Homicide

The same steps used to charge someone with any crime is the same for murder. Enough evidence has to be gathered for the person to be charged with it; the person has been arrested and brought before the court for trial. In many states a person must be indicted by a grand jury to be formally charged with murder, but can be arrested and held pending such grand jury indictment.

One has to be careful in labeling such a person. They could have narcissistic qualities, DO think they know it all, or just perhaps they worry about you and want to help the best way they can even if the advice isn't knowledgeable. Some people may have a low confidence level, lack enough education and are trying hard to fit in. You are either going to have to accept this person for the way they are or, you are going to have to walk away.

Charles 'Charlie' Starkweather (19) went on a killing spree from December 1, 1957 to January 29, 1958. Starkweather, accompanied by his girlfriend, Caril Ann Fugate (14) murdered eleven people (including Fugate's mother, stepfather, and two year old step-sister) in Nebraska and Wyoming. Starkweather was convicted and sentenced to death; he was executed in 1959. Fugate, was sentenced to life in prison, but that sentence was reduced and she served 17 years.

The courts do not decide what level of security you are incarcerated under when you are sentenced to prison. The courts prescribe a certain amount of time and the prisoner is remanded to prison to serve that time. The security level or the level of the facility is determined by the Department of Corrections of your state. This usually depends on the crime that you've been convicted of, and, most importantly, how much time you have left to serve. Your mental and physical health may also have an impact on what level of security you will be assigned to.

It is not legal to do, but you get paid for it so yes.

In the US, the criminal justice system includes hundreds of jobs and professions at all levels. The 'system' starts with laws enacted by governing bodies. Enforcing those laws, protecting citizens from criminals and ensuring public safety (fire, emergency medical, roads, buildings, etc.) incorporates dozens of agencies, at local, state, and federal levels. Each of those agencies employ a wide variety of workers.

The criminal justice system begins with a police force to enforce laws enacted, investigate crimes, collect evidence, apprehend law breakers and criminals, and to provide appropriate information and evidence to a prosecuting agency to process a person accused of a crime through the court system. A police force may also be required to protect victims and witnesses.

A prosecuting agency takes a case through a series of steps outlined by laws that include a decision process (pleadings, hearings, trials, etc.) to officially determine the guilt or innocence of an accused, to determine a sentence for those found guilty, arranging for a sentence to be followed through. When the determination is incarceration, the guilty person is turned over to the appropriate incarceration facility.

Incarceration facilities include jails, or local, state, and federal prisons. These facilities are charged with housing those people sentenced to their facility for the period of the persons sentence. Convicted persons may complete their sentence or released before the end of their sentence on some form of provisional parole. At this point, those still serving their sentences on parole are monitored by an agency to ensure that the provisions of parole are followed, and arrange re-incarceration for those people who do not obey their provisions.

The most obvious occupations through all these steps in the criminal justice system are police officers, investigators, technical and scientific experts, prosecutors, lawyers, judges, correction and parole officers. But there are also hundreds of 'behind the scenes' occupations such as building and equipment maintenance, clerical and administration, and ongoing training.

Actually the question would be, "Who were the shooters at Columbine High School?" Only because there were two shooters who were also seniors at the high shcool, their names were Eric Harris and Dylan Klebold.

Not unless it was an accidental homicide.

Murder is the act of killing another human being with "malice aforethought". Malice aforethought is defined to be the intent to kill or to inflict bodily injury, either expressed or implied. If a deadly weapon is used, intent to kill will necessarily be implied by a court of law.

Aggrivated Murder is Murder in the first degree which is confined to homicide committed by poison and other killings committed with a premeditated design and to those which accompany the commission of atrocious felonies.

Improved: Aggrivated murder is when the defendent is paid or receives a value to commit an act of murder in the 1st degree.

From Wikipedia: Homicide (Latin homicidium, homo human being + caedere to cut, kill)

No, this would be murder, even if the person was trespassing.

The only time it is legally justifiable to kill someone else is in self defence or for the defence of those around you.For example, if the trespasser was a madman with a gun or a knife which he was using to threaten your family, then yes, killing him is perfectly justified because it is self defence.

However if the person was just trespassing and is posing no danger to anybody, there is no justification to kill.
There is a very fine line between self defence and murder. As a rule of thumb, if the person is unarmed and is not a risk to your life or the lives of others, then it is murder.

