Nationalism

After Napoleon had subdued most of Continental Europe, most of the various peoples of Europe were drafted into the French Army to defend the new French Empire. However, people began to realize that they had unique customs and traditions. While they had no concept of coherent local identity, they could tell that whatever they were, they were not French. This provided the groundswells that would lead to the Nationalist movements as each of these conquered groups began to articulate what their cultural views were, how they defined themselves, and their historical narratives.

The two political parties fought a bloody civil war. The nationalist government lost, and retreated to Taiwan. The communist established "People's Republic of China" in place of the nationalist government "Republic of China".

Zionism is one of numerous causes of the Arab-Israeli Conflict and the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict. Zionism is the philosophy that the Jewish people should have a nation-state just like the German people, Turkish people, Greek people, and so on. Without Zionism, there would be no State of Israel, and hence any conflicts associated with that state would not exist. However, the mere existence of the State of Israel does not cause conflict; the existence combined with its rejection by its neighbors for various reasons.

Many things had absolutely nothing to do with the growth of nationalism, such as scientific discoveries, monetary policy, urban development, industrialization, aristocratic entitlements, etc. There were also many forces directly opposed to nationalism, such as imperial armies, aristocrat-controlled presses, enlightened despots, and threats from larger foreign enemies who might overrun a newly independent nationalist state.

However, this question looks as if there are specific choices that a person is considering between and the only way to address those choices would be to provide them.

nationalism

kibbutz

Because Chris Walker let it happen

Military and Economic aid from Germany and Italy.

Both GERMAN and ITALY are correct answers to this.

Yeah. sana may sumagot nito, we also need it for our Rizal Class..

Nationalism is not a religion, A nationalist is first and foremost interested in the interests of his/her own country/nation. regardless of the effect that this may have on others. Nationalism is a political school of thought as opposed to a theological school as in religion.

The fragmentation of China into multiple national identities.

Napoleon's Empire crossed much of Europe and included people who spoke fundamentally different languages and had different cultural identities. When people began to have nationalistic thoughts, which held that each cultural group should have its own nation, this caused a number of non-French regions in French Empire to rebel and seek independence. Nowhere was this more pronounced than in Spain where the Guerrillas fought with the French Occupiers for nearly a decade.

The only real similarity is that all three were ethnic nationalisms that focused on a secular government. They catered to different populations in different areas of the world and had many aspects relating specifically to those populations.

no...

Brand Nationalism is a term coined by Martin Belk at the Prague Writers' Festival 2012, in conversation with Turkish writer Gündüz Vassaf, who asserted that "Nationalism is on its way out around the world." In response, Belk suggested that with the proliferation of cable TV, internet, and other mass media outlets, loyalties, sentiments and acts of patriotic deference will be on behalf of corporate brands, products and trends, hence 'Brand Nationalism'.

Sun Yat-sen founded the Nationalist Party (Kuomintang or KMT) in China.

what are super nationalist beliefs

It's President Andrew Jackson of course! :)

The word's connotations can vary according to circumstance. In a non-independent country, a nationalist would generally be someone who seeks national independence (an anti-colonialist or anti-imperialist). In a nation divided between different sovereign entities, a nationalist would be someone seeking unification of the various territories (a unionist or irredentist). In a multi-ethnic state, a nationalist can be either one seeking separate statehood for their national group (a separatist or secessionist), or conversely one seeking to forge a composite nation from the various communities. A nationalist can also be one who strongly promotes the concept of the nation over social division at home or international collaboration abroad. The term can thus embrace people from the internationalist left to the ultra-nationalist right, and is best approached with caution.

To put matters as simply as possible, there were two kinds of nationalism (not only in Germany). The one was liberal and inclusive. The other was illiberal and 'exclusive'. In particular, the latter was preoccupied with 'sniffing out' people who were regarded as 'not belonging'. In times of prosperity, liberal nationalism generally prevailed and in times of hardship, the illiberal variety was vastly more popular. Illiberal nationalism actively contributed to and supported Anti-Semitism, where as liberal nationalism allowed for Jews to be an active part of society, but with some distrust.

Ask Richard Wagner

corruption ay iwasan, upang tuwid na landas ay maranasan

konsepto ng nationalismo, wag natin limutin, sa halip isa-isip,isapuso at isagawa ang mga mabubuting gawain.

That is a very good question. That question can be split into two other questions :

"Can there be a nation without nationalism?"

and

"Can there be nationalism without a nation?"

Looking at these two questions, I would say that nationalism comes first.