answersLogoWhite

0

The Romanovs

The Romanovs reigned over Russia from 1613 to 1917. During the Romanov’s reign, their descendants were called the Holstein-Gottorp-Romanov, and ruled all of Russia, Lithuania, Finland, Poland and Malta.

919 Questions

Who was the tsarina Alexandra's lover?

Her husband, the Czar, of course. As far as is known she had no extra-marital dalliance though was extremely friendly with Rasputin. Olga ( oldest child) was Born before Nicholas II became Czar-he being Crown Prince ( Czarevich) at the time, if that means anything. Olga was six feet two inches, a regular Wonder Woman type.

Where did the February Revolution happen?

The February Revolution in Russia in 1917 broke out spontaneously in Petrograd, Russia as a city wide protest demonstration and general strike. Things then spread to other cities as well and calmed down only when news of the Tsar's abdication was announced.

Petrograd had been St. Petersburg, then Petrograd, then Leningrad and is now St. Petersburg again.

Who was the last Czar of Russia?

Nicholas II (executed by the communists in 1918)

Though it is commonly believed that Nikolas II was the last czar of Russia, that information MAY be incorrect. Nikolas II abdicated his throne in 1917. Because he was not assassinated or overthrown the throne should have gone to his son Alexei, the rightful heir. But, Nikolas abdicated for his son, "although there is a question about whether he had the legal right to do this well."

Grand Duke Michael Romanov had lost the right to become czar when he was married without the consent of Czar Nikolas II, but Nikolas abdicated in his favor. Michael realized the throne would never be safe unless the people wanted a monarchy. A few hours after Nikolas and Alexei's abdication, Michael signed a manifesto explaining that he would only become czar if through an election at the Constituent Assembly the people agreed to a monarchy. This election never occurred and so Michael refused to be czar. So since Nikolas II did indeed legally abdicate his throne, he certainly isn't the last czar. The question is whether Alexei really was the last czar or if Michael II truly was the last czar of Russia.

Actual Fact:

Even if Nicholas II had legally abdicated the throne, he remains the last Czar of Russia, because no one else was crowned or acted as Czar. Nicholas II was indeed the last Tsar for exactly the reasons stated above. The answer states that Mikhail refused to become Czar, so how could he be considered the last Czar?

The Russian Law of Succession stated that the throne was not the Emperor's personal property to do with as he pleased. Title descended automatically to the eldest son. The Grand Duke Michael was not the eldest son and to complicate things more, he had disqualified himself from being Tsar by marrying a commoner. Since Mikhail refused to accept the appointment, was never crowned Czar (or Emperor) and never acted as Czar, he cannot be considered the last Czar. In fact, the abdication to Mikhail was illegal and of no effect. Similarly for Alexei, the abdication was not to him, but even if it had been to him, he was never crowned Czar and never acted as Czar.

It is also arguable that Nicholas II's voluntary abdication of his position was in and of itself illegal and of no effect. Thus, it can be looked at as Nicholas II abdicating the right to rule the country but that he was still the Tsar until his death. The question of the legality of the abdication was serious enough to suggest that Nicholas II might be restored to the throne at some time in the future, had he lived and political conditions changed. One thing is fairly certain. Had the monarchist forces succeeded in overthrowing the new Bolshevik regime, they would certainly have put Nicholas II back on the throne, rather than Mikhail or Alexei.

If Mikhail or Alexei were the true last Czars of Russia, one of them would have had to be restored to the throne, not Nicholas II.

Who is the director of Anastasia?

Donald Bluth. as this was a cartoon film producer/director ranks overlap. He took considerable (Flak) from a Russian Orthodox cleric who thought he was needlessly trivializing the Romanov Martyrdom.

What was the house of special purpose and how is it related to the last tsar of Russia and his family?

The "house of special purpose" or the Ipatiev house was where Nicholas II, his wife, Alexandra along with their son and four daughters were imprisoned before they were murdered by the local Soviet in Ekaterinburg.


