Fascism

May, 1945

Hitler Could Had Won The War If He Would Have Kept His Non-Agression Pact In 1941 With The Soviets, Instead He Decided To Invade The Soviet Union Sparking A War With Them, At This Time The Soviets Had A Population Of 140 Million, Germany Had 90 Million. Therefore Stalin Had The Resources To Build A Bigger Army And He Also Had More Easy Access To Oil Than Hitler Did To Fuel His Tanks, Ships, Aircrafts Etc... If Hitler Would Had Used His Military To Focus On Great Britian And The U.S. He Could Had Taken Them Over, Then Rape Their Women To Produce German Hybrids/Semi-Aryans Use Those Rape Childeren To Increase Army By 10x What It Was. Then Focus On Russia And Conquering It.

No thet didn't

Fascism in the 20s/30s was a response to the economic situation after WWI. People followed leaders b/c of economic distress.

The Catholic Church has never supported the Fascists, Nazis or Communists. The Church tends to support democratic forms of government today.

Yes Nazis were born into the group they joined up with a government funded youth group at 7.

the Nazis were racist bastards! that believed if you didnt have blonde hair and blue eyes you were simply no good.They ecspecailly hated Jews(Isrealites).

They still exist today but theyre dwindling numbers don't pose much of a threat.

communism seems to be more concerned with the welfare of the people.

fascism=considers deferences in class

communism=equal class

With its emphasis on nationalism, militarism, traditionalism, anti-communism, and anti-liberalism, Fascism is typically considered to be far right-wing. However, Italian Fascism in particular, did include some leftist elements, so it doesn't always fit easily on the traditional "left vs right" scale.

Fascism is not a political choice, like democracy or communism.

General Francisco Franco became the leader of Spain after winning the Spanish Civil War n 1939. He was not a fascist of the Hitler Mussolini school although he welcomed their support. He was a Spanish Catholic Authoritarian. Franco was first and foremost a Spaniard.

Fascism started with Benito Amilcare Andrea Mussolini who was an Italian politician who led the National Fascist Party and is credited with being one of the key figures in the creation of Fascism. Fascism included elements of nationalism, corporatism, national syndicalism, expansionism, social progress and anti-communism in combination with censorship of subversives and state propaganda.

Mussolini and the fascists managed to be simultaneously revolutionary and traditionalist because this was vastly different to anything else in the political climate of the time, it is sometimes described as "The Third Way". The Fascisti, led by one of Mussolini's close confidants, Dino Grandi, formed armed squads of war veterans called Blackshirts (or squadristi) with the goal of restoring order to the streets of Italy with a strong hand. The blackshirts clashed with communists, socialists and anarchists at parades and demonstrations; all of these factions were also involved in clashes against each other. The government rarely interfered with the blackshirts' actions, owing in part to a looming threat and widespread fear of a communist revolution. The Fascisti grew so rapidly that within two years, it transformed itself into the National Fascist Party at a congress in Rome. Also in 1921, Mussolini was elected to the Chamber of Deputies for the first time. In the meantime, from about 1911 until 1938, Mussolini had various affairs with the Jewish author and academic Margherita Sarfatti, called the "Jewish Mother of Fascism" at the time.

Adolf Hitler ran for public office under the Socialist Party and was very obsessed with the occult and witchcraft. A lot of the nazis were into socialism, but most were not into witchcraft.

The Nazis conquered much of Europe, and collected and exterminated millions of Jews, Gypsies, homosexuals, etc.

It is shorthand for the full party name, National Socialist German Workers' Party, Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiterpartei in German.

NO, but there are definitely aspects of irridentist nationalism in the current Hungarian government. Hungary is an illiberal democracy that has some degree of voting and some restrictions on its freedom of speech, but its closest link to fascism is its irridentism and nationalism. Regardless, there is no totalitarian apparatus in the Hungarian government as it currently exists and corporatism is not currently a Hungarian economic policy (which is more-or-less controlled by the European Union).

Definition of Fascism:
Fascism is a variant of extreme corporatist nationalism headed by an authoritarian leadership and is usually classified as a far-right political theory. It originated in Italy under Mussolini and Hitler's Nazism is a variant of Fascism. Fascist movements shared certain common features, including the veneration of the state, a devotion to a strong leader, and an emphasis on ultra-nationalism and militarism. Fascism views political violence, war, and imperialism positively and it asserts that stronger nations have the right to expand their territory by displacing weaker nations since the national race was in perpetual conflict with other nations and races. It also argues that corporations should be able to maintain independence from direct government control (in contrast to communism), but that these privately-owned and run corporations should work in tandem with government interests.

