answersLogoWhite

0

Editing and Revising

This category is for questions about how one would go about taking an incomplete draft and bringing it to the final stages of a composed paper.

407 Questions

What can replace then?

The word "then" can often be replaced with alternatives such as "subsequently," "afterward," or "next," depending on the context. In some cases, using phrases like "at that time" or "following that" may also work. It's important to consider the specific meaning and flow of the sentence to choose the best substitute.

When elaborating an essay what should you do?

When elaborating on an essay you should explain what the essay means to you. You can use examples from the essay, but tell more about the ideas that they create in your own mind.

How do you explain the popularity of work teams in the us when its culture places such high value on individualism and individual effort?

It's nothing more than a false ego. People have to work in teams to get any major project done. Bill Gates for example is likely the first name when mentioning Microsoft, but there have been and still are many hands involved many of them so

involved that Microsoft would have never made it if they were removed from it.

This is what capitalism brings, wealth and acknowledgement for the few when there are many hands involved.

What are the FOUR ways to repair comma splice and run-on sentence errors?

To repair comma splice and run-on sentence errors, you can use the following methods:

  1. Separate the clauses into distinct sentences by adding a period between them.
  2. Use a semicolon to connect closely related independent clauses.
  3. Insert a coordinating conjunction (for, and, nor, but, or, yet, so) after a comma.
  4. Rephrase one of the clauses to make it dependent, often using subordinating conjunctions like although or because.

Does the glossary go before the contents page?

yes, a bibliography does come before or after the glossary. That is the answer to the question YOU asked. Remember to use precise wording when asking questions.

What are the steps in the prewriting process for writing a description?

choose a topic narrow the topic consider the audience and purpose and gather ideas

How do you write a letter to office to issue my identity card?

If you want to get a national identity card from the government, it's highly likely you'll need to do so by completing a form, rather than writing a letter. Find out from them what form you need to fill out, and any documents you may need to submit with the form, as well as whether there is a processing fee. You can find this information by searching your government's web site, phoning your local authority, or writing a letter to them. If you write a letter to them, don't forget to include your own address in the letter.

Do you use comma after phrase with when...?

Yes, a comma is typically used after a phrase that starts with "when" if it comes at the beginning of a sentence. For example: "When the bell rang, the students rushed out of the classroom."

What does letterese mean in writing?

It is an elaborate way of stating something and it is usally unclear.

Ex. (per John M. Lannon:Technical Communication 11th ed)

1) As per your request - instead write: As you requested

2) Contingent upon receipt of - instead write: As soon as we receive

How do you say i want my bedroom on the top floor?

Strictly speaking, if you are trying to get that bedroom then it isn't yours yet. so I would recommend, I want the bedroom on the top floor. If you get it, then you can call it your bedroom.

How many steps are there in the writing process?

If you are looking for specific steps, do not bother. Each successful writer seems to use a slightly different technique. Fiction and non fiction writers however use totally different techniques.

Non fiction writers create the outline. They recreate it in far more detail. Then they fill in the details. They frequently spend more time on the outline than on the text itself.

Fiction writers each have their own technique. When Margaret Mitchell wrote Gone With the Wind, she wrote it backwards. She wrote the last chapter first, then the next to the last chapter and so forth.

All fiction writers constantly revise. TK Rowling revised the first page of Harry Potter 15 times. Katherine Revised her novel Christy, 49 times.

Jack London would revise his material using colored pencils. He would use a different color each day.

Finally, the manuscript is typed and sent to the editor or agent. The editor suggests changes. With many novels, the editor removes the first 4 chapters! Then the editor creates galley proofs. Then the editor creates page proofs. Then the editor creates the book. So most of the writing process occurs in the revising process.

Of course, everything begins with the idea. One woman used the story board technique. She put pictures around her room in the order she wanted the story to go. Another woman went to the Holy Land. As she went from site to site, she imagined what one historical figure was saying to another.

Put yourself in the dangerous place. Imagine you are Jane trying to hide from the man who just escaped death row for rape and murder. You are Bill with one bullet in your gun. If you do not hit the charging grizzly in his heart he will eat you.

A good writer puts you in the scene.

If the quote ends at the middle of sentence does the page number go after the quote or after the period?

It always goes at the end of the sentence. It may seem counter-intuitive, but that is according to the MLA guidelines. Also, the period goes before the number as demonstrated here (123).

