been made all throughout history against Jews.
If Marx were simply commenting on capitalists in general, he would not have singled out Jews for particularly harsh treatment. In addition, if he were making comments on the nature of capitalists by likening them to Jews, there would be no doubt about his anti Semitism, since he would have had the anti Semitic opinion first and then apply it to capitalists to denigrate capitalists.
Marx also had anti-Semitic views wholly unrelated to capitalism. He disrespected them because of their devotion to religion as well, a commodity for which Marx had no use whatsoever.
Lastly, I would tale issue with the above statement that Marx should not be viewed as a racist because he simply used "typical and acceptable insults of his time." The use of typical and acceptable insults in vogue at the time does not absolve Marx of anti-Semite charges. It indicts the society as a whole for its ingrained racism.
Whatever his REASON for being anti-Semitic, the FACT is he WAS anti-Semitic. That makes him a racist.
Addenda:
He was also known to use the epithet, "Stupid Jew of negro blood." Any attack he could levy on the opponent was valid in his mind. Ad hominem was one of his preferred methods of "debate."
Writer name Vijayi Vishwa Tiranga Pyara?
Vijayi Vishwa Tiranga Pyara is a phrase in Hindi that translates to "May the Indian tricolor flag always emerge victorious worldwide." It is often used to express patriotism and national pride in India.
Who is a writer who fought intolerance?
Harper Lee, author of "To Kill a Mockingbird," used her writing to address issues of racial injustice and intolerance in the American South. Through her novel, Lee shed light on the realities of prejudice and discrimination, advocating for understanding and empathy towards others.
15 quotes from the book to kill a mockingbird about racism?
What is an example of racism in To Kill a Mockingbird?
In "To Kill a Mockingbird" the theme of prejudice is shown mainly through the minor characters of Boo Radley, Tom Robinson and Dolphus Raymond. Examples would be how the town of Maycomb has many different stories in how these people act even though they may not have even met them once. This could be how in Maycomb many people believe that one day when Boo was cutting out pictures from a magazine he stabbed his father. Or that Dolphus Raymond decides to live and have children with a coloured women because he's drunk all the time, although he's not, he just pretends to give them a reason. These are examples of prejudice. Scouts Aunt Alexandra was also prejudice. If you have ancestors who drank or were in to drugs she believed it ran in the family, so that everyone in that family had the same problem. She would think this even if she had never meet one of them in her life.
Also Aunt Alexandra is prejudice against Calpurnia because she says to Atticus "we don't need her now." (page 137) her reasoning is not because Cal is black its because Cal is a lower class person
Racism in To Kill a Mockingbird?
This is a very difficult question to answer. Many many many people say that there was racism in the book. I dont believe the racism was offensive at all. I dont take racism lightly and i dont beleve it was too racist. I would definetly recomend this book for children and adults. it opened my eyes on how people shuldnt judge other people by stories or rumors.
Sexism in to kill a mockingbird?
Sexism isn't as large a topic of discrimination like racism, but does play a role in the development of the novel. Sexism is expressed towards women from men and women alike. Men feel they must protect women from unsightly things, (Lee 221), and women believe to be a lady they must dress, act, and speak a certain way. Aunt Alexanria makes it her goal to womanize Scout and makes her dress in her nicest dress and attend tea parties. Miss Stephanie tells Scout she'll never be a lady unless she starts wearing dresses. And during Tom's testimony women, and children, are asked to leave the courtroom to 'protect' them from the nature of the case.
Sexism is an important theme in "To Kill a Mockingbird" and should be observed when discussing the discrimination of the novel.
Which sociologist developed the typology distinguishing prejudice and discrimination?
The sociologist who developed the typology distinguishing prejudice and discrimination is Robert Merton. He described four possible relationships individuals may have toward prejudice and discrimination: unprejudiced nondiscriminators, unprejudiced discriminators, prejudiced nondiscriminators, and prejudiced discriminators.