If your referring to the pamphlet "Those damned Nazis" by Joseph Goebbels, than "those damned Nazis" is a fundamental statement of what it means to be a national socialist as well as a criticism of the left and the right wind in German party politics. Its actually pretty straight forward but if i suppose the cliff notes would be as follows.

In the first part of the pamphlet, the nation state is described as an organic union of people. To be nationalist is to believe the nation is the only way to bring all the forces of the nation together to preserve and improve the conditions under which national citizens live. However to be National or nationalist has nothing to do with supporting a particular form of government, rather the nationalist embraces any form of government that preserves the content of the nation. In this part Goebbels criticizes people who associate the nation only with a particular political form (monarchy, republic, etc) or with a particular economic forms (private property vs state ownership). The nationalist sees that all these political and economic forms are temporal but that the content of the nation is eternal.

In the second part of the pamphlet, socialism is described as the means to create a classless society. Goebbels criticizes international capitalism because it allows for the wealth of a nation to be used in a manner which destructive to the nation state and criticizes Marxism because it degrades the question of socialism to matters of "wages and the stomach" namely redistribution of wealth. Contrary to international capitalism and international socialism, Nationalist Socialism concerns forming a new state consciousness that includes every productive citizen.

Goebbels sums up the first two parts by stating that the Nazi is against bourgeoisie party politics and for genuine nationalism, against Marxism but for true socialism, united domestically and free internationally.

In the third part of the pamphlet Goebbels explains what is meant by workers party. Here the worker's party is radically redefined to include anyone who is involved in what that Nazis economist call productive labor. The notion relies on a principle that anyone who creates value for the community and the state is a worker (not just industrial workers). Here again there is criticism of capitalism, in particular using workers like they are a machine in work which is not creative or valueless.

The forth part of the pamphlet roles out the anti-Semitic portion of the pamphlet and is pretty much uninteresting nonsense. Though the basic claim is that the Jews as a community are either pro-capitalist and internationalist and opposed to national socialist workers.

the fivth part of the pamphlet lists the revolutionary demands of the NSDAP and is basically the Nazis early party political platform listing a number of international and domestic demands better conditions for workers and the rejection of the treaty of Versailles.

Comments: All in all its a pretty interesting argument that cleverly splits the difference between the radical right and radical left in German politics during the 30 and manages to synthesize the best of both into a unified philosophy. Unfortunately everything promising about this pamphlet was quickly compromised when the Nazis came into power, Goebbels and other radical socialists in the NSDAP quickly became outsiders unless they compromised these ideas.

P.S. hope this helped.

YES! Very much so. It supported nazi during ww2.

well the treaty of versaille ended world war one. and basically the germans got screwed over by the other big countries such as the US, so germans became pissed off and this lead hitler to take power in germany. Hitler empowered germans through a sense of nationalistic pride, saying that the treaty of versaille was very unfair. He even said stuff like "we will break the chains of versaille", and this ultimately led to world war two

Since the foundation of the Nazi party, there have been members all over the world. The majority lived in Germany up until the end of the Second World War but others lived in countries like England and the United States.

Today, people who call themselves Nazis are generally white males who live in Western Europe and in the United States.

A Nazi is a person in the political party that was created by Hitler.

not any more.

dude, thats false

They most certainly did not act alone. Some countries even paid the Nazis to take their Jews. In France the rounding up of Jews was done by the French police and the transportation done by the French railways.

Women became restricted by rigid, traditional gender roles.

For the first time in history, a country was attacked from sea, ground and air at the same time. Sweden was neutral and that gave nazi-Germany free pass straight into Norway. Norway was completely paralysed and just had to give in.. the government and the royal family escaped to the UK.

Italy was the first Fascist state in Europe, with Mussolini seizing power in 1922. Hitler's Germany is the most infamous of the fascist states, but along with Italy these powers did not last beyond WWII. Spain and Portugal also fell to Fascism in the 1930's, with the regimes lasting into the 1970s.


Additionally, a puppet Fascist state existed in wartime Croatia and in Vichy France, and sympathetic Fascist leaders/individuals were active in perpetrating the Holocaust across Ukraine and the Baltic states.