Parole and Conditional Release

Question cannot be answered with any definite time or penalty. A juvenile that age and charged with that serious a crime would probably be certified to be tried as an adult. Thus, they would be subject to serving an adult term in state prison.

The individual he issued the Capias for may be in jail on another charge, un-related to the Capias he is serving.

If employment is a condition of your parole, then it can be required of you.

yes, but if he says no take him to court and deal it with it there. it's the best for your child and because there has been custody set, this would be the legal thing to do. nicole * Not unless the original custodial order stipulates that both parents must agree on child care issues. Generally the court gives either parent leeway in such situations and assumes that they will act in the child/children's best interest until it is proven otherwise.

Well the law in Canada over that question is YES, but it does depend on the situation. Emancipation doesn't always mean your living alone, it could mean a transfer of legal guardianship (mom&dad > aunt&uncle); in that case it is up to your new legal guardians to make that decision. If the Emancipation document gives you right to live alone (only given if one can support themselves - meaning being able to pay bills, rent, and for food) and attend school at the same time. So to answer your question as long as your document says you have legal right to live alone you have the ability to make any choice of where you live, there will probably be some requirements like quarterly reports to the judge, and enrolling in school. AGAIN THESE ARE THE LAWS IN CANADA, VERIFY WITH THE TWO STATE DEPARTMENTS ON THEIR REGULATIONS.

I'm not a lawyer, answer is specific to personal experience and knowledge of process in CA and NV. No, both of these states will continue prosecution based on original statements and complaint and report of arresting officer, law recognizes pressure on complainant (victim) and assumes role of complainant (State of CA vs. perpetrator). Even recanting complaint will usually not work and refusal to testify also not likely to work. Advise you let him sit in jail, be forced into court-mandated anger management program no matter how much suffering it causes you. you will both be better off. In most cases and most states when there is a domestic violence dispute with injury or serious complaint, an arrest must be made. Now what most people think is that YOU are pressing charges against a person. However, in reality the state or county is bringing the charges against the person arrested. You have the option to not testify and retract you original statement. However, you cannot force the police/court to drop the charges against him. Often when a spouse/family member/etc. chooses to no longer participate in a trial, it proceeds anyway with the ADA (Assistant District Attorney) as the 'accuser'. Many people who are victims of abuse are not able to see their loved one punished or admit to the abuse so this protocol of the state bring charges rather then the victim prevents victim intimidation/violence and means that more abusers end up being charged, tried, and convicted. You may as I said choose to argue your original police statement was inaccurate BUT most likely the police will dismiss your request and the court would most likely allow the prosecutor to read your original statement to the judge and have it be presented as evidence in his trial, without you present to argue you husband's side. If he has already been sentenced, there are no grounds for you to appeal the decision. Nothing you do at that point would make a difference. If you told the police you made a false statement, they would simply arrest you as well. I would recommend in this case only attempting to clear him of charges if he is totally innocent, has not yet been to trial, and you can get a good lawyer. Otherwise he is going to have to accept the consequences of his actions and you should contact a domestic abuse counselor that can help you deal with the situation.

Usually no, one of the conditions of release is that you have little or no contact with "criminal elements." Of course if you're married to the person, that is a different story, you haven't got much choice. Just let the court know about the situation beforehand. DON'T let them find it out as a 'surprise' after the fact.

The most reliable predictor of future behavior is past behavior. When an employer hires someone they are investing in that person and want a reliable employee. Employers know that often convicted felons have problems other than the fact that they committed a crime. These problems can lead someone to offend. Some examples are poor decision making skills, drug and alcohol abuse, impulsiveness, and anger control issues. What guarantee does the convicted felon have that they have changed? Employers do not want to deal with these problems at the workplace.

For as long as the remaining time on his original sentence or his maximum expiration date. That does not mean they will.

If the drug has been prescribed for you and you are doing all of the other things you have been asked to do, you probably are in the clear. Depends on the drug as to whether there will be follow up.

