Fascism glorifies the state above the individual by emphasizing the need for what?
For the welfare of the county not themselves!
What is the significance of fascism to World war 2?
The significance of fascism is the impact it has had on millions of lives. One of most widely known examples of fascism is the with Adolf Hitler and the Nazi party in Germany. The effects of the horror endured by people of that generation still remain today.
How did World War 1 contribute to the rise of fascism in Germany?
The Treaty of Versailles. Research it :--)
What countries that use fascism?
Facism refers to a strict government that has a dictator who has the ultimate control and encourages on extreme racism and nationalism. The countries that were effected by fascism were Germany and Italy and countries taken over by Germany in world war 2.
The relaxtion of the Open Door Policy.
^ This answer is incorrect- Plato
What part did nationalism play in the establishment of fascist governments?
Nationalism is metaphorically a costume for fascism. Nationalist leaders are dictators just a little more economically based. So to sum it up; Fascism: military. Nationalism: economy.
Answer this question…Because Germany was ruled by a dictator, economic decisions could be made and carried out efficiently.
Is Obama a fascist communist or a socialist?
Even though the term Socialist can be used in various fashions we can definitely assert Barack Obama is a socialist, largely from his history, his influences, his statements and his deeds. He shares many views in the political spectrum of socialism which lends much credence that the man is indeed a socialist. ANSWER II: Some people feel that President Obama is a socialist because the laws and regulations he is trying to pass could be interpreted as taking away personal freedoms. Some of the regulations President Obama is attempting to pass go beyond what the Constitution states is the government's job. In his book The Audacity of Hope, President Obama states that: "They conclude that the Constitution itself was largely a happy accident... that we can never hope to discern the Founders' 'original intentions' since the intentions of Jefferson were never those of Hamilton, and those of Hamilton differed greatly from those of Adams; that because the 'rules' of the Constitution were contingent on time and place and the ambitions of the men who drafted them, our interpretation of the rules will necessarily reflect the same contingency, the same raw competition, the same imperatives- cloaked in high-minded phrasing- of those factions that ultimately prevail. ... so I see a certain appeal to this shattering of myth, to the temptation to believe that the constitutional text doesn't constrain us much at all, so that we are free to assert our own values unencumbered by fidelity to the stodgy traditions of a distant past." This alarms Republicans because it suggests that President Obama does not respect the Constitution or believe that it should be followed and upheld. Also in The Audacity of Hope President Obama constantly advocates spreading the wealth around. This system would be extremely wonderful, but if one "robs the rich to give to the poor", soon enough the rich decide that they don't have to work for their money. If they do nothing at all, the government will make sure they get money anyway. This creates problems because if no one wants to work anymore, then the government has to force people to work, thus taking away personal freedoms. This is why some people believe that President Obama is a socialist. Furthermore, he has sympathy for certain socialistic ideals which are certainly upheld by our liberally biased Supreme Court judges.
Now that the right-wing quote-mining and misrepresentation is out of the way... No, Obama is not a socialist. Actual socialists get quite upset when he is accused of this. Obama is a corporate centrist who leans slightly left on social issues- at most. Some leftists point out that much of what he has done has actually been in line with what President Reagan did in the 1980s- which shows how far the Republicans have shiftedsince then. As an aside, the idea that this Supreme Court is "liberally biased" (despite being 55% conservative, some vehemently so) is so hysterically wrong that it invalidates everything else said by that answerer.
First... what is "socialism"? At it's core, it's the belief that the economy should be managed by society in general, rather than by individuals; and that the "means of production" should be collectively owned, again, rather than owned privately by individuals. There are many kinds of socialism, from the extremes of Anarcho-Syndicalism and Communism to the relatively mild "Social Democracy" practiced in much of Europe. Despite the pervasive belief in the US, "socialism" does not equal "the Soviet Union" or "communism"; nor does it equate to "the government doing things".
Now that we have a definition to work with, and instead of quote-mining a book from a decade ago, why don't we go by what he has actually done as President to determine if he's a socialist?