The house of special purpose was the residence of Nicholas Ipatiev the governor of Ekaterinburg. Hastily made up as a prison for the last Imperial family, the half-cellar room was the scene of the bloody regicide of Nicholas, his family and a few faithful retainers from the Imperial court. Shot and stabbed with bayonets at point blank range.


The story is told in John Boyne's Book, 'The House of Special Purpose'

ISBN: 9780385616065


How old is Nicholas Romanov?

Nicholas Romanov, Prince of Russia was 91 years old when he died on September 15, 2014 (birthdate: September 26, 1922).

What month did the first revolution of 1917 occur?

The first revolution in Russia in 1917 occurred in February according to the Julian calendar which was in effect within Russia at that time. In the western world, which used the Gregorian calendar, it occurred in March.

What was the last year russia was ruled by a czar?

I believe that the year there was a Russian Czar was March 15, 1917 when Nicolas the II abdicated the throne.

What date did the Texas Revolution begin?

October 2nd, 1835 the battle that started it all began at Gonzales when a group of Texans repel a group of Mexicans.

What was the castle Anastasia lived in called?

If it"s the complex I believe you mean, still extant and used as a(Federated Office Building) by the Soviets, the home address of Her Highness was the Kremlin Winter Palace in St,Petersburg. Russia, in Czarist days had two capitals, with St.Petersburg being preferred by the Royal Family. So it"s the Kremlin Winter Palace, for a reral Anastasia fan her address would be: H.I.H. Anastasia Nicolaievna, C/O Kremlin Winter Palace, 5000 Nevsky Prospekt, St.Petersburg, Russia. Kremlin roughly tranlates as a fortified manor house in Russian, and there are several though capitalized onme usually means Moscow, other Russian cities had their Kremlins as welll The term Castle is not used, Kremlin- a fortified manor house- approximates this usage. asnd correclty the kremlin Winter Palace, which dates to Catherinian times. Catherine park, a large amusement park within Troika distance of St.Petersburg was built over a twelve year period by an Italian architect named Antonin Rinaldi. Ironically, and there may be family connections, the last Chief Engineer of Palisades Amusement Park, WA sone Robert Rinaldi (the man behind the rides). Both are fine Italian names. PAP went under in l97l Catherine Park is still up and up. Dah!

umm they mostly stayed at the Alexander Palace, they didn't really like the Winter Palace as much.

Was there a real princess from Russia named Anastasia?

There were several Princesses named Anastasia in Russia. The most famous one was the fourth daughter of Nicholas II, the last Russian Tsar. Her full title was Her Imperial Highness The Grand Duchess Anastasia Nicolaievna of Russia (b. June 18, 1901, believed to have died July 17, 1918.)

After the Imperial family was executed in 1918 there have been several people who claimed to be Anastasia, but they either lacked proof, or were proven to be impostors.

Recent archaeological research in July and August 2007 at the execution site in Ekaterinburg, Russia discovered remains believed to be those of Anastasia. DNA testing results from DNA submitted by Prince Philip, Duke of Edinburgh, first cousin to the children of the Tsar and Empress, have proven the remains are those of two of the Tsar's children.

The male remains were those of the Tsarevitch Alexei, while the female ones were initially believed to be Anastasia, but were proven to be s sister Grand Duchess Marie.

Anastasia's fate remains uncertain. However, it most likely is nothing like the various fictional accounts.

Who was the father of the last czar of russia?

Tsar Alexander Mikhailovich Romanov was the father of Tsar Nicholas Alexandrovich Romanov.

After the abdication of Czar Nicholas II the first Russian government was primarily associated with?

Alexander Kerensky

The government was called the Provisional Government and was headed first by Prince Georgy Lvov and then Alexander Kerensky until it was overthrown by Lenin and the Bolsheviks/Communists.

What were serfs beofor revolution of 1917?