What is a primary goal of revision?

Revision reinforces memory.

Revision may also help to clarify matters that may not have been entirely clear in the past.

Revision may reveal important matters previously overlooked.

A sentence with furthermore in it?

A sentence with furthermore: Furthermore, he left orders not to be disturbed. Your welcome for this answer for all those folks who wonder this question. :*

What would not be a step in the pre-writing process?

Which of the following would not be a step in the pre-writing process?

What is the abbreviation for editor?

For the singular "editor", received wisdom says the abbreviation is "ed." - with a period - because "editor" does not end on a d (as "ed" does).

Similarly/conversely (take your pick!) the abbreviation for the plural, "editors" is often given as "eds" - no period because both "editors" and "eds" end in s.

I think this is a bit daft - it makes reference lists look inconsistent. And of course "clean" text is all the fashion these days e.g. no period after "Mr" etc.

So I prefer just "eds" and "ed". But ultimately one must (usually) go with the publishers styles.

What is the difference between revising and editing?

Revision proceeds editing. At this stage the author rewords the given current document so that it is easier to read, makes more sense, more clearly portrays their thoughts etc. The author makes sure that the overall document is in sync with the given thesis, its structure is satisfactory and there are no unsupported assertions or incongruent facts, etc.

Editing is the final stage in writing. The author/editor checks for spelling, grammar, consistent writing style, incorrect data or word usage etc.

Are you passionate about the English Language and are you highly skilled in grammar?

I personally love the English language and am saddened when I see it bastardised. I also know how to be grammatically correct but admit to being somewhat lazy when it comes to implementing proper grammer in my writings.

How do you critique a book or story?

Critiquing - the process of going through a piece of writing and finding problems - is a tricky job. You need to let the author know what isn't working, but you don't need to insult the author.

Let's look at the actual process first:

  • Grammar - look through the work and check for grammar, spelling, punctuation, and other similar mistakes. You can highlight them any way you want - it's best not to correct them on the computer because the author needs to see where the mistakes were made and learn how to correct them
  • Factual - check to be sure that all the facts are correct. If the author has included a statement that you know to be false (this is fact, not opinion), then highlight that. This is a good idea if you are an expert in any area, such as antique weapons or ballet, because the author can really use your critical eye
  • Logical - read through the work and make sure that things happen in a logical manner. Highlight any spots where something happens that doesn't seem to be logical, or where something "comes out of left field"
  • Characters - read through the work and make sure that any characters seem realistic (this step will be used mostly in fictional writing). Highlight any spots where someone behaves in an odd manner (based on previous behavior or conversation), or where someone seems to suddenly change personality
  • Continuity - just like in a movie or tv show, check to be sure that anything which has happened does not suddenly vanish. If someone takes off a hat in one scene, but suddenly shows up with the hat miraculously back on his head, highlight that spot
  • Overall Image - one of the little-known tricks of writing is to look for any spots where you have huge blocks of text, and break them up into smaller paragraphs or chapters. Look at the overall shape of the work without reading it, and highlight any areas that seem larger than the rest

You may choose to do only one of the above, or you may do everything - the author will be grateful for anything you do to help!

How to Give the Critique: it is essential that you learn how to give criticism in a non-confrontational manner. You want to criticise the work, not the author.

  • use "I" statements like "I noticed on page 3 that the word 'through' is misspelled" or "I felt that the character of Henry seemed to act differently in Chapter 6 - before then he had been loud and argumentative and in that chapter he is suddenly very meek."
  • find something positive to say. Even if you didn't like the piece, look for something that did work well and point that out, such as "I thought that you really described the countryside well in this scene; I could picture myself in that meadow."
  • avoid making broad statements like "it's great" or "it sucks" - make your comments very specific and point out each spot you are criticising so that the author can look at that again (they might not change anything, but at least you won't get into a fight about it this way)
  • stay away from any personal comments about the author
  • remember that it's the author's work - don't take anything personally if they decide not to take your advice

Personally i read the story several times with no outside influence. Then i construct an idea of what this story is about. This is where you decided whether Romeo And Juliet was a play about true love or true foolishness.

Keep in mind that you can't be Wong with your interpretation as long as you can back it up.

At this point I would do research on the artist an his or her work and reconstruct your interpretation if needed.

This is really basic but it is how I analyze most stories. It helps me to write all of thoughts down on paper in order to see the analysis visibly.