Much of his tenure as President has largely been to continue with policies initiated by his predecessor, much to the chagrin of leftists and socialists. He has largely gone out of his way to placate corporate interests since 2009- hell, his signature achievement, the Affordable Care Act (derisively called "Obamacare" by its detractors) was an idea cooked up by the conservative Heritage Foundation in the 1990s as a conservative, market-based counter to "Hillarycare". Likewise, look at his allies in the current debate over the Trans Pacific Partnership (TPP) - mega-corporations and Republicans, while socialists and liberals strongly oppose it. Wall Street and corporate profits are at record highs, while wages are largely stagnant. He also has done nothing to curtail the power of the military-industrial complex, which is something socialists despise. If Obama's a socialist, he's terrible at it.
If you want to see what an actual socialist looks like, take a look at Bernie Sanders, one of Vermont's US Senators. He believes in "democratic socialism", which is a milder form that seeks to combine socialism and democracy.
When did fascism end in germany?
Mussolini was overthrown in 1943 and imprisoned, though he was shortly after freed from prison by SS commandos and taken to the German-controlled northern part of Italy. There he organised the Italian Social Republic, which was finally defeated in 1945. He was shot by Italian partisans while trying to escape the country.
The Nazis and citizens of Germany would say
"Heil Hitler" meaning Hitler Greeting or German Greeting
They would say this in unison and do the hand signal also
Yes, in that Fascism may be (loosely) defined as totalitarian Capitalism.
There was no such thing as German Fascism because the Germans were National Socialists (Nazis).
National Socialism is actually more like communism than Fascism. Hitler adopted a lot of Mussolini's ideas which made National Socialism look like Fascism but they could not be more different.
Fascism is a faith based strong centrist government while National Socialism endorsed the extermination of certain people for the betterment of the nation.
Strong nationalism is at times hard for some people to separate from racism but this is the line that the two governments walk.
IN ORDER
Fascism believes in --------------------------------- God-Country-Family
National Socialism/Communism------------------ Country-Family-God
Democracy ------------------------------------------ Family-God-Country
What did a fascist uniform include?
A fascist uniform appeared militarist in style. The uniforms usually had a symbol of their movement on them. Italian movements had a black shirt, Germany had a tan shirt, and many had sashes on the sleeves.
What were Mussolini's Fascist followers called?
Mussolini's fascist followers were called "Blackshirts."
When Fascists differed from communists because fascists?
represented the wealthy and supported a society with classes.
What did the Nazis do with the Jews' bodies when they died?
The Nazi's, in order to dispose of dead bodies in concentration camps often buried them in massive grave pits, incinerated them in purpose built crematoria, or used parts of them for medical experiments or to help the war effort, human hair was used for rope for the Kriegsmarine. At the end of the war though when the Allies were closing in and the SS were only interested in saving their own skin, they had too many bodies to deal with, when the British army liberated Bergen-Belsen, they found 10,000 unburied bodies.
Is fascism the same as communism?
I will say no because though communist governments in the past and in the present use fascism, communism is a type of economy and has an authoritarian leader, meaning it is controlled by government(aka Executive wing in context to American government), while in fascism the economy is also controlled by an authoritarian leader but will use the military and other violent methods to keep the people in control.
So, to answer your question, No communists are not worse then fascists in theory.
How are fascism and comunism similar?
Fascism, notably in Germany and Italy leading up to and during World War II, involved extreme control of the government over its citizens. Russia during the Soviet (Communist) period also emphasized conformit. At times, particularly under Stalin, they were downright ruthless. In this respect, Fascism and (at least sometimes) Communism have been quite similar.
On the other hand, the underlying sentiment of Communism is international, and history is perceived as a struggle between upper and lower classes in all countries. Fascism values one's own country above all else, and many Fascists of whatever country view every other country as inferior. In this way, Communism and Fascism are quite different.
Finally, consider that each country in each period of time is not going to be exactly comparable to a different country, and not necessarily the same as that same country 50 years down the road, no matter what word is applied to their way of government.
How did fascist leaders take command of the economics of their countries?
A lot of leaders were put there by the League of Nations. Even though it failed in the end, US gave a lot of money to the countries that were in debt to raise their economy.
However US itself went in depression which got out after WW2 and US did the same after WW2 but this time to prevent the spread of communism.
What are 3 pros and 3 cons of Fascism?
pros: less conflicts with the government
more efficient
easier to vote because theres only one person
cons: violent
have to listen to the government no matter how bad it is
forceful