Before the Russian Revolution of 1917, serfs were agricultural laborers who were bound to the land and under the control of landowners, often working under harsh conditions with limited rights. They were essentially considered part of the estate they worked on, with their lives heavily regulated by their lords. Although the Emancipation Reform of 1861 granted them legal freedom, many serfs still faced significant economic hardships and social restrictions, leading to widespread discontent that contributed to the revolutionary fervor.

What was the Tsar?

Who was Tsar

Well several links have been removed while as safety reason's on the topic by US government and so are the news being scrutinize or removed now it is no more what was Tsar it more about who is Tsar. Well the name is Shahid Tsar who is making billions of dollars in USA with his faithful attorney H.D. Harrison making him stronger. Harrison who now is teaming up with Tsar's best friend M.Lakhani whom Tsar wants to be in as per his trust and faith in him so meanwhile as Tsar has left USA for reason. Last year in March 2012 Tsar did a deal with Penthouse the biggest porn company of the world but M. Lakhani insisted Tsar not to make such a business deal getting Penthouse in the group for that Tsar did lost a huge amount but won the case as per by mistake of owners who were intending to get maximum from Tsar for selling of the Penthouse magazine, films, sites, later on Tsar decided to buy them on the actual market price and as a punishment M.Lakhani will be heading the company.

The following is a complete details that Tsar though a billionaire starting his business from getting an amount of 5 million pounds sterling from his Barclays account London, no question were asked or raised by US authority regarding from where did Tsar got that money in his account in London but authorities made sure the money was clean.

Universal Pictures and Comcast

July 8, this year, Comcast acquired back its 49% shares sold to General Electronics last year November 2013 for $163.7 billion . Universal Pictures saw a 20% increase in its revenue driven by higher theatrical revenue from the strong performance of Les Miserables, Identity Thief and Mama in the quarter ended March 31, 2013. We estimate close to $18.4 billion in revenue being generated by the movie business of Comcast in 2013 H.D.Harrison legal advisor and spokes person of Tsar Holding and Comcast said in a briefing confirming that Tsar's daughter took the decision to sell it and invest it with Paramount acquiring 33% share but Tsar's was disturbed and so Harrison made sure to get them back by paying a heavy amount to General Electronics.

Does the movie business matter materially for Comcast? May be not. However Furious 6 has received from viewers is quite convincing for Universal Pictures. It is hard to predict the success of any movie in advance, but given the numbers Fast and Furious 6 has generated in the first three days, it is fair to assume that overall revenue for the movie will be more than its previous sequel.

Our price estimated value for Comcast this year 2013 stands at $6,946 billion, implying a premium of over 10% to the market price including its theme parks know as Universal studios tour parks, hotels, Universal Citywalk, NBC universal, Focus Features, MCA, RCA, Universal Music, Universal Media, Czar Communications, Czar Media, Czar Metrics, Millennium Pictures and lot other production companies that comes under Tsar & Czar Holdings & Comcast, even Cloud 9 company erected by Roxanne Tsar the company to invent & introduce Blue Ray & HD DVDS.

Universal Pictures is a division of Universal Studios. Universal Studios is part of NBC Universal. NBC Universal is one of the world's leading media and entertainment companies in the development, production, and marketing of entertainment, news, and information for the global audience. NBC Universal owns and operates a valuable portfolio of news and entertainment television networks, a premier motion picture company, significant television production operations, with some of the most leading television channels and television stations & studios, world-renowned theme parks, and a suite of leading Internet-based businesses. NBC Universal is owned by Comcast Corporation soon to be a Tsar company.

Below you can see the in details that are from newspaper from L.A, New York Post.

In a sweeping assertion of his institutional power to decide whether or not the U.S. has the right to check Tsar's financial data, that he and Europe's privacy. Shahid Faruk Tsar had the authority to exercise "independent scrutiny" of the SWIFT system and all other aspects of gold reserves staying in Bank of England to decide whether privacy laws are being violated.