A person can only be charged with one type of homicide for each person who was killed. If a pregnant woman was killed and the fetus was at least half term, then there are two homicides with which a person can be charged. Vehicular homicide is typically a less serious offense than murder. If evidence exists that the driver purposely ran over an individual with the intent to kill him, and did kill him, the driver can be charged with murder.

The two brothers were brutally killed because of a cricket match, some say because they were accused of being thief's, what ever the reason, this shows how poor security, humanity and government is in Pakistan,

Here is the full story:

The two brothers had several arguments with the murderers over who has the right to play in the cricket ground.

on the day the two brothers were killed there was armed robbery in sailkot. one of the murderers brother was shot and there house was robbed. The whole area was alerted that there are armed robbers in the area and everyone start searching. The two brothers happened to be passing through there at the WRONG time. They had cricket equipment in there bag and were on motor bike. The murderers saw them and shouted "ITS THEM!!! they had a fight with us over cricket the other day, they are the robbers, they shot the man, GET THEM!!!" without any second thoughts the mob got the brothers aged 16 and 18 and beat them to death.

You can hear one of the brother shouting please shoot us!!! don't hit us with sticks.

According to the neighbours the two boys had never troubled anyone, they always had the highest marks at school, one of them knew the holy Quraan by heart. they are from a well respected family.

Some people who knew them tried to rescue them, but they were beaten too. dozens of police could be seen there surrounding the area so no one jumps in to save the boys.

I don't know what to call them, because no living creature will do what they did to the boys. Watch videos on utube. they beat them for 2-3 long hours then hanged them upside down. you could not see the guys mouth, nose or eyes, that's how much there faces were swollen from the beating.

Lets hope they hang the murderers were the hanged the two innocent boys.

RIP.

Yes, there was a successful case in August of 2016.

After the death of 23 year old Ty Hernandez, his parents found out he had died from fentanyl toxicity. They had no idea he had been using drugs. They tracked down their son's dealer through a series of text messages the two had exchanges.

An undercover officer then purchased drugs from the dealer, and had a recorded conversation about Ty's death. The dealer, Christopher Massena, laughed and said overdoses are good, because they prove the drugs are strong.

A grand jury has found Massena guilty, and he could face up to 100 years in prison due to all the related charges. This case sets a precedent for more charges against dealers due to drug related harm.

If the homocides are not related (e.g. not the same crime/crime scene), you can allege that the landlord has failed to provide safe and liveable accomodations in contravention of the lease (implied or written -- no-one means to rent a house on the edge of a cliff).

First though, you need to write to the landlord (registered, return receipt requested), advise him of your concerns, and ask him to correct the defect. This can mean putting up fences, cameras, lights, hiring a security company, etc. If he compromises you'll have a harder time breaking the lease. If, however, he refuses all your suggestions, this makes it more likely the court will uphold your declaration that the landlord violated the terms of the lease.

If he fixes things -- check it out -- it might be safe enough.

If he doesn't, write to him and explain how the court hearing will go. Be calm and nice, and DONT threaten with ANYTHING at all -- not even a court case! Odds are he'll let you go.

Nelson Erazo.

In most cases of course they will and do their best to pursue the most reasonable and least distructive settlement. Be advised however that when it comes time to renew your insurance there may be a noticable increase in the rates depending on how much had to be compensated or if court proceedings are still pending.

If the officer used deadly force that wasn't authorized he probably was arrested and charged with manslaughter or if it was intense enough, murder. I only mention this because some insurance companies will want written documentation confirming that the officer was

1. Arrested

2. Being remanded without bail pending trial.

3. Terminated from his company position without the possibility of rehire.

and that the company and or designated 3rd party licensee is in no way defending or otherwise backing up the illegal act in order to process claims.

Furthermore they may require the assailant sign a waiver acknowledging that upon settlements the insurance company assumes the full right to pursue him civily for collection of ALL attorney, compensation, court, and damage costs.

Yes, but only if the blade penetrates all the way to the brain, which is not easy.

1. You must have a 4 year degree. 2. You must have a valid driver's liscense. 3. You must be 21 years of age. 4. You must live in one of the five boroughs of New York City.

About 2000 a year

City Homicide ended on 2011-03-30.

Yes, so is Konnan.

A motion to dismiss can be entered any time after indictment or charge, and before disposition is entered at trial. The more critical factor is finding adequate grounds for the dismissal.