There is no specific right to own a home. Right now the laws are tending toward freezing the rates of ARMS so people can get refinanced. However, that only works if the payments are up to date. Other than that, there are non profits that help with credit counseling so that you can recover your rating and perhaps buy another house in the future.

Bonding is a decision made by the insurance company, each one has different rules. Generally, you cannot get a bond if you have a felony related to dishonesty. For example, theft or fraud. If you have a felony not related to dishonesty (say, assault or drunk driving) some companies will bond you particularly if many years have past.

If you are asking about your job title or position being referred to as "probationary" on your paycheck, that means that you are being evaluated for your suitability and fitness for the job you were hired to do. Most probationary employment periods run only a few weeks or months although some can run up to a year in length.

If it is the probation officer's warrant then yes, but they probably will not. If it is the judge's warrant the probation officer cannot.

Yes, many schools have cracked down on bullying and violence. there are students that were arrested, did comm service, paid fines and ended up on probation with a record for a schoolyard fight

There are several instances in which this might happen. One example is - if the wanted person fled out of state to avoid arrest - in most (all?) states the statute of limitations stops running if the fugitive flees out of state. If that was the case here, the "want" would reactivate if/when the wanted person returned to OH.

Yes, that type of job should be easier to get, it's up to the individual owner, their hiring process and if they do backgrounds. Just don't admit to it on an app.

I don't know. Possible.

There are a number of factors and each states determines this in a unique way. One of the biggest deciding factors is the needs of the state, the Department of Corrections, and the individual facilities. This breaks down to basic cost and space. To determine which of the thousands of inmates may be given parole is theoretically a matter of behavior of the potential candidates at that point. Again theoretically, candidates or potential parolees' institutional records are reviewed as well as the cases for which they are serving, and in some states the desires of the any victims and the prosecutors who tried the cases. In reality, the factor of costs remains the only constant. While it can be, and will be argued, many parole boards weigh current censuses of the department, the number of inmates, with the potential of return for those released, and the rate at which they might return. Where the argument enters into it is those who maintain parolees are those who are safest to be released. This is not the case as evidenced by the severe lack of rehabilitative services available to inmates. If there were a desire to release those who would be productive members of society, every effort would be made to make available training and counseling that most inmates need, rather than the cursory efforts that are currently made. Ultimately, it boils down to a decision making process for released inmates; whether they will or won't engage in criminal behavior after they are released that may return them to prison. While many of those locked up are very intelligent, the prison population lacks in any form of education or training which they may use to help them remain free. The undeniable fact is that many only know the lives from which they came, that of the criminal. And, while it is easy for those who have never been convicted to say, "Those should just not break the law," those who would say such seriously lack the empathy necessary to understand the truth. In essence those who would argue such are naive to the truth of the corruption in the system. Ask any previously incarcerated person who has ever been release how easy it is to land back inside. Once a criminal, always a criminal after all.

It boils down to the needs/desires of the state outweighing the requirements of the few or the one. Bureaucracy cares for nothing but the propagation of itself. Once established by the people, for the people, it becomes a parasite that feeds on its own flesh, sacrificing bits of itself only to survive and grow.

A person who is in very bad health that otherwise would not be released can be granted parole.

Teodulo Natividad

You may contact the local probation office by looking up the number in your local phonebook government listings.

Each states Parole Board keeps offices in the individual state capitals. As most state government maintain internet sites, contact with a Parole board or its members may be done through email. Check your state's website.

you may have to serve the remainder of your sentence

Salary may vary, depending on level of experience.

According to a customized salary report by the BLS (Bureau of Labor Statistics), the mean annual wage for probation officers in Texas was $35,300 as of May 2008. The median annual salary was $33,460, and the middle half brought home between $28,880 and $40,280 each year. The 10 percent of probation officers in the state who earned the lowest salaries had an income of less than $26,020. The highest-earning 10th made more than $49,380.

Texas doesn't pay as well as other states for this profession although there may be more opportunities for employment in that field.

That will depend on what you are are probation for. Contact your states dept of insurance or their web page, to find the licensing requirements.