The opinion by privacy of Shahid Faruk Tsar included a warning that a foreign government like the U.S. cannot be trusted with his gold reserves & financial data, because it's his private & confidentiality with Bank of England. In the words of the opinion, "lack of compliance with data protection rules would not only breach Tsar's fundamental rights to protection of personal data, but could also expose European companies to risks of use for economic espionage of data relating to their commercial transactions."

In proposing next steps regarding privacy Shahid Faruk Tsar was careful not to overstep his immediate power, even as he turned the screws on the Bank of England financial regulators. He called on the European Central Bank and other financial institutions to act immediately through his lawyer H.D. Harrison who is an American citizen.

H.D. Harrison concluded with a tough warning: "it would not be acceptable that the architecture of the Tsar's gold reserves systems would be to allowed and facilitate U.S authorities either what level of they are that personal data relating to any of Tsar's affiliation with British government & between member states including queen.

But the messages of Shahid Faruk Tsar from his American lawyer H.D. Harrison could not have been clearer, they are mad as hell in the United States, and they are not going to take it anymore. They are more upset with the Tsar then they are worried about terrorist attacks. They will do their best to discourage British governments from agreeing to anything then Tsar's financial activities are less than completely secret from the U.S. finance as a result of the privacy Shahid Faruk Tsar's pressure and his latest decision is undeniable. The attitude towards the U.S. in Europe at this time is remarkably ugly, as was evident in the tone of the privacy H.D. Harrison opinion. Something broader and quicker is needed, but to forestall that the privacy Shahid Faruk Tsar have warned U.S opinion that who are they to oppose the negotiation of any new agreements by Tsar with British & other European countries.

Whereas American authorities made their point that Tsar earned all of his fortune in USA and we by no means would allow American money either his or anybody to take it and start investing in Europe, in that case even the profits and actuall revenue should be deposited in America with American rights to deduct the taxes according to American laws created for the billionaires.

Investigations on Shahid Tsar

Last Updated: January 30, 2012

Article II section 2 of the U.S. Constitution states that:

"the President shall nominate, an by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, shall appoint Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls, Judges of the Supreme Court, and all other Officers of the United States, whose Appointments are not herein otherwise provided for, and which shall be established by Law."

However, President Barack Obama has been taking advantage of a recent precedent by appointing government officials who are not subject to Senate approval. These "Tsars" have tremendous power to regulate and control enormous parts of the American economy and government. And, as powerful as these Tsars are, some of them may not have even been subjected to a basic FBI background check.

This has allowed Obama to appoint several people with radical left-wing views, including one who supported the "9/11 truthers" movement (which believes the Bush administration may have been behind the 9/11 terror attacks on America) and another who called for "white people" to be removed from powerful positions in the media to make way for "people of color" and gays and voiced support for virulently anti-American Venezuelan dictator Hugo Chavez. These Tsars have responsibilities that include managing America's Middle Eastern policy, "diversity," the auto industry, science, so-called climate change, "safe schools," health care and even the dispersal of funds from the Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP).

Judicial Watch is concerned that some of these Tsars appointments raise significant constitutional questions. Our goal is to find out exactly what these Tsars are up to specially Shahid Faruk Tsar, what is his missions, and how much taxpayer money and government personnel he has at his disposal. In that effort, Judicial Watch has filed Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) and document requests for all of the Tsars that Obama has appointed so far. Several of these investigations have already resulted in lawsuits due to the Obama Administration's stonewalling with regard to the release of relevant documents. Judicial Watch has also been key in publicizing the connections some of Obama's Tsars have had to radical, racist and even communist organizations.

What was a very harmful story that Czar Nicholas th second did to any Jewish family?

The IKGB- Imperial Counter Intelligence Service- it must be admitted circulated the bogus Protocols of the Elders of Zion- a blatant Anti-Semitic tract. It had nothing to do with Communism, by the way.